Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
Dne 03. 10. 20 v 23:28 Tom Seewald napsal(a): > Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/lib/.build-id/0e/fd9f1f23d7cefd37989b7d1b401b4994fee742 conflicts > between attempted installs of openjfx-11.0.3-1.fc33.x86_64 and > openjfx8-8.0.202-24.b07.fc33.x86_64 > file /usr/lib/.build-id/2d/747b771939ec456dadf18bfbec6a5db9d3a4cc conflicts > between attempted installs of openjfx-11.0.3-1.fc33.x86_64 and > openjfx8-8.0.202-24.b07.fc33.x86_64 > > If this needs to be formally filed as a bug, should it be opened against > openjfx or fedora-upgrade or something else? Against openjfx please. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On 10/2/20 3:50 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync Fedora 33 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 8.9 kB/s | 5.1 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 33 - x86_64 2.0 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 33 - x86_64 - Updates 712 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 33 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.3 MB/s | 1.0 MB 00:00 Fedora 33 - x86_64 - Test Updates 4.6 MB/s | 18 MB 00:03 Fedora 33 - x86_64 - Updates 844 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 33 - x86_64 6.4 MB/s | 65 MB 00:10 RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Free - Updates 363 B/s | 257 B 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Free 969 kB/s | 913 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree - Updates 629 B/s | 257 B 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree 339 kB/s | 278 kB 00:00 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 - mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libwebsockets.so.16()(64bit) needed by mosquitto-1.6.12-1.fc33.x86_64 Problem 2: package collectd-mqtt-5.9.2-2.fc32.x86_64 requires collectd(x86-64) = 5.9.2-2.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - collectd-5.9.2-2.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package collectd-mqtt-5.9.2-2.fc32.x86_64 Problem 3: package gtatool-pcd-2.2.3-6.fc33.x86_64 requires libpcl_common.so.1.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gtatool-pcd-2.2.3-6.fc33.x86_64 requires libpcl_io.so.1.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gtatool-pcd-2.2.3-6.fc33.x86_64 requires libpcl_octree.so.1.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package gtatool-pcd-2.2.3-4.fc32.x86_64 - pcl-1.9.1-6.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gtatool-pcd-2.2.3-4.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: package qgis-3.12.1-4.fc33.x86_64 requires libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.14.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package qgis-3.12.1-4.fc33.x86_64 requires libQt5Sql.so.5(Qt_5.14.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package qgis-3.12.1-4.fc32.x86_64 - qt5-qtbase-5.14.2-5.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - qgis-3.12.1-4.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
Hey! while upgrading I get this error : Problem: package nodejs-grunt-1.0.4-4.fc33.noarch requires (npm(rimraf) >= 2.0 with npm(rimraf) < 3), but none of the providers can be installed - package nodejs-grunt-cli-1.2.0-9.fc32.noarch requires npm(grunt), but none of the providers can be installed - nodejs-rimraf-2.6.1-7.fc32.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nodejs-grunt-1.0.4-3.fc32.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nodejs-grunt-cli-1.2.0-9.fc32.noarch ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fr, 2020-10-02 at 09:50 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync Hi, I got no real problems, but the following packages would get downgraded: appstream-data noarch 32- 7.fc33 fedora 17 M firefox x86_64 81.0.1-1.fc33 updates- testing 102 M radare2 x86_64 4.5.0- 1.fc33.1 fedora 4.0 M radare2-common noarch 4.5.0- 1.fc33.1 fedora 1.3 M strace x86_64 5.7.0.6.7ab6- 1.fc33fedora 1.1 M thunderbird x86_64 68.10.0- 1.fc33 fedora 83 M as far as I see there should be already bugreports for radare2 and strace. I suppose firefox and thunderbird should not go unnoticed? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Regards Sven Kieske Systementwickler Mittwald CM Service GmbH & Co. KG Königsberger Straße 4-6 32339 Espelkamp Tel.: 05772 / 293-900 Fax: 05772 / 293-333 https://www.mittwald.de Geschäftsführer: Robert Meyer, Florian Jürgens St.Nr.: 331/5721/1033, USt-IdNr.: DE814773217, HRA 6640, AG Bad Oeynhausen Komplementärin: Robert Meyer Verwaltungs GmbH, HRB 13260, AG Bad Oeynhausen Informationen zur Datenverarbeitung im Rahmen unserer Geschäftstätigkeit gemäß Art. 13-14 DSGVO sind unter www.mittwald.de/ds abrufbar. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
Error: Problem: package mbrowse-0.4.3-20.fc31.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.35()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-25.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mbrowse-0.4.3-20.fc31.x86_64 -- Tom Yates - https://www.teaparty.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On 05. 10. 20 9:30, Petr Pisar wrote: Problem 3: package irssi-1.2.2-6.fc33.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.32.0-462.fc33.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package irssi-1.2.2-2.fc31.x86_64 - package perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.209-9.fc31.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.0), but none of the providers can be installed perl-Digest-Bcrypt was removed from F33. I added the package into fedora-obsolete-packages-33-27 package that ensures that perl-Digest-Bcrypt will be uninstalled. More such package will be handled right after the freeze: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884617 Adding them one by one is tedious (but does not harm anything). I recommend not to do it unless absolutely time critical. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 08:01:16AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > Problem 2: package python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 requires > libxml2(x86-64) = 2.9.10-4.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed > - libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 python2-libxml2 was updated to python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4 in F31. I updated the release number in fedora-obsolete-packages-33-27 package that ensures that python2-libxml2 will be uninstalled. > Problem 3: package irssi-1.2.2-6.fc33.x86_64 requires > libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.32.0-462.fc33.x86_64 and > perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.fc31.x86_64 > - problem with installed package irssi-1.2.2-2.fc31.x86_64 > - package perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.209-9.fc31.noarch requires > perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.0), but none of the providers can be installed perl-Digest-Bcrypt was removed from F33. I added the package into fedora-obsolete-packages-33-27 package that ensures that perl-Digest-Bcrypt will be uninstalled. Thanks for the report. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
During an attempted upgrade to F33 Beta I ran into: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/lib/.build-id/0e/fd9f1f23d7cefd37989b7d1b401b4994fee742 conflicts between attempted installs of openjfx-11.0.3-1.fc33.x86_64 and openjfx8-8.0.202-24.b07.fc33.x86_64 file /usr/lib/.build-id/2d/747b771939ec456dadf18bfbec6a5db9d3a4cc conflicts between attempted installs of openjfx-11.0.3-1.fc33.x86_64 and openjfx8-8.0.202-24.b07.fc33.x86_64 If this needs to be formally filed as a bug, should it be opened against openjfx or fedora-upgrade or something else? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
>Problem 1: package copydeps-4.0-3.fc32.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.8, but
>none of the providers can be installed
> - python3-3.8.5-5.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> - problem with installed package copydeps-4.0-3.fc32.noarch
This is because copydeps has been rewritten in Rust, so I retired the python
package ("copydeps") in favour of the Rust one ("rust-copydeps"). However, as I
wrote earlier on devel [1], my Rust packages got unpushed from F33, so now
there's no new version for copydeps to get upgraded to.
>Problem 2: package hedgewars-1.0.0-12.fc33.x86_64 requires
>libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.14.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can
>be installed
> - package hedgewars-1.0.0-12.fc33.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) =
> 5.14.2, but none of the providers can be installed
> - problem with installed package hedgewars-1.0.0-9.fc32.x86_64
> - qt5-qtbase-5.14.2-5.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> - hedgewars-1.0.0-9.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
The error message is for 1.0.0-12, but I see that 1.0.0-13 has been built and
submitted to bodhi recently [2]. Since it's marked as "pushed to stable", I
guess it's just a matter of waiting for the mirrors to propagate.
[1]
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/J6QVZZLWBVWZPX6FIRMEX7MURGIHKDKS/
[2] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-8c4a470e9c
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On 02. 10. 20 16:05, Alexander Scheel wrote: I've got a weird one: Error: Problem 1: package openssh-ldap-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 requires openssh-debuginfo(x86-64) = 8.3p1-3.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - openssh-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package openssh-ldap-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 But I'm not partial to my debuginfo and I can nuke it before upgrading. Is this worth reporting? AFAIK this should not happen :) We don't normally obsolete debuginfos: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/988 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
Take some time but All went smothly, so the unique problem I found was with the following two packed I've had to remove: 1. copyq Error: Problema: conflicting requests - nothing provides qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.14.2 needed by copyq-3.12.0- 4.fc33.x86_64 2. openjfx - I've remove it and then install later again without problem. I've been in fedora 33 for 2 days all all fine, performance good too. Regards., -- Héctor Louzao @hhlp He / Him / His Fedora Project Contributor https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:HhlpTZ=Europe/Madrid ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:59 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > Error: Problem: problem with installed package mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 - mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libwebsockets.so.16()(64bit) needed by mosquitto-1.6.12-1.fc33.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -Jared ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 1:50 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: I get a handful of downgrades: Downgrading: appstream-data noarch 32-7.fc33fedora 17 M mod_http2x86_64 1.15.7-2.fc33fedora 151 k radare2 x86_64 4.5.0-1.fc33.1 fedora 4.0 M radare2-common noarch 4.5.0-1.fc33.1 fedora 1.3 M stellarium x86_64 0.20.2-3.fc33fedora 204 M strace x86_64 5.7.0.6.7ab6-1.fc33 fedora 1.1 M I'll see whether bugs have been filed for them already. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
I've got a weird one: Error: Problem 1: package openssh-ldap-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 requires openssh-debuginfo(x86-64) = 8.3p1-3.fc32, but none of the providers can be installed - openssh-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package openssh-ldap-debuginfo-8.3p1-3.fc32.x86_64 But I'm not partial to my debuginfo and I can nuke it before upgrading. Is this worth reporting? On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 3:51 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Or > against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora > 33. Please check existing reports against > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1803235_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=11399170 > > Thank you > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Friday, October 2, 2020 3:50:19 AM EDT Miroslav Suchý wrote: > dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync Error: Problem: problem with installed package umbrello-19.12.2-1.fc32.x86_64 - umbrello-19.12.2-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libKDevPlatformInterfaces.so.55()(64bit) needed by umbrello-20.04.3-2.fc33.x86_64 - nothing provides libKDevPlatformLanguage.so.55()(64bit) needed by umbrello-20.04.3-2.fc33.x86_64 - nothing provides libKDevPlatformSerialization.so.55()(64bit) needed by umbrello-20.04.3-2.fc33.x86_64 - nothing provides libKDevPlatformShell.so.55()(64bit) needed by umbrello-20.04.3-2.fc33.x86_64 Hmm. I guess no one uses UML anymore? -Steve ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:50:19AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: Congratulations, this is overall the most problem-free upgrade I've encountered at the beta stage! On two different F32 x86_64 servers, a F32 RPi quasi-server, two F32 workstation, and a F32 laptop, the upgrade was completely clean. I did run into some issues on an F31 server: [[ problem 1 is a local package that needs to be rebuilt ]] Problem 2: package python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 requires libxml2(x86-64) = 2.9.10-4.fc31, but none of the providers can be installed - libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python2-libxml2-2.9.10-4.fc31.x86_64 Problem 3: package irssi-1.2.2-6.fc33.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.32.0-462.fc33.x86_64 and perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.fc31.x86_64 - problem with installed package irssi-1.2.2-2.fc31.x86_64 - package perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.209-9.fc31.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.30.0), but none of the providers can be installed - irssi-1.2.2-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-Digest-Bcrypt-1.209-9.fc31.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.30.3-454.module_f33+9369+dac0eadc.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.30.3-454.module_f33+9711+083176da.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.32.0-460.module_f33+9696+dc99464e.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.32.0-461.module_f33+9980+83f6a35a.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.30.3-455.module_f33+10047+8c6c443b.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.32.0-461.module_f33+9996+d5a76496.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - Solomon -- Solomon Peachypizza at shaftnet dot org (email) @pizza:shaftnet dot org (matrix) High Springs, FL speachy (freenode) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 09:50:19AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. Error: Problem: problem with installed package mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 - mosquitto-1.6.10-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libwebsockets.so.16()(64bit) needed by mosquitto-1.6.12-1.fc33.x86_64 Correct package to report against would be mosquitto or whatever provides libwebsockets? -- Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on practicality. to...@pipebreaker.pl — Baron Vladimir Harkonnen ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Fri, Oct 2, 2020 at 6:30 AM Richard Shaw wrote: > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64 > - qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - nothing provides qt5-qtwebengine(x86-64) = 5.15.0 needed by > qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.0-2.fc33.x86_64 > Already reported: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5773 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64 - qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.14.2-1.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides qt5-qtwebengine(x86-64) = 5.15.0 needed by qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld-5.15.0-2.fc33.x86_64 Problem 2: package cppclean-0.13-1.fc32.noarch requires python(abi) = 3.8, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.8.5-5.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package cppclean-0.13-1.fc32.noarch I don't remember installing qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld for any reason so I just erased it and it didn't pull in any other packages, but I'll report it to RPM Fusion nonetheless. So it looks like cppclean needs to be rebuilt for python 3.9? Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
* Miroslav Suchý: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. You may also run `dnf > upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. Not exactly what you asked for, but: I sent a note to Dmitry about the missing strace 5.8 build Fedora 33. Thanks, Florian -- Red Hat GmbH, https://de.redhat.com/ , Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243, Managing Directors: Charles Cachera, Brian Klemm, Laurie Krebs, Michael O'Neill ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Friday, October 2, 2020 10:05:11 AM WEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote: > > Problem 2: package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 requires > > > > libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > > >- libcroco-0.6.13-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > > > >- problem with installed package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 > > > > The second hippo-canvas has been retired in Fedora 31. Should I open a bug > > within the fedora-obsolete-package component? > > Yes please. Done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1884548 -- José Abílio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Friday, October 2, 2020 10:04:34 AM WEST Miro Hrončok wrote: > Or a broken sed in %prep: > > sed -i 's/python/python3/' *.py > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871631 You are right, I arrived to the same conclusion. The sed call was required with previous versions but sugar-recall 7 has explicit "#!/usr/bin/python3 in the single file it uses it. I have removed that sed line and I will submit the corresponding builds to rawhide and Fedora 33. -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote: Problem 2: package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 requires libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libcroco-0.6.13-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 The second hippo-canvas has been retired in Fedora 31. Should I open a bug within the fedora-obsolete-package component? Yes please. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On 02. 10. 20 10:59, José Abílio Matos wrote: The first really looks like a bug. I do not see any reason for a package to require python 3.3. The most likely explanation is a typo. Or a broken sed in %prep: sed -i 's/python/python3/' *.py https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1871631 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
On Friday, October 2, 2020 8:50:19 AM WEST Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > ... In one machine I got this: Problem 1: problem with installed package sugar-recall-6-4.fc31.noarch - sugar-recall-6-4.fc31.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides /usr/bin/python33 needed by sugar-recall-7-1.fc33.noarch Problem 2: package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 requires libcroco-0.6.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libcroco-0.6.13-3.fc32.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package hippo-canvas-0.3.0-28.fc30.x86_64 The first really looks like a bug. I do not see any reason for a package to require python 3.3. The most likely explanation is a typo. The second hippo-canvas has been retired in Fedora 31. Should I open a bug within the fedora-obsolete-package component? Regards, -- José Abílio___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F32 to F33
Do you want to make Fedora 33 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=33 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f33 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 33. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1803235_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=11399170 Thank you -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
