Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
On Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 02:34:05AM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > I am so sorry Kevin, I missed the message for some reason. > > > Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or > > later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact > > method? This might be something we could add to the account system also > > and you could just get it from there? (ie, IRC, Matrix, email, other) > > I agree with you, this would be helpful for both sponsors and newcomer > packagers. As you suggest, ideally, we should have this information in > the accounts system (not defined within the sponsors site). Once the > information is available there is no reason why not to display it :-) > > I created a ticket for it > https://github.com/fedora-infra/noggin/issues/685 > > > There are packager groups... could perhaps look at them and get sponsors > > from them? ie, python-sig, graphics-sig, etc? > > I originally thought so but then I decided to go with custom > configuration files because I checked SIG memberships of some sponsors > that I know and they never were in the SIG for the thing that I know > they are interested in. Taking you for an example, in your config > https://kevin.fedorapeople.org/sponsor.yaml you have the following > interests - command-line, desktop, mobile, python, and epel but you > are not a member of Desktop SIG, Mobility SIG, and Python SIG. Well, does 'desktop' mean 'gnome-sig' there? Or all desktops? And there's no mobility sig group that I am aware of. So, yeah, it's murky. > But I guess we could take the SIG memberships and use them as one of > the sources of configuration (in complement to what we already have). > Does this sound reasonable to you? Possibly, but mapping them could be difficult, so perhaps just better to let people self tag. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
I am so sorry Kevin, I missed the message for some reason. > Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or > later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact > method? This might be something we could add to the account system also > and you could just get it from there? (ie, IRC, Matrix, email, other) I agree with you, this would be helpful for both sponsors and newcomer packagers. As you suggest, ideally, we should have this information in the accounts system (not defined within the sponsors site). Once the information is available there is no reason why not to display it :-) I created a ticket for it https://github.com/fedora-infra/noggin/issues/685 > There are packager groups... could perhaps look at them and get sponsors > from them? ie, python-sig, graphics-sig, etc? I originally thought so but then I decided to go with custom configuration files because I checked SIG memberships of some sponsors that I know and they never were in the SIG for the thing that I know they are interested in. Taking you for an example, in your config https://kevin.fedorapeople.org/sponsor.yaml you have the following interests - command-line, desktop, mobile, python, and epel but you are not a member of Desktop SIG, Mobility SIG, and Python SIG. But I guess we could take the SIG memberships and use them as one of the sources of configuration (in complement to what we already have). Does this sound reasonable to you? Jakub On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 7:43 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 05:03:36PM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > > Hello fellow Fedora people, > > > > Inspired by @msuchy's Flock 2016 presentation, I > > would like to tackle one of the topics discussed there - The > > discoverability of Fedora sponsors for newcomers. > > Thanks for taking this on! :) > > > I have a website ready to be deployed. If you are interested in the > > technical details, please see this RFE > > > > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470 > > > > and also the code > > > > https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors > > > > The page design is as simple as possible. You can see some screenshots > > here. > > > > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470#comment-735105 > > Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or > later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact > method? This might be something we could add to the account system also > and you could just get it from there? (ie, IRC, Matrix, email, other) > > > > A very important feature to me is grouping sponsors by their areas of > > interests / expertise, and I would like to ask for your help in this > > matter. > > > > At this moment, I have manually defined areas such as Python, C/C++, > > Haskell, Ruby, Functional programming, Web development, Modularity, > > etc and manually assigned people to them (the small number, that I > > personally know that do these kinds of things). > > > > Do you have any idea if there is a way to generate such areas and tie > > people to them based on some already existing information within the > > Fedora infrastructure? > > There are packager groups... could perhaps look at them and get sponsors > from them? ie, python-sig, graphics-sig, etc? > > kevin > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 05:03:36PM +0200, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello fellow Fedora people, > > Inspired by @msuchy's Flock 2016 presentation, I > would like to tackle one of the topics discussed there - The > discoverability of Fedora sponsors for newcomers. Thanks for taking this on! :) > I have a website ready to be deployed. If you are interested in the > technical details, please see this RFE > > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470 > > and also the code > > https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors > > The page design is as simple as possible. You can see some screenshots > here. > > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470#comment-735105 Looks pretty cool. Not sure it would be something for the first cut, or later, but it might be nice to have a way to list 'preferred' contact method? This might be something we could add to the account system also and you could just get it from there? (ie, IRC, Matrix, email, other) > > A very important feature to me is grouping sponsors by their areas of > interests / expertise, and I would like to ask for your help in this > matter. > > At this moment, I have manually defined areas such as Python, C/C++, > Haskell, Ruby, Functional programming, Web development, Modularity, > etc and manually assigned people to them (the small number, that I > personally know that do these kinds of things). > > Do you have any idea if there is a way to generate such areas and tie > people to them based on some already existing information within the > Fedora infrastructure? There are packager groups... could perhaps look at them and get sponsors from them? ie, python-sig, graphics-sig, etc? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
Dne 11. 06. 21 v 17:03 Jakub Kadlcik napsal(a): Do you have any idea if there is a way to generate such areas and tie people to them based on some already existing information within the Fedora infrastructure? What about adopting the approach we use for Fedora Planet: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Planet#How_to_join_the_Planet I.e. fetch this information from special file in $HOME at fedorapeople.org? Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Improving Fedora sponsors discoverability
Hello fellow Fedora people, Inspired by @msuchy's Flock 2016 presentation, I would like to tackle one of the topics discussed there - The discoverability of Fedora sponsors for newcomers. I have a website ready to be deployed. If you are interested in the technical details, please see this RFE https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470 and also the code https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-sponsors The page design is as simple as possible. You can see some screenshots here. https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue/470#comment-735105 A very important feature to me is grouping sponsors by their areas of interests / expertise, and I would like to ask for your help in this matter. At this moment, I have manually defined areas such as Python, C/C++, Haskell, Ruby, Functional programming, Web development, Modularity, etc and manually assigned people to them (the small number, that I personally know that do these kinds of things). Do you have any idea if there is a way to generate such areas and tie people to them based on some already existing information within the Fedora infrastructure? Otherwise, we will have to stick with manually defined groups, which is fine with me. But in that case I would like to ask you, what areas of interest you would like to see. And if you are a Fedora packager sponsor, in what areas would you like to be listed? Thank you, Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
