Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-09-11 Thread Jiri Kastner
hi,
requested review for libgssglue unretirement:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006837

can you, please, comment/review?
thanks

best regards
jiri kastner

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:20:36 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:

 I don't know what happened with libgssglue.
 
 This was retired for what reason?
 
 It affects too many...

http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgssglue.git/plain/dead.package

is not helpful and only tells Obsolete package, but that doesn't 
seem to refer to RPM Obsoletes:

  $ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssglue
  $

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130624/1047519.html

-- 
Fedora release 20 (Null) - Linux 3.11.0-0.rc6.git1.2.fc20.x86_64
loadavg: 0.20 0.43 0.45
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 10:02:04AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:

 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgssglue.git/plain/dead.package
 
 is not helpful and only tells Obsolete package, but that doesn't 
 seem to refer to RPM Obsoletes:
 
   $ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssglue
   $
 
 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130624/1047519.html

There is a similar retired package, but I did not check which was first:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgssapi

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:30:00 +0200, Till Maas wrote:

  http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libgssglue.git/plain/dead.package
  
  is not helpful and only tells Obsolete package, but that doesn't 
  seem to refer to RPM Obsoletes:
  
$ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssglue
$
  
  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130624/1047519.html
 
 There is a similar retired package, but I did not check which was first:
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libgssapi

Retired, but not marked dead.package yet. And:

  $ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssapi
  libgssglue-0:0.4-2.fc19.i686
  libgssglue-0:0.4-2.fc19.x86_64

Steve?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Christopher Meng
I want to know the reason, why he retired it. If there is a new package,
which will replace it? Or just retired it because of 'I have no time'?

Gssapi affects serf library, and serf library affects subversion.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Christopher Meng
Till, can you unblock libgssapi? I can maintain it for serf.

Thanks.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Till Maas
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 05:33:15PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
 Till, can you unblock libgssapi? I can maintain it for serf.

You first need to get it re-reviewed and then file an SCM admin request:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests

Also you should research whether libgssapi or libgssglue or some other
lib should be used currently.

Btw. you also wanted to claim vblade, please do you with a SCM admin
request.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

libgssapi libgssglue / Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:46:23 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:

 I want to know the reason, why he retired it.

Well, the dead.package file is supposed to tell, but in this case it's
only ambiguous.

 If there is a new package, which will replace it? 

A _replacement_ would need to follow the guidelines and at least obsolete
the old package. That isn't done. Perhaps there is a completely
separate package that shall be used [and ported to] instead. Even then
the dead.package ought to mention that.

 Or just retired it because of 'I have no time'?
 
 Gssapi affects serf library, and serf library affects subversion.

libgssapi has been _renamed_ to libgssglue in 2007 (!):
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/286691

It's beyond my time to find out what has happened later.

libgssapi-devel and libgssapi have been retired for F18, F19 and Rawhide
a few months ago.

  $ repoquery --whatobsoletes libgssapi-devel
  libgssglue-0:0.4-2.fc19.i686
  libgssglue-0:0.4-2.fc19.x86_64

It should read libgssglue-devel, but that's another story. Anyway,
libgssglue has been retired for F20 and newer, _not_ for F19 and older.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Christopher Meng
Oops...

I think I should use krb5

Ignore all my emails...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-24 Thread Mat Booth
On 24 August 2013 00:18, Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:

 Hi,

 On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25:47PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:

  Depending on: maven2-common-poms
antlr-maven-plugin (maintained by: spot, tradej)
antlr-maven-plugin requires maven2-common-poms =
 1.0-50.fc20

 This is a BR, I reported it here:
 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887166
 and blocked maven2-common-poms again.


Deps on maven2-common-poms are redundant, I thought they had all been
removed by now -- sorry about that, I will fix the remaining ones.

-- 
Mat Booth
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-23 Thread Till Maas
Hi,

I blocked the following packages that were retired in pkgdb but not
blocked in koji (there might be some packages included that have been
retired recently where rel-eng tickets were filed):

acheck
acheck-rules
animorph
bsd-mailx
c-ares19
cdi-api11
clearlooks-phenix-theme
climm
detex
emerillon
gnome-shell-extension-noripple
gnome-shell-extension-workspacesmenu
gpp4
guiloader-c++
hardinfo
ibus-panel-extensions
icc_examin
makehuman
metapost-metauml
mhgui
nemo-open-terminal
nodejs-tobi-cookie
perl-Bio-SamTools
php-pecl-zendopcache
PythonCAD
python-nova-adminclient
python-testosterone
repsurgeon
rhevsh
tetex-IEEEtran
xmltex

I also temporarily blocked the following packages but then run a
dependency check and noticed that a lot of packages depend on these
retired packages. The dependency check is not complete, because
too many packages are affected. I did not yet Bcc all maintainers, since
this affects too many maintainers as well.

  Package(co)maintainers
===
directfb   orphan, kwizart  
libgssglue orphan   
maven2-common-poms orphan, mizdebsk, akurtakov, fnasser, yyang, huwang, 
   dbhole, sochotni 
python-quantumclient   orphan, jruzicka, vaneldik, pbrady, apevec, gkotton, 
   markmc, rkukura  
spacewalk-web  orphan   
tslib  orphan   

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: directfb
xine-lib (maintained by: kkofler, kkofler, rdieter)
xine-lib-extras requires libdirect-1.6.so.0, 
libdirectfb-1.6.so.0, libfusion-1.6.so.0


Depending on: libgssglue
conserver (maintained by: jkastner)
conserver requires libgssglue.so.1, 
libgssglue.so.1(libgssapi_CITI_2)
conserver requires libgssapi-devel = 0.4-2.fc19, 
libgssglue-devel = 0.4-2.fc19
conserver-client requires libgssglue.so.1, 
libgssglue.so.1(libgssapi_CITI_2)

libserf (maintained by: cicku, jorton)
libserf requires libgssapi-devel = 0.4-2.fc19

rdesktop (maintained by: ssp, fab, alexl, caillon, caolanm, hadess, 
johnp, mbarnes, mclasen, rhughes, rstrode, ssp, xiphmont, rathann)
rdesktop requires libgssglue.so.1, 
libgssglue.so.1(libgssapi_CITI_2)
rdesktop requires libgssglue-devel = 0.4-2.fc19

gnome-rdp (maintained by: lbazan, vicodan, echevemaster, lbazan)
gnome-rdp requires rdesktop = 1.8.0-1.fc20
gnome-rdp requires rdesktop = 1.8.0-1.fc20

vinagre (maintained by: hadess, rishi, berrange, teuf)
vinagre requires rdesktop = 1.8.0-1.fc20

gnome-do-plugins (maintained by: nushio, mcrha, antiaircraft)
gnome-do-plugins-vinagre requires vinagre = 3.9.90-1.fc21

subversion (maintained by: jorton, lkundrak, kanarip)
subversion requires libserf-1.so.0
subversion-javahl requires libserf-1.so.0
subversion-libs requires libserf-1.so.0
subversion-python requires libserf-1.so.0
subversion-ruby requires libserf-1.so.0
subversion-tools requires libserf-1.so.0


Depending on: maven2-common-poms
antlr-maven-plugin (maintained by: spot, tradej)
antlr-maven-plugin requires maven2-common-poms = 1.0-50.fc20

buildnumber-maven-plugin (maintained by: weli, mizdebsk, tradej, dbhole)
buildnumber-maven-plugin requires maven2-common-poms = 
1.0-50.fc20

maven-scm (maintained by: guidograzioli, mizdebsk, jcapik, akurtakov, 
sochotni, java-sig)
maven-scm requires maven2-common-poms = 1.0-50.fc20

mercury (maintained by: gil)
mercury requires maven2-common-poms = 1.0-50.fc20

plexus-ant-factory (maintained by: sochotni, tradej, msrb, mizdebsk, 
java-sig)
plexus-ant-factory requires maven2-common-poms = 1.0-50.fc20

maven-plugin-tools (maintained by: jcapik, mizdebsk, yyang, sochotni, 
java-sig, jcapik)
maven-plugin-tools requires plexus-ant-factory = 
1.0-0.12.a2.1.fc20
maven-script-ant requires plexus-ant-factory = 
1.0-0.12.a2.1.fc20

access-modifier-annotation (maintained by: msrb, tradej, mizdebsk, 
sochotni, java-sig)
access-modifier-annotation requires 
mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-plugin) = 1.7

fasterxml-oss-parent (maintained by: gil, java-sig)
fasterxml-oss-parent requires 
mvn(org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-scm-plugin) = 1.7


Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-23 Thread Till Maas
Hi,

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 11:25:47PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:

 Depending on: maven2-common-poms
   antlr-maven-plugin (maintained by: spot, tradej)
   antlr-maven-plugin requires maven2-common-poms = 1.0-50.fc20

This is a BR, I reported it here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887166
and blocked maven2-common-poms again.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Blocking unblocked retired packages

2013-08-23 Thread Christopher Meng
I don't know what happened with libgssglue.

This was retired for what reason?

It affects too many...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct