Re: Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

2024-02-16 Thread Petr Pisar 
V Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:11:38PM +0100, Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> If locally run mock is expected to mimich Koji as much as possible, it should
> change fedora-40*.cfg to use dnf5.
> 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2264535

-- Petr



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

2024-02-16 Thread Petr Pisar 
V Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 12:09:27PM +0100, Ralf Corsépius napsal(a):
> Am 16.02.24 um 12:00 schrieb Ralf Corsépius:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along
> > 
> > /etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg
> > and
> > /etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg
> > 
> > Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager']
> > 
> > fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl
> > which sets
> > config_opts['package_manager']=dnf
> > 
> > This is unlike fedora-rawhide-*.cfg which sets
> > config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5
> > 
> > I.e. all fc40 packages having been built before fedora-40*.cfgs were
> > introduced, were using "dnf", while packages being built from now on
> > will be using "dnf"
> 
> Typo: This was meant to be
> "... were using "dnf5", ... will be using "dnf".
> 
> > Shouldn't fedora-40*.cfgs set config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5 ?
> > 
Good catch. F40 packages are suppossed to be built with dnf5
.

I believe Koji uses mock configs from Koji build tag configuration instead
those provided by mock-core-configs.

If locally run mock is expected to mimich Koji as much as possible, it should
change fedora-40*.cfg to use dnf5.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

2024-02-16 Thread Ralf Corsépius 

Am 16.02.24 um 12:00 schrieb Ralf Corsépius:

Hi,

today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along

/etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg
and
/etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg

Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager']

fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl
which sets
config_opts['package_manager']=dnf

This is unlike fedora-rawhide-*.cfg which sets
config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5

I.e. all fc40 packages having been built before fedora-40*.cfgs were 
introduced, were using "dnf", while packages being built from now on 
will be using "dnf"


Typo: This was meant to be
"... were using "dnf5", ... will be using "dnf".


Shouldn't fedora-40*.cfgs set config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5 ?

Ralf

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Doubts on /etc/mock/fedora-40-*.cfg

2024-02-16 Thread Ralf Corsépius 

Hi,

today, mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39.noarch landed, bringing along

/etc/mock/fedora-40-x86_64.cfg
and
/etc/mock/fedora-40-i386.cfg

Now, I'm wondering about config_opts['package_manager']

fedora-40-*.cfg includes templates/fedora-branched.tpl
which sets
config_opts['package_manager']=dnf

This is unlike fedora-rawhide-*.cfg which sets
config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5

I.e. all fc40 packages having been built before fedora-40*.cfgs were 
introduced, were using "dnf", while packages being built from now on 
will be using "dnf"


Shouldn't fedora-40*.cfgs set config_opts['package_manager']=dnf5 ?

Ralf
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue