Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-27 Thread Adam Samalik
 I think it probably makes sense to focus on http://devassistant.org/ and
 https://dapi.devassistant.org/ as the entry points to the Fedora
 developer experience...

Agree. They can start with the interesting part - coding - first.

 ...We may want to pick out particular assistants and
 highlight them (especially if we design the Fedora DA package to come
 with some assistants pre-installed), but I think it makes sense to push
 the comprehensive side of the story further upstream...

Exactly. We would provide information how to get it running on Fedora - like
the current Ruby guide. (They can, of course, use DevAssistant)

 ..., and have
 developers.fedoraproject.org present a more filtered view, just as the
 main Fedora repos represent a filtered view of the upstream software
 repositories.

 My rationale for that is that DA provides an abstraction layer over
 various mundane technical details - if you're using a well-maintained DA
 Assistant to automate setting up a particular kind of project, then your
 own practices can automatically adapt as recommendations change...

Good point. I didn't think about it this way.

...If
 folks want to learn more about the details of a recommendation, they can
 dig into the implementation of the relevant assistant, but if they don't
 want to care, they don't have to.

 The DA folks are also actively working on offering good support for the
 Container Tools workflow coming out of Project Atomic - that's a
 Vagrant+containers based approach designed to be cross-platform for
 development purposes and cross-distro for both development and
 deployment, so adopting it for web service development means folks are
 automatically lowering the barriers to entry to contributing to and
 deploying their project. That workflow also actively encourages folks to
 clearly separate their unit testing from their behavioural testing.

 Given a default assumption that folks are willing to use DevAssistant 
 (either through the GUI or through the CLI), then the following kinds of
 questions could help guide site users to appropriate assistants:

 * I want to build a web application, where do I start? 
 * I want to build a command line application, where do I start?
 * I want to build a desktop GUI application, where do I start?
 * I want to build a mobile application, where do I start?
 * I want to work with the Raspberry Pi, where do I start?
 * I want to work with Arduino devices, where do I start? 
 * I want to work with other embedded devices, where do I start?
 * I want to provide online documentation for my project, where do I start?
 * I want to collaborate effectively with others on my project, where do
 I start?

 That last one wouldn't be a pointer to any DA Assistants, but rather a
 pointer to resources like choosealicence.com, and a review of some of
 the available project hosting options (most notably GitLab, GitHub,
 BitBucket and FedoraHosted)

I really like the point about collaboration and choosing a license. It's
essential and I totally missed it in the initial plan. 

 P.S. A note regarding the Raspberry Pi: I think this is a good example
 of a case where cross-distro development support is important, as we'd
 like to make it easy for folks to develop for the Raspberry Pi on Fedora
 while targeting both the default Raspbian image and the Fedora Pi remix,
 rather than only supporting developing for the latter.

I like the hidden message in this note: We don't want to vendor-lock you
to Fedora. We want you to use it because it helps you, not because
you have to.




- Original Message -
From: Nick Coghlan ncogh...@redhat.com
To: Adam Samalik asama...@redhat.com, Development discussions related to 
Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group mailing list 
env-and-sta...@lists.fedoraproject.org, du...@redhat.com
Sent: Monday, 27 July, 2015 6:41:40 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

On 07/24/2015 07:16 PM, Adam Samalik wrote:
 Hi Nick,
 
 thanks! 
 
 What I'm still missing in the current prototype is the problem to be solved 
 starting point - as you pointed out at the env-and-stacks meeting. For 
 example: I want to develop a web application. The site would give me options 
 like Django, Flask, Ruby on Rails, PHP, Jekyll,... Or even better, something 
 more precise like deciding the type of the web app: an application with 
 backend and database, a static site, blog or a wiki page? The tech-specific 
 overview would show up afterwards. Suitable tools and deployment option would 
 show up as well. What do you think?

I think it probably makes sense to focus on http://devassistant.org/ and
https://dapi.devassistant.org/ as the entry points to the Fedora
developer experience. We may want to pick out particular assistants and
highlight them (especially if we design the Fedora DA package to come
with some assistants pre-installed), but I think it makes sense to push
the comprehensive side of the story

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-24 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 23 Jul 2015 01:17, Adam Samalik asama...@redhat.com wrote:

 Hi everyone,

 I updated the prototype and tried apply your feedback:
https://developer-phracek.rhcloud.com/

Very nice!

 What I would like to do next? Ideally, if you find some time, I would
like to have a session with you, people interested in this project, to
discuss the content, structure and basically everything related to this.
For example, I really like how the Fedora Hubs project [2] is going. If we
could do something similar, even when the Fedora Developer Portal is not
that big, it would be really nice.

I'd be interested in attending a session like that (but would also
understand if having Australia in the time zone mix proved impractical from
the point of view of scheduling a discussion).

Regards,
Nick.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-24 Thread Adam Samalik
Hi Nick,

thanks! 

What I'm still missing in the current prototype is the problem to be solved 
starting point - as you pointed out at the env-and-stacks meeting. For example: 
I want to develop a web application. The site would give me options like 
Django, Flask, Ruby on Rails, PHP, Jekyll,... Or even better, something more 
precise like deciding the type of the web app: an application with backend and 
database, a static site, blog or a wiki page? The tech-specific overview would 
show up afterwards. Suitable tools and deployment option would show up as well. 
What do you think?

About the session vs time zones, I haven't realized that we are literally all 
around the world :-)
Personally, I'm very flexible with timing and willing to do a session at (I 
know I will regret that at 3 AM) any time. It's very important for me to make 
it successful. Or we can do more than one. I will attend both/all of them.

Adam



- Original Message -
From: Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Cc: Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group mailing list 
env-and-sta...@lists.fedoraproject.org, ncogh...@redhat.com, du...@redhat.com
Sent: Friday, 24 July, 2015 10:45:06 AM
Subject: Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept




On 23 Jul 2015 01:17, Adam Samalik  asama...@redhat.com  wrote: 
 
 Hi everyone, 
 
 I updated the prototype and tried apply your feedback: 
 https://developer-phracek.rhcloud.com/ 

Very nice! 

 What I would like to do next? Ideally, if you find some time, I would like to 
 have a session with you, people interested in this project, to discuss the 
 content, structure and basically everything related to this. For example, I 
 really like how the Fedora Hubs project [2] is going. If we could do 
 something similar, even when the Fedora Developer Portal is not that big, it 
 would be really nice. 

I'd be interested in attending a session like that (but would also understand 
if having Australia in the time zone mix proved impractical from the point of 
view of scheduling a discussion). 

Regards, 
Nick. 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-22 Thread Adam Samalik
Hi everyone,

I updated the prototype and tried apply your feedback: 
https://developer-phracek.rhcloud.com/

I removed everything random from the home page and changed it - so it better 
explains the purpose of the portal. The previous version was more about 
previewing the technology and structure in the main menu. The homepage itself 
wasn't that important - sorry again for not making this clear in advance.

We should be now able to use the prototype to:
  - preview the content from our content repo [1] (it's better than reading 
markdown)
  - decide whether this structure is acceptable (and probably change it a lot)
  - and basically have something running

What it's not in the prototype:
  - section with docker images and vagrant boxes to download
  - section with blogs and updates

What I would like to do next? Ideally, if you find some time, I would like to 
have a session with you, people interested in this project, to discuss the 
content, structure and basically everything related to this. For example, I 
really like how the Fedora Hubs project [2] is going. If we could do something 
similar, even when the Fedora Developer Portal is not that big, it would be 
really nice.

If you don't know what this is all about, please visit our project wiki [3] or 
ask me any question.

Adam


[1] https://github.com/developer-portal/content
[2] http://blog.linuxgrrl.com/2015/07/01/fedora-hubs-update/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Developer





- Original Message -
From: Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, 22 July, 2015 3:24:11 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

On 07/21/2015 04:00 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: 



On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely  jwak...@redhat.com  wrote: 


On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote: 


Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to improve 
Fedora for developers. 
Just contents are missing. 

Under The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora 
and ready to use! would it be worth mentioning C and C++? 

GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard, and we ship 
more of the latest C++ standard library extensions than any 
other compiler. 

There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited 
by shiny dynamic languages ;-) 

-- 
devel mailing list 
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel 
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct 

​Personally, I'm a little uncomfortable with the phrasing Fedora is made for 
developers. It implies that we don't do anything to make it great for 
non-developers, which is not true at all. ​Is there a better way we can word 
this? 


As I mentioned in the first mail. This is proof of concept and will be 
definitely changed. 
UX team could look at it and let us know whether is fullfield with 
fedoraproject UX layouts. 
Other pages which could be developed later on could have the same faces so that 
all pages looks the same. 




-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth! 




-- 
Petr Hracek
Software Engineer
Developer Experience
Red Hat, Inc
Mob: +420777056169
email: phra...@redhat.com 

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-22 Thread Petr Hracek

On 07/21/2015 04:00 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com 
mailto:jwak...@redhat.comwrote:


On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:

Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would
like to improve Fedora for developers.
Just contents are missing.


Under The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora
and ready to use! would it be worth mentioning C and C++?

GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard,
and we ship more of the latest C++ standard library extensions
than any
other compiler.

There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited
by shiny dynamic languages ;-)

-- 
devel mailing list

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


​Personally, I'm a little uncomfortable with the phrasing Fedora is 
made for developers. It implies that we don't do anything to make it 
great for non-developers, which is not true at all. ​Is there a better 
way we can word this?



As I mentioned in the first mail. This is *proof of concept* and will be 
definitely changed.
UX team could look at it and let us know whether is fullfield with 
fedoraproject UX layouts.
Other pages which could be developed later on could have the same faces 
so that

all pages looks the same.


--
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!





--
Petr Hracek
Software Engineer
Developer Experience
Red Hat, Inc
Mob: +420777056169
email: phra...@redhat.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Adam Samalik
Thank you all for the feedback!

The site is just a prototype to see how the technology works and to be able to 
preview the content in a better way than reading markdown from the git repo.

Fedora is made for developers - To be honest, I wasn't trying to write 
something great, I just added a line of text to fill the space up. The homepage 
itself is very far away from the final state. The main purpose [of the 
currently deployed version] of this prototype is to be able to preview the 
content from git.

There is no C and C++ - Sory guys, again, the homepage is just filled up with 
random stuff. C and C++ will be definitely a part of the content! I promise I 
will use Lorem Ipsum more often to avoid these unpleasant situations :-)

Thanks again for the feedback! Any ideas and more feedback is very very 
welcome! Please feel free to get engaged in any way. Git repos and the project 
wiki are mentioned in Petr's first email. Everything on the current prototype 
might be (and probably will be) changed according to your feedback.

Adam

- Original Message -
From: Josh Boyer jwbo...@fedoraproject.org
To: Máirín Duffy du...@redhat.com
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora 
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group 
mailing list env-and-sta...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Tuesday, 21 July, 2015 4:05:03 PM
Subject: Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@redhat.com wrote:


 On 07/21/2015 09:51 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:

 I'm curious how this is going to be tied into the Fedora Hubs work?
 If it isn't, I'm curious why not :)


 So Fedora Hubs' main audiences are folks who are contributing to Fedora,
 whether they are new or experienced Fedora contributors.

 It's my understanding that the developer.fpo site is more focused towards:

 - developers who may develop apps for Linux but do not exclusively focus on
 Fedora in terms of as a target for their own applications

 - developers who may want to or do use Fedora, and while they happen to be
 developers but don't actually develop Fedora itself.

 That being said, there is no reason why we couldn't have a hub tied to
 developer.fpo that aggregates info from developer.fpo and provides a social
 space for Fedora contributors who also fit into the developer.fpo audience.

 Hope that makes sense?

Yes, thank you.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Máirín Duffy



On 07/21/2015 10:48 AM, Adam Samalik wrote:

There is no C and C++ - Sory guys, again, the homepage is just filled up with 
random stuff. C and C++ will be definitely a part of the content! I promise I will use 
Lorem Ipsum more often to avoid these unpleasant situations :-)


I don't know if this content is similarly random then, but with the 
aforementioned target audiences in mind, I'm not sure what's up with the 
Fedora.next section (far right on the nav bar) and the content under 
that. I'm not sure of the context in which the target audience devs 
would need this info?


Another suggestion - I think the language-specific documentation was a 
core and valuable feature in the proposal but it's a bit hidden in this 
design. Under the runtimes/frameworks section on the front, maybe add a 
button for each one More info for $LANG/FRAMEWORK developers that 
would drive users to those lang/framework-specific pages (similar to how 
you did 'learn more' for the tools.) Having these accessible only from a 
drop-down menu obscures them a lot unfortunately.


I think the main thing the site is missing is a narrative for how/why 
you'd want to use it. I know you don't have final content, but I think 
users are really going to need more guidance to understand how/why 
they're going to use the site. I think a good next step is developing 
that narrative.


You might also get more helpful / useful feedback by reposting part of 
the proposal on the wiki here on list so folks can get more of an idea 
of the background / context around the site. It was in your footnotes 
but not everybody reads all of those :)


~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Petr Stodulka



On 21.7.2015 16:04, Josh Boyer wrote:
The site is specifically targeted at developers. The URL will likely 
be something like developers.fedoraproject.org. This isn't a generic, 
front-page site. Given the targeted nature of it, I think it's 
perfectly fine to say Fedora is built for developers. I mean, you 
wouldn't want a developer coming to this page and seeing Fedora is 
built for everyone and then a bunch of text explaining that. josh 

Agree
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Petr Hracek phra...@redhat.com wrote:
 Hi Fedora devels and other folks,

 Adam Samalik and me we create a first proof of concept Fedora Developer
 Portal.
 Testing instance is already available here [1].

 Fedora Developer Portal is a new place for developers and not only for them,
 providing information about tools, projects, technologies
 and other features that are packaged in Fedora.

 This page would be mainly used for developers building on Fedora and help
 them with tools.
 But of course other users can use main technologies developed on Fedora.
 It is plan to have reference to this portal from [2].

 What is possible structure of Fedora Developer Portal is on [3] page under
 section 'Structure'.

 If anyone is interested with helping us to create this portal please clone
 repository [4]
 and provide any contents.
 We will review it together with other colleagues and add it to this Page.

 UX design is going to be discussed and reviewed by Mairin. Thanks for your
 help.

I'm curious how this is going to be tied into the Fedora Hubs work?
If it isn't, I'm curious why not :)

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Jonathan Wakely

On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to 
improve Fedora for developers.

Just contents are missing.


Under The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora
and ready to use! would it be worth mentioning C and C++?

GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard, and 
we ship more of the latest C++ standard library extensions than any

other compiler.

There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited
by shiny dynamic languages ;-)

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:

 On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:

 Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to
 improve Fedora for developers.
 Just contents are missing.


 Under The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora
 and ready to use! would it be worth mentioning C and C++?

 GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard, and we
 ship more of the latest C++ standard library extensions than any
 other compiler.

 There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited
 by shiny dynamic languages ;-)

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


​Personally, I'm a little uncomfortable with the phrasing Fedora is made
for developers. It implies that we don't do anything to make it great for
non-developers, which is not true at all. ​Is there a better way we can
word this?


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Máirín Duffy

(resending with my fpo email; my rht email isn't sub'ed to devel@)

On 07/21/2015 09:51 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:

I'm curious how this is going to be tied into the Fedora Hubs work?
If it isn't, I'm curious why not :)


So Fedora Hubs' main audiences are folks who are contributing to Fedora, 
whether they are new or experienced Fedora contributors.


It's my understanding that the developer.fpo site is more focused towards:

- developers who may develop apps for Linux but do not exclusively focus 
on Fedora in terms of as a target for their own applications


- developers who may want to or do use Fedora, and while they happen to 
be developers but don't actually develop Fedora itself.


That being said, there is no reason why we couldn't have a hub tied to 
developer.fpo that aggregates info from developer.fpo and provides a 
social space for Fedora contributors who also fit into the developer.fpo 
audience.


Hope that makes sense?

~m
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Máirín Duffy du...@redhat.com wrote:


 On 07/21/2015 09:51 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:

 I'm curious how this is going to be tied into the Fedora Hubs work?
 If it isn't, I'm curious why not :)


 So Fedora Hubs' main audiences are folks who are contributing to Fedora,
 whether they are new or experienced Fedora contributors.

 It's my understanding that the developer.fpo site is more focused towards:

 - developers who may develop apps for Linux but do not exclusively focus on
 Fedora in terms of as a target for their own applications

 - developers who may want to or do use Fedora, and while they happen to be
 developers but don't actually develop Fedora itself.

 That being said, there is no reason why we couldn't have a hub tied to
 developer.fpo that aggregates info from developer.fpo and provides a social
 space for Fedora contributors who also fit into the developer.fpo audience.

 Hope that makes sense?

Yes, thank you.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Josh Boyer
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Neal Gompa ngomp...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:

 On 21/07/15 15:45 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:

 Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to
 improve Fedora for developers.
 Just contents are missing.


 Under The latest stable runtimes and frameworks Packaged in Fedora
 and ready to use! would it be worth mentioning C and C++?

 GCC 5 is the first compiler to default to the latest C11 standard, and we
 ship more of the latest C++ standard library extensions than any
 other compiler.

 There's a lot happening in that space, and not everyone gets excited
 by shiny dynamic languages ;-)

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct


 Personally, I'm a little uncomfortable with the phrasing Fedora is made for
 developers. It implies that we don't do anything to make it great for
 non-developers, which is not true at all. Is there a better way we can word
 this?

The site is specifically targeted at developers.  The URL will likely
be something like developers.fedoraproject.org.  This isn't a generic,
front-page site.  Given the targeted nature of it, I think it's
perfectly fine to say Fedora is built for developers.  I mean, you
wouldn't want a developer coming to this page and seeing Fedora is
built for everyone and then a bunch of text explaining that.

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Fedora developer portal - proof of concept

2015-07-21 Thread Petr Hracek

Hi Fedora devels and other folks,

Adam Samalik and me we create a first proof of concept Fedora Developer 
Portal.

Testing instance is already available here [1].
*
**Fedora Developer Portal* is a new place for developers and not only 
for them, providing information about tools, projects, technologies

and other features that are packaged in Fedora.

This page would be mainly used for developers building on Fedora and 
help them with tools.

But of course other users can use main technologies developed on Fedora.
It is plan to have reference to this portal from [2].

What is possible structure of Fedora Developer Portal is on [3] page 
under section *'Structure'.


*If anyone is interested with helping us to create this portal please 
clone repository [4]

and provide any contents.
We will review it together with other colleagues and add it to this Page.

UX design is going to be discussed and reviewed by Mairin. Thanks for 
your help.


Some discussion about this portal is on EnvStack mailing list.

What Fedora developer portal should cover at all is here [3] and can be 
extended of course.

GitHub repository for content is [4].
GitHub repository for website is [5].

Feel free to send us any comment or improvements. We would like to 
improve Fedora for developers.

Just contents are missing.

[1] https://developer-phracek.rhcloud.com/
[2] https://getfedora.org/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Developer
[4] https://github.com/developer-portal/content
[5] https://github.com/developer-portal/website

--
Petr Hracek
Software Engineer
Developer Experience
Red Hat, Inc
Mob: +420777056169
email: phra...@redhat.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct