CLA problems (was: Re: Install fedora-easy-karma by default?)
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:20:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/11/2010 02:14 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Can you leave bodhi feedback with an FAS account if you haven't signed a CLA? (The thing about FAS accounts I am not crazy about is the CLA. What about using a bugzilla account instead?) What is the problem you have with the CLA? Imho it is to complex, which scares potential contributor away. Especially if only a comment and a karma value are required, the CLA is way to complex to require it. Regards Till pgpStmOHP9LdN.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: CLA problems (was: Re: Install fedora-easy-karma by default?)
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 09:20:11AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 03/11/2010 02:14 AM, Matthew Woehlke wrote: Can you leave bodhi feedback with an FAS account if you haven't signed a CLA? (The thing about FAS accounts I am not crazy about is the CLA. What about using a bugzilla account instead?) What is the problem you have with the CLA? Imho it is to complex, which scares potential contributor away. Especially if only a comment and a karma value are required, the CLA is way to complex to require it. We don't require it though I thought? Can somone who has not signed the CLA confirm? -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
