Please use the announce list (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18)
Something with [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] in the subject line should probably go to devel-announce list. Best regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On 31 July 2012 18:11, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) Fixed (thanks to kwizard for providing the fix, I just committed it). Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On 31 July 2012 18:11, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package apache-commons-launcher (fails to build) Package eclipse-collabnet-merge (fails to build) Fixed these two. Package eclipse-emf-query (fails to build) Package eclipse-emf-transaction (fails to build) Package eclipse-emf-validation (fails to build) Package eclipse-m2m-qvtoml (fails to build) Package eclipse-mdt-ocl (fails to build) Package eclipse-mdt-uml2 (fails to build) Working on these... -- Mat Booth http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Package man-pages-ko (orphan) I have taken ownership of this one. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
2012/7/31 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. ... Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart Hi have a fix ready for primary arches, and finally succeeded to do runtime test with the hardware. Now I cannot fix it because I'm not really a co-maintainer yet as I'm still in the 'awating review' state https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libcrystalhd The bugzilla where the FTBFS was discussed is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716154 What is the process I can follow to take over maintenance of the package ? Thx Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Hi, On 08/03/2012 11:27 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: 2012/7/31 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. ... Package libcrystalhd (fails to build) comaintained by: kwizart Hi have a fix ready for primary arches, and finally succeeded to do runtime test with the hardware. Now I cannot fix it because I'm not really a co-maintainer yet as I'm still in the 'awating review' state https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/libcrystalhd The bugzilla where the FTBFS was discussed is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716154 What is the process I can follow to take over maintenance of the package ? If you can send me a git format-patch formatted patch for master (*), I can use my proven packager rights to at least fix it for now, that way it won't get blocked and you save a significant amount of work to get it unblocked later. Regards, Hans *) Or some other way I can make the changes without needing to think too much :) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Hi, On 07/31/2012 07:11 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. snip Package libhid (fails to build) I've fixed the FTBFS for libhid. Regards, Hans -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Sérgio Basto wrote: On Ter, 2012-07-31 at 22:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) can't resolve this fail g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o kdatecombo.o kdatecombo.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o kfileitemext.o kfileitemext.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o klistviewitemdups.o klistviewitemdups.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o klistviewitemsingle.o klistviewitemsingle.cpp kdatecombo.cpp:17:26: fatal error: kdatecombo.moc: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [kdatecombo.o] Error 1 My Koji Rawhide build succeeded just fine. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
- Original Message - Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package libqttracker (fails to build) comaintained by: jreznik I'm inclined to let it die but I'll take a look. It's leftover after unsuccessful MeeGo packaging efforts. R. The script that generated this page can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py There you can also report bugs and RFEs. -- Jaroslav Řezník jrez...@redhat.com Engineering Program Manager Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On 07/31/2012 10:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: Removing: libgtkhotkey synapse requires libgtkhotkey.so.1 CC'ing Michel Alexandre Salim, synapse maintainer Ideally the synapse maintainer should own this as well but since I use synapse, I am going to take ownership of this for now to rescue synapse from being removed. Michel, if you want to maintain it, feel free to ask. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
- Original Message - - Original Message - Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package libqttracker (fails to build) comaintained by: jreznik I'm inclined to let it die but I'll take a look. It's leftover after unsuccessful MeeGo packaging efforts. Let it die in Fedora too - upstream is dead. It was part of Maemo 6, and as Nokia killed it, nobody is working anymore on it. It's needed for Qt Mobility but only on Maemo 6/MeeGo platform. No dependencies in Fedora. R. R. The script that generated this page can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/browser/scripts/find-unblocked-orphans.py There you can also report bugs and RFEs. -- Jaroslav Řezník jrez...@redhat.com Engineering Program Manager Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 602 797 774 Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Bill Nottingham wrote, at 08/01/2012 02:11 AM +9:00: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package ragel (fails to build) Package xaos (fails to build) Package xdrawchem (fails to build) Fixed these. Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Le 31/07/2012 19:11, Bill Nottingham a écrit : Package libgtksourceviewmm (fails to build) retired, since nobody claimed it. Package nvi (orphan) Package torque (orphan) Both taken and co-maintainers are very welcome ! best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package freenx-client (fails to build) Fixed. Package pngcrush (fails to build) Fixed. Package tritonus (orphan) Taken. -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. still there's no orphaned iptraf -- Nikola -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On Ter, 2012-07-31 at 22:42 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) can't resolve this fail g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o kdatecombo.o kdatecombo.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o kfileitemext.o kfileitemext.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o klistviewitemdups.o klistviewitemdups.cpp g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/include/kde -I/usr/lib64/qt-3.3/include -I. -DQT_THREAD_SUPPORT -D_REENTRANT -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o klistviewitemsingle.o klistviewitemsingle.cpp kdatecombo.cpp:17:26: fatal error: kdatecombo.moc: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make[2]: *** [kdatecombo.o] Error 1 Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) but since the build.log files are no longer available, I need to run new builds first, so it's going to take a while. :-( Are those build.log files really so large that they cannot be kept for longer? :-( It's so annoying to see those build failures and to have no idea why the builds failed. I also really dislike the way FTBFS are handled now. In the past, bugs were filed for the build failures and they were all tracked on a tracking bug in Bugzilla, so it was always possible to see what needed fixing, and it was possible for provenpackagers to work on that in a coordinated fashion. These days, we get surprised with the failures at the last moment when they have actually been happening for 2 or 3 releases (depending on whether they would have built on F16 had there been a mass rebuild there)! We really need to track those failures in Bugzilla again. Kevin Kofler -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Nikola Pajkovsky (npajk...@redhat.com) said: Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com writes: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. still there's no orphaned iptraf Please follow the procedure at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Thanks, Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On Qua, 2012-08-01 at 00:36 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: I wrote: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) I fixed these 4 packages now. Note that krecipes and tesseract both have newer upstream versions available: * krecipes: - current in Fedora: 1.0-beta2 (kdelibs3) - current upstream: 2.0-beta2 (kdelibs4) Note that this will need significant packaging changes, being a KDE Platform 4 app now (whereas the current Fedora specfile is for the old kdelibs3 version). * tesseract: - current in Fedora: 3.00 - current upstream: 3.01 (new features, bugfixes etc.) It looks like they both could use a new (co)maintainer. For komparator and qalculate-kde, the respective kdelibs3-based versions currently in Fedora are the latest (last?) upstream versions though. :-( Hi, repoquery -q qalculate-kde komparator komparator-0:0.9-5.fc15.x86_64 qalculate-kde-0:0.9.7-3.fc15.x86_64 Since komparator and qalculate-kde was not rebuild in F17. Shouldn't we also update F17 ? at least. Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Whoops, sorry about the reply to all (dang gmail)... I'll repost just to the devel mailing list (I canceled the original). On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Will the FTBFS packages be orphaned prior to being blocked? It would seem a grace period would be a good idea so people can pick them up if the current owner is non-responsive. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Package gnofract4d (orphan) comaintained by: firewing I have taken ownership of this one. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) said: Whoops, sorry about the reply to all (dang gmail)... I'll repost just to the devel mailing list (I canceled the original). On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Will the FTBFS packages be orphaned prior to being blocked? It would seem a grace period would be a good idea so people can pick them up if the current owner is non-responsive. Not directly. But if you have a fix and can get a proven packager to apply and build it, they won't be blocked. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote: Before we branch for Fedora 18, as is custom, we will block currently orphaned packages and packages that have failed to build since Fedora 16. The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. If no one claims any of these packages, they will be blocked before we branch for Fedora 18. We will block these packages on Monday, August 06. Note that if you're receiving this mail directly, it's because you are a co-maintainer of one of these packages. Please work with your comaintainers to take up maintenance. Package freenx-client (fails to build) Fixed. Package pngcrush (fails to build) Fixed. Package tritonus (orphan) Taken. -J Too many recipients. . . -J -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) but since the build.log files are no longer available, I need to run new builds first, so it's going to take a while. :-( Are those build.log files really so large that they cannot be kept for longer? :-( It's so annoying to see those build failures and to have no idea why the builds failed. I also really dislike the way FTBFS are handled now. In the past, bugs were filed for the build failures and they were all tracked on a tracking bug in Bugzilla, so it was always possible to see what needed fixing, and it was possible for provenpackagers to work on that in a coordinated fashion. These days, we get surprised with the failures at the last moment when they have actually been happening for 2 or 3 releases (depending on whether they would have built on F16 had there been a mass rebuild there)! We really need to track those failures in Bugzilla again. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) but since the build.log files are no longer available, I need to run new builds first, so it's going to take a while. :-( Are those build.log files really so large that they cannot be kept for longer? :-( It's so annoying to see those build failures and to have no idea why the builds failed. There's 3 per build (src,i686,x64) and they do get pretty big, just look at the size of a kernel, qt or libreoffice build. I also really dislike the way FTBFS are handled now. In the past, bugs were filed for the build failures and they were all tracked on a tracking bug in Bugzilla, so it was always possible to see what needed fixing, and it was possible for provenpackagers to work on that in a coordinated fashion. These days, we get surprised with the failures at the last moment when they have actually been happening for 2 or 3 releases (depending on whether they would have built on F16 had there been a mass rebuild there)! We really need to track those failures in Bugzilla again. That's being worked on as discussed in one of these threads, previously it was done by Matt Domsch with access large amounts of enterprise HW, there was a request for someone to step up to expedite the process if you have time. That said every build gets failure emails sent out so you could setup some form of rules to highlight the problem or write a script to query koji on occasion for your failed builds to email you a list of current non builds. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) but since the build.log files are no longer available, I need to run new builds first, so it's going to take a while. :-( The tesseract issue is documented at bz 843275. In general, I wish people would be closing out the relevant bugs when they fix these packages ... I also really dislike the way FTBFS are handled now. Agreed, this shouldn't be nearly so ad-hoc. See recent threads. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
On 07/31/2012 02:03 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Are those build.log files really so large that they cannot be kept for longer? :-( It's so annoying to see those build failures and to have no idea why the builds failed. There's 3 per build (src,i686,x64) and they do get pretty big, just look at the size of a kernel, qt or libreoffice build. Are they at least stored compressed? As such logs are highly repetitive, they're ideal for compression. I tried a kernel build.log with bzip2, and it went from 3.9M to 211K. And qt is better, from 20M to 294k! Josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
Tom Lane wrote: The tesseract issue is documented at bz 843275. In general, I wish people would be closing out the relevant bugs when they fix these packages ... Well, that bug was filed only a week ago, and neither the tracker nor the individual bugs were referenced in any way from the nagmail, so how was I expected to know about them? Anyway, I closed the 4 bugs for the FTBFS issues I fixed. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
I wrote: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) I fixed these 4 packages now. Note that krecipes and tesseract both have newer upstream versions available: * krecipes: - current in Fedora: 1.0-beta2 (kdelibs3) - current upstream: 2.0-beta2 (kdelibs4) Note that this will need significant packaging changes, being a KDE Platform 4 app now (whereas the current Fedora specfile is for the old kdelibs3 version). * tesseract: - current in Fedora: 3.00 - current upstream: 3.01 (new features, bugfixes etc.) It looks like they both could use a new (co)maintainer. For komparator and qalculate-kde, the respective kdelibs3-based versions currently in Fedora are the latest (last?) upstream versions though. :-( Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] [FINAL NOTICE] Retiring packages for F-18
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 El Wed, 01 Aug 2012 00:36:43 +0200 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at escribió: I wrote: I'm looking into these: Bill Nottingham wrote: Package komparator (fails to build) Package krecipes (fails to build) Package qalculate-kde (fails to build) Package tesseract (fails to build) I fixed these 4 packages now. Note that krecipes and tesseract both have newer upstream versions available: * krecipes: - current in Fedora: 1.0-beta2 (kdelibs3) - current upstream: 2.0-beta2 (kdelibs4) Note that this will need significant packaging changes, being a KDE Platform 4 app now (whereas the current Fedora specfile is for the old kdelibs3 version). * tesseract: - current in Fedora: 3.00 - current upstream: 3.01 (new features, bugfixes etc.) It looks like they both could use a new (co)maintainer. I've orphaned krecipes since i've not used it in years Dennis -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAYdsgACgkQkSxm47BaWffQrgCgs2zPOb30iFmoAHPhtAsHTXZ4 5d4AoKzJSA6S5wtnAuZNIcTpBBscu0Ym =w+M1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
