Re: Is there a problem if we add ~4 thousand automatically generated obsoletes?
On 12/3/21 19:11, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: Seehttps://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/ Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have any observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve deps)? I think that would increase the size of the primary repodata... I guess by number * length of obsolete, so might not be that bad? It would likely affect dnf processing time as well, but not sure how much. It seems like something to try and avoid if possible. kevin Hi, point taken. I've checked with the dnf team as well, and they're of the same opinion. So we won't be turning on the automatic Obsoletes in Fedora, only in ELN. Thanks for the feedback! Tomáš ___ devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Is there a problem if we add ~4 thousand automatically generated obsoletes?
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 02:06:41PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > See > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/ > > Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have > any observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve > deps)? I think that would increase the size of the primary repodata... I guess by number * length of obsolete, so might not be that bad? It would likely affect dnf processing time as well, but not sure how much. It seems like something to try and avoid if possible. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Is there a problem if we add ~4 thousand automatically generated obsoletes?
See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/2OCCFIKT7LZ7IPO3OKIEH3TDTGERSORM/ Would adding automatically generated obsoletes to 3624 Python packages have any observable negative impact (e.g. on the repodata size or time to resolve deps)? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
