Re: Test the side-tag: (was: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE)
V Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 12:03:39PM +0200, Nicola Sella napsal(a): > *TL;DR please, test scratch builds in f39-build-side-68994 side-tag.* > > The changes for dnf5 are now ready to be tested before landing in rawhide. > We made a side-tag with the newest dnf and dnf5, and we would like to get > some feedback on that. We would like to push the changes to rawhide for the > next week. > I upgraded dnf5 on my dnf5-only system to the side tag packages without any problems. I was able to use your side tag as a boostrap and build repository in mock. I was able to install python3-dnf alognside dnf5. Scratchbuilding libmodulemd in Koji with your side tag also passed. I did not test uprading f39 to your side tag repository. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Test the side-tag: (was: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE)
On 15. 06. 23 12:03, Nicola Sella wrote: Hi all, *TL;DR please, test scratch builds in f39-build-side-68994 side-tag.* The changes for dnf5 are now ready to be tested before landing in rawhide. We made a side-tag with the newest dnf and dnf5, and we would like to get some feedback on that. We would like to push the changes to rawhide for the next week. When you do merge this, please coordinate with me and Tomáš Hrnčiar about Python 3.12. Most importantly: Don't merge a Python 3.11 build of dnf to rawhide if the Python 3.12 side tag was merged in the meantime. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Test the side-tag: (was: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE)
Hi all, *TL;DR please, test scratch builds in f39-build-side-68994 side-tag.* The changes for dnf5 are now ready to be tested before landing in rawhide. We made a side-tag with the newest dnf and dnf5, and we would like to get some feedback on that. We would like to push the changes to rawhide for the next week. Use `fedpkg scratch-build --target=f39-build-side-68994` to test it. f39-build-side-68994 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taginfo?tagID=68994 dnf-4.16.1-2.fc39 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2209712 dnf5-5.0.14-1.fc39 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2215368 Thank you, Nicola On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 9:41 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > Hello, > > I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in > rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The > change was already announced in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5. > > Best regards > > Jaroslav Mracek > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
Il 29/05/23 23:33, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +, Leigh Scott wrote: Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like the following: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635 Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a single one and dnf5 can't understand them? Mattia >>> The package is broken >>> >>> $ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel >>> Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates28 kB/s | 14 kB >>> 00:00 >>> Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB >>> 00:03 >>> Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023 >>> 18:06:51 BST. >>> Dependencies resolved. >>> >>> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job >>> - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF- >>> devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing >> The dependency is auto-generated, it's not the packager's fault. I >> suspect the ultimate cause is this upstream: >> >> https://gitea.nouspiro.space/nou/libXISF/commit/1c0d6e4e054f1c5ac461e6da3a63c5f7acaa0a28 >> >> which causes the pkgconfig file to have this line: >> >> Requires.private: lz4;pugixml;zlib >> >> (you can see that line >> in >> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libXISF/0.2.5/1.fc38/x86_64/libXISF-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm >> ). That's what our dependency generator turns into >> `pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib)`. I'll file an upstream issue. > Upstream fixed this very quickly (thanks Dušan!) and I'm doing -2 > builds with the fix backported now. Will edit the updates. > -- > Adam Williamson (he/him/his) > Fedora QA > Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org > https://www.happyassassin.net > Thank you Adam! Indeed, I should have looked into the problem more carefully before pointing my finger against dnf5. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > > > Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: > > > > > > I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like > > > the > > > following: > > > > > > Error: > > > Problem: conflicting requests > > > - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by > > > libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635 > > > > > > Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a > > > single one and dnf5 can't understand them? > > > > > > Mattia > > > > The package is broken > > > > $ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel > > Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates28 kB/s | 14 kB > > 00:00 > > Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB > > 00:03 > > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023 > > 18:06:51 BST. > > Dependencies resolved. > > > > Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job > > - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF- > > devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing > > The dependency is auto-generated, it's not the packager's fault. I > suspect the ultimate cause is this upstream: > > https://gitea.nouspiro.space/nou/libXISF/commit/1c0d6e4e054f1c5ac461e6da3a63c5f7acaa0a28 > > which causes the pkgconfig file to have this line: > > Requires.private: lz4;pugixml;zlib > > (you can see that line > in > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libXISF/0.2.5/1.fc38/x86_64/libXISF-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm > ). That's what our dependency generator turns into > `pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib)`. I'll file an upstream issue. Upstream fixed this very quickly (thanks Dušan!) and I'm doing -2 builds with the fix backported now. Will edit the updates. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +, Leigh Scott wrote: > > Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: > > > > I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like > > the > > following: > > > > Error: > > Problem: conflicting requests > > - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by > > libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635 > > > > Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a > > single one and dnf5 can't understand them? > > > > Mattia > > The package is broken > > $ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel > Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates28 kB/s | 14 kB > 00:00 > Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB > 00:03 > Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023 > 18:06:51 BST. > Dependencies resolved. > > Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job > - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF- > devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing The dependency is auto-generated, it's not the packager's fault. I suspect the ultimate cause is this upstream: https://gitea.nouspiro.space/nou/libXISF/commit/1c0d6e4e054f1c5ac461e6da3a63c5f7acaa0a28 which causes the pkgconfig file to have this line: Requires.private: lz4;pugixml;zlib (you can see that line in https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/libXISF/0.2.5/1.fc38/x86_64/libXISF-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64.rpm ). That's what our dependency generator turns into `pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib)`. I'll file an upstream issue. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
> Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: > > I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like the > following: > > Error: > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by > libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635 > > Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a > single one and dnf5 can't understand them? > > Mattia The package is broken $ sudo dnf --enablerepo u*g install libXISF-devel Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates28 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00 Fedora 38 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.6 MB/s | 5.1 MB 00:03 Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:08 ago on Mon 29 May 2023 18:06:51 BST. Dependencies resolved. Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc38.x86_64 from updates-testing ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
I am really sorry but this doesn't sound like a problem of DNF or DNF5. DNF and DNF5 uses the same solver therefore I do not expect any difference in behavior. May I ask you to verify the behavior with DNF first? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: > Hello, > > I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF > in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of > May. The change was already announced in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5. > > Best regards > > Jaroslav Mracek I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like the following: Error: Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides pkgconfig(lz4;pugixml;zlib) needed by libXISF-devel-0.2.5-1.fc39.x86_64 from brew-101573635 Looks like multiple 'BuildRequires: pkgconfig()' are squashed to a single one and dnf5 can't understand them? Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
On 26. 05. 23 11:51, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5>.
It seem rawhide copr builds are broken...
To reproduce, try:
$ COPR=whatever
$ copr create $COPR
--repo='http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/$basearch/'
--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --delete-after-days 7
$ copr add-package-distgit $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster --commit
rawhide
$ copr build-package $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster
See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/whatever/builds/
I get:
...
Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
Start(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: mounting tmpfs at
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root.
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.5
INFO: Mock Version: 3.5
Start: dnf install
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
ERROR:
Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-0s4wy2p4/dummy-test-package-gloster/dummy-test-package-gloster.spec) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 26 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M fb947d9bf50448af8a0250f849d154de -D
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1685094318.073555/root -a
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4as66jul:/etc/resolv.conf
--console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;\007" --setenv=PS1= \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/ --releasever 39 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
Copr build error: Mock build failed
OK, Koji is broken as well, this is not limited to Copr.
See e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101549275
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9276/101549276/root.log
...
DEBUG util.py:443: Unknown argument "groupinstall" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more information about the arguments.
DEBUG util.py:596: Child return code was: 2
I've requested the update to be untagged in https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11441
Please ship this change by means that will not distrupt the work of all others
unnecessarily.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
On 26. 05. 23 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5>.
It seem rawhide copr builds are broken...
To reproduce, try:
$ COPR=whatever
$ copr create $COPR
--repo='http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/$basearch/'
--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --delete-after-days 7
$ copr add-package-distgit $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster --commit
rawhide
$ copr build-package $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster
See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/whatever/builds/
I get:
...
Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
Start(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: mounting tmpfs at
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root.
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.5
INFO: Mock Version: 3.5
Start: dnf install
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
ERROR:
Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-0s4wy2p4/dummy-test-package-gloster/dummy-test-package-gloster.spec) Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 26 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M fb947d9bf50448af8a0250f849d154de -D
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1685094318.073555/root -a
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4as66jul:/etc/resolv.conf
--console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/installation-homedir --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;\007" --setenv=PS1= \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8 --setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0 --setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/ --releasever 39 --setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local --disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
Copr build error: Mock build failed
OK, Koji is broken as well, this is not limited to Copr.
See e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=101549275
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/9276/101549276/root.log
...
DEBUG util.py:443: Unknown argument "groupinstall" for command "dnf5". Add
"--help" for more information about the arguments.
DEBUG util.py:596: Child return code was: 2
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
On 24. 05. 23 9:40, Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
Hello,
I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in
rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The
change was already announced in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5
<https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5>.
It seem rawhide copr builds are broken...
To reproduce, try:
$ COPR=whatever
$ copr create $COPR
--repo='http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/repos/rawhide/latest/$basearch/'
--chroot fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --delete-after-days 7
$ copr add-package-distgit $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster --commit
rawhide
$ copr build-package $COPR --name dummy-test-package-gloster
See https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/churchyard/whatever/builds/
I get:
...
Finish(bootstrap): dnf install
Start(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): creating root cache
Finish(bootstrap): chroot init
Start: chroot init
INFO: mounting tmpfs at
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root.
INFO: calling preinit hooks
INFO: enabled root cache
INFO: enabled package manager cache
Start: cleaning package manager metadata
Finish: cleaning package manager metadata
INFO: enabled HW Info plugin
Mock Version: 3.5
INFO: Mock Version: 3.5
Start: dnf install
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #2, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
WARNING: Dnf command failed, retrying, attempt #3, sleeping 10s
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
ERROR:
Exception(/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/workspace/workdir-0s4wy2p4/dummy-test-package-gloster/dummy-test-package-gloster.spec)
Config(fedora-rawhide-x86_64) 1 minutes 26 seconds
INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results
INFO: Cleaning up build root ('cleanup_on_failure=True')
Start: clean chroot
INFO: unmounting tmpfs.
Finish: clean chroot
ERROR: Command failed:
# /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M fb947d9bf50448af8a0250f849d154de -D
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-bootstrap-1685094318.073555/root -a
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --rlimit=RLIMIT_NOFILE=10240
--capability=cap_ipc_lock --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv.4as66jul:/etc/resolv.conf
--console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100 --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash
--setenv=HOME=/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/installation-homedir
--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\033]0;\007"
--setenv=PS1= \s-\v\$ --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
--setenv=LC_MESSAGES=C.UTF-8 --setenv=SYSTEMD_NSPAWN_TMPFS_TMP=0
--setenv=SYSTEMD_SECCOMP=0 --resolv-conf=off /usr/bin/dnf --installroot
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64-1685094318.073555/root/ --releasever 39
--setopt=deltarpm=False --allowerasing --disableplugin=local
--disableplugin=spacewalk --disableplugin=versionlock install @buildsys-build
--setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts
Unknown argument "--allowerasing" for command "dnf5". Add "--help" for more
information about the arguments.
Copr build error: Mock build failed
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
V Wed, May 24, 2023 at 02:34:57PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in > > rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The > > change was already announced in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ > > ReplaceDnfWithDnf5. > > This is quite an ambitious schedule. Bugs filed yesterday against > packages using dnf, for a change that is planned in 7 days time. If I understand the change correctly, packages are expected to RPM-depend on "dnf5", but to execute "dnf" command. That means the bugs are not actionable until the change is implemented in dnf5. -- Petr signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > Hello, > > I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in > rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The > change was already announced in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ > ReplaceDnfWithDnf5. This is quite an ambitious schedule. Bugs filed yesterday against packages using dnf, for a change that is planned in 7 days time. And 'dnf download' is not as featureful as the old version of dnf so it really does require deeper changes to supermin. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE
Hello, I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of May. The change was already announced in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnfWithDnf5. Best regards Jaroslav Mracek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
