Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
Il 09/03/2015 10:38, Xavier Bachelot ha scritto: Hi, On 08/03/2015 17:42, gil wrote: i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) FYI, there is already an ongoing review for java3d : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 hi yes, forgot this bug, thanks for remind to me I'm not sure of the current status, but some part of java3d is non-free due to a restriction in the license and there is an ongoing effort to replace the affected code. forgot also this pb Regards, Xavier regards gil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
On Mar 7, 2015 6:15 AM, Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com wrote: There is a generic 'wishlist': https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist Brilliant, thanks for the link. That is indeed what I was looking for, but I didn't think the list would be _quite_ that long! Wow, it seems there's no shortage of package requests already. Il 08/03/2015 04:03, Pete Travis ha scritto: The GIS SIG might be interested in this too. There's no dedicated mailing list that I'm aware of, but http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS will lead you to #fedora-gis and a list of names, at least. Fantastic! Why didn't I find that SIG myself I wonder. Thanks. And I can see that the package I'm talking about is already listed in the 'wishlist' on there, so that means that the people who I was hoping to ask already know my question :) Il 09/03/2015 10:38, Xavier Bachelot ha scritto: FYI, there is already an ongoing review for java3d : Oh, that's a little discouraging. Nearly three years old and nobody working on it. Like you I assumed that if Debian were happy with it then so would most other groups! Well, for me java3d is only optional at runtime, but unfortunately it's a requirement at build time. It would be _possible_ to prepare a source tar without any java3d capability, but I'm not sure that's the right way to go. Thanks for all your replies, it's really helpful. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
On 3/9/15, gil punto...@libero.it wrote: hi i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x18): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x80): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] GraphicsContext3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] NativeScreenInfo.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] NativeConfigTemplate3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x60): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] CgShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GLSLShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Lights.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Result: 1 any ideas? It appears to be that ld doesn't work in that scenario, but I don't know why on ARM it fails and shared library wasn't created... So please try replace executable=ld with executable=gcc in exec dir for linking purpose, and add -shared to arg line. Thanks. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
Hi, On 08/03/2015 17:42, gil wrote: i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) FYI, there is already an ongoing review for java3d : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=832853 I'm not sure of the current status, but some part of java3d is non-free due to a restriction in the license and there is an ongoing effort to replace the affected code. Regards, Xavier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
On 3/9/15, gil punto...@libero.it wrote: hi i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x18): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x80): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] GraphicsContext3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] NativeScreenInfo.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] NativeConfigTemplate3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x60): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] CgShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GLSLShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Lights.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Result: 1 any ideas? Full log, please? -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
Il 09/03/2015 04:13, Christopher Meng ha scritto: On 3/9/15, gil punto...@libero.it wrote: hi i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x18): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x80): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] GraphicsContext3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] NativeScreenInfo.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] NativeConfigTemplate3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x60): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] CgShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GLSLShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Lights.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Result: 1 any ideas? Full log, please? Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9178041 https://gil.fedorapeople.org/java3d-1.5.2-1.fc20.src.rpm https://gil.fedorapeople.org/java3d.spec thanks -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
Il 08/03/2015 04:03, Pete Travis ha scritto: On Mar 7, 2015 6:15 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com mailto:ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100 fed...@activityworkshop.net mailto:fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote: Hi list, I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking in the wrong place! Not at all. This is a fine place. ;) I've seen lots of pages about how to become a Fedora packager, and the processes for reviewing packages, but I haven't yet found anything suggesting how I could go about _requesting_ whether an already experienced Fedora packager might like to adopt another package. Is there such a thing, or is the only option that I dive into learning how to do it myself? There is a generic 'wishlist': https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist But as you can see from looking at it, its kind of a big dumping ground of anything anyone anytime thought might be nice to have packaged. ;) To be specific, I would be interested in submitting the GPL2 java application GpsPrune for inclusion. It's already in Debian, so maybe that's a good starting point. And there are unofficial rpms in OpenSuse, which may also be helpful. There are only a small number of dependencies, most of which are optional, and I would be more than happy to help from my side to tweak things if necessary. I believe that if there were packagers who had already created packages for java applications, and were willing to take on another one, it would take orders of magnitude less effort than if I were to try to do it myself and ask for it to be reviewed. Is there a way to submit a request for packaging? I'd suggest mailing the Fedora Java sig: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel You may also get some interest here in further replies. ;) Hope that helps, kevin -- The GIS SIG might be interested in this too. There's no dedicated mailing list that I'm aware of, but http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS will lead you to #fedora-gis and a list of names, at least. --Pete hi i prepared java3d spec file, GpsPrune's dependency but seem do not build/support ARM arch (rawhide) [exec] DrawingSurfaceObjectAWT.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x18): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Canvas3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x80): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] GraphicsContext3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] NativeScreenInfo.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] NativeConfigTemplate3D.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GeometryArrayRetained.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x60): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Attributes.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x8): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] CgShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] GLSLShaderProgram.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr0' [exec] Lights.o:(.ARM.exidx+0x0): undefined reference to `__aeabi_unwind_cpp_pr1' [exec] Result: 1 any ideas? regards gil -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100 fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote: Hi list, I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking in the wrong place! Not at all. This is a fine place. ;) I've seen lots of pages about how to become a Fedora packager, and the processes for reviewing packages, but I haven't yet found anything suggesting how I could go about _requesting_ whether an already experienced Fedora packager might like to adopt another package. Is there such a thing, or is the only option that I dive into learning how to do it myself? There is a generic 'wishlist': https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist But as you can see from looking at it, its kind of a big dumping ground of anything anyone anytime thought might be nice to have packaged. ;) To be specific, I would be interested in submitting the GPL2 java application GpsPrune for inclusion. It's already in Debian, so maybe that's a good starting point. And there are unofficial rpms in OpenSuse, which may also be helpful. There are only a small number of dependencies, most of which are optional, and I would be more than happy to help from my side to tweak things if necessary. I believe that if there were packagers who had already created packages for java applications, and were willing to take on another one, it would take orders of magnitude less effort than if I were to try to do it myself and ask for it to be reviewed. Is there a way to submit a request for packaging? I'd suggest mailing the Fedora Java sig: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel You may also get some interest here in further replies. ;) Hope that helps, kevin pgpACqZMWjUXl.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Is there a process for requesting packaging?
Hi list, I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking in the wrong place! I've seen lots of pages about how to become a Fedora packager, and the processes for reviewing packages, but I haven't yet found anything suggesting how I could go about _requesting_ whether an already experienced Fedora packager might like to adopt another package. Is there such a thing, or is the only option that I dive into learning how to do it myself? To be specific, I would be interested in submitting the GPL2 java application GpsPrune for inclusion. It's already in Debian, so maybe that's a good starting point. And there are unofficial rpms in OpenSuse, which may also be helpful. There are only a small number of dependencies, most of which are optional, and I would be more than happy to help from my side to tweak things if necessary. I believe that if there were packagers who had already created packages for java applications, and were willing to take on another one, it would take orders of magnitude less effort than if I were to try to do it myself and ask for it to be reviewed. Is there a way to submit a request for packaging? Thanks for your time, activityworkshop Links for those interested: https://packages.debian.org/gpsprune http://packages.ubuntu.com/gpsprune https://software.opensuse.org/package/gpsprune -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Is there a process for requesting packaging?
On Mar 7, 2015 6:15 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:53:27 +0100 fed...@activityworkshop.net wrote: Hi list, I'm an upstream developer and I'm unfamiliar with the Fedora processes, so my apologies if I'm asking obvious questions or asking in the wrong place! Not at all. This is a fine place. ;) I've seen lots of pages about how to become a Fedora packager, and the processes for reviewing packages, but I haven't yet found anything suggesting how I could go about _requesting_ whether an already experienced Fedora packager might like to adopt another package. Is there such a thing, or is the only option that I dive into learning how to do it myself? There is a generic 'wishlist': https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist But as you can see from looking at it, its kind of a big dumping ground of anything anyone anytime thought might be nice to have packaged. ;) To be specific, I would be interested in submitting the GPL2 java application GpsPrune for inclusion. It's already in Debian, so maybe that's a good starting point. And there are unofficial rpms in OpenSuse, which may also be helpful. There are only a small number of dependencies, most of which are optional, and I would be more than happy to help from my side to tweak things if necessary. I believe that if there were packagers who had already created packages for java applications, and were willing to take on another one, it would take orders of magnitude less effort than if I were to try to do it myself and ask for it to be reviewed. Is there a way to submit a request for packaging? I'd suggest mailing the Fedora Java sig: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel You may also get some interest here in further replies. ;) Hope that helps, kevin -- The GIS SIG might be interested in this too. There's no dedicated mailing list that I'm aware of, but http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GIS will lead you to #fedora-gis and a list of names, at least. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
