Re: No arch broken dependency issue

[Pavel Raiskup]

On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 3:10:33 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26?

I probably don't understand the question.  This IMO shouldn't be blocker for
Fedora 26 release, just there's the issue that packages which:

BuildArch: noarch
ExclusiveArch: x86_64 noarch

are distributed for every architecture, because 'noarch' in ExclusiveArch means
package is compatible with every architecture.  The correct form should be:

BuildArch: noarch
ExclusiveArch: x86_64

That's fine now, because rhbz#1298668 is fixed.  But still I need to test
this.  Unless we fix all the packages having 'noarch' in ExclusiveArch,
there will be uninstallable (or not working) packages in "base" F26
repository, but how serious this would be?

> The emails are annoying but I'm more concerned that things will be
> broken when branch from rawhide happens.

I hope, except for fixing the issue for f26, the annoying email disappears
with this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/vim-syntastic.git/commit/?id=c9a831c25854d3

Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No arch broken dependency issue

[Jeremy Newton]

So does exclusive arch actually block the unsupported arches come f26? The
emails are annoying but I'm more concerned that things will be broken when
branch from rawhide happens.

On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 6:50 AM, Pavel Raiskup  wrote:

> On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm
> having.
> >
> > I keep getting this email:
> > >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> > >On ppc64le:
> > >orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love
> > >Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> >
> > This is because it's noarch that depends on "love", which doesn't
> compile on ppc64le.
> >
> > I added an exclusive arch to the spec in hopes to silence this:
> > >ExclusiveArch: %{arm} %{ix86} x86_64 %{mips} aarch64 ppc64 noarch
> >
> > Is this not sufficient anymore for noarch? Or is this a bug in buildsys?
>
> I recently filed similar thing against pungi:
> https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/87
>
> Pavel
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: No arch broken dependency issue

[Pavel Raiskup]

On Sunday, November 13, 2016 4:28:26 PM CET Jeremy Newton wrote:
> Hi,
> I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having.
> 
> I keep getting this email:
> >orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> >On ppc64le:
> >orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love
> >Please resolve this as soon as possible.
> 
> This is because it's noarch that depends on "love", which doesn't compile on 
> ppc64le.
> 
> I added an exclusive arch to the spec in hopes to silence this:
> >ExclusiveArch: %{arm} %{ix86} x86_64 %{mips} aarch64 ppc64 noarch
> 
> Is this not sufficient anymore for noarch? Or is this a bug in buildsys?

I recently filed similar thing against pungi:
https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/issue/87

Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

No arch broken dependency issue

[Jeremy Newton]

Hi,
I was wondering if any of the RPM guru's know how to fix an issue I'm having.

I keep getting this email:
>orthorobot has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>On ppc64le:
>orthorobot-1.1-4.fc26.noarch requires love
>Please resolve this as soon as possible.

This is because it's noarch that depends on "love", which doesn't compile on 
ppc64le.

I added an exclusive arch to the spec in hopes to silence this:
>ExclusiveArch: %{arm} %{ix86} x86_64 %{mips} aarch64 ppc64 noarch

Is this not sufficient anymore for noarch? Or is this a bug in buildsys?

Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org