Re: Fwd: Ask Fedora

2011-11-29 Thread sarfraj khanjade
I want to  get out of discussion ,what i should do?
I want to stop receiving mailplease help me.

On 11/28/11, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Sun, 2011-11-27 at 03:17 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
 Hi

 Forwarding with permission for discussions

 FWIW - I haven't looked at Ask Fedora yet, but all Stefano's points
 sound absolutely sensible and appropriate to me based on what experience
 I have, and are obviously borne of experience. It's very gracious of him
 to pass them along.
 --
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
 http://www.happyassassin.net

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: gcc 4.6 for package monkeys

2011-01-28 Thread sarfraj khanjade
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:11 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:

 On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:29:45PM -0800, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
  On 1/27/2011 23:26, Julian Sikorski wrote:
   I have just run into an issue with gcc-4.6, namely RPM Fusion's mame
   failed to compile [1]. I was told that #includestddef.h  was missing.
   So I have two questions: why did including this header directly became
   necessary (code builds fine with 4.5) and are there any other issues we
   package monkeys might run into with a new compiler?
 
  GCC 4.6 changed a lot of compiler warnings to errors, so a lot of code
  (especially C++ code) that used to get away with violations like
  omitting headers or assigning to un-assignable things will now fail to
  build.

 Care to share details?  Of course there were many changes in the C++ FE,
 especially for C++0x, and maybe some warnings changed into errors, but
 nothing I'd describe as a lot.  We haven't still written
 http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.6/porting_to.html so if you have interesting
 info about changes that affect a lot of packages, details would be
 certainly
 welcome.  The STL changes not to include cstddef internally is certainly
 one thing that will be added there.

Jakub
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel