Packages going to be orphaned (was: Users with commit rights in src.fp.o but no more in packager group)
I've filed a ticket [1] to fedora-infrastructure and @kevin is going to remove commit rights from users which are no longer packagers. There are a few packages which are going to be orphaned after the main admin is removed. Here it is the list: - bumpversion - dia-CMOS - dia-Digital - dia-electric2 - dia-electronic - drawtiming - dnsviz - ell - espresso-ab - fortune-mod - hct - kicad - monobristol - msimonson-anonymouspro-fonts - sticky-notes - ytalk If you spotted any package you're willing to take as main admin, let @kevin known by commenting on the ticket (or replying here, I suppose). Otherwise the packages will enter the usual 6 weeks limbo before being retired. Mattia [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10869 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. What about regular PGP key and password changes? Wouldn't perl-sig find guilty on next clean-up and removed of the ownership? I don't understand what you are trying to express. The same what happened to cweyl. perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Only the ones who are rights to commit. ?!? All mails stemming from packages with perl-sig as maintainer or co-maintainer would have to go to the perl-devel list. Everybody can listen but not everybody can step in. Without real group support from package database side there cannot be real group of maintainers. Now each maintainer must be granted permissions for each package separately. So there is no positive effect of making perl-sig the owner. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. There would be a problem that nobody would be personally responsible for a package. You are presuming there is a need to have a personal responsibility. The purpose of collaborative maintenance is to abandon this tie and to replace it with a group responsibility. I don't think group responsibility works. The result is every group memeber says it does somebody else and then bugs will never get fixed. I think it's better when each package is owned by a real person. I don't agree. Like in real life, all tasks beyond a certain size require to team up and can not be handled by single individuals anymore. I see the point, but then there must be set some packaging standard. Like some rawhide spec files are kept compatible with EPEL-5, some packages are not registered for release monitoring, some packagers require different subset of package dependencies, some packages are rebased through all distributions etc. Once you get your packages for free modifications by a group, then you cannot expect they do not divert from your packaging standards. Therefore I like the idea a person maintains his set of packages and the other ones step in only for short temporary help. -- Petr pgp9d7RZQsZNM.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Petr Pisar wrote: I don't think group responsibility works. The result is every group memeber says it does somebody else and then bugs will never get fixed. Group responsibility has been working fine for KDE SIG ever since its inception with the Core-Extras Merge in Fedora 7. No matter who the official primary maintainer is, the core KDE packages are de facto all SIG-maintained and we all feel responsible for them. I don't see why such a model wouldn't work for other SIGs nor why we still don't have pkgdb support for this (all the core KDE packages should probably be owned by a kde-sig group, and a bunch of KDE-related packages comaintained by the SIG). Once you get your packages for free modifications by a group, then you cannot expect they do not divert from your packaging standards. Of course you need to accept some compromises, like in any other team- maintained code. So it helps to agree on a SIG-wide standard. But I don't see why this would be a problem for specfiles any more than for upstream projects, many of which are team-maintained. (In fact, the whole purpose of the Fedora packaging guidelines is to have a common standard for packages, but some stylistic issues are deliberately left unspecified there and should be agreed on in the SIG.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 06:01:03AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. What about regular PGP key and password changes? Wouldn't perl-sig find guilty on next clean-up and removed of the ownership? I don't understand what you are trying to express. The same what happened to cweyl. perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Only the ones who are rights to commit. ?!? All mails stemming from packages with perl-sig as maintainer or co-maintainer would have to go to the perl-devel list. Everybody can listen but not everybody can step in. Without real group support from package database side there cannot be real group of maintainers. Now each maintainer must be granted permissions for each package separately. So there is no positive effect of making perl-sig the owner. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. There would be a problem that nobody would be personally responsible for a package. You are presuming there is a need to have a personal responsibility. The purpose of collaborative maintenance is to abandon this tie and to replace it with a group responsibility. I don't think group responsibility works. The result is every group memeber says it does somebody else and then bugs will never get fixed. I think it's better when each package is owned by a real person. I don't agree. Like in real life, all tasks beyond a certain size require to team up and can not be handled by single individuals anymore. I see the point, but then there must be set some packaging standard. Like some rawhide spec files are kept compatible with EPEL-5, some packages are not registered for release monitoring, some packagers require different subset of package dependencies, some packages are rebased through all distributions etc. Once you get your packages for free modifications by a group, then you cannot expect they do not divert from your packaging standards. Therefore I like the idea a person maintains his set of packages and the other ones step in only for short temporary help. -- Petr pgp4iIXCLgalX.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
I grabbed ruby-shadow, as it's needed for Puppet. I would love co-maintainers. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Peter Gordon a écrit : And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership of qrencode. =) Approved in devel, f16 and f15 branch Thank you for your involvement :) -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 pgp0lXcNEzlxF.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt Can you regenerate the lists after so many taken to know what is left ? as sgallagh write : For the packages that will be orphaned, could someone also generate a list of any packages that depend on them? It might help find new maintainers so we don't end up breaking dependencies in F17. I see for example vte which is need for geany . Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt Taking back what was left of my packages: perl-Flickr-API perl-Flickr-Upload And two java packages that I wish not to maintain anymore: picocontainer nanoxml Hopefully, someone will pick them, as they are dependency for intellij-idea. -- Michal Ingeli xmpp:k...@kyberia.sk, #311753144 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 10:07 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. What about regular PGP key and password changes? Wouldn't perl-sig find guilty on next clean-up and removed of the ownership? I don't understand what you are trying to express. perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Only the ones who are rights to commit. ?!? All mails stemming from packages with perl-sig as maintainer or co-maintainer would have to go to the perl-devel list. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. There would be a problem that nobody would be personally responsible for a package. You are presuming there is a need to have a personal responsibility. The purpose of collaborative maintenance is to abandon this tie and to replace it with a group responsibility. Also there could be problems with synchronisation between unassigned volunteering perl-sig members. Sure, ... but in practice, coordination of such efforts rarely is a problem in case of incident response. They are typicallly resolved via bugzilla or email. I think it's better when each package is owned by a real person. I don't agree. Like in real life, all tasks beyond a certain size require to team up and can not be handled by single individuals anymore. That said, to me, maintaining several hundreds of perl packages by single individuals is impossible and inevitably requires to team up. Surely, for you, a person, whom I assume to be being paid full time for maintaining perl packages, the threshold of number of perl-packages you can handle is higher than that of people (like me), who do so as volunteered side-job in their spare time. Nevertheless your capabilities/resources are limited also. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Correct. No one has spent any time to allow groups to be owners. This would be a significant rearchitecting so I haven't assigned it as an EasyFix task to anyone who has just arrived in infrastructure. Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... Anyway, I just noticed the iburrell packages also are on your list. IMO, these should likely followup the cweyl treatment, because much of perl would not be usable without them. nod Someone could pick them up or (since we still have a list of which packages these are) I could assign them to someone in a placeholder capacity or as primary owner. cweyl had specifically asked that mmaslano be made a comaintainer of all his perl* packages earlier so that seemed like it wouldn't make waves if I set the ownership to prevent orphaning. -Toshio People on the list already asked for maintainance of various Perl group like perl-Moose-*. So, could you go once more over those packages, which you gave me and orphan them? Everyone from Perl SIG can take the group of perl packages, which are interesting for him. The packagedb-cli can be used even by regular users to take over more packages. Marcela -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Correct. No one has spent any time to allow groups to be owners. This would be a significant rearchitecting so I haven't assigned it as an EasyFix task to anyone who has just arrived in infrastructure. Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
* Ralf Corsepius [11/01/2012 09:59] : Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case. If perl-sig is the maintainer, only provenpackagers will be able to commit. Emmanuel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. What about regular PGP key and password changes? Wouldn't perl-sig find guilty on next clean-up and removed of the ownership? perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Only the ones who are rights to commit. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. There would be a problem that nobody would be personally responsible for a package. Also there could be problems with synchronisation between unassigned volunteering perl-sig members. I think it's better when each package is owned by a real person. -- Petr pgpMhbkb64a7w.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 02:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. If that assumption was wrong, some of those packages may be orphaned in the next few days as well: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/cweyl-perl.txt The ticket with all the details is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3046 I've taken: * libssh2 * perl-Test-Distribution (EPEL) * perl-Test-MinimumVersion (EPEL) * perl-XML-Simple (EPEL) * python-fpconst (EPEL) Co-maintainers welcome, as with all of my (pghmcfc) packages: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/pghmcfc Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Took the followin in Fedora (not EPEL) for now: perl-Algorithm-Annotate perl-Data-Hierarchy perl-File-chdir perl-Time-Progress perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree * rogue tinyfugue -P pgpOPEL64YCmK.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
I took clips and clipsmm, I was the only maintainer and I'm an active developer for clipsmm. Tim -- Tim Niemueller t...@niemueller.de www.niemueller.de = Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Hello I've taken: * qrencode * dnstracer So co-maintener are welcome too Matthieu -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 pgpRbLYWonwUe.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I've taken over tetex-IEEEtrans and Jigdo. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like to take that one if I can. 2012/1/11 Casper fan...@fedoraproject.org: Hello I've taken: * qrencode * dnstracer So co-maintener are welcome too Matthieu -- Pour encrypter vos emails Clef GPG ID : 83288189 Empreinte : CC26 692F 5205 AC8F 7912 7783 D7A7 F4C5 8328 8189 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 18:30 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. Took hfsplus-tools. Still provenpackager+ as before, comaintainers welcome. - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:26:59AM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: People on the list already asked for maintainance of various Perl group like perl-Moose-*. So, could you go once more over those packages, which you gave me and orphan them? Everyone from Perl SIG can take the group of perl packages, which are interesting for him. The packagedb-cli can be used even by regular users to take over more packages. Okay, I've gone ahead and orphaned those packages now. -Toshio pgpCZeeNkRJlY.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:44:16AM -0500, solarflow99 wrote: I don't see slim in the list, but I know its been orphaned. I'd like to take that one if I can. You can sign up right here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/slim -Toshio pgpn8JWUP2rJh.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I'll be taking over eclipse-oprofile and eclipse-callgraph. -- Roland Grunberg -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed - php-ZendFramework
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt php-ZendFramework have a co-maintainer (heller) I could ownership on it or co-ownership as heller want. Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I took ownership of the haskell packages of bos: I had already been maintaining for a while anyway as comaintainer. And it makes more sense that one person owns all the haskell-platform packages anyway. Thanks to Bryan for his long involvement in and help with Fedora Haskell: he is fully committed to Haskell development and churning out some great libraries in the community in recent years that a lot of people are using. I hope he will still continue to use Fedora Haskell for his projects anyway. :) Jens -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
I've taken iec16022 for the Fedora 15/16/Devel branches. I would appreciate assistance in the EPEL branches though. (I've left those orphaned.) And if it's agreeable with Casper, I've also requested comaintainership of qrencode. =) I have done so because another of my packages, gLabels, requires both of these. As usual, comaintainers are welcome. Thanks and regards. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) pe...@thecodergeek.com Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Correct. No one has spent any time to allow groups to be owners. This would be a significant rearchitecting so I haven't assigned it as an EasyFix task to anyone who has just arrived in infrastructure. Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... Anyway, I just noticed the iburrell packages also are on your list. IMO, these should likely followup the cweyl treatment, because much of perl would not be usable without them. nod Someone could pick them up or (since we still have a list of which packages these are) I could assign them to someone in a placeholder capacity or as primary owner. cweyl had specifically asked that mmaslano be made a comaintainer of all his perl* packages earlier so that seemed like it wouldn't make waves if I set the ownership to prevent orphaning. -Toshio People on the list already asked for maintainance of various Perl group like perl-Moose-*. So, could you go once more over those packages, which you gave me and orphan them? Everyone from Perl SIG can take the group of perl packages, which are interesting for him. The packagedb-cli can be used even by regular users to take over more packages. Marcela -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Correct. No one has spent any time to allow groups to be owners. This would be a significant rearchitecting so I haven't assigned it as an EasyFix task to anyone who has just arrived in infrastructure. Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Also, in cases nobody steps up and takes action, you (who is subscribed to the perl-list) could step up in any case. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 01/11/2012 09:26 AM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: On 01/11/2012 05:18 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. So, pseudo-user wouldn't work well... I don't see any reason why it would not. What about regular PGP key and password changes? Wouldn't perl-sig find guilty on next clean-up and removed of the ownership? perl-sig mails go to the perl mailing list, anybody interested can listen and step in. It's what several persons who are subscribed to the perl-list seem to have done for a long time - E.g. I do. Only the ones who are rights to commit. I.e. to sum up: Actually nothing would change to you and nothing would change many of the perl-sig maintainers. There would be a problem that nobody would be personally responsible for a package. Also there could be problems with synchronisation between unassigned volunteering perl-sig members. I think it's better when each package is owned by a real person. -- Petr pgpoQqRkfXkxp.pgp Description: PGP signature -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. If that assumption was wrong, some of those packages may be orphaned in the next few days as well: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/cweyl-perl.txt The ticket with all the details is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3046 -Toshio pgpHog7zd9F5N.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Anyway, I just noticed the iburrell packages also are on your list. IMO, these should likely followup the cweyl treatment, because much of perl would not be usable without them. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/10/2012 09:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I've taken: cutecom mrpt nqc I have also requested commit access for the available (el5 and el6) branches of mediatomb. I maintain the fedora branches, and was going to take the el ones, but I noticed someone else called dibs in the first inactive package maintainers thread. Co-maintainers are welcome! Rich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 04:36:24AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Correct. No one has spent any time to allow groups to be owners. This would be a significant rearchitecting so I haven't assigned it as an EasyFix task to anyone who has just arrived in infrastructure. Note that the perl-sig pseudo-user could own the packages if the perl-sig wants to continue maintaining them and doesn't want them orphaned. That works right now. What it wouldn't grant is commit rights to the packages. Anyway, I just noticed the iburrell packages also are on your list. IMO, these should likely followup the cweyl treatment, because much of perl would not be usable without them. nod Someone could pick them up or (since we still have a list of which packages these are) I could assign them to someone in a placeholder capacity or as primary owner. cweyl had specifically asked that mmaslano be made a comaintainer of all his perl* packages earlier so that seemed like it wouldn't make waves if I set the ownership to prevent orphaning. -Toshio pgpraQBvQoY2l.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I'm a little confused, I thought I picked up xournal. I see it on that list as to be orphaned. I've been issuing updates as needed so will that ownership automatically pass to me? I checked packagedb and I see there are other co-maintainers with commit rights. Its funny since I think I've been managing the package as if I were the sole maintainer. Do I just sit and wait then? -- Nathanael d. Noblet t 403.875.4613 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 09:38:56PM -0700, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: On 01/10/2012 07:30 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt I'm a little confused, I thought I picked up xournal. I see it on that list as to be orphaned. I've been issuing updates as needed so will that ownership automatically pass to me? I checked packagedb and I see there are other co-maintainers with commit rights. Its funny since I think I've been managing the package as if I were the sole maintainer. Do I just sit and wait then? No, please just pick it up. The pkgdb does not automatically select a comaintainer to promote to maintainer at this time as there were some user interface warts that people felt were too onerous. We want it to come back someday but haven;t had time to do a lot of work on it. -Toshio pgpMKkSuzITdg.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
Le 11/01/2012 03:30, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. If that assumption was wrong, some of those packages may be orphaned in the next few days as well: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/cweyl-perl.txt The ticket with all the details is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3046 -Toshio Took * cairomm (i was the sole co-maintainer) * osc * osc-source_validator * python-yolk * python-py2pack As usual, co-maintainers are welcome H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. If that assumption was wrong, some of those packages may be orphaned in the next few days as well: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/cweyl-perl.txt The ticket with all the details is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3046 -Toshio ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce I have taken soundtracker, rosegarden4 (bsjones) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
I have taken: * ack * perl-Data-Types * perl-MongoDB * Zim robin On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Brendan Jones brendan.jones...@gmail.comwrote: On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/**fedora-infrastructure/** attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-**orphaned.txthttps://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/**fedora-infrastructure/** attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-**losing-comaints.txthttps://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. If that assumption was wrong, some of those packages may be orphaned in the next few days as well: https://fedorahosted.org/**fedora-infrastructure/** attachment/ticket/3046/cweyl-**perl.txthttps://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/cweyl-perl.txt The ticket with all the details is here: https://fedorahosted.org/**fedora-infrastructure/ticket/**3046https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3046 -Toshio I have taken soundtracker, rosegarden4 (bsjones) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages with inactive owners orphaned and inactive comaintainers removed
On 01/11/2012 03:30 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: As part of the announced cleanup after the mass password and ssh key reset, packages that had owners who were inactive at this time were orphaned. comaintainer who were inactive were likewise removed from packages. The list of orphaned packages is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-orphaned.txt The list of packages that lsot comaintainers is here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/attachment/ticket/3046/to-be-losing-comaints.txt The perl-* packages owned by cweyl were reassigned ownership to mmaslano, one of the comaintainers under the assumption that this was what the perl team would desire. I was under the impression, it's the perl-sig's intention to have packages which loose its primary maintainer, to be colaboratively maintained. It's at least how I remember the situation when JPO had quit and had left 100s of packages behind. IIRC, back then, packages having had a co-maintainer had been assigned to the 1st co-comaintainer or somebody having stood up to voluneer filling the gap. Those remaining without maintainer were assigned to spot as placeholder, because the packagedb wasn't able to cope with maintainer == perl-sig. I guess the packagedb situation hasn't sufficiently improved since then? Anyway, I just noticed the iburrell packages also are on your list. IMO, these should likely followup the cweyl treatment, because much of perl would not be usable without them. Ralf -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On mercredi 22 juin 2011 14:00:40 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: We (as KDE SIG) should probably take care about the rest of K* and Q* apps/libs, I'll talk to guys. knutclient If nobody wants knutclient, I will maintain it. I have an UPS and use nut and knutclient to monitor it. -- Laurent Rineau http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LaurentRineau -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Laurent Rineau wrote: If nobody wants knutclient, I will maintain it. I have an UPS and use nut and knutclient to monitor it. Instead of nut, you should use UPower. Just a suggestion as that is what Gnome does. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Toshio, I'd like to take tcptrack, if no one has taken it yet. (I had a cursory look at the long thread and I didn't see anyone taking it) Jitesh On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. To try and minimize the problems this could cause, I'm publishing the current list of packages to be orphaned and will start reassigning owners if someone asks to take them over. We want to make sure that important packages are not going to be orphaned by this change. We're planning on removing people from packager and orphaning packages on Thursday if all goes well. The list of packages being orphaned are listed below and the list of packages with first level dependencies will be attached. Note that the dependency list could be incomplete in two ways: 1) Since I'm using source package names, we don't capture things that dep on a subpackage. 2) The list does not follow the dep chain out to see if something relies on something that relies on something that relies on a package that's being orphaned. Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken. (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday so you need a cvsadmin to reassign ownership for now). http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/packages_losing_owners.txt: adanaxisgpl adf-accanthis-fonts adf-tribun-fonts aldo apache-commons-collections apanov-edrip-fonts apanov-heuristica-fonts atop auto-destdir ax25-apps ax25-tools bibletime bitstream-vera-fonts boo boswars-addons brandy btanks buffer callgit camcardsync cdo chess ciso clex cmospwd CodeAnalyst-gui colrdx comoonics-base-py contextkit cronolog ctapi-common ctapi-cyberjack cwrite db4o dbh dejavu-fonts demorse django-contact-form django-evolution django-notification django-pagination django-sct django-tagging drbd dxcc E ecolier-court-fonts edsadmin elfinfo ember ember-media EmfEngine espeak fcitx feh fig2sxd fldigi flite fontpackages frama-c gappa gdeskcal gdesklets-goodweather gdesklets-quote-of-the-day gdm gfs-ambrosia-fonts gfs-artemisia-fonts gfs-baskerville-fonts gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts gfs-bodoni-fonts gfs-complutum-fonts gfs-decker-fonts gfs-didot-classic-fonts gfs-didot-fonts gfs-eustace-fonts gfs-fleischman-fonts gfs-garaldus-fonts gfs-gazis-fonts gfs-goschen-fonts gfs-ignacio-fonts gfs-jackson-fonts gfs-neohellenic-fonts gfs-nicefore-fonts gfs-olga-fonts gfs-philostratos-fonts gfs-porson-fonts gfs-pyrsos-fonts gfs-solomos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts ghost-diagrams gnome-globalmenu gnome-rdp gnome-screensaver gnome-themes-extras gnubik google-droid-fonts gpsk31 granule greadelf griv gtkparasite gtksourceview2-sharp gtksourceview-sharp gtranslator gts gurlchecker gwaei halibut harminv healpy HippoDraw imagej imgtarget initng initng-conf-gtk initng-ifiles itpp jomolhari-fonts kanjistrokeorders-fonts kbibtex kcheckers kde-plasma-ihatethecashew kde-plasma-translatoid kdetv kgtk klibido knutclient krusader leafpad libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt libassa libax25 libcgroup libcmpiutil libctl libdwarf libglfw libibverbs libkdcraw liblicense libmatheval libmlx4 libmthca liborigin2 libqttracker libvirt-cim libvirt-qpid libwfut libwps LinLog linpsk linuxdcpp lpsk31 ltl2ba madwimax meshmagick minisat2 mod_auth_pam mod_dnssd mod_mono moin-latex mono-addins mono-basic mono-debugger monodevelop monodevelop-boo monodevelop-debugger-gdb monodevelop-debugger-mdb monodevelop-vala mono-tools monotorrent mono-zeroconf moto4lin mpdscribble mrepo multiget mumbles muParser mx nabi nant ncview netcdf netsniff-ng notification-daemon-engine-slider ocfs2-tools oflb-riordonfancy-fonts ogre ois olpcsound osiv paratype-pt-sans-fonts pcmanx-gtk2 perl-Config-Simple perl-Font-TTF perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ perl-Makefile-DOM perl-Net-SMTP-SSL pgRouting phoronix-test-suite photoprint photoprint-borders picocom pisg pitivi polipo presto procbench proxychains purple-plugin_pack pyOpenSSL python-Chaco python-Enable python-mechanoid python-memcached python-pip python-polib python-pydns python-pyspf python-rabbyt python-tilecache python-TraitsBackendWX python-werkzeug python-zc-lockfile python-zdaemon python-zope-event python-zope-testing pywebkitgtk pyxmms qjson qoauth qps qt4-qsa qterm QTeXEngine qtiplot quazip qwit qwt qwt-doc rubygem-heroku rubygem-mail rubygem-mustache rubygem-railties rubygem-tzinfo scala scantailor scidavis scitools scrip secstate seedit senamirmir-washra-fonts sil
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Toshio, I wan to take fcitx. Fedora Debian User, former Ubuntu User My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager Ambassador https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:19:51PM +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: I can take kbibtex. Done. -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Those packages are already orphaned. On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com wrote: Toshio, I wan to take fcitx. Fedora Debian User, former Ubuntu User My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager Ambassador https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:19:51PM +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: I can take kbibtex. Done. -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
I can take kbibtex. Robin On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:21 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:53:47PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. photoprint I'll take photoprint. I just updated it to latest upstream and fixed it FTBFS. Done. Thanks! -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: rstrode took over gdm and gnome-screensaver this morning. On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:39:28PM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:24:08AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Excellent. Let me know. We're planning to orphan packages on Thursday after the infra meeting. Of course, people can take the packages after they're orphaned but the sooner the better so that we don't get to the point in the release cycle where we need to remove orphaned packages (and their dependents) from the repositories There have been a lot of changes--would you consider posting a new list of the packages that are still slated to be orphaned? Thanks! Yep. The lists here have been updated: http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/ In the deps list I note the following packages: * flite = speech-dispatcher - kdeaccessibility * *fonts* incl (fontpackages) = if nim doesn't sign, someone has stepped up to take over * kgtk * libcgroup = policycoreutils * libibverbs = corosynclib, glusterfs-common, openmpi, qpid-cpp-client-rdma * libmlx4 = libibverb * libmthca = libibverb * mx = smolt, python-logilab-common = pylint, gwibber * python-pip = I have someone who's expressed interest in this but they need a packaging mentor (I'm willing to sponsor if someone else is willing to be primary mentor). He's Tim Flink and has completed part of a review but that's it so he does need mentoring: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675587 * python-polib = transifex * There's some python zope modules if the people packaging up those zope modules want to take those on. * pywebkitgtk = gwibber, rhythmbox * SOAPpy = python-twisted-web * sound-theme-freedesktop = libcanberra * xerces-c = qpid, xqilla, xalan-c * xqilla - qpid-cpp-server-xml The list of to be orphaned packages (first level deps are attached): espeak flite HippoDraw I'll take the three above packages. olpcsound This package has long been dead and I thought it had been killed. It looks like it only lives on in the ancient and long dead OLPC-X branches. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:12:01AM +0300, Kalev Lember wrote: On 06/22/2011 03:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: xerces-c I can take xerces-c if its current owner doesn't sign the FPCA. I sent a personal mail to jrobie yesterday but no reply so far. Done. Toshio pgph4ctHKyfi6.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 09:50:01AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: espeak jskarvad had already taken this. I've made you a comaintainer. flite HippoDraw Done. olpcsound This package has long been dead and I thought it had been killed. It looks like it only lives on in the ancient and long dead OLPC-X branches. Thanks for the heads up and the rel-eng ticket. I've EOL'd the pkgdb branches for OLPC-X. -Toshio pgpobZhJb9NkW.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 04:19:51PM +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: I can take kbibtex. Done. -Toshio pgpC4NtEUSZxO.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 06:49:00PM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 21/06/11 04:35 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:30:42AM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: On 20/06/11 10:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: gdesklets-goodweather gdesklets-quote-of-the-day I contacted Owen Taylo, current owner, and currently wait for his reply. I am co-maintainer of those packages. Great. Let me know if you want to take them over (if Owen doesn't sign the FPCA) and I'll transfer them over. Otherwise, they'll be orphaned on Thursday and you can take them then. I will take them over should Owen not sign FPCA. If nobody is interested to take *font* packages, I would like to take them as well (useful for Design Team). Owen has signed so you're off the hook there. Paul Flo Williams has been in touch with Nicholas Mailhot and he's hopefully going to sign the fpca tonight. I'm going to delay orphaning/rmoving groups until tomorrow to hopefully give him time to do so. If he doesn't I'll make both you and Paul owners/comaintainers of the font packages tomorrow morning. -Toshio pgpv3mVlQS8Pp.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 09:46:17AM -0700, Dan Young wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: python-werkzeug I'm packaging python-flask, which has python-werkzeug as a dep. I'll take it. Done. Note that python-werkzeug has EPEL-4,5,and 6 branches which I've now orphaned. Feel free to pick them up in the pkgdb if you're interested in EPEL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-werkzeug -Toshio pgpQEmfauwE2s.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:27:35AM -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: Hi, if no other is interested, I can provide new home for these: espeak Reassigned to you, thanks! libax25 demorse linpsk LinLog bjensen has now signed so these are no longer orphaned. You're welcome to apply to be a comaintainer if you're interested, though. That seems to be the way the packages the Ham Radio SIG maintains works. -Toshio pgpoMMpUmbru9.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:00:40PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: Hi, I'll take these. kde-plasma-ihatethecashew kde-plasma-translatoid libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt libqttracker For MeeGo stack, I'll take these, I did review for most of them. We (as KDE SIG) should probably take care about the rest of K* and Q* apps/libs, I'll talk to guys. Done. Thanks, -Toshio pgpOc7V0gI1fA.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: SOAPpy I'll take this one. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. photoprint I'll take photoprint. I just updated it to latest upstream and fixed it FTBFS. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 02:53:47PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. photoprint I'll take photoprint. I just updated it to latest upstream and fixed it FTBFS. Done. Thanks! -Toshio pgptEImIzOOlz.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On 06/22/2011 03:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: xerces-c I can take xerces-c if its current owner doesn't sign the FPCA. I sent a personal mail to jrobie yesterday but no reply so far. -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
krusader I'll take this if it's not already taken. Radek Novacek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Monday, June 20, 2011 07:34:10 PM Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. To try and minimize the problems this could cause, I'm publishing the current list of packages to be orphaned and will start reassigning owners if someone asks to take them over. We want to make sure that important packages are not going to be orphaned by this change. We're planning on removing people from packager and orphaning packages on Thursday if all goes well. The list of packages being orphaned are listed below and the list of packages with first level dependencies will be attached. Note that the dependency list could be incomplete in two ways: 1) Since I'm using source package names, we don't capture things that dep on a subpackage. 2) The list does not follow the dep chain out to see if something relies on something that relies on something that relies on a package that's being orphaned. Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken. (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday so you need a cvsadmin to reassign ownership for now). http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/packages_losing_owners.txt: Hi, I'll take these. kde-plasma-ihatethecashew kde-plasma-translatoid libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt libqttracker For MeeGo stack, I'll take these, I did review for most of them. We (as KDE SIG) should probably take care about the rest of K* and Q* apps/libs, I'll talk to guys. Thanks Toshio -- Jaroslav Řezník jrez...@redhat.com Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Hi, if no other is interested, I can provide new home for these: espeak libax25 demorse linpsk LinLog regards Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Good day, dbh libmatheval muParser I'll take those, if they ain't taken. - fabian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
xcowsay I'll take this too. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On 22/06/2011 02:12, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: tetrinetx I’ll be interested in taking this one. -- Florent Le Coz louizat...@fedoraproject.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On 06/21/2011 11:46 AM, Deji Akingunola wrote: I will like to take the following 3 bibletime ncview netcdf The last two are already being effectively maintained by Orion, he can have them if he want. I have to say, I'd forgotten that I wasn't the official owner. Welcome aboard! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: python-werkzeug I'm packaging python-flask, which has python-werkzeug as a dep. I'll take it. -- Dan Young dyo...@mesd.k12.or.us Multnomah ESD - Technology Services 503-257-1562 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:59:52PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: libcgroup I'll take this one if it isn't already grabbed. Done. Thanks Josh. -Toshio pgpT70h8aEKKc.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:26:11PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 17:02 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: sound-theme-freedesktop If nobody else picks this one up, I'll take it. Done. -Toshio pgpuWlb4nI3SE.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:56:02PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 6:12 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: stp tex-zfuzz zenon Since nobody else has spoken for these, I'll take them, but comaintainers would be very welcome. Done. -Toshio pgpR6dzvOUTTN.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 02:32:46PM +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Good day, dbh libmatheval muParser I'll take those, if they ain't taken. Done. Note that muParser has EL-4, EL-5, and EL-6 branches that I've now orphaned. If you want to take them, feel free to log into the pkgdb and do so: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/muParser -Toshio pgpbazY2jZ7oB.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:34:47AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: xcowsay I'll take this too. Done. -Toshio pgpXt4TeSNtpr.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:41:20PM +0200, Radek Novacek wrote: krusader I'll take this if it's not already taken. Done. -Toshio pgpoeIbR58OVp.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:02:32AM +, Ben Boeckel wrote: Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: feh vifm I'll take these. Done. pgpyLHXy8u7GF.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:00:43AM +0530, Arun SAG wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: webattery I will take this. Done. Note that this package has branches for EPEL5 and EPEL6. I've orphaned those so you can pick them up in the packagedb if your interested in them: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/webattery -Toshio pgpweM6X1mHhC.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/06/11 00:06, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Note that three of these have EPEL branches that are already orphaned: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/django-tagging https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/django-pagination https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/django-notification If you want the EPEL branches, go ahead and take them in the pkgdb. -Toshio Thank you! I grabbed those EPEL branches just a few minutes ago. - -- Matthias Runge mru...@matthias-runge.de mru...@fedoraproject.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOADhtAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWpK8IAJQzGpb5q1XDyDmbTH1NHE5c coLhToFxsnsKVx62zrd56k7nB6YXh2m0pMN9BYJRe4rpr2+icrqewWmjHBneSty1 h1PTmYvsb0K2alewqxtZmwlVbznaRuuSjYmMdtR1CvwWjfw8G15xJg+aSsvhtBzI KaI4sjTVUS9nyzfzelDSn/Fqtz6ts/APi2XmmeyCqivtbV0m63rPPrpEDr5lFdUp FlYgcHiGwY2Pre0I8PJQFWepu+vgAlbagkvxAuc/TbIbTB7a3u6fjq66nh/JcUFd BTELg/vxwPw1WQHCqBnsIgaT5iNIi11hRq7WyE0/8TSFjp4xegnqEBAG7EouGok= =LIOj -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:35:03PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: I'll take atop too. Done. atop has branches for EL-4, EL-5, and EL-6 which I've now orphaned. Feel free to pick them up in the packagedb if you're interested in EPEL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/atop -Toshio pgpb3dLuGJUlC.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:56:44PM -0700, Peter Gordon wrote: I'll take dejavu-fonts. I'd really hate to see my favorite font package get stale. :) Done. -Toshio pgpgloMoa59QR.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: perl-Config-Simple perl-Font-TTF perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ perl-Makefile-DOM perl-Net-SMTP-SSL I'll take those... -- # Petr Sabata pgpDLxKTmyxQ8.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Hi, On 06/20/2011 07:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. To try and minimize the problems this could cause, I'm publishing the current list of packages to be orphaned and will start reassigning owners if someone asks to take them over. We want to make sure that important packages are not going to be orphaned by this change. We're planning on removing people from packager and orphaning packages on Thursday if all goes well. The list of packages being orphaned are listed below and the list of packages with first level dependencies will be attached. Note that the dependency list could be incomplete in two ways: 1) Since I'm using source package names, we don't capture things that dep on a subpackage. 2) The list does not follow the dep chain out to see if something relies on something that relies on something that relies on a package that's being orphaned. Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken. (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday so you need a cvsadmin to reassign ownership for now). http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/packages_losing_owners.txt: snip I'll take: adanaxisgpl zvbi And I've also taken the liberty of sending a personal mail to nim (Nicolas Mailhot) pointing out that he needs to sign the new CLA, to stop all the font packages he is the owner of getting orphaned. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Hi. May I take the apache-commons-collections ? Thanks :] BR, Jaromir. -- Red Hat Czech, s.r.o. Software Engineer / BaseOS Email: jca...@redhat.com Web: www.cz.redhat.com Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45, Brno, Czech Republic IC: 27690016 - Original Message - From: Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:02:01 AM Subject: Re: Packages that will be orphaned On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 08:04:46PM +0200, Jarosław Górny wrote: Oh, dear, I've missed the deadline. I've signed the FPCA now. I received a notice: You have successfully completed the FPCA. You are now in the 'cla_fpca' group Hope it's not too late... Not at all. Updated lists are now available on http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/ adanaxisgpl adf-accanthis-fonts adf-tribun-fonts apache-commons-collections apanov-edrip-fonts apanov-heuristica-fonts atop auto-destdir bibletime bitstream-vera-fonts brandy buffer camcardsync cdo ciso clex cmospwd CodeAnalyst-gui comoonics-base-py contextkit cronolog ctapi-cyberjack cwrite db4o dbh dejavu-fonts demorse drbd ecolier-court-fonts edsadmin elfinfo EmfEngine espeak fcitx feh fig2sxd flite fontpackages gdeskcal gdesklets-goodweather gdesklets-quote-of-the-day gdm gfs-ambrosia-fonts gfs-artemisia-fonts gfs-baskerville-fonts gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts gfs-bodoni-fonts gfs-complutum-fonts gfs-decker-fonts gfs-didot-classic-fonts gfs-didot-fonts gfs-eustace-fonts gfs-fleischman-fonts gfs-garaldus-fonts gfs-gazis-fonts gfs-goschen-fonts gfs-ignacio-fonts gfs-jackson-fonts gfs-neohellenic-fonts gfs-nicefore-fonts gfs-olga-fonts gfs-philostratos-fonts gfs-porson-fonts gfs-pyrsos-fonts gfs-solomos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts ghost-diagrams gnome-globalmenu gnome-rdp gnome-screensaver gnome-themes-extras granule greadelf griv gtkparasite gtranslator gts gurlchecker gwaei halibut harminv healpy HippoDraw imagej imgtarget initng initng-conf-gtk initng-ifiles itpp jomolhari-fonts kanjistrokeorders-fonts kbibtex kde-plasma-ihatethecashew kde-plasma-translatoid kdetv kgtk klibido knutclient krusader leafpad libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt libassa libax25 libcgroup libcmpiutil libctl libdwarf libglfw libibverbs libkdcraw liblicense libmatheval libmlx4 libmthca liborigin2 libqttracker libvirt-cim libvirt-qpid libwps LinLog linpsk linuxdcpp madwimax mod_auth_pam mod_dnssd moin-latex monotorrent moto4lin mrepo multiget mumbles muParser mx nabi ncview netcdf netsniff-ng notification-daemon-engine-slider ocfs2-tools oflb-riordonfancy-fonts olpcsound osiv paratype-pt-sans-fonts pcmanx-gtk2 perl-Config-Simple perl-Font-TTF perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ perl-Makefile-DOM perl-Net-SMTP-SSL pgRouting phoronix-test-suite photoprint photoprint-borders picocom pisg polipo presto procbench proxychains purple-plugin_pack python-Chaco python-Enable python-mechanoid python-pip python-polib python-pydns python-pyspf python-rabbyt python-tilecache python-TraitsBackendWX python-werkzeug python-zc-lockfile python-zdaemon python-zope-event python-zope-testing pywebkitgtk pyxmms qjson qoauth qps qt4-qsa qterm QTeXEngine qtiplot quazip qwit qwt qwt-doc rubygem-heroku rubygem-mail rubygem-mustache rubygem-railties rubygem-tzinfo scantailor scidavis scitools scrip secstate seedit senamirmir-washra-fonts sil-andika-fonts sil-charis-compact-fonts sil-charis-fonts sirius smb4k SOAPpy sound-theme-freedesktop spyder ss5 stix-fonts stp straw sx tcptrack tenr-de-styles-pkg tetrinetx tex-zfuzz tibetan-machine-uni-fonts tinycdb transifex userspace-rcu vidalia vifm webattery whowatch wifiroamd xcowsay xdx xerces-c xgridfit xinha xmlcopyeditor xmms xmms-alarm xqilla xvkbd yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts zenon zvbi -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: libcmpiutil libvirt-cim I'm trying to contact the maintainer to get them to sign FCPA asap. Failing that I'll find another volunteer to take them. libvirt-qpid I'm already comaintainer, so I'll take this one, unless someone else wants it. Rgards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, 20.06.11 17:02, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote: mod_dnssd I should probably take this, as I am upstream of this package. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Dne 20.6.2011 19:34, Toshio Kuratomi napsal(a): Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. To try and minimize the problems this could cause, I'm publishing the current list of packages to be orphaned and will start reassigning owners if someone asks to take them over. We want to make sure that important packages are not going to be orphaned by this change. We're planning on removing people from packager and orphaning packages on Thursday if all goes well. The list of packages being orphaned are listed below and the list of packages with first level dependencies will be attached. Note that the dependency list could be incomplete in two ways: 1) Since I'm using source package names, we don't capture things that dep on a subpackage. 2) The list does not follow the dep chain out to see if something relies on something that relies on something that relies on a package that's being orphaned. Please reply to this thread if you'd like to take any packages or ping me on IRC and I'll reply to this thread with what packages have been taken. (Needed since we aren't orphaning in the pkgdb until Thursday so you need a cvsadmin to reassign ownership for now). http://toshio.fedorapeople.org/fpca/packages_losing_owners.txt: adanaxisgpl adf-accanthis-fonts adf-tribun-fonts aldo apache-commons-collections apanov-edrip-fonts apanov-heuristica-fonts atop auto-destdir ax25-apps ax25-tools bibletime bitstream-vera-fonts boo boswars-addons brandy btanks buffer callgit camcardsync cdo chess ciso clex cmospwd CodeAnalyst-gui colrdx comoonics-base-py contextkit cronolog ctapi-common ctapi-cyberjack cwrite db4o dbh dejavu-fonts demorse django-contact-form django-evolution django-notification django-pagination django-sct django-tagging drbd dxcc E ecolier-court-fonts edsadmin elfinfo ember ember-media EmfEngine espeak fcitx feh fig2sxd fldigi flite fontpackages frama-c gappa gdeskcal gdesklets-goodweather gdesklets-quote-of-the-day gdm gfs-ambrosia-fonts gfs-artemisia-fonts gfs-baskerville-fonts gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts gfs-bodoni-fonts gfs-complutum-fonts gfs-decker-fonts gfs-didot-classic-fonts gfs-didot-fonts gfs-eustace-fonts gfs-fleischman-fonts gfs-garaldus-fonts gfs-gazis-fonts gfs-goschen-fonts gfs-ignacio-fonts gfs-jackson-fonts gfs-neohellenic-fonts gfs-nicefore-fonts gfs-olga-fonts gfs-philostratos-fonts gfs-porson-fonts gfs-pyrsos-fonts gfs-solomos-fonts gfs-theokritos-fonts ghost-diagrams gnome-globalmenu gnome-rdp gnome-screensaver gnome-themes-extras gnubik google-droid-fonts gpsk31 granule greadelf griv gtkparasite gtksourceview2-sharp gtksourceview-sharp gtranslator gts gurlchecker gwaei halibut harminv healpy HippoDraw imagej imgtarget initng initng-conf-gtk initng-ifiles itpp jomolhari-fonts kanjistrokeorders-fonts kbibtex kcheckers kde-plasma-ihatethecashew kde-plasma-translatoid kdetv kgtk klibido knutclient krusader leafpad libaccounts-glib libaccounts-qt libassa libax25 libcgroup libcmpiutil libctl libdwarf libglfw libibverbs libkdcraw liblicense libmatheval libmlx4 libmthca liborigin2 libqttracker libvirt-cim libvirt-qpid libwfut libwps LinLog linpsk linuxdcpp lpsk31 ltl2ba madwimax meshmagick minisat2 mod_auth_pam mod_dnssd mod_mono moin-latex mono-addins mono-basic mono-debugger monodevelop monodevelop-boo monodevelop-debugger-gdb monodevelop-debugger-mdb monodevelop-vala mono-tools monotorrent mono-zeroconf moto4lin mpdscribble mrepo multiget mumbles muParser mx nabi nant ncview netcdf netsniff-ng notification-daemon-engine-slider ocfs2-tools oflb-riordonfancy-fonts ogre ois olpcsound osiv paratype-pt-sans-fonts pcmanx-gtk2 perl-Config-Simple perl-Font-TTF perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ perl-Makefile-DOM perl-Net-SMTP-SSL pgRouting phoronix-test-suite photoprint photoprint-borders picocom pisg pitivi polipo presto procbench proxychains purple-plugin_pack pyOpenSSL python-Chaco python-Enable python-mechanoid python-memcached python-pip python-polib python-pydns python-pyspf python-rabbyt python-tilecache python-TraitsBackendWX python-werkzeug python-zc-lockfile python-zdaemon python-zope-event python-zope-testing pywebkitgtk pyxmms qjson qoauth qps qt4-qsa qterm QTeXEngine qtiplot quazip qwit qwt qwt-doc rubygem-heroku rubygem-mail rubygem-mustache rubygem-railties rubygem-tzinfo scala scantailor scidavis scitools scrip secstate seedit senamirmir-washra-fonts sil-andika-fonts sil-charis-compact-fonts sil-charis-fonts sirius smb4k SOAPpy sound-theme-freedesktop spyder ss5 stix-fonts stp straw sx tcptrack tenr-de-styles-pkg
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: qoauth qjson qwt qwt-doc I'll take these. -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:00:10PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: I'll take google-droid-fonts. Done. -Toshio I hope someone picks up stix-fonts! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: And I've also taken the liberty of sending a personal mail to nim (Nicolas Mailhot) pointing out that he needs to sign the new CLA, to stop all the font packages he is the owner of getting orphaned. Hans, If you do get a hold of Nicolas let him know he can have google-droid-fonts back if he wants it. I'm not a fonts guy and reading through the bug reports I can see I'm over my head. My main purpose in taking ownership was to keep them from getting orphaned as they are used in several MythTV themes. Of course if he doesn't respond or doesn't want it back I'll do my best to learn about fonts :) Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
Richard Shaw wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 2:22 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote: And I've also taken the liberty of sending a personal mail to nim (Nicolas Mailhot) pointing out that he needs to sign the new CLA, to stop all the font packages he is the owner of getting orphaned. If you do get a hold of Nicolas let him know he can have google-droid-fonts back if he wants it. I'm not a fonts guy and reading through the bug reports I can see I'm over my head. Don't worry about it. I pinged Nim this morning too, and told Toshio that I'd take all unclaimed font packages, including fontpackages and xgridfit, if Nim isn't able to. I'll co-maintain Droid if you need a hand. Regarding #517789, at a quick glance it seems to be held on determining the fontconfig incantations to correctly prioritise bits of Droid, and doesn't look broken at the moment, so it can be left as FutureFeature. -- Paul Flo Williams http://hisdeedsaredust.com/category/fonts/feed -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: cronolog I'll take this. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Paul Flo Williams p...@frixxon.co.uk wrote: Richard Shaw wrote: If you do get a hold of Nicolas let him know he can have google-droid-fonts back if he wants it. I'm not a fonts guy and reading through the bug reports I can see I'm over my head. Don't worry about it. I pinged Nim this morning too, and told Toshio that I'd take all unclaimed font packages, including fontpackages and xgridfit, if Nim isn't able to. I'll co-maintain Droid if you need a hand. Sure! Make the request and I'll approve. Regarding #517789, at a quick glance it seems to be held on determining the fontconfig incantations to correctly prioritise bits of Droid, and doesn't look broken at the moment, so it can be left as FutureFeature. Good to know! Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: perl-Config-Simple perl-Font-TTF perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ perl-Makefile-DOM perl-Net-SMTP-SSL Done. Note that perl-Config-Simple has EPEL-5 and EPEL-6 branches and perl-Makefile-DOM has an EPEL-5 branch. I've now orphaned these. Feel free to pick them up in the pkgdb if you care about EPEL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Config-Simple https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Makefile-DOM -Toshio pgpvJCKo6tw6U.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
2011/6/20 Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com: transifex As I co-maintain this, I'm interested in becoming the maintainer. k.r. Domingo Becker -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:09:19AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:02:07AM +0200, Petr Sabata wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: perl-Config-Simple perl-Font-TTF perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ perl-Makefile-DOM perl-Net-SMTP-SSL Done. Thanks. Note that perl-Config-Simple has EPEL-5 and EPEL-6 branches and perl-Makefile-DOM has an EPEL-5 branch. I've now orphaned these. Feel free to pick them up in the pkgdb if you care about EPEL: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Config-Simple https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Makefile-DOM Not really. Any volunteers? -- # Petr Sabata pgpPkdlOvZJ99.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 09:22:48AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: snip I'll take: adanaxisgpl zvbi Done. And I've also taken the liberty of sending a personal mail to nim (Nicolas Mailhot) pointing out that he needs to sign the new CLA, to stop all the font packages he is the owner of getting orphaned. Thanks very much. The font packages are one of the last major group of packages that I've been worried about. -Toshio pgpEhm5slmgmW.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 05:13:40AM -0400, Jaromir Capik wrote: Hi. May I take the apache-commons-collections ? Thanks :] Done. pgpNg69xvsBLu.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 11:01:55AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:34:10AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: libcmpiutil libvirt-cim I'm trying to contact the maintainer to get them to sign FCPA asap. Failing that I'll find another volunteer to take them. Excellent. Let me know. We're planning to orphan packages on Thursday after the infra meeting. Of course, people can take the packages after they're orphaned but the sooner the better so that we don't get to the point in the release cycle where we need to remove orphaned packages (and their dependents) from the repositories libvirt-qpid I'm already comaintainer, so I'll take this one, unless someone else wants it. Done. -Toshio pgpUtIsiL6I5J.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 12:38:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 20.06.11 17:02, Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) wrote: mod_dnssd I should probably take this, as I am upstream of this package. Done. Thanks. -Toshio pgpZ4OQdfD43S.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 01:27:51PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: I would like to takeover ruby* Thank you. Done: rubygem-heroku rubygem-mail rubygem-mustache rubygem-railties rubygem-tzinfo have been reassigned to you. -Toshio pgp8vSG4ziLDZ.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of last week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from the packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will be orphaned. To try and minimize the problems this could cause, I'm publishing the current list of packages to be orphaned and will start reassigning owners if someone asks to take them over. We want to make sure that important packages are not going to be orphaned by this change. We're planning on removing people from packager and orphaning packages on Thursday if all goes well. I will like to take the following 3 bibletime ncview netcdf The last two are already being effectively maintained by Orion, he can have them if he want. I'm already a co-maintainer for 'bibletime'. Deji -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:44:23AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Toshio Kuratomi wrote: qoauth qjson qwt qwt-doc I'll take these. Done. Thanks -Toshio pgpXkhgJuIfj4.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On 20/06/11 10:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: gdesklets-goodweather gdesklets-quote-of-the-day I contacted Owen Taylo, current owner, and currently wait for his reply. I am co-maintainer of those packages. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.thefinalzone.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Packages that will be orphaned
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 08:24:08AM -0600, Ken Dreyer wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote: cronolog I'll take this. Done. cronolog also has EL-5 and EL-6 branches. I've orphaned those if you'd like to take them in the pkgdb: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/cronolog -Toshio pgp3LsKwRivPY.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
