Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 11:55, Stuart S wrote: > I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37 > > Got the following errors > > Problem: conflicting requests > - nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module > php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64 > You have an outside module installed on the system. Going from the name I would expect it is the remi PHP ones. You will need to disable that module and/or replace it with the f37 one to get things going. > Error: > Problem 1: package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 > requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed > - package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires > php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed > - php-common-7.4.33-2.fc35.remi.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package > php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 > Problem 2: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires > libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers > can be installed > - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires > qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed > - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) > > > I know this is not a help page but can someone point me in right direction > as I can't find it... > > Cheers > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37 Got the following errors Problem: conflicting requests - nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64 Error: Problem 1: package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed - php-common-7.4.33-2.fc35.remi.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 Problem 2: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) I know this is not a help page but can someone point me in right direction as I can't find it... Cheers ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
right, I was running with just "--skip broken" ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Error: Problem 1: package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.71()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.71()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 requires libicudata.so.71()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both libicu-71.1-2.fc37.x86_64 and libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64 - problem with installed package boost-regex-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 - package webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - boost-regex-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Seemingly all fine after --allowerasing. Cheers, Il giorno gio 3 nov 2022 alle ore 10:33 Robert Balejik ha scritto: > Problem 1: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - mutter-42.5-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 2: package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64 requires > libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64 > Problem 3: package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires > libncurses.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libtinfo.so.5()(64bit), but > none of the providers can be installed > - ncurses-compat-libs-6.2-9.20210508.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 > Problem 4: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires > system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed > - fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - fedora-release-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch > Problem 5: problem with installed package > switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64 > - package switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.4-2.fc37.x86_64 requires > switchboard(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed > - switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - switchboard-6.0.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > Problem 6: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires > system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed > - package fedora-release-36-20.noarch requires fedora-release-common = > 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed > - package fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch requires > fedora-release-common = 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed > - package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release, > but none of the providers can be installed > - fedora-release-common-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > - problem with installed package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines:
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Problem 1: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mutter-42.5-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64 Problem 3: package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libncurses.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libtinfo.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - ncurses-compat-libs-6.2-9.20210508.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 Problem 4: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fedora-release-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch Problem 5: problem with installed package switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64 - package switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.4-2.fc37.x86_64 requires switchboard(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed - switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - switchboard-6.0.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 6: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-release-36-20.noarch requires fedora-release-common = 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch requires fedora-release-common = 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed - package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release, but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-common-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Added --allowerasing I'll have to wait for the 'beid-release', usually a few weeks after the official Fedora-release. Removing dependent packages: gufw noarch 21.04.0-2@rpmsphere-noarch 3.2 M Downgrading: grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 fedora 33 k pipewire-gstreamer x86_64 0.3.59-2.fc37updates-testing 60 k pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit x86_64 0.3.59-2.fc37updates-testing 136 k pipewire-libsx86_64 0.3.59-2.fc37updates-testing 1.7 M Transaction Summary Install 49 Packages Upgrade2270 Packages Remove1 Package Downgrade 4 Packages It will work here. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
oli oli via devel kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 18.36: Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:04 ago on Thu Sep 22 17:22:15 2022. Error: Problem 1: package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch requires python3.10dist(mopidy) >= 3, but none of the providers can be installed - mopidy-3.3.0-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch Problem 2: package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64 mopidy-spotify is a RPM Fusion package, which has been retired [1]. According to the retirement notice, it does not work any more, so I suppose you should just remove it. I am not sure if RPM Fusion has something like fedora-obsolete-packages, where it could be added so that it would be automatically removed for others having the same problem. [1]: https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/mopidy-spotify.git/commit/?id=a390757c3c03c58191a38161bf043da3ee9a0a06 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:36 PM Marcin Szydelski wrote: > > Hi > > Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) > > KDE Spin > > With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28 (snip) > Error: > Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 4: package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 5: package gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-3.fc37.noarch requires > gnome-shell >= 3.33, but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 6: problem with installed package gnome-desktop4-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 7: package gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-42-3.fc37.noarch > requires gnome-shell >= 3.14.0, but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 8: package gnome-shell-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 requires > gnome-settings-daemon(x86-64) >= 3.37.1, but none of the providers can be > installed > Problem 9: problem with installed package gnome-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 10: problem with installed package > gnome-session-xsession-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 11: problem with installed package > gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 12: problem with installed package > xdg-desktop-portal-gnome-42.3-1.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 13: problem with installed package > gnome-control-center-42.3-1.fc36.x86_64 > Problem 14: problem with installed package gdm-1:42.0-2.fc36.x86_64 These are all caused by brokenness of the Pantheon desktop. I've requested the affected packages to be added to fedora-obsolete-packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126443 This has happened for rawhide already, but the change is still pending for F37. I assume this will be ready it in time for the final release, so this problem should go away. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:04 ago on Thu Sep 22 17:22:15 2022. Error: Problem 1: package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch requires python3.10dist(mopidy) >= 3, but none of the providers can be installed - mopidy-3.3.0-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch Problem 2: package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Hi Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six) KDE Spin With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28 Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:29 ago on czw, 22 wrz 2022, 13:27:23. Error: Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mutter-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 *Problem 3: package nvidia-driver-cuda-3:515.76-1.fc36.x86_64 requires nvidia-persistenced = 3:515.76, but none of the providers can be installed - nvidia-persistenced-3:515.76-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nvidia-driver-cuda-3:515.76-1.fc36.x86_64 * Problem 4: package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libecal-2.0.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - evolution-data-server-3.44.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 Problem 5: package gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-3.fc37.noarch requires gnome-shell >= 3.33, but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-clutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-cogl-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-cogl-pango-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires mutter(x86-64) >= 43~rc, but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43.0-1.fc37.x86_64 requires mutter(x86-64) >= 43.0, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both mutter-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and mutter-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both mutter-43.0-1.fc37.x86_64 and mutter-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 - problem with installed package gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-2.fc36.noarch - package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-cogl-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-2.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - gnome-shell-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 Problem 6: problem with installed package gnome-desktop4-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - package gnome-desktop4-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 requires gnome-desktop3(x86-64) = 43~rc-1.fc37, but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-desktop4-43-1.fc37.x86_64 requires gnome-desktop3(x86-64) = 43-1.fc37, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43-1.fc37.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package pantheon-session-settings-35.0-1.fc36.noarch requires gala, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop4-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pantheon-session-settings-35.0-1.fc36.noarch Problem 7: package gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-42-3.fc37.noarch requires gnome-shell >= 3.14.0, but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-clutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-cogl-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires libmutter-cogl-pango-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:30:09PM -, James E. LaBarre wrote: > Also encountered the same error for 0ad > --- > > Error: > Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 > - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084299 Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
... Downgrading: conmon x86_64 2:2.1.3-1.fc37 fedora 57 k grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 fedora 33 k hdparmx86_64 9.62-4.fc37 fedora 96 k openssl-pkcs11x86_64 0.4.12-1.fc37 fedora 73 k qt5-qtquickcontrols2 x86_64 5.15.5-3.fc37 fedora1.7 M qt6-qtwayland x86_64 6.3.1-4.fc37 fedora971 k Transaction Summary === Install52 Packages Upgrade2499 Packages Remove 8 Packages Downgrade 6 Packages Total download size: 4.1 G Operation aborted. -- Fine on my system :) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Also encountered the same error for 0ad --- Error: Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) no other errors encountered (the task exited at that point) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 04:29:22 PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: I would guess it happened because the F36 webkitgtk version number was ahead of the F37 webkitgtk version, so the versioned obsoletes that the F37 webkitgtk packages have didn't match. Oh, OK then. Good catch! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:52 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin > wrote: > > Error: Transaction test error: > > file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of > > webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64 > > conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64 > > This problem would go away if webkit2gtk3 (F36 package) were replaced > by webkit2gtk4.0 (corresponding F37 package, which does not provide > /usr/bin/WebKitWebdriver). I don't know why that is not happening, so > I'm not sure what to do about this. > I would guess it happened because the F36 webkitgtk version number was ahead of the F37 webkitgtk version, so the versioned obsoletes that the F37 webkitgtk packages have didn't match. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I see a similar report here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127841 which reveals a packaging bug. But that one is slightly different because there is an additional conflict with webkit2gtk5.0 as well, which is a bug (only one of the F37 packages should provide the file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver). I will fix that, but if you provided the full error message, then it won't help with your problem. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64 This problem would go away if webkit2gtk3 (F36 package) were replaced by webkit2gtk4.0 (corresponding F37 package, which does not provide /usr/bin/WebKitWebdriver). I don't know why that is not happening, so I'm not sure what to do about this. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/12/22 14:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal potential problems. You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual upgrade. In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 37. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages first: https://red.ht/2kuBDPu and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F37FailsToInstall) reports: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2045109_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12486533 Thank you Miroslav Hello, I've got no issue running this command, but when I try to do the actual update, I get Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64 Has anyone encountered the same issue? Best regards, Robert-André ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:06:42 + Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Error: Transaction test error: > file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of > lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package > lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 [snip list of lv2-devel conflicts] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123422 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Error: Transaction test error: file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/buf-size from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/core from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/data-access from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/dynmanifest from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/event from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/instance-access from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/log from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/midi from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/morph from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/options from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/parameters from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/patch from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/port-groups from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/port-props from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/presets from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/resize-port from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/state from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/time from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/ui from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/units from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/uri-map from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/urid from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 file /usr/include/lv2/worker from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Fedora 37 - x86_64 6.7 MB/s | 81 MB 00:11 Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_643.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 2.8 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:01 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates570 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates590 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 3.0 MB/s | 4.7 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 221 kB/s | 267 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free 1.2 MB/s | 680 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates 665 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Error: Problem: package google-noto-sans-phoenician-vf-fonts-20201206-10.fc36.noarch requires google-noto-fonts-common = 20201206-10.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - google-noto-fonts-common-20201206-10.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package google-noto-sans-phoenician-vf-fonts-20201206-10.fc36.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 14:08 +0300, Timo Saarinen wrote: > > On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > > Hi, > > where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ? > > is not is any known repo that I'm aware > > Hi, > > signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installed > it using the following commands. > > dnf config-manager --add-repo > https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:im:signal/Fedora_36/network:im:signal.repo > dnf install signal-desktop > thank you , I'm using this sources [1] (which are basically the same) to build nodejs-electron and element-desktop on corp [2] for my surprise openSUSE:Factory updated electron from version 17 to version 19 . [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/nodejs-electron https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/element-web https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/element-desktop [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/electrons/monitor/ > Timo -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I'm unable to figure out why, but running the command: sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37 on my main system (with RPMFusion and some copr repos enabled) consistently causes dnf to segfault. The crashing function appears to be solver_addbestrules. In either case, I'm submitting a bug report generated by abrt. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
> On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hi, > where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ? > is not is any known repo that I'm aware Hi, signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installed it using the following commands. dnf config-manager --add-repo https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:im:signal/Fedora_36/network:im:signal.repo dnf install signal-desktop Timo ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 9:52 PM Alexander Ploumistos < alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote: > The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions. > Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion > package. > > However, I think that for people on Workstation who > encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not > comfortable with a terminal), the loss of seahorse-nautilus is going > to be a significant problem. Could anyone take a look to see if it can > be patched to work on F37? I was able to get the compilation going up > to a point, but the subsequent errors were beyond my knowledge. > seahorse-nautilus should be hopefully fixed with https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5d2dea3270 Can you try if it works and leave karma in the bodhi update? Thanks! -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Works fine for me. Removing: kernel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 0 kernel-corex86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 92 M kernel-modules x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 57 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates3.4 M Downgrading: grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 fedora 33 k hdparm x86_64 9.62-4.fc37 fedora 96 k kf5-filesystem x86_64 5.96.0-2.fc37 fedora 11 k openssl-pkcs11 i686 0.4.12-1.fc37 fedora 76 k openssl-pkcs11 x86_64 0.4.12-1.fc37 fedora 73 k qt6-qtwayland x86_64 6.3.1-4.fc37 fedora 971 k Transaction Summary == Install 62 Packages Upgrade2856 Packages Remove4 Packages Downgrade 6 Packages Total download size: 3.3 G Operation aborted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync Problem 1: problem with installed package mkdocs-1.2.3-2.fc36.noarch - mkdocs-1.2.3-2.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - nothing provides (python3.11dist(markdown) < 3.4~~ with python3.11dist(markdown) >= 3.2.1) needed by mkdocs-1.3.1-2.fc37.noarch Problem 2: package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36.x86_64 requires openjfx(x86-64) = 3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36.x86_64 Problem 3: problem with installed package seahorse-nautilus-3.11.92-20.fc36.x86_64 - package seahorse-nautilus-3.11.92-20.fc36.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 4: problem with installed package gtkhash-nautilus-1.4-4.fc35.x86_64 - package gtkhash-nautilus-1.4-4.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package nautilus-python-4.0~alpha-1.fc37.x86_64 requires nautilus-extensions(x86-64) >= 43~beta, but none of the providers can be installed - package nautilus-python-4.0~alpha-1.fc37.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both nautilus-extensions-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 - problem with installed package nautilus-python-1.2.3-10.fc36.x86_64 - nautilus-python-1.2.3-10.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 16:46 +, Timo S via devel wrote: > $ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 - > -enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null > && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync > Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:47 ago on Tue 13 Sep 2022 > 19:34:54. > Error: > Problem 1: problem with installed package nodejs-electron-19.0.16- > 1.3.x86_64 > - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires > libavif.so.13()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > - libavif-0.9.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > Problem 2: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 > - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires > libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can > be installed > - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a > distupgrade repository > Problem 3: problem with installed package signal-desktop-5.58.0- > 1.7.x86_64 > - package signal-desktop-5.58.0-1.7.x86_64 requires (nodejs- > electron(x86-64) >= 19 with nodejs-electron(x86-64) < 20), but none > of the providers can be installed > - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires > libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires > libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires > libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires > libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed > - libjxl-0.6.1-9.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Hi, where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ? is not is any known repo that I'm aware -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Fedora 37 - x86_64 22 MB/s | 81 MB 00:03 Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 3.0 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 4.5 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates 237 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates 722 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 4.1 MB/s | 5.0 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 266 kB/s | 267 kB 00:01 RCM Tools for Fedora 37 (RPMs) 7.5 kB/s | 4.5 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free 528 kB/s | 680 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates 192 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Error: Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:00 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual > upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate > package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > Fedora 37. Please check existing reports against > > fedora-obsolete-packages first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F37FailsToInstall) > reports: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2045109_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12486533 > > Thank you > > Miroslav > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
OK, third time is the charm. I finally got the command right. Everything went just fine.: sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync $ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Copr repo for PyCharm owned by phracek 54 kB/s | 44 kB 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 14 MB/s | 81 MB 00:05 Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 2.4 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_642.1 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:01 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates 333 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates 313 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.4 MB/s | 5.0 MB 00:03 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 273 kB/s | 267 kB 00:00 google-chrome 11 kB/s | 3.6 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver 14 kB/s | 14 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Steam3.0 kB/s | 2.2 kB 00:00 Dependencies resolved. [...] Transaction Summary == Install 55 Packages Upgrade2348 Packages Downgrade95 Packages Total download size: 2.6 G Operation aborted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/14/22 09:40, Scott Beamer wrote: I just copied and pasted from the OP... Ok, but you have to be aware that your email client might reformat the text and mess up the lines. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I just copied and pasted from the OP... ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:06:29 - "Richard Myers" wrote: > This is for F35 -> F37 ... > > I sure > would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which > shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or > 4 Fedora revisions, maybe more): > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf/plugin.py", line 104, > in _caller getattr(plugin, method)() > File > "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf-plugins/generate_completion_cache.py", > line 62, in sack cur.execute("delete from available") > sqlite3.DatabaseError: database disk image is malformed > > I've tried (in the past) many things to try to fix it, but nothing > worked. Can't remember everything I tried, because it has been a > couple of years, but suffice to say, I've tried the low-hanging, > obvious stuff, and some obscure things... The database it is trying to access is /var/cache/dnf/packages.db If you delete it, it will rebuild it at the next update, and that should take care of the error, since it shouldn't build a malformed database from scratch. If it does, you should open an error agaist package python3-dnf-plugins-core component generate_completion_cache.py ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:44 ago on Wed 14 Sep 2022 02:12:53 PM CEST. Error: Problem: problem with installed package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64 - package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) # dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync --skip-broken Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:12 ago on Wed 14 Sep 2022 02:12:53 PM CEST. Error: Problem: problem with installed package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64 - package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Copr repo for Signal-Desktop owned by luminoso 561 B/s | 341 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop': - Status code: 404 for https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luminoso/Signal-Desktop/fedora-37-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:248c:e400:4:bbc1:1840:93a1) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates 26 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates 30 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 22 kB/s | 16 kB 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 919 kB/s | 1.4 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 16 kB/s | 13 kB 00:00 Hashicorp Stable - x86_64 476 B/s | 314 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'hashicorp': - Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/37/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:20dc:7800:18:566b:ecc0:93a1) Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'hashicorp': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried Ignoring repositories: copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop, hashicorp Error: Problem: package elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37.x86_64 requires libecal-2.0.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc36.x86_64 - evolution-data-server-3.44.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
This is for F35 -> F37 ... Error: Problem 1: package compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.20-1.fc35.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.20-1.fc35.x86_64 Problem 2: package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be installed - package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.lucene.core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be installed - lucene-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch Problem 3: package mono-yui-2.0.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires libyui.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libyui-3.10.0-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package mono-yui-2.0.2-6.fc35.x86_64 Problem 4: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-41.5-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 Problem 5: package perl-Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4-37.fc35.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4-37.fc35.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 6: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- I sure would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or 4 Fedora revisions, maybe more): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf/plugin.py", line 104, in _caller getattr(plugin, method)() File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf-plugins/generate_completion_cache.py", line 62, in sack cur.execute("delete from available") sqlite3.DatabaseError: database disk image is malformed I've tried (in the past) many things to try to fix it, but nothing worked. Can't remember everything I tried, because it has been a couple of years, but suffice to say, I've tried the low-hanging, obvious stuff, and some obscure things... -Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:06 PM Thomas Link via devel wrote: > > Error: > Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires > libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > Problem 3: package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 > requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be > installed This is fallout from the removal of the Pantheon desktop environment, caused by the libsoup3pocalypse and other big breaking changes in GNOME 43. You should be able to work around this problem by using "--allowerasing". But to ensure that's not necessary in the future, I filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126443 Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/13/22 12:07, Scott Beamer wrote: # dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found... No such command: . Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command( )' You have linebreaks in the wrong places. The \ should have been at the end of the line. The following should be all one line: dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/12/22 22:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: I have updated 5 native systems running Fedora 36 (all running Xfce) to Fedora 37 as follows: (1) ASUS G750JS 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700HQ CPU @ 2.40GHz Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 06) NVIDIA Corporation GK104M [GeForce GTX 870M] (rev a1) (2) Dell Precision T5610 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz (8 cores total) NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 760] (rev a1) (3) Dell Precision T3600 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (8 cores total) NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [NVS 310] (rev a1) (4) Dell Optiplex 3040 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100T CPU @ 3.20GHz Intel Corporation HD Graphics 530 (rev 06) (5) Intel NUC i7 NUC11PAH 1 x 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz Intel Corporation TigerLake-LP GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] (rev 01) All working fine. I have one more native system to convert, which is the exact same H/W platform as (5) above (but with less memory), which I will do after release. Upgrades were performed around the time of the updates-testing activation point (long before the beta was released). I recall some non-show-stopping complaints from dnf, but the upgrades happened without a blocking incident and all machines are functioning normally now. Ian -- Ian Laurie FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser TZ: Australia/Sydney ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Everything looks good for me. I get notices about packages getting replaced: evince x86_64 43~alpha-4.fc37 fedora2.0 M replacing evince-nautilus.x86_64 42.3-1.fc36 and some others but I would expect this. No errors. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Error: Problem 1: package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 requires flatpak-session-helper(x86-64) = 1.12.7-5.fc36, but none of the providers can be installed - flatpak-session-helper-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 requires (flatpak-selinux = 1.12.7-5.fc36 if selinux-policy-targeted), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-flathub-remote-1-3.fc37.noarch requires flatpak, but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package selinux-policy-targeted-36.14-1.fc36.noarch - problem with installed package fedora-flathub-remote-1-2.fc36.noarch - selinux-policy-targeted-36.14-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - flatpak-selinux-1.12.7-5.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - fedora-flathub-remote-1-2.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - package flatpak-1.13.3-6.fc37.i686 is filtered out by exclude filtering - package flatpak-1.13.3-6.fc37.x86_64 is filtered out by exclude filtering - package flatpak-1.14.0-1.fc37.i686 is filtered out by exclude filtering - package flatpak-1.14.0-1.fc37.x86_64 is filtered out by exclude filtering (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
> # dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && > echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync > bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found... > No such command: . Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help > It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command( )' OK, I tried it again, with a fresh install of F36.I still got an error message with the command, but it looks like it was all set to run the upgrade.: $ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found... [sudo] password for scott: [...] Transaction Summary == Install 55 Packages Upgrade2349 Packages Downgrade94 Packages ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found... No such command: . Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command( )' ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I get the following problems: Problem 1: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-workstation-36-18.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch Problem 2: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed - package fedora-release-workstation-36-18.noarch requires fedora-release-common = 36-18, but none of the providers can be installed - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-rawhide-36-1.noarch requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release = 36-1, but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-common-36-18.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-rawhide-36-1.noarch ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/12/22 08:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync conflict due to elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126527 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: Hi. I've got the following errors: > Error: > Problem 1: package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires openjfx(x86-64) = 3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35, but none of the providers can be installed > - openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 > Problem 2: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed > - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed > - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository > - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) Should I report them in Bugzilla (for the appropriate packages)? I use Fedora 35. Nevertheless, the F35→F37 path should be also supported. Marcin ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
no any problem on this laptop. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I found issues with evolution-rss dependencies. Will report it to them. [root@introdesk ~]# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-syncFedora 37 - x86_64 12 MB/s | 81 MB 00:06 Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 1.5 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 1.4 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:02 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates 157 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates 209 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 2.3 MB/s | 4.6 MB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 173 kB/s | 267 kB 00:01 Hashicorp Stable - x86_64 315 B/s | 314 B 00:00 Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'hashicorp': - Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/37/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:21d4:e00:18:566b:ecc0:93a1)Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'hashicorp': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were triedRPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free 226 kB/s | 680 kB 00:03 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free tainted 732 B/s | 1.8 kB 00:02 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates 185 B/s | 257 B 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree 141 kB/s | 248 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver 9.9 kB/s | 14 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Steam 1.5 kB/s | 2.2 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree tainted 2.5 kB/s | 3.8 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Updates 183 B/s | 257 B 00:01 Ignoring repositories: hashicorpError: Problem 1: package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libebook-contacts-1.2.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.63()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libebackend-1.2.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libecal-2.0.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.3()(64bit), but none of the
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Error: Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - mutter-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 Problem 3: package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.63()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - evolution-data-server-3.44.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 Problem 4: package gnome-session-42.0-4.fc37.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~alpha-6.fc37.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package gnome-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 - package switchboard-plug-keyboard-2.7.0-3.fc36.x86_64 requires gala, but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package switchboard-plug-keyboard-2.7.0-3.fc36.x86_64 Problem 5: package gnome-session-42.0-4.fc37.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~alpha-6.fc37.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 - package gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-4.fc37.x86_64 requires gnome-session(x86-64) = 42.0-4.fc37, but none of the providers can be installed - package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - problem with installed package gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 - package switchboard-plug-notifications-2.2.0-3.fc36.x86_64 requires gala(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package switchboard-plug-notifications-2.2.0-3.fc36.x86_64 (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:47 ago on Tue 13 Sep 2022 19:34:54. Error: Problem 1: problem with installed package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires libavif.so.13()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - libavif-0.9.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 2: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: problem with installed package signal-desktop-5.58.0-1.7.x86_64 - package signal-desktop-5.58.0-1.7.x86_64 requires (nodejs-electron(x86-64) >= 19 with nodejs-electron(x86-64) < 20), but none of the providers can be installed - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - libjxl-0.6.1-9.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
sudo dnf - 1 ST 3 rawhide module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync Copr repo for gnome-info-collect owned by vstan 484 B/s | 1.3 kB 00:02 Fedora 37 - x86_64 2.9 MB/s | 80 MB 00:27 Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 1.3 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:01 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 2.0 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:01 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates 352 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates 329 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.8 MB/s | 9.1 MB 00:05 Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 132 kB/s | 268 kB 00:02 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free 491 kB/s | 680 kB 00:01 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates 409 B/s | 257 B 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree 285 kB/s | 248 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Updates 356 B/s | 257 B 00:00 Error: Problem 1: package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 Problem 2: package nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) -- Luya Tshimbalanga Fedora Design Team Fedora Design Suite maintainer ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules What do you mean by "default modules"? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 14:59 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your > time and try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled > again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo -- > enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync > Error: Problem 1: package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be installed - package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires osgi(org.apache.lucene.core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be installed - lucene-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch Problem 2: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04- 3.fc35.x86_64 Problem 3: package perl-File-Inplace-0.20-31.fc36.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-File-Inplace-0.20- 31.fc36.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 4: package mod_perl-2.0.12-5.fc37.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.fc37.x86_64 and perl- libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-492.fc37.x86_64 and perl- libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 - problem with installed package mod_perl-2.0.12-1.fc36.x86_64 - package perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.22-11.fc36.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed - mod_perl-2.0.12-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.22- 11.fc36.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.module_f37+14796+372df908.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 5: package perl-BDB-1.92-18.fc37.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.fc37.x86_64 and perl- libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-492.fc37.x86_64 and perl- libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 - problem with installed package perl-BDB-1.92-16.fc36.x86_64 - package perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-1:0.30-18.fc36.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-BDB-1.92-16.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-1:0.30- 18.fc36.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.module_f37+14796+372df908.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering Problem 6: package perl-BSD-Resource-1.291.100-20.fc37.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.fc37.x86_64 and perl- libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-492.fc37.x86_64 and perl- libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 - problem with installed package perl-BSD-Resource-1.291.100- 18.fc36.x86_64 - package publican-4.3.2-23.fc36.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed - perl-BSD-Resource-1.291.100-18.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package publican-4.3.2-23.fc36.noarch - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering - package perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.module_f37+14796+372df908.x86_64 is filtered out by modular filtering (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it:
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
What do you mean by "default modules"? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Error: Problem: package nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64 (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
I've just add --alowerasing for protonvpn... LANG=C sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync --allowerasing; Installing weak dependencies: clevis-pin-tpm2x86_64 0.5.2-2.fc37 fedora736 k fedora-chromium-config-gnome noarch 2.0-2.fc37 fedora9.6 k firefox-langpacks x86_64 104.0.2-1.fc37 updates-testing40 M libreoffice-gtk4 x86_64 1:7.4.0.3-1.fc37 fedora508 k perl-IO-Compress-Brotlix86_64 0.004001-6.fc37 fedora 27 k python3.10 x86_64 3.10.7-1.fc37 updates-testing27 k python3.10-tkinter x86_64 3.10.7-1.fc37 updates-testing 347 k rubygem-irbnoarch 1.4.1-169.fc37 updates-testing86 k sysprof-agent x86_64 3.45.1-1.fc37 fedora130 k Removing: kernel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates0 kernel-corex86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 92 M kernel-devel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 64 M kernel-modules x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 57 M kernel-modules-extra x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36 @updates 3.4 M Removing dependent packages: kmod-v4l2loopback-5.19.4-200.fc36.x86_64 x86_64 0.12.7-1.fc36 @@commandline 17 k nmstate-plugin-ovsdb noarch 2.0.0-1.fc36 @fedora22 k nvautoinstall noarch 0.4.1-0.fc36 @copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:t0xic0der:nvidia-auto-installer-for-fedora 216 k python3-bodhi noarch 5.7.5-1.fc36 @fedora32 k python3-language-servernoarch 0.36.2-6.fc35 @fedora 245 k python3-pipreqsnoarch 0.4.10-4.fc35 @fedora97 k python3-proton-client noarch 0.7.1-2 @protonvpn-fedora-stable 64 k python3-protonvpn-nm-lib noarch 3.12.0-1.fc36 @protonvpn-fedora-stable 388 k python3-yarg noarch 0.1.9-16.fc35 @fedora56 k seahorse-nautilus x86_64 3.11.92-20.fc36 @fedora 847 k Downgrading: grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 fedora 33 k kf5-filesystem x86_64 5.96.0-2.fc37 fedora 11 k openjfxx86_64 3:17.0.0.1-4.fc37 fedora8.8 M openssl-pkcs11 i686 0.4.12-1.fc37 fedora 76 k openssl-pkcs11 x86_64 0.4.12-1.fc37 fedora 73 k protonvpn-cli noarch 2.2.11-6.fc37 fedora 90 k python3-xarray noarch 2022.3.0-2.fc37 fedora2.1 M qt6-qtwayland
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 13/09/2022 12:15, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: How should I proceed? It should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 13. 09. 22 12:15, Mikel Olasagasti wrote: Hau idatzi du Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 ira. 12, al. (15:00)): Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync Error: Problem: package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 I see package has been retired. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-books How should I proceed? Please report this to fedora-obsolete-packages: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=fedora-obsolete-packages=37 -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
Hau idatzi du Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022 ira. 12, al. (15:00)): > > Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and > try to run: > > # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules > # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again > sudo dnf module reset '*' > > dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync Error: Problem: package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 I see package has been retired. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-books How should I proceed? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
In a F36 toolbox: Transaction Summary Install 21 Packages Upgrade588 Packages Downgrade1 Package Total download size: 438 M Operation aborted. Wants to downgrade grubby. So no issues. I cannot run this on my actual system because the mirrors I use (which I hard-coded for bandwidth) still has F37 in testing/beta folders. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ > --enablerepo=updates-testing \ > $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo > --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ > --assumeno distro-sync Without modules enabled, works fine here: dnf --releasever=37 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync Install 49 Packages Upgrade3911 Packages Remove7 Packages Downgrade 5 Packages Total download size: 3.8 G Operation aborted. Downgrading: grubby hdparm keepassxc openssl-pkcs11 texmaker ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
W dniu 12.09.2022 o 14:59, Miroslav Suchý pisze: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again sudo dnf module reset '*' dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync No issues this time: Transaction Summary = Install 48 Packages Upgrade4450 Packages Remove7 Packages Downgrade 131 Packages Total download size: 6.3 G Operation aborted. Removal is the usual one - kernel, nvidia and some Python. Downgrade is mostly KDE. Plus grubby, hdparm and some cmake. I am waiting for "downgrade" number to go further down (it was at 233 last week) and upgrade this or next week. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions. Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion package. However, I think that for people on Workstation who encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not comfortable with a terminal), the loss of seahorse-nautilus is going to be a significant problem. Could anyone take a look to see if it can be patched to work on F37? I was able to get the compilation going up to a point, but the subsequent errors were beyond my knowledge. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On Mon, 12 Sep 2022, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and try to run: In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate package. Seemed fine. I saw two issues related to python azure packages but since I maintain some that might be self inflected. will double check though on a stock install. Paul ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37
On 9/12/22 08:59 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \ --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \ --assumeno distro-sync Error: Problem: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue