Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Josh Boyer 
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:58 AM, David Howells  wrote:
> Jan Kurik  wrote:
>
>> let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule.
>>
>> There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler in F24 and use it to
>> compile all the binaries delivered in this release [1].
>
> Do the cross-gcc packages also need moving to GCC6 immediately as I believe

It would be a good idea regardless...

> they're used to compile some bits too?

Which bits?  AFAIK, Fedora does not allow cross-compiling for official
Fedora packages.

josh
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Neal Gompa 
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Josh Boyer 
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:58 AM, David Howells 
> wrote:
> > Jan Kurik  wrote:
> >
> >> let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule.
> >>
> >> There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler in F24 and use it to
> >> compile all the binaries delivered in this release [1].
> >
> > Do the cross-gcc packages also need moving to GCC6 immediately as I
> believe
>
> It would be a good idea regardless...
>
> > they're used to compile some bits too?
>
> Which bits?  AFAIK, Fedora does not allow cross-compiling for official
> Fedora packages.
>
> josh
>
>
​We do, as our mingw packages are all cross compiled packages.​




-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread David Howells 
Jan Kurik  wrote:

> let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule.
> 
> There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler in F24 and use it to
> compile all the binaries delivered in this release [1].

Do the cross-gcc packages also need moving to GCC6 immediately as I believe
they're used to compile some bits too?

David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Daniel P. Berrange 
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 09:02:08AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:58 AM, David Howells  wrote:
> > Jan Kurik  wrote:
> >
> >> let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule.
> >>
> >> There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler in F24 and use it to
> >> compile all the binaries delivered in this release [1].
> >
> > Do the cross-gcc packages also need moving to GCC6 immediately as I believe
> 
> It would be a good idea regardless...
> 
> > they're used to compile some bits too?
> 
> Which bits?  AFAIK, Fedora does not allow cross-compiling for official
> Fedora packages.

They're used to build some firmware blobs for QEMU/KVM, eg seabios
because we need to build x86 seabios code on ppc/arm/etc hosts for
example.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com  -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org  -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org   -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org   -o-   http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 07:22:46PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > Jan, previously when we've updated the schedule, the previous dates for
> > each milestone are retained with a strikethrough (see
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Schedule). Are we not doing
> > that intentionally this time because we're so early in the process?
> OK, I will update the schedule in this way. Thanks for letting me
> know. I did not know it is a "best practice" to do it so.

I find it convenient because people ask me about the schedule _a lot_.
:)

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Jan Kurik 
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:33 PM, Matthew Miller
 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:23:55AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> schedule for 2 weeks. Please check the updated schedule at
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule#Key_Milestones .
>> Dates for the most important milestones follows:
>
> Jan, previously when we've updated the schedule, the previous dates for
> each milestone are retained with a strikethrough (see
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Schedule). Are we not doing
> that intentionally this time because we're so early in the process?

OK, I will update the schedule in this way. Thanks for letting me
know. I did not know it is a "best practice" to do it so.

Regards,
Jan

> --
> Matthew Miller
> 
> Fedora Project Leader
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-12 Thread Matthew Miller 
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:23:55AM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> schedule for 2 weeks. Please check the updated schedule at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule#Key_Milestones .
> Dates for the most important milestones follows:

Jan, previously when we've updated the schedule, the previous dates for
each milestone are retained with a strikethrough (see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/23/Schedule). Are we not doing
that intentionally this time because we're so early in the process?

-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Changes in F24 schedule - two weeks slip

2016-01-11 Thread Jan Kurik 
Hi Fedora people,

let me inform you about changes in Fedora 24 schedule.

There is a will to accommodate GCC6 compiler in F24 and use it to
compile all the binaries delivered in this release [1]. To make this
happen we need to do mass rebuild which was not originally scheduled
for this release. On FESCo meeting the last Friday has been decided to
go on with GCC6 and do the mass rebuild. This causes slip of F24
schedule for 2 weeks. Please check the updated schedule at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/Schedule#Key_Milestones .
Dates for the most important milestones follows:

2016-03-15 Alpha Release
2016-04-26 Beta Release
2016-05-31 Fedora 24 Final Release (GA)

Regards,
Jan

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC6
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1519
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org