Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups
Hi all, Thank you very much for your responses. I criticized just the abscence of mail to prevent ambassadors for the creation of WG. I understand your position. You're right. I overestimate the place of ambassador in the developpement production. Please forgive me about this big mistake. Alexandre. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups
On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 10:01 +0100, Nobrakal wrote: Hi all, Thank you very much for your responses. I criticized just the abscence of mail to prevent ambassadors for the creation of WG. As a French native speaker, I know what you meant here, but prevent means empêcher, not prévenir ;) For others, Alexandre meant: ... the absence of mail to **let ambassadors know** about... Hopefully nobody got confused. :) -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups
It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our technical base but are there any plots for other people? Thanks. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups
Hi, I think that coordinators and Fesco tried to integrate as much as possible community members. But truth is that most people who self-nominated were RH employees, so i'd rather say that RH employees even had an handicap. As for the Cloud WG -i can't speak for other WG-, we wish that non-voting members are integrated as much as possible in defining the future of Fedora in the clouds. We can't do everything and we don't intend to close the door to anyone. Remember that we're just kickstarting a major overhaul on how we think and build Fedora, these WG are only there to lead the definition of our products in the open and keep the process focused. Either i would have been appointed into the Cloud WG or not, i would have participated anyway in that effort. H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Nobrakal nobra...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, Sorry for the double-post, but I think it's necessary. Recently, some Working Groups has been created [1]. In the most of case (except in the Server WG with Truong Anh. Tuan), we don't have any representant of the ambassador group. As others have pointed out we do have ambassadors in at least almost every group and it is really important to understand these announcements are only regarding the initial voting membership of the groups. Everyone is encouraged and welcome to participate and they will be listened to during any discussions. Not being a voting member of the group does not mean your input to the process is any less valuable to it succeeding. It really isn't any different than only FAmSCo members getting to vote during FAmSCo meetings. You can still attend FAmSCo meetings and give your input on any issues. It is up to you to participate though. John -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
