Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
Yes, that is the plan. On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:45 PM Björn Persson wrote: > > > ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 > > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 > > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg > > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink > > Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file > verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610): > > The gnupg2 package will keep that name, right? So if we tell packagers > to write "BuildRequires: gnupg2" in their spec files, that dependency > will remain valid forever? > > Björn Persson > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
> ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 > ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 > ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg > ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink Just for clarity, and in the context of the proposed source file verification policy (https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/610): The gnupg2 package will keep that name, right? So if we tell packagers to write "BuildRequires: gnupg2" in their spec files, that dependency will remain valid forever? Björn Persson pgp9JizII5TyK.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 04:30:21PM +0100, Tomas Mraz wrote: > On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:59 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implemen > > tation > > > > == Summary == > > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will > > now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. > > I, as the primary maintainer of the gnupg2 package, welcome this change > and I will cooperate on its implementation if it is acked by FESCo. As the maintainer of gnupg (1) I also agree. This has been proposed by upstream and I've been meaning to slip a rename and symlink into rawhide but just haven't gotten around to it yet. To be clear, gnupg v1.4.x will not be going away, I plan to maintain it for as long as upstream supports it. -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 09:59:26AM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > == Upgrade/compatibility impact == > Users will have to adapt to change that gpg is now called gpg1 if > their usage is not compatible with both 1.x and 2.x. What are the actual incompatibilities? I'm in particular interested about command line uses that will be get broken. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation > > == Summary == > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will > now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. > This is great. This is a change I've been looking forward to for quite some time now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 09:59 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implemen > tation > > == Summary == > The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will > now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. I, as the primary maintainer of the gnupg2 package, welcome this change and I will cooperate on its implementation if it is acked by FESCo. -- Tomáš Mráz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb [You'll know whether the road is wrong if you carefully listen to your conscience.] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation == Summary == The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. == Owner == * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Gnatenko]], [[User:till|Till Maas]], [[User:ngompa|Neal Gompa]] * Email: ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org, opensou...@till.name, ngomp...@gmail.com == Detailed Description == For long time, GnuPG 2 is de-facto standard and it is unfortunate to have /usr/bin/gpg to point to GnuPG 1 given that all major repositories already have it that way. Some of them don't even have GnuPG 1 shipped (RHEL is one example). == Benefit to Fedora == This change will bring Fedora in line with other major distributions, users will get consistent experience between distributions and the naive expectation that "gpg" binary is the latest and greatest implementation of GnuPG. == Scope == * Proposal owners: ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink ** Check and fix if needed existing packages which require /usr/bin/gpg * Other developers: Everything can be handled by change owners. * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7920 #7920] * Policies and guidelines: No changes are needed. * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) == Upgrade/compatibility impact == Users will have to adapt to change that gpg is now called gpg1 if their usage is not compatible with both 1.x and 2.x. == How To Test == Before change is implemented, owners will prepare COPR repository. You will need to enable it and update and ensure that your applications/scripts still work. == User Experience == * /usr/bin/gpg is pointing to latest release of GnuPG 2 which makes consistent user experience between distributions == Dependencies == What can't be adopted to this change will be patched to use gpg1 explicitly, no action is needed from any developers. == Contingency Plan == * Contingency mechanism: Owners will revert changes and postpone change to next release. * Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze. * Blocks release? No * Blocks product? No == Documentation == Both gpg1 and gpg2 have their own documentation shipped with them. -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 30 System-Wide Change Proposal: GnuPG2 as default GPG implementation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnuPG2_as_default_GPG_implementation == Summary == The /usr/bin/gpg path representing the main GPG implementation will now use GnuPG 2 instead of GnuPG 1. == Owner == * Name: [[User:ignatenkobrain|Igor Gnatenko]], [[User:till|Till Maas]], [[User:ngompa|Neal Gompa]] * Email: ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org, opensou...@till.name, ngomp...@gmail.com == Detailed Description == For long time, GnuPG 2 is de-facto standard and it is unfortunate to have /usr/bin/gpg to point to GnuPG 1 given that all major repositories already have it that way. Some of them don't even have GnuPG 1 shipped (RHEL is one example). == Benefit to Fedora == This change will bring Fedora in line with other major distributions, users will get consistent experience between distributions and the naive expectation that "gpg" binary is the latest and greatest implementation of GnuPG. == Scope == * Proposal owners: ** Rename gnupg package to gnupg1 ** Rename gpg binary to gpg1 ** Rename gpg2 binary to gpg ** Create gpg2 → gpg symlink ** Check and fix if needed existing packages which require /usr/bin/gpg * Other developers: Everything can be handled by change owners. * Release engineering: [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7920 #7920] * Policies and guidelines: No changes are needed. * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change) == Upgrade/compatibility impact == Users will have to adapt to change that gpg is now called gpg1 if their usage is not compatible with both 1.x and 2.x. == How To Test == Before change is implemented, owners will prepare COPR repository. You will need to enable it and update and ensure that your applications/scripts still work. == User Experience == * /usr/bin/gpg is pointing to latest release of GnuPG 2 which makes consistent user experience between distributions == Dependencies == What can't be adopted to this change will be patched to use gpg1 explicitly, no action is needed from any developers. == Contingency Plan == * Contingency mechanism: Owners will revert changes and postpone change to next release. * Contingency deadline: Beta Freeze. * Blocks release? No * Blocks product? No == Documentation == Both gpg1 and gpg2 have their own documentation shipped with them. -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
