Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:14:22AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > Error: > Problem: package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch requires ant = > 1.10.9-2.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed > - ant-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9- > 2.fc34.noarch > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > I removed ant-apache-log4j - nothing else was removed at the same time. > Should I be reporting an issue? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ant/pull-request/7 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ant/pull-request/8 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 1:20 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > > and try to run: > > > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > > > distro-sync > > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > > potential problems. > > > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > > > > If you get this prompt: > > > > ... > > Total download size: XXX M > > Is this ok [y/N]: > > > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > > report it against the appropriate package. > > I get several errors related to Qubes OS. Most of them are cases that will > need to be fixed by the Qubes OS team, but the lack of an upgrade candidate > for PulseAudio is concerning, as Qubes OS currently ships a PulseAudio > module for sound support in VMs. Is there a replacement for PulseAudio > modules in Fedora 35? Some sort of PipeWire plugin? > What module are you using? It may have been reimplemented in PipeWire, and if not, you should ask upstream at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/pipewire/-/issues -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. I get several errors related to Qubes OS. Most of them are cases that will need to be fixed by the Qubes OS team, but the lack of an upgrade candidate for PulseAudio is concerning, as Qubes OS currently ships a PulseAudio module for sound support in VMs. Is there a replacement for PulseAudio modules in Fedora 35? Some sort of PipeWire plugin? Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour she/her/hers OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. Error: Problem: package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch requires ant = 1.10.9-2.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - ant-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9- 2.fc34.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) I removed ant-apache-log4j - nothing else was removed at the same time. Should I be reporting an issue? > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual > upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, > please report it against the appropriate package. > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed > in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" > (F35FailsToInstall) reports: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# > > Thank you > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
I tested in a F33 KDE spin too. All good, no problems. Instalar 125 Pacotes Atualizar 1737 Pacotes Remover 3 Pacotes Desatualizar 3 Pacotes Em ter., 7 de set. de 2021 às 13:15, Miroslav Suchý escreveu: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# > > Thank you > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Hello! Works for me: Installieren100 Pakete Aktualisieren 4705 Pakete Entfernen 7 Pakete Zurücksetzen 9 Pakete Gesamte Downloadgröße: 6.8 G Best Regards Christoph Am 07.09.21 um 18:14 schrieb Miroslav Suchý: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 2021-09-07 9:14 a.m., Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync All good so far. Transaction Summary Install 70 Packages Upgrade 2516 Packages Remove 4 Packages Downgrade 14 Packages Total download size: 3.3 G Is this ok [y/N]: -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > napsal(a): > > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > I got this, not sure what to file against: > > > > > > Error: > > > Problem: package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3-35.fc33.x86_64 requires > > > libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > > > perl-Mozilla-LDAP was retired, so the bug would be against > > fedora-obsolete-packages. > > I obsoleted perl-Mozilla-LDAP in fedora-obsolete-packages-35-17. Oh, indeed. I opened a pull request to do that (and more) yesterday too ;( Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
V Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 05:58:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > I got this, not sure what to file against: > > > > Error: > > Problem: package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3-35.fc33.x86_64 requires > > libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > > perl-Mozilla-LDAP was retired, so the bug would be against > fedora-obsolete-packages. I obsoleted perl-Mozilla-LDAP in fedora-obsolete-packages-35-17. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:14:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: Error: Problem 1: package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch requires ant = 1.10.9-2.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - ant-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package ant-apache-log4j-1.10.9-2.fc34.noarch https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ant/pull-request/7 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ant/pull-request/8 Problem 2: package plocate-1.1.7-1.fc34.x86_64 requires liburing.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package plocate-1.1.7-1.fc34.x86_64 requires liburing.so.1(LIBURING_0.1)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package plocate-1.1.7-1.fc34.x86_64 requires liburing.so.1(LIBURING_0.2)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package plocate-1.1.7-1.fc34.x86_64 requires liburing.so.1(LIBURING_0.4)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - liburing-0.7-4.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package plocate-1.1.7-1.fc34.x86_64 That's my local issue. The review for plocate is dragging on… https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002418 I'd say that's impressively few conflicts. Seems much better than the transition to F34 at the same part in the release cycle. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
This is F34 with 5041 packages. I think people alrady reported arduino-core and gnuradio, I reported the gqrx libboost/boost_thread issue https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002104 On 9/7/21 12:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Error: Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all), but none of the providers can be installed - objectweb-asm-8.0.1-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch Problem 2: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: problem with installed package gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - package gqrx-2.14.4-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libboost_thread.so.1.75.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - boost-thread-1.75.0-4.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-analog.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-channels.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-digital.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fec.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fft.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-filter.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-network.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-qtgui.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-soapy.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-trellis.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-uhd.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-video-sdl.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-vocoder.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-wavelet.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-zeromq.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires gnuradio(x86-64) = 3.9.2.0-5.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed - package freedv-1.6.0-1.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package gnuradio-devel-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - problem with installed package freedv-1.4-6.fc34.x86_64 - gnuradio-devel-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - freedv-1.4-6.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 5: cannot install both
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > I got this, not sure what to file against: > > Error: > Problem: package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3-35.fc33.x86_64 requires > libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed perl-Mozilla-LDAP was retired, so the bug would be against fedora-obsolete-packages. (But I assume all packages mentioned in this thread will be harvested for f-o-p, so there should be no need to file the bug.) Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 11:22:49PM +0100, chedi toueiti wrote: > Error: > Problem: problem with installed package > watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 > - watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - nothing provides libfolly.so.2021.04.12.00()(64bit) needed by > watchman-2021.04.12.00-1.fc35.x86_64 > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1965963 Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
I didnt log the error messages but when rebasing Fedora Silverblue, there was an issue that I encountered: In Silverblue 34 I had at some point clicked "enable workstation repositories" in Gnome Software and forgotten about it. This added a layer with the relevant rpms. As this rpm is now in the main compose, rebasing streams caused problems. I had to reset the Fedora 34 install to not include the layered packages before rebasing. As the prompt was from the GUI, I suspect a lot of Silverblue users will hit this. other than that it was a smooth upgrade. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) > reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# > I got this, not sure what to file against: Error: Problem: package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3-35.fc33.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.32()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.32.1-477.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-Mozilla-LDAP-1.5.3- 35.fc33.x86_64 - package perl-libs-4:5.32.1-471.module_f35+12589+8a7d3254.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.32.1-471.module_f35+12574+98410e7f.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) HTH, Simo. -- Simo Sorce RHEL Crypto Team Red Hat, Inc ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:46:31PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > php-imap is just a wrapper around uw-imap, and as a result was removed, too. > Time to start migration to non-abandoned solution :( Well, crap. Fortunately the mostly-braindead Net_IMAP PEAR module will do what I need.. Time to start auditing the php stuff I have deployed everywhere. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachypizza at shaftnet dot org (email) @pizza:shaftnet dot org (matrix) High Springs, FL speachy (libra.chat) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:19:41AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:52:58PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > > >- package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) = > > > 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed > > > > This line repeats a lot in your output. I think you will get forward with > > this if you figure out what happened to php-imap in Fedora 34 and, whatever > > that was, how to recover from it. > > Yeah, it looks like the php-imap package was dropped in the F34 testing > cycle due to an issue that probably only needed a simple rebuild to fix: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929640 If I remember correctly, the problem was in uw-imap, which was abandoned and removed from Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/uw-imap/c/ba748fd8f4697d79cf54a4b8a488f95fff04d7c1?branch=rawhide php-imap is just a wrapper around uw-imap, and as a result was removed, too. In other words, it's not only a question of rebuilding, as dependencies for php-imap are no longer in Fedora. > > I rely on php-imap for authentication purposes on a _lot_ (using php > packages that remain included with Fedora!) so this is actually a major > blocking issue for me. Time to start migration to non-abandoned solution :( -- Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: to...@pipebreaker.pl one blends softly casual into the other. — Frank Herbert ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:52:58PM +0300, Otto Urpelainen wrote: > >- package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) = > > 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed > > This line repeats a lot in your output. I think you will get forward with > this if you figure out what happened to php-imap in Fedora 34 and, whatever > that was, how to recover from it. Yeah, it looks like the php-imap package was dropped in the F34 testing cycle due to an issue that probably only needed a simple rebuild to fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1929640 ...but it was not added to the fedora-obsolete-packages list. Remi is building it in his own external PHP repositories, so it's clear there's nothing inherently broken about it: https://fedora.pkgs.org/34/remi-x86_64/php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc34.remi.x86_64.rpm.html There's been a bugzilla ticket open since June about this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1971202 I rely on php-imap for authentication purposes on a _lot_ (using php packages that remain included with Fedora!) so this is actually a major blocking issue for me. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachypizza at shaftnet dot org (email) @pizza:shaftnet dot org (matrix) High Springs, FL speachy (libra.chat) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Solomon Peachy kirjoitti 7.9.2021 klo 23.25: On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: System 7 (Special Snowflake Fedora 33 server) This one is really bad, with pretty much anything relying on PHP breaking. (Problem 1 is a local site package that just needs rebuilding for F35's perl stuff) - package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) = 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed This line repeats a lot in your output. I think you will get forward with this if you figure out what happened to php-imap in Fedora 34 and, whatever that was, how to recover from it. Otto ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 11:25 AM Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > Tested on two machines, went without a hitch on one, but I got this on > the other: > > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 > - 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - nothing provides 0ad-data = 0.0.24b needed by 0ad-0.0.24b-3.fc35.x86_64 > Problem 2: package eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-3.fc34.noarch requires > osgi(org.hamcrest.core), but none of the providers can be installed > - hamcrest-core-1.3-31.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-3.fc34.noarch > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > For 0ad, I see that 0.0.25b-1 was pushed to testing in F33 and F34 but > not in F35 yet. Not sure if it's a FTBFS there at the moment. > > eclipse has been retired IIRC, so I guess that's the issue here. Yeah, the "main" eclipse package has been retired, but other packages in the stack had not been. As discussed in the "Orphaned packages need new maintainers" thread, I have now gone ahead and retired the remaining eclipse packages: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J4TYLSIWUGPAIIOHIDQFVNZMELIS7H7J/ And also filed a bug against fedora-obsolete-packages to have those packages removed on upgrade to Fedora 35. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 10:56:33AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > Local site content is not managed by Fedora. That's a local user's content. > Similar to generic dynamic libraries in /usr/local/lib64. I'm aware of that, which is why I didn't bother including it on the list. I only mentioned it because starting the list with "problem 2" may lead to questions about what happened to problem 1. The other 13 or so problems, however, are purely with fedora-supplied PHP packages, which is why I _did_ include them in my report of the upgrade failure. - Solomon -- Solomon Peachypizza at shaftnet dot org (email) @pizza:shaftnet dot org (matrix) High Springs, FL speachy (libra.chat) signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Tested on two machines, went without a hitch on one, but I got this on the other: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 - 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides 0ad-data = 0.0.24b needed by 0ad-0.0.24b-3.fc35.x86_64 Problem 2: package eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-3.fc34.noarch requires osgi(org.hamcrest.core), but none of the providers can be installed - hamcrest-core-1.3-31.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package eclipse-jdt-1:4.19-3.fc34.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) For 0ad, I see that 0.0.25b-1 was pushed to testing in F33 and F34 but not in F35 yet. Not sure if it's a FTBFS there at the moment. eclipse has been retired IIRC, so I guess that's the issue here. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
V Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 04:25:32PM -0400, Solomon Peachy napsal(a): > System 7 (Special Snowflake Fedora 33 server) > > This one is really bad, with pretty much anything relying on PHP > breaking. (Problem 1 is a local site package Local site content is not managed by Fedora. That's a local user's content. Similar to generic dynamic libraries in /usr/local/lib64. >that just needs rebuilding for F35's perl stuff) > Because new Perl is not binary compatible to the old one. If Fedora did not change local site path for each new Perl, Fedora delivered software could crash in the user-supplied incompatible code. Perl maintainers pondered whether to keep a pure-Perl site code, comparing to a binary XS code, in an invariant path, and decided to keep them togegher in a changing path. The reason is a possible unsatisfied dependencies. E.g. a pure-Perl module requires an XS module. Unfortunatelly Fedora cannot provide any tools for automatically rebuilding the user's site content because Fedora has no clue how and were from the user populated the site content. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, Sep 07, 2021 at 06:14:58PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: #v+ Error: Problem 1: package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 requires dhcp-relay = 12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - dhcp-relay-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 #v- -compat package for "dhcp" was removed: * Fri Jun 11 2021 Pavel Zhukov - 12:4.4.2-12.b1 - Drop compat package finally I've opened a bug against fedora-obsolete-packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002163 #v+ Problem 2: problem with installed package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-1.4-6.fc34.x86_64 - package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-1.4-6.fc34.x86_64 requires libpulsecore-14.2.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - pulseaudio-14.2-3.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository #v- This is RPMFusion's package. Given that, and the fact Pulseaudio got replaced by Pipewire, this is not important. -- Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: to...@pipebreaker.pl one blends softly casual into the other. — Frank Herbert ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 7.9.2021 klo 19.14: sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync Error: Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all), but none of the providers can be installed - objectweb-asm-8.0.1-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch Already reported: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001333 Problem 3: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository This is already discussed in this thread, but was not in Bugzilla, so I reported it there: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002142 Problem 4: problem with installed package gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - package gqrx-2.14.4-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libboost_thread.so.1.75.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gqrx-2.14.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - boost-thread-1.75.0-4.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Reported twice already: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991876 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002104 Problem 5: package postgresql-server-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 requires postgresql-private-devel, but none of the providers can be installed - package postgresql-private-devel-13.4-1.fc35.i686 conflicts with libpq-devel provided by libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 - package postgresql-private-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 conflicts with libpq-devel provided by libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc35.x86_64 - problem with installed package postgresql-server-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - problem with installed package libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 - postgresql-server-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - libpq-devel-13.4-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package postgresql-private-devel-13.4-1.module_f35+12619+a275bc38.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering This is apparently a case where the user just has to pick one or the other: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/postgresql/blob/f35/f/postgresql.spec#_215 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Error: Problem: problem with installed package watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 - watchman-2021.04.26.00-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides libfolly.so.2021.04.12.00()(64bit) needed by watchman-2021.04.12.00-1.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 10:13 PM wrote: > El mar, 07-09-2021 a las 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý escribió: > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > > > Transaction Summary > > > Install 107 Packages > Upgrade 3805 Packages > Remove 13 Packages > Downgrade 32 Packages > > Total download size: 4.9 G > Is this ok [y/N]: > > > thx dev TEAM for make FEDORA better. as always GOOD WORK > > > -- > Héctor Louzao ->@hhlp > He / His / Him > Fedora Project Contributor > TZ=Europe/Madrid > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhlp > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > -- *Chedi Toueiti* * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff. ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right. *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me and brings me back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
El mar, 07-09-2021 a las 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý escribió: > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync Transaction Summary === = Install 107 Packages Upgrade 3805 Packages Remove 13 Packages Downgrade 32 Packages Total download size: 4.9 G Is this ok [y/N]: thx dev TEAM for make FEDORA better. as always GOOD WORK -- Héctor Louzao ->@hhlp He / His / Him Fedora Project Contributor TZ=Europe/Madrid https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Hhlp ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > sudo dnf module reset '*' > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync System 1 (Fedora 34 x86_64 server) System 2 (Fedora 34 / headless Raspberry Pi 3 / aarch64 ) System 3 (Fedora 34 x86_64 workstation) Clean upgrades, yay! System 4 (Fedora 34 x86_64 server) Error: Problem: package php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.5-6.fc34.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.5-6.fc34.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - php-common-7.4.23-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-pecl-apcu-bc-1.0.5-6.fc34.x86_64 System 5 (Fedora 34 x86_64 workstation w/ a lot of i686 libs) System 6 (Fedora 34 workstation laptop w/no i686 stuff) Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 - 0ad-0.0.25-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides 0ad-data = 0.0.24b needed by 0ad-0.0.24b-3.fc35.x86_64 Problem 2: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gr-funcube-1.0.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - problem with installed package gr-funcube-1.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64 - lpcnetfreedv-0.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gr-funcube-1.0.0-1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository System 7 (Special Snowflake Fedora 33 server) This one is really bad, with pretty much anything relying on PHP breaking. (Problem 1 is a local site package that just needs rebuilding for F35's perl stuff) Problem 2: package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 Problem 3: package dokuwiki-20200729-4.fc35.noarch requires php-json, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10~RC1-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - problem with installed package dokuwiki-20200729-2.fc33.noarch - package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 requires php-common(x86-64) = 7.4.23-1.fc33, but none of the providers can be installed - php-json-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - dokuwiki-20200729-2.fc33.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-imap-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 Problem 4: package php-pecl-xmlrpc-1.0.0~rc2-3.fc35.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20200930-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-pecl-xmlrpc-1.0.0~rc2-3.fc35.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20200930-64, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10~RC1-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - cannot install both php-common-8.0.10-1.fc35.x86_64 and php-common-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-horde-horde-lz4-1.0.10-16.fc33.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package php-xmlrpc-7.4.23-1.fc33.x86_64 - package
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Miroslav Suchý writes: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync All good over here :) Thanks everyone who worked on F35! Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Testing went fine in Virtualbox Updated a Fedora 34 Respin Image to the Fedora 35 from today and it went fine, but took its while as it was a 1,7GB download and 3443 package updates On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 9:53 PM Rex Dieter wrote: > Should be fixed with > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtbase/c/70d501d41e08f3f2b18d54367d46c0be81afc73f > > On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:13 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz > wrote: > >> On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: >> > [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 >> > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing >> > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync >> > Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. >> > Error: >> > Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires >> > qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be >> > installed >> >- qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade >> > repository >> >- problem with installed package >> qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 >> > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) >> > >> > >> > Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: >> >> From qt5-qtbase changelog it looks like this package was disabled due >> to Firebird FTBFS on s390x which was later fixed. >> >> So probably qt5-qtbase maintainers (Cc-ed) need to enable it back. >> >> ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Should be fixed with https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/qt5-qtbase/c/70d501d41e08f3f2b18d54367d46c0be81afc73f On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:13 PM Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > > [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 > > --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing > > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. > > Error: > > Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires > > qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be > > installed > >- qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > > repository > >- problem with installed package > qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > > > > Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: > > From qt5-qtbase changelog it looks like this package was disabled due > to Firebird FTBFS on s390x which was later fixed. > > So probably qt5-qtbase maintainers (Cc-ed) need to enable it back. > > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Hi! Everythings seems to be ok. Regards. Le 2021-09-07 18:14, Miroslav Suchý a écrit : Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 6:14 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. I guess I'm lucky, I didn't get any error except a couple of COPR in need of an update. Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 11:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: Heck yeah! Sign me up! > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. Install 89 Packages Upgrade3833 Packages Remove6 Packages Downgrade22 Packages Total download size: 4.1 G Is this ok [y/N]: n Operation aborted. LGTM! Ohhh yeah!! Joe -- Joe Doss j...@solidadmin.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 2:24 PM Steven A. Falco wrote: > I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the > version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus > codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64. > I'll take a look when I have a second, I thought I had already rebuilt gnuradio... Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
I get errors mentioning gnuradio and codec2, probably as a result of the version change in codec2; i.e., codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 versus codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64. Full report below. Steve # dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Fedora 35 - x86_64 9.8 MB/s | 78 MB 00:07 Fedora 35 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_645.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 2.8 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:01 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates490 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Updates427 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 4.9 MB/s | 6.5 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 656 kB/s | 1.3 MB 00:02 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free 1.2 MB/s | 946 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free - Updates 4.1 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree 508 kB/s | 243 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree - Updates2.1 kB/s | 1.2 kB 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates Archive194 B/s | 531 B 00:02 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnuradio-3.9.0.0-5.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: package gnuradio-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.0.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both codec2-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 and codec2-0.9.2-7.fc34.x86_64 - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-analog.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-audio.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-blocks.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-channels.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-digital.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fec.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-fft.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-filter.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-network.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-pmt.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-qtgui.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-runtime.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-soapy.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-trellis.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-uhd.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-video-sdl.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-vocoder.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-wavelet.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires libgnuradio-zeromq.so.3.9.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnuradio-devel-3.9.2.0-5.fc35.x86_64 requires gnuradio(x86-64) = 3.9.2.0-5.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed - package codec2-devel-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 requires libcodec2.so.1.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package codec2-devel-1.0.0-1.fc35.2.x86_64 requires codec2(x86-64) =
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 9/7/21 1:57 PM, Digimer wrote: Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 3: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) The python3-google-api-core fixes are pushed to testing[0] and are waiting for stable. [0] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-942a234915 -- Major Hayden OpenPGP_0x737051E0C1011FB1.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 07.09.2021 20:47, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. Error: Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: From qt5-qtbase changelog it looks like this package was disabled due to Firebird FTBFS on s390x which was later fixed. So probably qt5-qtbase maintainers (Cc-ed) need to enable it back. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 2021-09-07 12:14 p.m., Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. 0 root@gravitar:/home/digimer# dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync AnyDesk Fedora - stable 2.1 kB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 13 MB/s | 78 MB 00:06 Fedora 35 - Source 3.0 MB/s | 7.3 MB 00:02 Fedora 35 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_6 3.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 3.8 MB/s | 3.3 MB 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Updates 170 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora 35 - Updates Source 280 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Updates 460 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 35 - x86_64 - Test Updates 6.6 MB/s | 6.5 MB 00:00 Fedora Modular 35 - x86_64 - Test Updat 859 kB/s | 1.3 MB 00:01 google-chrome 2.6 kB/s | 3.5 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free 1.5 MB/s | 946 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free tainted 8.9 kB/s | 6.1 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Free - Updat 6.0 kB/s | 1.8 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree 513 kB/s | 243 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree tain 14 kB/s | 4.2 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 35 - Nonfree - Up 3.7 kB/s | 1.2 kB 00:00 Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - python3-opencensus-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 2: package gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-40.fc34.x86_64 requires libx264.so.161()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - x264-libs-0.161-6.20210412git55d517b.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-40.fc34.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-azure-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch Problem 4: problem with installed package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch - package python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch requires (python3.10dist(opencensus) < 1 with python3.10dist(opencensus) >= 0.7.13), but none of the providers can be installed - python3-opencensus-ext-threading-0.7.13-1.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.10dist(google-api-core) < 2 with python3.10dist(google-api-core) >= 1) needed by python3-opencensus-0.7.13-3.fc35.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Digimer Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/ "I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 07.09.2021 18:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync [root@puchatek hrw]# LANGUAGE=C LC_ALL=C LANG=C dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:28:08 ago on Tue Sep 7 20:16:12 2021. Error: Problem: package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2-16.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package qt5-qtbase-ibase-5.15.2-16.fc34.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Removed "qt5-qtbase-ibase" package and distrosync command went fine: Install 118 Packages Upgrade4434 Packages Remove3 Packages Downgrade14 Packages Total download size: 4.3 G Is this ok [y/N]: ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
On 7/9/21 13:14, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync I think I proposed this during the last round of updates, can we add "--assumeno" to this command line, to avoid potential unintended updates? This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# No problems detected here Install 69 Packages Upgrade 2765 Packages Remove 6 Packages Downgrade 18 Packages Total download size: 3.6 G Operation aborted. Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 LGTM :) Install 22 Packages Upgrade 427 Packages Remove 3 Packages Total download size: 451 M Is this ok [y/N]: On Tue, 2021-09-07 at 18:14 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEumC8IPN+WURNbSUAE2VyCRPS8i0FAmE3qMQACgkQE2VyCRPS 8i3nXRAAhjup1xIRh1nESbMWpOxKq3iMkLOaoThllr6DAZcZlRy0pAgcgZSh5S1I bUWc3z9h9fIZgiSLLormSphezaO9YScWQVUgpA6OtMKdE89VGxV+t+Qbly7JBdpQ CE3zih2AsD2OhVVWuhLc//U1LL4nc57bY7FWnZuun0ynQ0LJI6qdR++wjvNSNczz +Huo7fdYLaijtmnJtOBU5RrUs/iDIP0Ph0iOI4upMyRTGmMESd8DflZ0wVTMsMam DBW0fgRIQFC32SlZsJmdVr2TZVkNuK0bK5YkS7x5eE1S6ClZsVApvWtd7IpuLx0G nzGb8BMx44/H/vJGjbggOLKBAdf0c3Z6DaJ+USrMPPfK5IlUDflF3CsECm+vk2ne XITZLwf8fCzkJkQWo4Bcu3M/pmt6igiNkKdsf+zGRUk2uMux/D4jEjujeB0U2Ki9 yP2Xj3tYBO1+d1roC24gJiWaVFrRbWSAKTb6xb0bs8nLCQDSYHxRKDfRt8eE9F7D v4V1dTosuA1h44BtxxPN6yRv5x7IQwrGwwKmLljVgP3h7PVBK1A6nVSz7aghvbyG Q6NxFqAkPeNs9Deq/xgWr9SCpYD4Zv/X7oVJsF2+QH1zd2rRu4mXa40XMR/J6xKy sal1WSzVssi9cHmvzE05cl+iSzsY9QuRWiemUjhqxeseexUOIn0= =rL+v -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Problem 1: package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch requires mvn(org.ow2.asm:asm-all), but none of the providers can be installed - objectweb-asm-8.0.1-2.fc34.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package arduino-core-1:1.8.13-5.fc34.noarch Problem 2: package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 requires dhcp-relay = 12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34, but none of the providers can be installed - dhcp-relay-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package dhcp-compat-12:4.4.2-11.b1.fc34.x86_64 Arduino was orphaned and then retired due to lack of maintainer. Looking at dhcp's pagure repo, the dhcp-compat subpackage was dropped recently. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Hey! Started helping out with this now during this evening On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 6:15 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ > > --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > If you get this prompt: > > ... > Total download size: XXX M > Is this ok [y/N]: > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please > report it against the appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# > > Thank you > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F34 to F35
Do you want to make Fedora 35 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' sudo dnf --releasever=35 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f35 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular \ distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. If you get this prompt: ... Total download size: XXX M Is this ok [y/N]: you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the actual upgrade. But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 35. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F35FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=1927313_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12125305# Thank you Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
