Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:30:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. we can query buildrequires: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink aide-0:0.15.1-10.fc23.src anyterm-0:1.1.29-27.fc23.src elpa-0:2015.02.002-5.fc23.src gnu-smalltalk-0:3.2.5-9.fc23.src gromacs-0:5.0.5-3.fc23.src hugs98-0:2006.09-22.fc23.src lightning-0:2.1.0-3.fc23.src openblas-0:0.2.14-3.fc23.src skychart-0:3.10-6.fc23.src transgui-0:5.0.1-4.fc23.src wine-0:1.7.47-1.fc23.src zfs-fuse-0:0.7.0-21.fc23.src More 2: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack pypy-0:2.5.0-1.fc23.src pypy3-0:2.4.0-2.fc23.src execstack is now built for rawhide and F23, and dependent packages have been either rebuilt. I changed BuildRequires: prelink to BR: /usr/bin/execstack everywhere. Some packages were not using execstack anymore; for those I removed the dependency. This issue is closed for now. Zbyszek PS. pypy does not build because of other issues. pypy3 builds fine. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. You probably encountered it with some OCaml packages. The OCaml backends used to be inconsistent about setting the non-executable stack bit on every object file, and so as a workaround I added a call to execstack to fix the final binaries. However all of those _should_ now be fixed (if you find that's not the case in Rawhide, please file a bug about it). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com schrieb am Di., 28. Juli 2015 um 01:31 Uhr: On 07/27/2015 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote: opensou...@till.name mailto:opensou...@till.name schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule Alpha Freeze will occur on 2015-07-28. Package (co)maintainers Status Change == [snip] jabref mef, tomspur 62 weeks ago [snip] I really like to keep jabref, but I cannot get it build and fixed... Greetings, Tom First hurdle I've hit is that upstream no longer ships the generated _JabRefPlugin.java file in it's source tarballs. Filed: https://sourceforge.net/p/jabref/bugs/1291/ Either they can fix that, or we'd need to build https://github.com/JabRef/jpfcodegen in order to generate that file ourselves. I'm getting farther with this now after figuring a bunch of stuff out. Hope to have something soon. Thanks a lot, Orion ! - Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:41:12AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: On 07/27/2015 10:31 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: That would work too, although more packages would have to be updated. But they probably should be updated to Require /usr/bin/execstack anyway, so that's fine. It would be great if binutils would take it. Anyone mind pinging upstream about it? Even if that happens, it will take a while. I submitted https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247795 . Not 100% convinced that this is a good idea, especially long term, but it'll allow us to build pypy and other packages. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
Am 27.07.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: prelinkorphan0 weeks ago A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? what i find interesting is with what energy prelink in the default setup was defended not so long ago and multiple times https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190268.html signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06AM +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule Alpha Freeze will occur on 2015-07-28. Package (co)maintainers Status Change == UpToolssebelk62 weeks ago akka willb, java-sig 62 weeks ago apt-maven-plugin goldmann 62 weeks ago bcfg2 fab, solj, zultron62 weeks ago clojure-compat kushal, gil, salimma 62 weeks ago clojure-contribsalimma 62 weeks ago clojure-maven-plugin salimma, gil 62 weeks ago clucy salimma 62 weeks ago cpmmmahut62 weeks ago emacs-common-ess alexlan 62 weeks ago epris rtnpro62 weeks ago escjmagne62 weeks ago gdmap mebourne 62 weeks ago honeyd pvrabec 62 weeks ago jabref mef, tomspur 62 weeks ago lancet kushal62 weeks ago libigtlmrceresa, peter 62 weeks ago mdsplibthias 62 weeks ago mule orphan, tspauld98 6 weeks ago nurbs++mycae 62 weeks ago opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago openuniverse mmahut, astronomy-sig 62 weeks ago pfHandle redragon 62 weeks ago prelinkorphan0 weeks ago A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. we can query buildrequires: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink aide-0:0.15.1-10.fc23.src anyterm-0:1.1.29-27.fc23.src elpa-0:2015.02.002-5.fc23.src gnu-smalltalk-0:3.2.5-9.fc23.src gromacs-0:5.0.5-3.fc23.src hugs98-0:2006.09-22.fc23.src lightning-0:2.1.0-3.fc23.src openblas-0:0.2.14-3.fc23.src skychart-0:3.10-6.fc23.src transgui-0:5.0.1-4.fc23.src wine-0:1.7.47-1.fc23.src zfs-fuse-0:0.7.0-21.fc23.src -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On 27/07/15 15:23, Peter Robinson wrote: From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. It allows the requires executable stack flag in an ELF image to be tweaked. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 07:19 +, opensou...@till.name wrote:
opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago
Patch in attach :
Update to 0.12.1.5 .
- Update Source0 URL to github.
- Drop lucene35 patch, upstream source changed a lot.
- Drop jflex patch, it was just one comment !?
You may download the source with:
spectool -g opengrok.spec
--
Sérgio M. B.
diff --git a/opengrok.spec b/opengrok.spec
index 1ddf6e6..fed2266 100644
--- a/opengrok.spec
+++ b/opengrok.spec
@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
# Webapp is disabled, since Fedora does not have the Java Webapp guidelines
# finished yet: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/JavaWebApps
%bcond_with webapp
+%global githubname OpenGrok
Name: opengrok
-Version:0.11.1
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.12.1.5
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Source browser and indexer
Group: Development/Tools
License:CDDL
URL:http://opengrok.github.io/OpenGrok/
-Source0:https://java.net/downloads/opengrok/%{name}-%{version}-src.tar.gz
+Source0:https://github.com/%{githubname}/%{githubname}/archive/%{version}.tar.gz#/%{githubname}-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1:opengrok
Source2:configuration.xml
Source3:opengrok-README.Fedora.webapp
@@ -32,7 +33,7 @@ BuildRequires: java_cup
BuildRequires: ant
BuildRequires: java-devel = 1.6
BuildRequires: unzip
-BuildRequires: junit4
+BuildRequires: junit
BuildRequires: ant-junit
BuildRequires: ctags
BuildRequires: docbook2X
@@ -65,11 +66,11 @@ OpenGrok web application
%prep
-%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}-src
+%setup -q -n %{githubname}-%{version}
%patch1 -p1 -b .nocplib
%patch3 -p1 -b .manifest-classpath
-%patch6 -p1 -b .jflex
-%patch7 -p1 -b .lucene35
+#patch6 -p1 -b .jflex
+#patch7 -p1 -b .lucene35
# This is not strictly needed, but to nuke prebuilt stuff
# makes us feel warmer while building
@@ -184,6 +185,12 @@ done)
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 27 2015 Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com - 0.12.1.5-1
+- Update to 0.12.1.5 .
+- Update Source0 URL to github.
+- Drop lucene35 patch, upstream source changed a lot.
+- Drop jflex patch, it was just one comment !?
+
* Wed Jun 17 2015 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.11.1-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_23_Mass_Rebuild
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:28 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 15:23 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. we can query buildrequires: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink aide-0:0.15.1-10.fc23.src anyterm-0:1.1.29-27.fc23.src elpa-0:2015.02.002-5.fc23.src gnu-smalltalk-0:3.2.5-9.fc23.src gromacs-0:5.0.5-3.fc23.src hugs98-0:2006.09-22.fc23.src lightning-0:2.1.0-3.fc23.src openblas-0:0.2.14-3.fc23.src skychart-0:3.10-6.fc23.src transgui-0:5.0.1-4.fc23.src wine-0:1.7.47-1.fc23.src zfs-fuse-0:0.7.0-21.fc23.src More 2: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack pypy-0:2.5.0-1.fc23.src pypy3-0:2.4.0-2.fc23.src Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
Dne 27.7.2015 v 16:44 Matthew Miller napsal(a): repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink dnf repoquery --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=rawhide-source --arch=src --whatrequires prelink While the --disable/enablerepo should be possible to replace just by --repo, but that does not work it seems :/ Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Monday 27 July 2015 07:19:06 opensou...@till.name wrote: emacs-common-ess alexlan 62 weeks ago I rebuilt emacs-common-ess for rawhide, and I am doing the same for f23. In the process I have obsoleted the xemacs sub-packages since the build process fails and upstream says that they are not supported. I have obsoleted the -el sub-package (per the emacs packaging guidelines). I added a -doc cub-package that carries all the documentation, and is larger than all the other sub-packages together. Doing this I should be able to close all the bugs opened against emacs-common-ess. :-) -- José Abílio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:28:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: So... execstack builds fine from prelink.rpm. prelink itself does not build because it wants to link various libraries statically. What about restoring the prelink package, but only to provide /usr/bin/execstack? :-/ and then renaming it to execstack? :) -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:17:42AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in Those are build time requirements. Approximately first two pages in the e-mail I was replying to ;) Depending on: prelink (24), status change: 2015-07-25 (0 weeks ago) aide (maintained by: mildew) aide-0.15.1-10.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 anyterm (maintained by: abo) anyterm-1.1.29-27.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 elpa (maintained by: rathann) elpa-2015.02.002-5.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 gnu-smalltalk (maintained by: s4504kr, laxathom) gnu-smalltalk-3.2.5-9.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 gromacs (maintained by: rathann, deji) gromacs-5.0.5-3.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 hugs98 (maintained by: petersen, haskell-sig) hugs98-2006.09-22.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 lightning (maintained by: s4504kr, laxathom, pcpa) lightning-2.1.0-3.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 openblas (maintained by: jussilehtola) openblas-0.2.14-3.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 pypy (maintained by: mstuchli, tomspur) pypy-2.5.0-1.fc23.src requires /usr/bin/execstack pypy3 (maintained by: churchyard, group::python-sig, mstuchli) pypy3-2.4.0-2.fc23.src requires /usr/bin/execstack skychart (maintained by: mattia, mmahut) skychart-3.10-6.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 transgui (maintained by: kumarpraveen) transgui-5.0.1-4.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 wine (maintained by: awjb, besser82, mooninite, stefanlsd, yayan8) wine-1.7.47-1.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 zfs-fuse (maintained by: limb) zfs-fuse-0.7.0-21.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 3:17 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:00:26PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? What are those? `dnf repoquery --whatrequires /usr/bin/execstack` gives me nothing. Also I've lived for years without the prelink packaged installed and never noticed anything that pulled it in From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:28:55PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: we can query buildrequires: repoquery --repoid=rawhide-source --archlist=src --whatrequires prelink Any idea how to do this with DNF? -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. In the packages I just looked at, it's used to mark an ELF binary as not requiring an executable stack. And I see for some ARM builds it's just commented out. It does seem like this could find a new home. -- Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 10:47:40AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:23:23PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: From dealing with this for arch bringups I know there are quite a few, but likely in the high teens/low 20s in number, of packages that use execstack. Not sure what feature it provides as I've never been bothered enough to look into it but it's generally used at build time not install time which means it won't be picked up by repoquery. In the packages I just looked at, it's used to mark an ELF binary as not requiring an executable stack. And I see for some ARM builds it's just commented out. It does seem like this could find a new home. So... execstack builds fine from prelink.rpm. prelink itself does not build because it wants to link various libraries statically. What about restoring the prelink package, but only to provide /usr/bin/execstack? Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:29:41AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:28:20PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: So... execstack builds fine from prelink.rpm. prelink itself does not build because it wants to link various libraries statically. What about restoring the prelink package, but only to provide /usr/bin/execstack? :-/ and then renaming it to execstack? :) That would work too, although more packages would have to be updated. But they probably should be updated to Require /usr/bin/execstack anyway, so that's fine. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On 07/27/2015 10:31 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: That would work too, although more packages would have to be updated. But they probably should be updated to Require /usr/bin/execstack anyway, so that's fine. It would be great if binutils would take it. Anyone mind pinging upstream about it? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 03:56:22PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 27.07.2015 um 15:00 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: prelinkorphan0 weeks ago A bunch of packages depend on /usr/bin/execstack, provide by prelink. If prelink goes away, they'll be ftbfs immediately. What is the plan here? Can we move execstack somewhere else, or is there a replacement tool? what i find interesting is with what energy prelink in the default setup was defended not so long ago and multiple times https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190268.html So, maybe that was unnecessary, and it'll stay around because of execstack. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know Package (co)maintainers Status Change == openuniverse mmahut, astronomy-sig 62 weeks ago openuniverse has been fixed and rebuilt in f23 and f24. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:19:06 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know Package (co)maintainers Status Change == prover9tcolles, dwheeler 62 weeks ago prover9 has been fixed and rebuilt of f23 and f24. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 17:18 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Seg, 2015-07-27 at 07:19 +, opensou...@till.name wrote: opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago Patch in attach : Update to 0.12.1.5 . - Update Source0 URL to github. - Drop lucene35 patch, upstream source changed a lot. - Drop jflex patch, it was just one comment !? You may download the source with: spectool -g opengrok.spec Sorry last patch is incorrect please don't apply it. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote: opensou...@till.name mailto:opensou...@till.name schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule Alpha Freeze will occur on 2015-07-28. Package (co)maintainers Status Change == [snip] jabref mef, tomspur 62 weeks ago [snip] I really like to keep jabref, but I cannot get it build and fixed... Greetings, Tom First hurdle I've hit is that upstream no longer ships the generated _JabRefPlugin.java file in it's source tarballs. Filed: https://sourceforge.net/p/jabref/bugs/1291/ Either they can fix that, or we'd need to build https://github.com/JabRef/jpfcodegen in order to generate that file ourselves. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
On 07/27/2015 12:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: On 07/27/2015 01:51 AM, Thomas Spura wrote: opensou...@till.name mailto:opensou...@till.name schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule Alpha Freeze will occur on 2015-07-28. Package (co)maintainers Status Change == [snip] jabref mef, tomspur 62 weeks ago [snip] I really like to keep jabref, but I cannot get it build and fixed... Greetings, Tom First hurdle I've hit is that upstream no longer ships the generated _JabRefPlugin.java file in it's source tarballs. Filed: https://sourceforge.net/p/jabref/bugs/1291/ Either they can fix that, or we'd need to build https://github.com/JabRef/jpfcodegen in order to generate that file ourselves. I'm getting farther with this now after figuring a bunch of stuff out. Hope to have something soon. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule Alpha Freeze will occur on 2015-07-28. Package (co)maintainers Status Change == UpToolssebelk62 weeks ago akka willb, java-sig 62 weeks ago apt-maven-plugin goldmann 62 weeks ago bcfg2 fab, solj, zultron62 weeks ago clojure-compat kushal, gil, salimma 62 weeks ago clojure-contribsalimma 62 weeks ago clojure-maven-plugin salimma, gil 62 weeks ago clucy salimma 62 weeks ago cpmmmahut62 weeks ago emacs-common-ess alexlan 62 weeks ago epris rtnpro62 weeks ago escjmagne62 weeks ago gdmap mebourne 62 weeks ago honeyd pvrabec 62 weeks ago jabref mef, tomspur 62 weeks ago lancet kushal62 weeks ago libigtlmrceresa, peter 62 weeks ago mdsplibthias 62 weeks ago mule orphan, tspauld98 6 weeks ago nurbs++mycae 62 weeks ago opengrok lkundrak 62 weeks ago openuniverse mmahut, astronomy-sig 62 weeks ago pfHandle redragon 62 weeks ago prelinkorphan0 weeks ago prover9tcolles, dwheeler 62 weeks ago publican-redhatrlandmann 62 weeks ago python-sprox lmacken 62 weeks ago python-umemcache yograterol62 weeks ago qtdbf tieugene 62 weeks ago robert-hooke salimma 62 weeks ago rubygem-icalendar tremble 62 weeks ago scala-stm willb 62 weeks ago scalacheck willb 62 weeks ago shrinkwrap-resolvergoldmann, gil, mizdebsk 62 weeks ago spark willb 62 weeks ago typesafe-configwillb, gil62 weeks ago The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: esc (1), status change: 2014-05-14 (62 weeks ago) dogtag-pki (maintained by: mharmsen, edewata, kwright, vakwetu) dogtag-pki-10.2.6-1.fc24.noarch requires esc = 1.1.0-24.fc21 Depending on: prelink (24), status change: 2015-07-25 (0 weeks ago) aide (maintained by: mildew) aide-0.15.1-10.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 anyterm (maintained by: abo) anyterm-1.1.29-27.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 elpa (maintained by: rathann) elpa-2015.02.002-5.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 gnu-smalltalk (maintained by: s4504kr, laxathom) gnu-smalltalk-3.2.5-9.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 gromacs (maintained by: rathann, deji) gromacs-5.0.5-3.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 hugs98 (maintained by: petersen, haskell-sig) hugs98-2006.09-22.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 lightning (maintained by: s4504kr, laxathom, pcpa) lightning-2.1.0-3.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 openblas (maintained by: jussilehtola) openblas-0.2.14-3.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 pypy (maintained by: mstuchli, tomspur) pypy-2.5.0-1.fc23.src requires /usr/bin/execstack pypy3 (maintained by: churchyard, group::python-sig, mstuchli) pypy3-2.4.0-2.fc23.src requires /usr/bin/execstack skychart (maintained by: mattia, mmahut) skychart-3.10-6.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 transgui (maintained by: kumarpraveen) transgui-5.0.1-4.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 wine (maintained by: awjb, besser82, mooninite, stefanlsd, yayan8) wine-1.7.47-1.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 zfs-fuse (maintained by: limb) zfs-fuse-0.7.0-21.fc23.src requires prelink = 0.5.0-1.fc20 elk (maintained by: marcindulak) elk-3.1.12-12.fc23.i686
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] FTBFS Packages in rawhide (2015-07-27)
opensou...@till.name schrieb am Mo., 27. Juli 2015 um 09:19 Uhr: The following packages did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Freeze, unless someone takes care of them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Schedule Alpha Freeze will occur on 2015-07-28. Package (co)maintainers Status Change == [snip] jabref mef, tomspur 62 weeks ago [snip] I really like to keep jabref, but I cannot get it build and fixed... Greetings, Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
