Re: FAT and HFS/HFS+ file system resizing restored in parted-3.1

2012-03-14 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Kofler  wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> Brian C. Lane wrote:
>>> I am going to be leaving parted at 3.0 for F17, I don't want to
>>> introduce a large change at this stage.
>>
>> This is really unhelpful, it's going to leave frontends with no way to
>> readd support for the lost functionality for another release.
>>
>> (FYI, I filed an RFE against upstream kde-partitionmanager to get support
>> for this in: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295339 . I might try to
>> come up with a patch if upstream doesn't react soon.)
>>
>> IMHO, we should actually either also upgrade F16 to parted 3.1 or backport
>> the new libparted-fs-resize library.
>
> PS: I also don't see how an added library which Anaconda doesn't even use
> could have any potential for breakage.

It wouldn't but the core parted has new features too and those have
the ability to break things in anaconda, it's not just a new library.

Peter
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: FAT and HFS/HFS+ file system resizing restored in parted-3.1

2012-03-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
I wrote:

> Brian C. Lane wrote:
>> I am going to be leaving parted at 3.0 for F17, I don't want to
>> introduce a large change at this stage.
> 
> This is really unhelpful, it's going to leave frontends with no way to
> readd support for the lost functionality for another release.
> 
> (FYI, I filed an RFE against upstream kde-partitionmanager to get support
> for this in: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295339 . I might try to
> come up with a patch if upstream doesn't react soon.)
> 
> IMHO, we should actually either also upgrade F16 to parted 3.1 or backport
> the new libparted-fs-resize library.

PS: I also don't see how an added library which Anaconda doesn't even use 
could have any potential for breakage.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: FAT and HFS/HFS+ file system resizing restored in parted-3.1

2012-03-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Brian C. Lane wrote:
> I am going to be leaving parted at 3.0 for F17, I don't want to
> introduce a large change at this stage.

This is really unhelpful, it's going to leave frontends with no way to readd 
support for the lost functionality for another release.

(FYI, I filed an RFE against upstream kde-partitionmanager to get support 
for this in: https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=295339 . I might try to 
come up with a patch if upstream doesn't react soon.)

IMHO, we should actually either also upgrade F16 to parted 3.1 or backport 
the new libparted-fs-resize library.

Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: FAT and HFS/HFS+ file system resizing restored in parted-3.1

2012-03-13 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 06:11:49PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> 
> > FYI, I released parted-3.1 yesterday,
> > 
> >http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10790
> > 
> > In addition to pretty many bug fixes,
> > 
> >This is to announce parted-3.1, a bug fix release that also reintroduces
> >a minimal subset of the file system resizing capability that was removed
> >in 3.0.  It adds a new, separate library, libparted-fs-resize, that
> >provides for resizing of FAT and HFS/HFS+ file systems.
> 
> FYI, there is a possible problem resizing certain JHFS+/JHFSX volumes. 
> Currently the code fails if the jhdr_header size is something other than 
> sector size. When volume size is > 1TiB, depending on the version of Apple's 
> Disk Utility used, the jhdr_header size won't be 512 bytes, is instead 4096 
> bytes. Details here:
> 
> http://lists.apple.com/archives/filesystem-dev/2012/Feb/msg1.html

I have rebased master to parted-3.1 and rebuilt pyparted against it. The
new libparted-fs-resize library is included, but there is currently no
user interface for the code.

I am going to be leaving parted at 3.0 for F17, I don't want to
introduce a large change at this stage.

-- 
Brian C. Lane | Anaconda Team | IRC: bcl #anaconda | Port Orchard, WA (PST8PDT)


pgp3kYHIMlYas.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: FAT and HFS/HFS+ file system resizing restored in parted-3.1

2012-03-08 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:27 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:

> FYI, I released parted-3.1 yesterday,
> 
>http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10790
> 
> In addition to pretty many bug fixes,
> 
>This is to announce parted-3.1, a bug fix release that also reintroduces
>a minimal subset of the file system resizing capability that was removed
>in 3.0.  It adds a new, separate library, libparted-fs-resize, that
>provides for resizing of FAT and HFS/HFS+ file systems.

FYI, there is a possible problem resizing certain JHFS+/JHFSX volumes. 
Currently the code fails if the jhdr_header size is something other than sector 
size. When volume size is > 1TiB, depending on the version of Apple's Disk 
Utility used, the jhdr_header size won't be 512 bytes, is instead 4096 bytes. 
Details here:

http://lists.apple.com/archives/filesystem-dev/2012/Feb/msg1.html


Chris Murphy
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

FAT and HFS/HFS+ file system resizing restored in parted-3.1

2012-03-03 Thread Jim Meyering
FYI, I released parted-3.1 yesterday,

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.parted.bugs/10790

In addition to pretty many bug fixes,

This is to announce parted-3.1, a bug fix release that also reintroduces
a minimal subset of the file system resizing capability that was removed
in 3.0.  It adds a new, separate library, libparted-fs-resize, that
provides for resizing of FAT and HFS/HFS+ file systems.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel