Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-27 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 
On Friday, 26 April 2024 at 15:47, Ben Beasley wrote:
> Josef,
> 
> I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169.
> Please create the Bodhi update.
> 
> The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is
> nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you want to do with RPMFusion is
> up to you.

olive is eligible for Fedora now as it has no dependencies outside
Fedora. I haven't looked at cinelerrra-gg, but it should be easey
at this point.

> For the curious, further details follow below.
> 
> – Ben Beasley (FAS music)
> 
> 
> 
> I double-checked the packages that were in your original list but not in the
> output of "fedrq wrsrc -s openexr":
> 
>     - The CTL package BuildRequires the compat package openexr2 instead, so
> it did not need to be rebuilt.
> 
>     - The synfig package also BuildRequires the compat package, and one can
> see that it links the compat libraries (e.g. libIlmImf-2_5.so.26), but it
> does depend *indirectly* on the current openexr via its dependencies. I
> think it did not need to be rebuilt, but an attempt was made to rebuild it
> in the side tag, which failed because the dependencies were not rebuilt yet
> – so I rebuilt it again, successfuly.
> 
>     - The cinelerra-gg and olive packages belong to RPMFusion, so there is
> nothing to do in Fedora.
> 
>     - The synfigstudio package really did need to be rebuilt! The source RPM
> does not depend on openexr, but the binary packages do.
> 
> To look for other cases like synfigstudio, I tried this:
> 
>     fedrq wr openexr-libs | xargs repoquery --repo=rawhide --qf
> '%{source_name}'
> 
> Other than synfigstudio, all of the resulting packages were in the original
> list.
> 
> On 4/25/24 11:20 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > 
> > The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the
> > packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle
> > soon).
> > 
> > I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the
> > Rawhide branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago.
> > Since I needed to rebuild OpenColorIO in the side tag, I raised the
> > issue[1] with the OpenColorIO maintainer and—after a quick, successful
> > trial-run in COPR—we ultimately decided to include the OpenColorIO
> > update in side tag rather than trying to revert it before rebuilding.
> > 
> > Therefore, OpenImageIO, krita, and luxcorerender received a second
> > rebuild commit for OpenColorIO 2.3.2 and a second build in the side tag.
> > The calligra and usd packages are also rebuilding for OpenColorIO 2.3.2
> > in the side tag. Once everything else is done, I will build Blender.
> > 
> > Finally, I will double-check the packages that were in Josef’s list but
> > not mine (CTL, cinelerra-gg, olive, synfig, and synfigstudio; libjxl is
> > just a binary package of jpegxl), to make sure I haven’t missed any
> > additional packages that really do need to be rebuilt.
> > 
> > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239262#c15
> > 
> > On 4/24/24 8:13 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > > 
> > > I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this
> > > set of packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that,
> > > and how “heavy” some of these packages are – and in the interest of
> > > not keeping this side tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead
> > > and start using provenpackager privilege to carefully work through
> > > the packages that can be rebuilt with a simple release bump.
> > > (Hopefully that means all of them!)
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 4/23/24 7:21 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:
> > > > 
> > > > $ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
> > > > CImg
> > > > Field3D
> > > > ImageMagick
> > > > OpenColorIO
> > > > OpenEXR_Viewers
> > > > OpenImageIO
> > > > OpenSceneGraph
> > > > YafaRay
> > > > blender
> > > > darktable
> > > > enblend
> > > > freeimage
> > > > gdal
> > > > gegl04
> > > > gimp
> > > > gmic
> > > > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> > > > hugin
> > > > jpegxl
> > > > kdelibs3
> > > > kf5-kimageformats
> > > > kf6-kimageformats
> > > > kio-extras
> > > > kio-extras-kf5
> > > > krita
> > > > luxcorerender
> > > > ogre
> > > > opencv
> > > > openvdb
> > > > pfstools
> > > > povray
> > > > prusa-slicer
> > > > vigra
> > > > vips
> > > > 
> > > > I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in
> > > > case anyone missed the original email.
> > > > 
> > > > I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these
> > > > rebuilds, but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who
> > > > wants to rebuild their own package.
> > > > 
> > > > That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the
> > > > packages that are in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I
> > > > co-maintain a few of them and have recently had to touch a few
> > > > more of them due to other ABI changes – also, there are some
> > > > long dependency chains involved.
>

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-26 Thread Josef Řídký 
Hi Ben,

Thanks a lot for your help. The update is submitted to bodhi for Rawhide.

@Richard Shaw  my fault about not giving you heads up
about the planned openexr update. My apologies. Will do in future.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 3:48 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:

> Josef,
>
> I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169.
> Please create the Bodhi update.
>
> The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is
> nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you want to do with RPMFusion is
> up to you.
>
> For the curious, further details follow below.
>
> – Ben Beasley (FAS music)
>
> 
>
> I double-checked the packages that were in your original list but not in
> the output of "fedrq wrsrc -s openexr":
> - The CTL package BuildRequires the compat package openexr2 instead,
> so it did not need to be rebuilt.
>
> - The synfig package also BuildRequires the compat package, and one
> can see that it links the compat libraries (e.g. libIlmImf-2_5.so.26), but
> it does depend *indirectly* on the current openexr via its dependencies. I
> think it did not need to be rebuilt, but an attempt was made to rebuild it
> in the side tag, which failed because the dependencies were not rebuilt yet
> – so I rebuilt it again, successfuly.
>
> - The cinelerra-gg and olive packages belong to RPMFusion, so there is
> nothing to do in Fedora.
>
> - The synfigstudio package really did need to be rebuilt! The source
> RPM does not depend on openexr, but the binary packages do.
>
> To look for other cases like synfigstudio, I tried this:
>
> fedrq wr openexr-libs | xargs repoquery --repo=rawhide --qf
> '%{source_name}'
>
> Other than synfigstudio, all of the resulting packages were in the
> original list.
> On 4/25/24 11:20 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the
> packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle soon).
>
> I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the Rawhide
> branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago. Since I
> needed to rebuild OpenColorIO in the side tag, I raised the issue[1] with
> the OpenColorIO maintainer and—after a quick, successful trial-run in
> COPR—we ultimately decided to include the OpenColorIO update in side tag
> rather than trying to revert it before rebuilding.
>
> Therefore, OpenImageIO, krita, and luxcorerender received a second rebuild
> commit for OpenColorIO 2.3.2 and a second build in the side tag. The
> calligra and usd packages are also rebuilding for OpenColorIO 2.3.2 in the
> side tag. Once everything else is done, I will build Blender.
>
> Finally, I will double-check the packages that were in Josef’s list but
> not mine (CTL, cinelerra-gg, olive, synfig, and synfigstudio; libjxl is
> just a binary package of jpegxl), to make sure I haven’t missed any
> additional packages that really do need to be rebuilt.
>
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239262#c15
> On 4/24/24 8:13 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this set of
> packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that, and how “heavy”
> some of these packages are – and in the interest of not keeping this side
> tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead and start using
> provenpackager privilege to carefully work through the packages that can be
> rebuilt with a simple release bump. (Hopefully that means all of them!)
>
>
> On 4/23/24 7:21 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:
>
> $ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
> CImg
> Field3D
> ImageMagick
> OpenColorIO
> OpenEXR_Viewers
> OpenImageIO
> OpenSceneGraph
> YafaRay
> blender
> darktable
> enblend
> freeimage
> gdal
> gegl04
> gimp
> gmic
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> hugin
> jpegxl
> kdelibs3
> kf5-kimageformats
> kf6-kimageformats
> kio-extras
> kio-extras-kf5
> krita
> luxcorerender
> ogre
> opencv
> openvdb
> pfstools
> povray
> prusa-slicer
> vigra
> vips
>
> I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in case
> anyone missed the original email.
>
> I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these rebuilds,
> but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who wants to rebuild their
> own package.
>
> That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the packages that are
> in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I co-maintain a few of them
> and have recently had to touch a few more of them due to other ABI changes
> – also, there are some long dependency chains involved.
> On 4/22/24 12:33 PM, Josef Řídký wrote:
>
> Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there was an
> issue with proper bug report reference.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild is
> still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-26 Thread Ben Beasley 

Josef,

I finished rebuilding everything in the side tag f41-build-side-88169. 
Please create the Bodhi update.


The packages cinelerra-gg and olive are RPMFusion packages, so there is 
nothing to do in Fedora; any coordination you want to do with RPMFusion 
is up to you.


For the curious, further details follow below.

– Ben Beasley (FAS music)



I double-checked the packages that were in your original list but not in 
the output of "fedrq wrsrc -s openexr":


    - The CTL package BuildRequires the compat package openexr2 
instead, so it did not need to be rebuilt.


    - The synfig package also BuildRequires the compat package, and one 
can see that it links the compat libraries (e.g. libIlmImf-2_5.so.26), 
but it does depend *indirectly* on the current openexr via its 
dependencies. I think it did not need to be rebuilt, but an attempt was 
made to rebuild it in the side tag, which failed because the 
dependencies were not rebuilt yet – so I rebuilt it again, successfuly.


    - The cinelerra-gg and olive packages belong to RPMFusion, so there 
is nothing to do in Fedora.


    - The synfigstudio package really did need to be rebuilt! The 
source RPM does not depend on openexr, but the binary packages do.


To look for other cases like synfigstudio, I tried this:

    fedrq wr openexr-libs | xargs repoquery --repo=rawhide --qf 
'%{source_name}'


Other than synfigstudio, all of the resulting packages were in the 
original list.


On 4/25/24 11:20 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:


The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the 
packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle soon).


I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the 
Rawhide branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago. 
Since I needed to rebuild OpenColorIO in the side tag, I raised the 
issue[1] with the OpenColorIO maintainer and—after a quick, successful 
trial-run in COPR—we ultimately decided to include the OpenColorIO 
update in side tag rather than trying to revert it before rebuilding.


Therefore, OpenImageIO, krita, and luxcorerender received a second 
rebuild commit for OpenColorIO 2.3.2 and a second build in the side 
tag. The calligra and usd packages are also rebuilding for OpenColorIO 
2.3.2 in the side tag. Once everything else is done, I will build Blender.


Finally, I will double-check the packages that were in Josef’s list 
but not mine (CTL, cinelerra-gg, olive, synfig, and synfigstudio; 
libjxl is just a binary package of jpegxl), to make sure I haven’t 
missed any additional packages that really do need to be rebuilt.


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239262#c15

On 4/24/24 8:13 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:


I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this 
set of packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that, 
and how “heavy” some of these packages are – and in the interest of 
not keeping this side tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead 
and start using provenpackager privilege to carefully work through 
the packages that can be rebuilt with a simple release bump. 
(Hopefully that means all of them!)



On 4/23/24 7:21 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:


I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:

$ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
CImg
Field3D
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph
YafaRay
blender
darktable
enblend
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
jpegxl
kdelibs3
kf5-kimageformats
kf6-kimageformats
kio-extras
kio-extras-kf5
krita
luxcorerender
ogre
opencv
openvdb
pfstools
povray
prusa-slicer
vigra
vips

I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in case 
anyone missed the original email.


I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these 
rebuilds, but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who wants 
to rebuild their own package.


That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the packages 
that are in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I co-maintain 
a few of them and have recently had to touch a few more of them due 
to other ABI changes – also, there are some long dependency chains 
involved.


On 4/22/24 12:33 PM, Josef Řídký wrote:
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there 
was an issue with proper bug report reference.


Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide 
rebuild is still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for 
rebuild of dependent packages.


Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:11 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:

Hi Ben,

thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away
and wait for their decision. So let's call F40 only (not
Rawhide) side tags builds on hold till the decision is made.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 2

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-25 Thread Ben Beasley 
The side tag is nearly complete. I have finished rebuilding all of the 
packages in “my” list for openexr except Blender (which I’ll tackle soon).


I discovered that an ABI-incompatible update was committed to the 
Rawhide branch for OpenColorIO, but never built, about two months ago. 
Since I needed to rebuild OpenColorIO in the side tag, I raised the 
issue[1] with the OpenColorIO maintainer and—after a quick, successful 
trial-run in COPR—we ultimately decided to include the OpenColorIO 
update in side tag rather than trying to revert it before rebuilding.


Therefore, OpenImageIO, krita, and luxcorerender received a second 
rebuild commit for OpenColorIO 2.3.2 and a second build in the side tag. 
The calligra and usd packages are also rebuilding for OpenColorIO 2.3.2 
in the side tag. Once everything else is done, I will build Blender.


Finally, I will double-check the packages that were in Josef’s list but 
not mine (CTL, cinelerra-gg, olive, synfig, and synfigstudio; libjxl is 
just a binary package of jpegxl), to make sure I haven’t missed any 
additional packages that really do need to be rebuilt.


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239262#c15

On 4/24/24 8:13 AM, Ben Beasley wrote:


I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this set 
of packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that, and how 
“heavy” some of these packages are – and in the interest of not 
keeping this side tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead and 
start using provenpackager privilege to carefully work through the 
packages that can be rebuilt with a simple release bump. (Hopefully 
that means all of them!)



On 4/23/24 7:21 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:


I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:

$ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
CImg
Field3D
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph
YafaRay
blender
darktable
enblend
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
jpegxl
kdelibs3
kf5-kimageformats
kf6-kimageformats
kio-extras
kio-extras-kf5
krita
luxcorerender
ogre
opencv
openvdb
pfstools
povray
prusa-slicer
vigra
vips

I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in case 
anyone missed the original email.


I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these 
rebuilds, but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who wants to 
rebuild their own package.


That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the packages 
that are in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I co-maintain a 
few of them and have recently had to touch a few more of them due to 
other ABI changes – also, there are some long dependency chains involved.


On 4/22/24 12:33 PM, Josef Řídký wrote:
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there 
was an issue with proper bug report reference.


Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild 
is still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of 
dependent packages.


Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:11 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:

Hi Ben,

thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and
wait for their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide)
side tags builds on hold till the decision is made.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ben Beasley
 wrote:

Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in
required in the stable F40 release? And would you consider
asking FESCo for approval as required by the Updates Policy?


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases

Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have
very messy interactions with other updates in other side
tags, e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9
for blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I
would advocate for delaying it by at least one week.

Thanks,

Ben Beasley (FAS music)

On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:

Hi folks,

this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the
openexr package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.

List of dependent package should be following (please,
correct me if I haven't found all):
CTL
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
blender
cinelerra-gg
darktable
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
kf5-kimageformats
kio-extras
krita
libjxl
olive
opencv
pfstools
povray
synfig
synfigstudio
vigra

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Richard Shaw 
Just an observation...

I'm very happy for the assist, I don't have the time I used to for
packaging and the dependency chain for this particular package is "fun",
but as the primary maintainer for openexr, you can imagine my surprise as
this announcement.

Perhaps it would be a good idea to contact the maintainer for a project
prior to such announcements?

Thanks,
Richard
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé 
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 01:05:08PM +, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:15 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package 
> > in Fedora Rawhide and f40.
> >
> 
> I note that there is a patent clause which
> allows DreamWorks to revoke the patent
> grants under some conditions for the
> lossy compression.
> 
> Has Fedora Legal reviewed the revocable
> patent license language, and does there
> need to be a (new) SPDX license to include
> that patent grant (BSD-3-Clause-Patent?)

The revocable patent language is probably harmless, because it looks
to be somewhat similar to the revocable patent clause already considered
acceptable in the Apache 2.0 license. Does need legal review though.

Even if the patent clause is a problem, openexr grants the option
to consume it under the terms of the Apache 2.0, instead of the
BSD + patent grant.

I notice Josef has opened a ticket to request review of this now

  https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/510

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Daniel P . Berrangé 
On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 03:48:28PM +0200, Josef Řídký wrote:
> As the mentioned patent clause is there for 10+ years I might just believe
> it went through Fedora Legal, as it is a much older legal related task than
> I am co-maintainer of the openexr itself.
> 
> But I am fine with having conversation with the Legal team about the proper
> SPDX license clause that should be used for this project.

Yes, I don't think it is correct to merely have "License: BSD-3-Clause"
listed in the spec. The LICENSE file refers to BSD-3-Clause as the
overall license, but the PATENTS file refines that to indicate that
a subset of files are under a choice of BSD-3-Clause OR Apache-2.0,
and that when taken under the BSD-3-Clause there is an additional
patent grant (whose language looks derived from the Apache patent
grant clause). The patent grant feels like it effectively creates
a new version of the BSD-3-Clause that would need a name. IOW the RPM
license would end up being an expression along the lines of:

  "BSD-3-Clause AND (BSD-3-Clause-with-...something... OR Apache-2.0)"

A ticket for Fedora legal at the 'fedora-license-data' repo is the
way forward.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com  -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Josef Řídký 
As the mentioned patent clause is there for 10+ years I might just believe
it went through Fedora Legal, as it is a much older legal related task than
I am co-maintainer of the openexr itself.

But I am fine with having conversation with the Legal team about the proper
SPDX license clause that should be used for this project.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:06 PM Gary Buhrmaster 
wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:15 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr
> package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.
> >
>
> I note that there is a patent clause which
> allows DreamWorks to revoke the patent
> grants under some conditions for the
> lossy compression.
>
> Has Fedora Legal reviewed the revocable
> patent license language, and does there
> need to be a (new) SPDX license to include
> that patent grant (BSD-3-Clause-Patent?)
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Gary Buhrmaster 
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:15 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package in 
> Fedora Rawhide and f40.
>

I note that there is a patent clause which
allows DreamWorks to revoke the patent
grants under some conditions for the
lossy compression.

Has Fedora Legal reviewed the revocable
patent license language, and does there
need to be a (new) SPDX license to include
that patent grant (BSD-3-Clause-Patent?)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Josef Řídký 
Thanks a lot. OpenCV package is ready to be rebuilt in the side tag, but is
blocked by gdal and vtk packages, so once done, just a simple fedpkg build
with side tag is necessary for opencv (no additional bump needed).

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 2:14 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:

> I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this set of
> packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that, and how “heavy”
> some of these packages are – and in the interest of not keeping this side
> tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead and start using
> provenpackager privilege to carefully work through the packages that can be
> rebuilt with a simple release bump. (Hopefully that means all of them!)
>
>
> On 4/23/24 7:21 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:
>
> I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:
>
> $ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
> CImg
> Field3D
> ImageMagick
> OpenColorIO
> OpenEXR_Viewers
> OpenImageIO
> OpenSceneGraph
> YafaRay
> blender
> darktable
> enblend
> freeimage
> gdal
> gegl04
> gimp
> gmic
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> hugin
> jpegxl
> kdelibs3
> kf5-kimageformats
> kf6-kimageformats
> kio-extras
> kio-extras-kf5
> krita
> luxcorerender
> ogre
> opencv
> openvdb
> pfstools
> povray
> prusa-slicer
> vigra
> vips
>
> I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in case
> anyone missed the original email.
>
> I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these rebuilds,
> but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who wants to rebuild their
> own package.
>
> That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the packages that are
> in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I co-maintain a few of them
> and have recently had to touch a few more of them due to other ABI changes
> – also, there are some long dependency chains involved.
> On 4/22/24 12:33 PM, Josef Řídký wrote:
>
> Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there was an
> issue with proper bug report reference.
>
> Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild is
> still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of dependent
> packages.
>
> Best regards
>
> Josef Ridky
> Senior Software Engineer
> Core Services Team
> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:11 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:
>
>> Hi Ben,
>>
>> thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and wait for
>> their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide) side tags builds on
>> hold till the decision is made.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Josef Ridky
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> Core Services Team
>> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ben Beasley 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in required in
>>> the stable F40 release? And would you consider asking FESCo for approval as
>>> required by the Updates Policy?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases
>>>
>>> Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have very messy
>>> interactions with other updates in other side tags, e.g.
>>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9 for
>>> blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I would advocate for
>>> delaying it by at least one week.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Ben Beasley (FAS music)
>>> On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr
>>> package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.
>>>
>>> List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I
>>> haven't found all):
>>> CTL
>>> ImageMagick
>>> OpenColorIO
>>> OpenEXR_Viewers
>>> OpenImageIO
>>> OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
>>> blender
>>> cinelerra-gg
>>> darktable
>>> freeimage
>>> gdal
>>> gegl04
>>> gimp
>>> gmic
>>> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
>>> hugin
>>> kf5-kimageformats
>>> kio-extras
>>> krita
>>> libjxl
>>> olive
>>> opencv
>>> pfstools
>>> povray
>>> synfig
>>> synfigstudio
>>> vigra
>>> vips
>>>
>>> I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven packager) to
>>> rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with following side-tags:
>>>
>>> F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
>>> Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169
>>>
>>> Best regards
>>>
>>> Josef Ridky
>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>> Core Services Team
>>> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
>>>
>>> --
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>>> List Archives: 
>>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-24 Thread Ben Beasley 
I rebuilt openvdb. I am finding that the dependency chains in this set 
of packages are even longer than I expected. Considering that, and how 
“heavy” some of these packages are – and in the interest of not keeping 
this side tag open for too long – I am going to go ahead and start using 
provenpackager privilege to carefully work through the packages that can 
be rebuilt with a simple release bump. (Hopefully that means all of them!)



On 4/23/24 7:21 PM, Ben Beasley wrote:


I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:

$ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
CImg
Field3D
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph
YafaRay
blender
darktable
enblend
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
jpegxl
kdelibs3
kf5-kimageformats
kf6-kimageformats
kio-extras
kio-extras-kf5
krita
luxcorerender
ogre
opencv
openvdb
pfstools
povray
prusa-slicer
vigra
vips

I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in case 
anyone missed the original email.


I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these 
rebuilds, but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who wants to 
rebuild their own package.


That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the packages that 
are in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I co-maintain a few 
of them and have recently had to touch a few more of them due to other 
ABI changes – also, there are some long dependency chains involved.


On 4/22/24 12:33 PM, Josef Řídký wrote:
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there 
was an issue with proper bug report reference.


Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild 
is still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of 
dependent packages.


Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:11 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:

Hi Ben,

thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and
wait for their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide)
side tags builds on hold till the decision is made.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ben Beasley
 wrote:

Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in
required in the stable F40 release? And would you consider
asking FESCo for approval as required by the Updates Policy?


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases

Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have
very messy interactions with other updates in other side
tags, e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9
for blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I
would advocate for delaying it by at least one week.

Thanks,

Ben Beasley (FAS music)

On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:

Hi folks,

this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the
openexr package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.

List of dependent package should be following (please,
correct me if I haven't found all):
CTL
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
blender
cinelerra-gg
darktable
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
kf5-kimageformats
kio-extras
krita
libjxl
olive
opencv
pfstools
povray
synfig
synfigstudio
vigra
vips

I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven
packager) to rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with
following side-tags:

F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

--
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedorapro

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Ben Beasley 

I get a slightly larger list with fedrq:

$ fedrq wrsrc -s openexr -F name
CImg
Field3D
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph
YafaRay
blender
darktable
enblend
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
jpegxl
kdelibs3
kf5-kimageformats
kf6-kimageformats
kio-extras
kio-extras-kf5
krita
luxcorerender
ogre
opencv
openvdb
pfstools
povray
prusa-slicer
vigra
vips

I BCC’d all of the foo-maintain...@fedoraproject.org aliases in case 
anyone missed the original email.


I am happy to work as provenpackager to help with some of these 
rebuilds, but I want to allow a *little* time for anyone who wants to 
rebuild their own package.


That said, I’m going to go ahead and rebuild some of the packages that 
are in or adjacent to the Blender stack, because I co-maintain a few of 
them and have recently had to touch a few more of them due to other ABI 
changes – also, there are some long dependency chains involved.


On 4/22/24 12:33 PM, Josef Řídký wrote:
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there was 
an issue with proper bug report reference.


Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild 
is still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of 
dependent packages.


Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:11 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:

Hi Ben,

thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and
wait for their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide) side
tags builds on hold till the decision is made.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ben Beasley
 wrote:

Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in
required in the stable F40 release? And would you consider
asking FESCo for approval as required by the Updates Policy?


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases

Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have very
messy interactions with other updates in other side tags, e.g.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9
for blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I
would advocate for delaying it by at least one week.

Thanks,

Ben Beasley (FAS music)

On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:

Hi folks,

this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the
openexr package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.

List of dependent package should be following (please,
correct me if I haven't found all):
CTL
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
blender
cinelerra-gg
darktable
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
kf5-kimageformats
kio-extras
krita
libjxl
olive
opencv
pfstools
povray
synfig
synfigstudio
vigra
vips

I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven
packager) to rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with
following side-tags:

F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

--
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fed

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Ben Beasley 

You can use:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?order=-tag_name&tagID=88169&inherited=1&latest=1

So far it looks like we have openexr, gegl04, and jpegxl.

On 4/23/24 7:13 AM, Tomas Smetana wrote:

Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel  napsal(a):


I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of
the others rebuilt first:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log


Similar for pfstools: I have not tried to rebuild the packages yet, but they
depend on ImageMagick, so unless that one is finished, the build would fail.

Is there a way to find out what's been already rebuilt?

Thanks and regards,

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Orion Poplawski 

On 4/23/24 06:01, Josef Řídký wrote:

So far only those two packages were built

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=88169&order=-build_id&latest=1 


E.g. for opencv there has to be libjxl rebuild first. Similarly for others.


I've started a jpegxl (libjxl) build here: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=116776214


On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:13 PM Tomas Smetana > wrote:


Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> napsal(a):

 > I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they
need some of
 > the others rebuilt first:
 >
 >
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log 

 >
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log 

 >

Similar for pfstools: I have not tried to rebuild the packages yet,
but they
depend on ImageMagick, so unless that one is finished, the build
would fail.

Is there a way to find out what's been already rebuilt?

Thanks and regards,
-- 
Tomáš Smetana

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/

List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines

List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org 

Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his  - surely the least important thing about me
IT Systems Manager 720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Josef Řídký 
So far only those two packages were built

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=88169&order=-build_id&latest=1

E.g. for opencv there has to be libjxl rebuild first. Similarly for others.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:13 PM Tomas Smetana  wrote:

> Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 +
> Gwyn Ciesla via devel  napsal(a):
>
> > I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some
> of
> > the others rebuilt first:
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log
> >
>
> Similar for pfstools: I have not tried to rebuild the packages yet, but
> they
> depend on ImageMagick, so unless that one is finished, the build would
> fail.
>
> Is there a way to find out what's been already rebuilt?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> --
> Tomáš Smetana
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-23 Thread Tomas Smetana 
Dne Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:02:07 +
Gwyn Ciesla via devel  napsal(a):

> I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of
> the others rebuilt first:
> 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log
> 

Similar for pfstools: I have not tried to rebuild the packages yet, but they
depend on ImageMagick, so unless that one is finished, the build would fail.

Is there a way to find out what's been already rebuilt?

Thanks and regards,
-- 
Tomáš Smetana
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel 
I tried to so synfig and gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free, and they need some of the 
others rebuilt first:

https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2955/116742955/root.log
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3027/116743027/root.log

-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

On Monday, April 22nd, 2024 at 7:14 AM, Josef Řídký  wrote:

> Hi folks,
> 

> this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package in 
> Fedora Rawhide and f40.
> 

> List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I 
> haven't found all):
> CTL
> ImageMagick
> OpenColorIO
> OpenEXR_Viewers
> OpenImageIO
> OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
> blender
> cinelerra-gg
> darktable
> freeimage
> gdal
> gegl04
> gimp
> gmic
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> hugin
> kf5-kimageformats
> kio-extras
> krita
> libjxl
> olive
> opencv
> pfstools
> povray
> synfig
> synfigstudio
> vigra
> vips
> 

> I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven packager) to 
> rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with following side-tags:
> 

> F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
> Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169
> 

> 

> Best regards
> 

> Josef Ridky
> Senior Software Engineer
> Core Services Team
> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký 
Well good news, the F40 rebuild is not needed. It looks like there was an
issue with proper bug report reference.

Sorry for the disturbance about that in F40. But the Rawhide rebuild is
still in place so please use f41-build-side-88169 for rebuild of dependent
packages.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 6:11 PM Josef Řídký  wrote:

> Hi Ben,
>
> thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and wait for
> their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide) side tags builds on
> hold till the decision is made.
>
> Best regards
>
> Josef Ridky
> Senior Software Engineer
> Core Services Team
> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ben Beasley 
> wrote:
>
>> Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in required in the
>> stable F40 release? And would you consider asking FESCo for approval as
>> required by the Updates Policy?
>>
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases
>>
>> Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have very messy
>> interactions with other updates in other side tags, e.g.
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9 for
>> blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I would advocate for
>> delaying it by at least one week.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ben Beasley (FAS music)
>> On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr
>> package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.
>>
>> List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I
>> haven't found all):
>> CTL
>> ImageMagick
>> OpenColorIO
>> OpenEXR_Viewers
>> OpenImageIO
>> OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
>> blender
>> cinelerra-gg
>> darktable
>> freeimage
>> gdal
>> gegl04
>> gimp
>> gmic
>> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
>> hugin
>> kf5-kimageformats
>> kio-extras
>> krita
>> libjxl
>> olive
>> opencv
>> pfstools
>> povray
>> synfig
>> synfigstudio
>> vigra
>> vips
>>
>> I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven packager) to
>> rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with following side-tags:
>>
>> F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
>> Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Josef Ridky
>> Senior Software Engineer
>> Core Services Team
>> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>> --
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Josef Řídký 
Hi Ben,

thanks for the notice. I'll fill the FESCO ticket right away and wait for
their decision. So let's call F40 only (not Rawhide) side tags builds on
hold till the decision is made.

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.


On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:04 PM Ben Beasley  wrote:

> Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in required in the
> stable F40 release? And would you consider asking FESCo for approval as
> required by the Updates Policy?
>
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases
>
> Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have very messy
> interactions with other updates in other side tags, e.g.
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9 for
> blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I would advocate for
> delaying it by at least one week.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben Beasley (FAS music)
> On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr package
> in Fedora Rawhide and f40.
>
> List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I
> haven't found all):
> CTL
> ImageMagick
> OpenColorIO
> OpenEXR_Viewers
> OpenImageIO
> OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
> blender
> cinelerra-gg
> darktable
> freeimage
> gdal
> gegl04
> gimp
> gmic
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
> hugin
> kf5-kimageformats
> kio-extras
> krita
> libjxl
> olive
> opencv
> pfstools
> povray
> synfig
> synfigstudio
> vigra
> vips
>
> I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven packager) to
> rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with following side-tags:
>
> F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
> Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169
>
> Best regards
>
> Josef Ridky
> Senior Software Engineer
> Core Services Team
> Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
> --
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: [HEADS-UP] openexr so name bump heading Rawhide and f40

2024-04-22 Thread Ben Beasley 
Is there a specific reason that an ABI-breaking update in required in 
the stable F40 release? And would you consider asking FESCo for approval 
as required by the Updates Policy?


https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/#stable-releases

Note that if this update happens in F40 now, it will have very messy 
interactions with other updates in other side tags, e.g. 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-45862e3ed9 for 
blender. Even if this update is truly required in F40, I would advocate 
for delaying it by at least one week.


Thanks,

Ben Beasley (FAS music)

On 4/22/24 8:14 AM, Josef Řídký wrote:

Hi folks,

this is in advance notice about the upcoming rebase of the openexr 
package in Fedora Rawhide and f40.


List of dependent package should be following (please, correct me if I 
haven't found all):

CTL
ImageMagick
OpenColorIO
OpenEXR_Viewers
OpenImageIO
OpenSceneGraph-OpenEXR
blender
cinelerra-gg
darktable
freeimage
gdal
gegl04
gimp
gmic
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free
hugin
kf5-kimageformats
kio-extras
krita
libjxl
olive
opencv
pfstools
povray
synfig
synfigstudio
vigra
vips

I would like to ask responsible maintainers (or kind proven packager) 
to rebuild their packages for Rawhide and f40 with following side-tags:


F40 -> f40-build-side-88171
Rawhide -> f41-build-side-88169

Best regards

Josef Ridky
Senior Software Engineer
Core Services Team
Red Hat Czech, s.r.o.

--
___
devel mailing list --devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email todevel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of 
Conduct:https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List 
Archives:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report 
it:https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue