Re: Broken dependencies: rt3
On Sun, 2010-12-19 at 11:04 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package ownership. In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/rt3 The person has been active in koji a day ago. Yeah. ;( I wish we could more easily target the epel owner(s) of a package. Especially in such cases where the Fedora maintainer isn't interested and doesn't have anything to do with the epel branches. Perhaps we could look at implementing a $packagename-epel-ow...@fedoraproject.org alias for just the epel branches for a package? I'll look into that. should be pretty trivial to implement. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: rt3
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 09:11:21 -0500 seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: should be pretty trivial to implement. yeah, with a bit of help I figured out how to modify the script that creates the aliases. Sadly, there's a filtering issue in pkgdb, where it's not filtering by product properly. ;( I filed a pkgdb ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/packagedb/ticket/217 Once thats solved it should be easy to have: $packagename-ow...@fedoraproject.org - all owners $packagename-epel-ow...@fedoraproject.org - epel owners only $packagename-fedora-ow...@fedoraproject.org - fedora owners only. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: rt3
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:24:56 +0100, Ralf wrote: Hi, I am mail bombed with mails complaining about broken deps originating from those EPEL6-versions of packages I maintain in Fedora. * I am not these packages' maintainer (I maintain them in Fedora, but do not maintain them in EPEL) - Stop this silly mail-bombardment! * The broken deps these mails are complaining about must have been present in EPEL for a long time, because none of these packages has been rebuilt recently. * Please add a human mail contact (reply-to) to these broken mails such that people being subject to this kind of bombardment have a chance to get some human's reaction. At least all of my attempts to contact those individuals on PM of whom I presume to be responsible remained unanswered. Please understand that this current practice doesn't leave me an alternative to filter these mails as spam. This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package ownership. In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/rt3 The person has been active in koji a day ago. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Broken dependencies: rt3
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:32:30 +0100 Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote: This is due to a flaw in the Fedora PKGNAME-owner aliases and using them also for EPEL. There are no separate aliases for EPEL package ownership. In pkgdb one can see that there is a different owner for the EPEL package: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/rt3 The person has been active in koji a day ago. Yeah. ;( I wish we could more easily target the epel owner(s) of a package. Especially in such cases where the Fedora maintainer isn't interested and doesn't have anything to do with the epel branches. Perhaps we could look at implementing a $packagename-epel-ow...@fedoraproject.org alias for just the epel branches for a package? I'll look into that. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
