Re: Buildroot broken in Rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Ralf Corsepius

On 07/23/2018 08:01 AM, Jan Synacek wrote:

I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this:

+ make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
-fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
-std=gnu99' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro   -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -lpthread -lrt -lm'
cc -MM -DDEPS_RUN -I. numad.c > .depend.X && mv .depend.X .depend
/bin/sh: cc: command not found

I consider that a broken buildroot.


You seem to be facing the nasty side-effects of the immaturity
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_GCC_from_BuildRoot
was implemented and (not) tested.

Likely your cases are examples for what I wrote in

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2HG7KMKWU65IXRGUAU2PK2RCGDWWZWJW/

Ralf
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PEHVWHB4UVQ3COA6TQPUY65DFLPSGNFS/


Re: Buildroot broken in Rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 07/22/2018 11:01 PM, Jan Synacek wrote:

I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this:

/bin/sh: cc: command not found

I consider that a broken buildroot.


There have been several announcements and several extensive mailing list 
threads about this.  gcc was removed from the buildroot by default and 
an attempt was made to add the build requirement to packages that needed 
it.  Many were not able to be detected automatically and I assume these 
packages were among those.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4UHRDTPSXXQE4CBDW3DUZZRADMC37XYW/


Buildroot broken in Rawhide

2018-07-22 Thread Jan Synacek
I got several FTBFS bug reports, the logs of which look like this:

+ make 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
-fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
-std=gnu99' 'LDFLAGS=-Wl,-z,relro   -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -lpthread -lrt -lm'
cc -MM -DDEPS_RUN -I. numad.c > .depend.X && mv .depend.X .depend
/bin/sh: cc: command not found

I consider that a broken buildroot.

-- 
Jan Synacek
Software Engineer, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FX2ONEFMTIDUPQLWTO3TR7S74J6XTVXP/