EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? -Ilyes -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:23 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there, Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale, shipped as part of the future Fedora releases? It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it, but merely packaging it as a first step. Any thoughts? Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. So? You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. Sure. I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Well assuming no legal issues anyone can package it and submit it for review ... I do know that SLES and RH releases are being worked on. It should also become available for Scientific Linux too at some point. So? You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
Ilyes Gouta wrote: I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts? Björn Persson signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200
Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote:
Ilyes Gouta wrote:
I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
According to PathScale's license document their products are partly
free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free
parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts?
Björn Persson
http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement
June 13th, 2011
PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now
available as an open source project and free download for Linux,
FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the
complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler,
runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of
ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest
performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers.
The sources seem to be available at
https://github.com/path64
The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the
compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the
build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was
on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to
build.
--
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org
# Git snapshot version
%global gitver 20326a5
# Version of system GCC
%global gccver 4.6
Name: path64-compiler
Version: 4.0.10
Release: 1.%{gitver}git%{?dist}
Summary: PathScale EKOPath compiler suite
Group: Development/Languages
License: GPLv3
URL: http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath-compiler-suite
# Tarball got from https://github.com/path64/compiler/tarball/4.0.10
# it is automatically generated, so checksums might not match
Source0: path64-compiler-%{version}-0-g%{gitver}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 %{ix86}
BuildRequires: cmake
BuildRequires: gcc-gfortran
BuildRequires: glibc-static%{?_isa}
%description
The PathScale® EKOPath Compiler Suite offers programmers a rich set of tools
and one of the world's most sophisticated optimization infrastructures to
maximize program performance on any Intel® 64 or AMD64 platform supporting
Intel® MMXâ¢, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AMD SSE4A and AVX.
* Intel® 64 AMD64 performance tuned
* ISO C99/C++ 2003 GNU compatible
* Fortran 90/95 and 2003
* Industry proven robustness and quality
%prep
%setup -q -n %{name}-%{gitver}
%build
mkdir objdir-%{_target_platform}
cd objdir-%{_target_platform}
gccdir=`echo %{_target_platform} | sed 's|-gnu||g'`
gccdir=/usr/lib/gcc/$gccdir/%{gccver}
%ifarch x86_64
export plat=x86_64
%else
export plat=x86_32
%endif
# The build will use the compiled compiler. Need to remove GNU specific flags from OPTFLAGS
#export CFLAGS=`echo %{optflags} | sed s|-fstack-protector||g;s|--param=ssp-buffer-size=4||g;s|-mtune=generic||g`
export CFLAGS=-Wall
export CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS
export FFLAGS=$CFLAGS
%{cmake} \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_TARGETS=${plat} \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_MATHLIBS=ON \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_FORTRAN=ON \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_HUGEPAGES=ON \
-DPATH64_ENABLE_OPENMP=ON \
-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release \
-DPSC_CRT_PATH_${plat}=%{_libdir} \
%ifarch x86_64
-DPSC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_${plat}=/%{_lib}/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 \
%else
-DPSC_DYNAMIC_LINKER_${plat}=/%{_lib}/ld-linux.so.2 \
%endif
-DPSC_CRT_PATH_${plat}=%{_libdir} \
-DPSC_LIBSUPCPP_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBSTDCPP_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBGCC_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBGCC_EH_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
-DPSC_LIBGCC_S_PATH_${plat}=$gccdir \
..
#make %{?_smp_mflags} VERBOSE=1
make VERBOSE=1
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
make -C objdir-%{_target_platform} install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
%clean
rm -rf %{buildroot}
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc
%changelog
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: EKOPath compiler in the next Fedora releases
We should also target and package a clearly stated and defined (features) version of the compiler, that has been tested and validated. -Ilyes On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jussi Lehtola jussileht...@fedoraproject.org wrote: On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200 Björn Persson bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se wrote: Ilyes Gouta wrote: I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora. According to PathScale's license document their products are partly free and partly unfree. You can of course only package the free parts. How useful are they without the unfree parts? Björn Persson http://www.pathscale.com/ekopath4-open-source-announcement June 13th, 2011 PathScale announced today that the EKOPath 4 Compiler Suite is now available as an open source project and free download for Linux, FreeBSD and Solaris. This release includes documentation and the complete development stack, including compiler, debugger, assembler, runtimes and standard libraries. EKOPath is the product of years of ongoing development, representing one of the industries highest performance Intel 64 and AMD C, C++ and Fortran compilers. The sources seem to be available at https://github.com/path64 The compiler part is GPLv3, the debugger is CDDL. I tried to get the compiler packaged for a few hours, but ran into some problems in the build phase; the compiler segfaulted in the bootstrap phase. This was on Fedora 15. My spec file is attached, maybe someone can get it to build. -- Jussi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussileht...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
