Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
> "RS" == Robert Scheck writes: RS> wouldn't it have been a clever alternative to use lua52-* rather a RS> quite unspecific "compat-lua-" to be really similar with your RS> python2/3 example? I made a similar suggestion in the packaging committee ticket. "compat-" is nonspecific and goes against the naming conventions already in the guidelines. While it's true that we have some compat-\* packages in Fedora, it shouldn't be perpetuated and certainly shouldn't be made the basis for a new Lua naming scheme. - J< ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
Hello Tomas, On Thu, 04 Apr 2019, Tomas Krizek wrote: > This makes it difficult to search for lua packages and preferably, there > should be just a single naming scheme. Based on a discussion with > maintainer of lua-lpeg and lua-mpack [2], we've agreed to use the naming > scheme compat-lua-* wouldn't it have been a clever alternative to use lua52-* rather a quite unspecific "compat-lua-" to be really similar with your python2/3 example? Regards, Robert pgpuiDPf1wkD5.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
On 04/04/2019 12.54, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 04. 19 12:33, Tomas Krizek wrote: >> If anyone has the rights to edit Package naming guidelines [1], please >> document the proper way to name lua and compat-lua packages. > > Could you please open a ticket at > https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues ? Done: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/878 For reference, the required changes in spec are quite minimal: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lua-cqueues/pull-request/1#request_diff -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
On 04. 04. 19 12:33, Tomas Krizek wrote: If anyone has the rights to edit Package naming guidelines [1], please document the proper way to name lua and compat-lua packages. Could you please open a ticket at https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues ? Thanks, -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
(This message is a copy for fedora-devel archival purposes, original message was rejected by mailing list and was only sent to CCed maintainers) Hi, there is no official package naming guideline for lua packages in Fedora [1]. Similarly to python2/python3, there are two version of lua: lua and compat-lua. There is currently inconsistency in the package names for compat-lua packages. Example: compat-lua-lpeg vs. lua-cqueues-compat This makes it difficult to search for lua packages and preferably, there should be just a single naming scheme. Based on a discussion with maintainer of lua-lpeg and lua-mpack [2], we've agreed to use the naming scheme compat-lua-* If you're a maintainer of a lua-*-compat package, please use the new naming scheme along with Provides for backward compatibility [3]. If anyone has the rights to edit Package naming guidelines [1], please document the proper way to name lua and compat-lua packages. Thanks! [1] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines [2] - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lua-mpack/pull-request/2 [3] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Extra_Provides -- Tomas Krizek PGP: 4A8B A48C 2AED 933B D495 C509 A1FB A5F7 EF8C 4869 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
