Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. there is missing orphaned iptraf. please get rid of it from f18. -- Nikola -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. [snip] That list seems seriously incomplete. I'm aware of at least these others that have FTBFS in both F17 and F18 mass rebuilds, as evidenced by their release tags: It's done by basing off of the F16FTBFS bug, as that's the easiest source of info when we haven't done a mass rebuild. We could include everything with older dist tags. Looking at it, that would be 78 more packages. It would be nice to get rid of anything that's FTBFS in non supported Fedora (ie at least fc16) and the last time I looked at that there's a good 150 odd packages that are fc15 or older packages. There's been two mass rebuilds since then and if the package maintainers haven't managed to fix them (or they've not been fixed by people like secondary arches that fix them because they're blocking their builds) the package maintainer is either AWOL or not doing their job of maintaining packages or even bothering to check failure emails so it's likely better off for Fedora that they're scrapped as well. I think in the F17 cycle I fixed over 100+ of these packages. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.comwrote: On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. [snip] That list seems seriously incomplete. I'm aware of at least these others that have FTBFS in both F17 and F18 mass rebuilds, as evidenced by their release tags: It's done by basing off of the F16FTBFS bug, as that's the easiest source of info when we haven't done a mass rebuild. We could include everything with older dist tags. Looking at it, that would be 78 more packages. It would be nice to get rid of anything that's FTBFS in non supported Fedora (ie at least fc16) and the last time I looked at that there's a good 150 odd packages that are fc15 or older packages. There's been two mass rebuilds since then and if the package maintainers haven't managed to fix them (or they've not been fixed by people like secondary arches that fix them because they're blocking their builds) the package maintainer is either AWOL or not doing their job of maintaining packages or even bothering to check failure emails so it's likely better off for Fedora that they're scrapped as well. I think in the F17 cycle I fixed over 100+ of these packages. It would probably help to keep track of the problem if we could manage to get back the FTBFS bugs. I don't know if there is some work done on this but it would definitely help with this issue. Johannes Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
On 07/24/2012 08:36 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: ... Removing: ncpfs hydra requires libncp.so.2.3 hydra requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-17.fc18 hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17) hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19) hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3 medusa requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-17.fc18 medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1) ... I've taken ncpfs, I'll try to maintain it (not a Netware/IPX expert), co-maintainers are welcome. The worst case is to re-orphan ncpfs and rebuild hydra/medusa without ncpfs support. Thanks, --Athmane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package healpix (fails to build) My patch fixing this has been accepted, and this package is now built correctly. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: That list seems seriously incomplete. I'm aware of at least these others that have FTBFS in both F17 and F18 mass rebuilds, as evidenced by their release tags: It's done by basing off of the F16FTBFS bug, as that's the easiest source of info when we haven't done a mass rebuild. We could include everything with older dist tags. Looking at it, that would be 78 more packages. It would be nice to get rid of anything that's FTBFS in non supported Fedora (ie at least fc16) and the last time I looked at that there's a good 150 odd packages that are fc15 or older packages. There's been two mass rebuilds since then and if the package maintainers haven't managed to fix them (or they've not been fixed by people like secondary arches that fix them because they're blocking their builds) the package maintainer is either AWOL or not doing their job of maintaining packages or even bothering to check failure emails so it's likely better off for Fedora that they're scrapped as well. I think in the F17 cycle I fixed over 100+ of these packages. I'm OK with being more thorough here, but I can't commit to bringing back the full FTBFS infrastructure myself - I just don't have the time. I'll see about getting the list of other non-building packages and get bugs filed for them. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Nikola Pajkovsky (npajk...@redhat.com) said: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. there is missing orphaned iptraf. please get rid of it from f18. Please follow the procedure at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Thanks, Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said: It would be nice to get rid of anything that's FTBFS in non supported Fedora (ie at least fc16) and the last time I looked at that there's a good 150 odd packages that are fc15 or older packages. There's been two mass rebuilds since then and if the package maintainers haven't managed to fix them (or they've not been fixed by people like secondary arches that fix them because they're blocking their builds) the package maintainer is either AWOL or not doing their job of maintaining packages or even bothering to check failure emails so it's likely better off for Fedora that they're scrapped as well. I think in the F17 cycle I fixed over 100+ of these packages. I'll see about getting the list of other non-building packages and get bugs filed for them. Done, new list sent. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package archmage (orphan) Package boolstuff (orphan) Package cmucl (orphan) comaintained by: green Package drupal6-video (orphan) Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build) Package fillmore-lombard (fails to build) comaintained by: salimma Package gant (fails to build) Package genus2reduction (orphan) Package globalplatform (orphan) Package gpshell (orphan) Package gtkmm-utils (orphan) Package gtkpod (orphan) Package hamster-applet (orphan) Package hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts (orphan) Package healpix (fails to build) Package json (orphan) Package k12linux-quick-start-guide (orphan) Package kadu (fails to build) comaintained by: gajownik radekl Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart Package libgtkhotkey (orphan) Package libhid (fails to build) Package libqttracker (fails to build) comaintained by: jreznik Package libsoup22 (orphan) Package natus (fails to build) Package ncpfs (orphan) Package ntfs-config (fails to build) Package nvi (orphan) Package perl-Nagios-Plugin-Beanstalk (orphan) Package pfqueue (orphan) Package pino (fails to build) Package polyester (orphan) Package polyester3 (orphan) Package python-batchhttp (orphan) Package python-chm (orphan) Package python-pywt (fails to build) Package python-remoteobjects (orphan) Package python-typepad (orphan) Package qtparted (fails to build) Package selenium-remote-control (fails to build) Package torque (orphan) Package typepad-motion (orphan) Package upstart (orphan) Package winwrangler (orphan) List of deps left behind by packages which are orphaned or fail to build: Removing: healpix skyviewer requires chealpix-devel = 2.13a-2.fc14 skyviewer requires libchealpix.so Removing: libgtkhotkey synapse requires libgtkhotkey.so.1 Removing: libsoup22 libopensync-plugin-syncml requires libsoup22-devel = 2.2.105-9.fc15 libsyncml requires libsoup-2.2.so.8 libsyncml requires libsoup22-devel = 2.2.105-9.fc15 Removing: ncpfs hydra requires libncp.so.2.3 hydra requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-17.fc18 hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17) hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19) hydra requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3 medusa requires ncpfs-devel = 2.2.6-17.fc18 medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS.2.2.0.17) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.0.19) medusa requires libncp.so.2.3(NCPFS_2.2.1) Removing: python-batchhttp django-typepad requires python-batchhttp = 1.1-5.fc18 Removing: python-chm chm2pdf requires python-chm = 0.8.4-12.fc18 Removing: python-remoteobjects django-typepad requires python-remoteobjects = 1.1-5.fc18 Removing: python-typepad django-typepad requires python-typepad = 1.1.2-5.fc18 Removing: selenium-remote-control perl-Alien-SeleniumRC requires selenium-server = 1.0.3-8.20100318svn.fc15 Removing: torque pbstop requires torque-client = 3.0.4-1.fc17 pdsh requires torque-devel = 3.0.4-1.fc17 pdsh-mod-torque requires torque = 3.0.4-1.fc17 pdsh-mod-torque requires libtorque.so.2 perl-PBS requires libtorque.so.2 perl-PBS requires libtorque-devel = 3.0.4-1.fc17 python-pbs requires torque-devel = 3.0.4-1.fc17 python-pbs requires libtorque.so.2 python3-pbs requires libtorque.so.2 Removing: upstart clamav-milter-upstart requires /sbin/initctl clamav-scanner-upstart requires /sbin/initctl dhcp-forwarder-upstart requires /sbin/initctl ip-sentinel-upstart requires /sbin/initctl milter-greylist-upstart requires /sbin/initctl tor-upstart requires /sbin/initctl The script that generated this page can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py There you can also report bugs and RFEs. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. That is currently scheduled to happen on or around August 7th. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package drupal6-video (orphan) Package gtkpod (orphan) Took these two, comaintainers welcome. -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. [snip] That list seems seriously incomplete. I'm aware of at least these others that have FTBFS in both F17 and F18 mass rebuilds, as evidenced by their release tags: alevt-0:1.6.2-16.fc15.x86_64 eboard-0:1.1.1-7.fc15.x86_64 enigma-0:1.01-15.x86_64 fbdesk-0:1.4.1-7.fc15.x86_64 fuse-emulator-0:1.0.0.1-1.fc16.x86_64 gconf-cleaner-0:0.0.3-2.fc15.x86_64 gdmap-0:0.8.1-8.fc15.x86_64 gimmix-0:0.5.7.1-2.fc15.x86_64 gnofract4d-0:3.13-2.fc15.x86_64 grace-0:5.1.22-9.fc16.x86_64 gshutdown-0:0.2-8.fc16.x86_64 gtksourceview-1:1.8.5-8.fc15.i686 gtksourceview-1:1.8.5-8.fc15.x86_64 hardinfo-0:0.5.1-3.fc15.x86_64 libgdiplus-0:2.10-2.fc16.i686 libgdiplus-0:2.10-2.fc16.x86_64 libgtksourceviewmm-1:0.3.1-7.fc15.i686 libgtksourceviewmm-1:0.3.1-7.fc15.x86_64 libharu-0:2.1.0-3.fc15.i686 libharu-0:2.1.0-3.fc15.x86_64 libpano12-0:2.8.6-5.fc15.i686 libpano12-0:2.8.6-5.fc15.x86_64 libpano12-tools-0:2.8.6-5.fc15.x86_64 metapixel-0:1.0.2-7.fc15.x86_64 munipack-0:1.2.10-2.fc15.i686 munipack-0:1.2.10-2.fc15.x86_64 pngcrush-0:1.6.10-7.fc15.x86_64 pngnq-0:1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 printoxx-0:2.8.1-2.fc15.x86_64 putty-0:0.60-7.20100910svn.fc15.x86_64 rpmdepsize-0:1.0-7.fc15.x86_64 stratagus-0:2.2.4-9.fc15.x86_64 tangogps-0:0.99.4-3.fc15.x86_64 tesseract-0:3.00-2.fc15.i686 tesseract-0:3.00-2.fc15.x86_64 tucnak2-0:2.31-1.fc13.x86_64 wmdrawer-0:0.10.5-11.fc16.x86_64 wmfire-0:1.2.3-4.fc15.x86_64 xaos-0:3.5-2.fc15.x86_64 (The reason I've got my eye on these is that they'd be what breaks if I remove libpng-compat and/or libtiff-compat, which I'd seriously like to do before F18 ships. Those were never intended to be more than a short-term workaround while people got their dependent packages rebuilt for the libpng and libtiff major version upgrades. I don't want to carry them just to support packages that are long-term FTBFS offenders.) regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) said: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. [snip] That list seems seriously incomplete. I'm aware of at least these others that have FTBFS in both F17 and F18 mass rebuilds, as evidenced by their release tags: It's done by basing off of the F16FTBFS bug, as that's the easiest source of info when we haven't done a mass rebuild. We could include everything with older dist tags. Looking at it, that would be 78 more packages. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v3] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package genus2reduction (orphan) I've taken this one. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
