Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. Sigh. Spoke too soon. Hang resurfaced. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877461 It still worth the update, IMHO. The 2.20.16 is just way better than the 2.20.10. As the gdm crash is still there, despite the 2.20.16 being the latest release, it might make sense to report the bug (with all the relevant information) directly on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ -Ilyes tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
hi ilyes, please tell me the installation folder. rpmbuilder looking root/rpm../SOURCE . but my all file under my account. fed On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. Sigh. Spoke too soon. Hang resurfaced. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877461 It still worth the update, IMHO. The 2.20.16 is just way better than the 2.20.10. As the gdm crash is still there, despite the 2.20.16 being the latest release, it might make sense to report the bug (with all the relevant information) directly on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ -Ilyes tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
unfortunatly rpmbuilder also giving error. git download intel-gpu-tools-20121217. etc. bz2 version but spec file lookin .20121219 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. Sigh. Spoke too soon. Hang resurfaced. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877461 It still worth the update, IMHO. The 2.20.16 is just way better than the 2.20.10. As the gdm crash is still there, despite the 2.20.16 being the latest release, it might make sense to report the bug (with all the relevant information) directly on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ -Ilyes tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. Sigh. Spoke too soon. Hang resurfaced. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877461 It still worth the update, IMHO. The 2.20.16 is just way better than the 2.20.10. As the gdm crash is still there, despite the 2.20.16 being the latest release, it might make sense to report the bug (with all the relevant information) directly on https://bugs.freedesktop.org/ -Ilyes I agree. System actually is running much better with the update to 2.20.16: The entire system feels snappier. I've updated my grab the error state script to also grab /var/log/Xorg.0.log and the gdm logs. When I capture these again, I'll report upstream tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. This is a bit much. The upstream announce email went out at 5AM (my time, 2AM Pacific), by to my reckoning: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2012-December/023371.html And your followup here is timestamped 6:23AM my time. I apologize for not reading fedora-devel on weekends, particularly before sunrise, but I'm not going to lose much sleep over it (if you'll pardon the expression). I'll submit an update today. Thanks for testing! - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/17/2012 09:56 AM, Ebru Arslan wrote: unfortunatly rpmbuilder also giving error. git download intel-gpu-tools-20121217. etc. bz2 version but spec file lookin .20121219 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 11:20 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com mailto:ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com mailto:seli...@gmail.com wrote: please stop top posting and HTML posting as well. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines?rd=Communicate/MailingListGuidelines#No_HTML_Mail.2C_Please https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines?rd=Communicate/MailingListGuidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message Thanks. - -- Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de mru...@fedoraproject.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz1+pAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWzGkH/RbCiaaiZiftS1g83Ho1UZoF iorBu3aqmfo4ezzb1xhyvWIJyf8JkPNKCp5b+RB+9krpgEUEox/Wi5nwvJ5r1YyV r6OWr7qWRyuUd+ba0JG1xJ0lWiHZ3FvxkJ0qJlAb2JGgLKRVT9NVHH/H+KWXZ+ux CQ4oppFYVNADGnnkgayIvcr9PVh3EV4E1YaaCvdCyjdJi01rGyE8QvEaubIPqm5Z /6N/mMYEWcF5INAiGHtDhj4mXembnsCdqUvlgg0q/9ntGp6nRE0VF7p1tv7PQoSA WMIGL0ZXnSBbjwY3k9McjdzWBZnBvFUfGWzK9qpXI98uSBEEbqryzSPTpNaASa0= =x8ib -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 06:30 -0800, Tom London wrote: The entire system feels snappier. FWIW, years of experience with forums, crappy review sites and Phoronix forums have taught me to automatically ignore absolutely any comment which includes this form of words. It is, in 99.99% of cases, entirely meaningless. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
Hi, Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote: I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel driver. i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i make ./configure but i already updated Fedora 14 . When I want update packages I do custom rpms, and recently use mock (*) to build the packages. #cd fedora-scm/ #git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git #cd xorg-x11-drv-intel/ edit xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec change version to Version: 2.20.16 fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-x86_64 (or fedora-14-x86_64) fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-i386 (or fedora-14-i386) and finally rpm -Uvh the build rpms if not have mock and fedpkg in F14 you could try rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ... (*) my notes to use mock http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the 2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote: I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel driver. i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i make ./configure but i already updated Fedora 14 . When I want update packages I do custom rpms, and recently use mock (*) to build the packages. #cd fedora-scm/ #git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git #cd xorg-x11-drv-intel/ edit xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec change version to Version: 2.20.16 fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-x86_64 (or fedora-14-x86_64) fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-i386 (or fedora-14-i386) and finally rpm -Uvh the build rpms if not have mock and fedpkg in F14 you could try rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ... (*) my notes to use mock http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the 2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote: I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel driver. i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i make ./configure but i already updated Fedora 14 . When I want update packages I do custom rpms, and recently use mock (*) to build the packages. #cd fedora-scm/ #git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git #cd xorg-x11-drv-intel/ edit xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec change version to Version: 2.20.16 fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-x86_64 (or fedora-14-x86_64) fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-i386 (or fedora-14-i386) and finally rpm -Uvh the build rpms if not have mock and fedpkg in F14 you could try rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ... (*) my notes to use mock http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sérgio M. B. -- I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Tom London seli...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the 2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45. -Ilyes On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:28 AM, Sérgio Basto ser...@serjux.com wrote: On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote: I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel driver. i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i make ./configure but i already updated Fedora 14 . When I want update packages I do custom rpms, and recently use mock (*) to build the packages. #cd fedora-scm/ #git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git #cd xorg-x11-drv-intel/ edit xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec change version to Version: 2.20.16 fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-x86_64 (or fedora-14-x86_64) fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-i386 (or fedora-14-i386) and finally rpm -Uvh the build rpms if not have mock and fedpkg in F14 you could try rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ... (*) my notes to use mock http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sérgio M. B. -- I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in. System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate the hang/crash. Sigh. Spoke too soon. Hang resurfaced. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877461 tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. -Ilyes -- Forwarded message -- From: Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk Date: Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM Subject: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 To: xorg-annou...@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org, x...@lists.freedesktop.org Rejoice! We have found a trick to make 830gm/845g stable at long last. Ever since the switch to GEM and dynamic video memory, those early second generation chipsets have been plagued by instability. The lack of flushing cachelines from the CPU to GMCH was eventually solved by using an undocmented bit, but 830/845 were still hanging under memory pressure. These deaths were all due to garbage finding its way into the command streamer, and they go away if we take a leaf out of the original driver and never reuse those pages for anything else. So for the first time ever, I have been able to complete running the test suite on an 845g, even whilst thrashing the page and buffer caches! -Chris * Run the SF stage as single-threaded on gen4 to workaround a few issues https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57410 * Keep the scanout SURFACE_STATE separate to avoid overriding its memory access control on gen6/7 (i.e. writes to the scanout need to be kept out of the render cache) * Tune batch flushing after an operation to an exported surface under a compositor. * Make sure the source is on the CPU for inplace composition of trapezoids using the CPU https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56825 * Immediately flush in the block hander after a split batch to reduce latency between the two halves of an operation. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51718 * Install a fallback config if we fail to install the desired config at VT switch (i.e. booting, after resume with 3 incompatible pipes on Ivybridge) * Pin batches to avoid CS incoherence on 830/845 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26345 Chris Wilson (53): sna: Tidy addition of fake GTF modes for panels sna/gen4: Avoid emitting URB_FENCE across a cache-line sna/gen4: Remove unused CC viewport sna/gen4: Special case solids through the general vertex emitter sna/gen4: Workaround render corruption with multiple SF threads sna/gen6+: Cache the scanout targets separately to avoid override PTE caching sna: Assume that future hardware only gets more flexible sna: Don't disable CPU bo if supported on unknown hw Refactor the common probe methods for scrn construction sna/gen4+: Add common glyph-to-dst emitters Fix compilation of UMS probe following 13f47008ec Remove the default log message sna: Mark proxies as dirty on first relocation sna: Only flush at the low apeture watermark if idle sna: Only flush before adding fresh surfaces to the batch sna: Only inspect the target ring for busyness sna: Convert the ring from BLT/3D to the internal index for kgem_ring_is_idle() sna: Flush upon change of target if GPU is idle sna: Replace remaining kgem_is_idle() with kgem_ring_is_idle() sna/gen4+: Refine test for preferring GPU spans sna: Move source to CPU prior to referencing for inplace trapezoids sna/sprite: Add a DBG to report whether the kernel supports sprites sna: Immediately flush a split batch sna: Compromise and only flush a split batch if writing to scanout sna: Avoid reusing the same 'busy' bit for two different meanings. sna: Try installing a fallback config on VT enter in case full desiredMode fails sna/dri: Only special case 'divisor msc-passed' for immediate flipping sna/dri: Disable name exchanges for SwapBuffers sna/dri: Query current msc before use sna/dri: Fix handling of current_msc target_msc sna/gen4: Use the single-threaded SF w/a for spans as well sna/gen3+: Use nearest for unscaled videos sna/gen2: STIPPLE requires an argument sna: Pin some batches to avoid CS incoherence on 830/845 sna: Fix the error path in kgem_init_pinned_batches() to use the right iter sna: Improve the initialisation failure path for pinned batches sna: Only flush the batch after an actual relocation sna: Fix typo for 830/845 gen sna: Fix up BLT overwrite detection to use target_handle sna/gen2: Align surface sizes to an even tile sna/gen2: Program solid mask using the DIFFUSE component sna/gen3: Remove incorrect optimisation of an opaque source for CA sna/gen2: Assertions sna/gen2: Initialise channel-is_affine for solid sna/gen2: Reorder reuse_source() to avoid NULL dereference for solids sna/gen3: Remove stray setting of vertex_start sna/gen3: Don't combine primitives if beginning a ca 2-pass
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. This update is an exception, but xorg-x11-drv package updates are usually fairly dull and not worth caring much about these days. I don't think you can use this update as a typical example of an xorg-x11-drv update. I'm sure ajax is considering whether this one is appropriate as an update. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.comwrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. This update is an exception, but xorg-x11-drv package updates are usually fairly dull and not worth caring much about these days. I don't think you can use this update as a typical example of an xorg-x11-drv update. I'm sure ajax is considering whether this one is appropriate as an update. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. This update is an exception, but xorg-x11-drv package updates are usually fairly dull and not worth caring much about these days. I don't think you can use this update as a typical example of an xorg-x11-drv update. I'm sure ajax is considering whether this one is appropriate as an update. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net Believe there are already a few BZs for GPU lockup: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=877461 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=869354 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879823 tom -- Tom London -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel driver. i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i make ./configure but i already updated Fedora 14 . On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fwd: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-video-intel 2.20.16
On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:10 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote: I am using 32 bit Fedora 14 . our platform is Adlink cPCI-3970D and this platform using Intel HD 3000 i915 graphic. I install Base video mode. after that i dont achieve install intel driver. i need installation steps of xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 . libdrm version,X-server version, etc. also create problem when i make ./configure but i already updated Fedora 14 . When I want update packages I do custom rpms, and recently use mock (*) to build the packages. #cd fedora-scm/ #git clone git://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/xorg-x11-drv-intel.git #cd xorg-x11-drv-intel/ edit xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec change version to Version: 2.20.16 fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-x86_64 (or fedora-14-x86_64) fedpkg mockbuild --root fedora-18-i386 (or fedora-14-i386) and finally rpm -Uvh the build rpms if not have mock and fedpkg in F14 you could try rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ... (*) my notes to use mock http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta ilyes.go...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Adam, On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi Adam, On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote: Hi, Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver updates more frequently in Fedora? These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X. It sucks if you use an 830 or 845, sure, but that's not many people any more. Nah, I have a GM45, and this particular update breaks the desktop and video acceleration (overlay) on my machine. Let's just move to the latest xf86-video-intel 2.20.16 update. I'll be filing a bugzilla w/ the GPU lockup report. I'm confused. If this update breaks your system, why would you want us to move to it? No, the 2.20.14 which is in updates-testing isn't stable. From the changelog, the 2.20.16 looks like it has fixes for the issues reported for GM45. -Ilyes -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
