Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2023-01-10 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 11:55, Stuart S  wrote:

> I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37
>
> Got the following errors
>
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module
> php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64
>

You have an outside module installed on the system. Going from the name I
would expect it is the remi PHP ones. You will need to disable that module
and/or replace it with the f37 one to get things going.



> Error:
>  Problem 1: package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64
> requires php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires
> php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - php-common-7.4.33-2.fc35.remi.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package
> php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires
> libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers
> can be installed
>   - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires
> qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
>
>
> I know this is not a help page but can someone point me in right direction
> as I can't find it...
>
> Cheers
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2023-01-10 Thread Stuart S
I've just tried this for Fed 35 >> Fed 37

Got the following errors

 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides module(platform:f35) needed by module 
php:remi-7.4:20230104141955:.x86_64
Error: 
 Problem 1: package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires 
php(api) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64 requires 
php(zend-abi) = 20190902-64, but none of the providers can be installed
  - php-common-7.4.33-2.fc35.remi.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package 
php-pecl-imagick-im6-3.7.0-1.fc35.remi.7.4.x86_64
 Problem 2: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 
5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed
  - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)


I know this is not a help page but can someone point me in right direction as I 
can't find it...

Cheers
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-11-03 Thread Robert Balejik
right, I was running with just "--skip broken"
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-11-03 Thread Federico Pellegrin
Error:
 Problem 1: package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package webkit2gtk3-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 2: package boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 requires
libicui18n.so.71()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 requires
libicuuc.so.71()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package boost-regex-1.78.0-9.fc37.x86_64 requires
libicudata.so.71()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both libicu-71.1-2.fc37.x86_64 and
libicu-69.1-6.fc36.x86_64
  - problem with installed package boost-regex-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64
  - package webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
libicui18n.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
libicuuc.so.69()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - boost-regex-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package webkit2gtk3-jsc-2.38.1-1.fc36.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

Seemingly all fine after --allowerasing.

Cheers,


Il giorno gio 3 nov 2022 alle ore 10:33 Robert Balejik 
ha scritto:

>  Problem 1: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - mutter-42.5-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64 requires
> libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64
>  Problem 3: package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires
> libncurses.so.5()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libtinfo.so.5()(64bit), but
> none of the providers can be installed
>   - ncurses-compat-libs-6.2-9.20210508.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64
>  Problem 4: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires
> system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - fedora-release-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch
>  Problem 5: problem with installed package
> switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64
>   - package switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.4-2.fc37.x86_64 requires
> switchboard(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - switchboard-6.0.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>  Problem 6: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires
> system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package fedora-release-36-20.noarch requires fedora-release-common =
> 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch requires
> fedora-release-common = 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release,
> but none of the providers can be installed
>   - fedora-release-common-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>   - problem with installed package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: 

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-11-03 Thread Robert Balejik
 Problem 1: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - mutter-42.5-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 2: package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package gnome-screensaver-3.6.1-27.fc32.x86_64
 Problem 3: package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libncurses.so.5()(64bit), 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64 requires libtinfo.so.5()(64bit), but none 
of the providers can be installed
  - ncurses-compat-libs-6.2-9.20210508.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package horst-3.0-6.fc23.x86_64
 Problem 4: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires 
system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - fedora-release-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch
 Problem 5: problem with installed package 
switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64
  - package switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.4-2.fc37.x86_64 requires 
switchboard(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed
  - switchboard-plug-tweaks-1.0.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - switchboard-6.0.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 Problem 6: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires 
system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package fedora-release-36-20.noarch requires fedora-release-common = 36-20, 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - package fedora-release-workstation-36-20.noarch requires 
fedora-release-common = 36-20, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch requires rpmfusion-nonfree-release, but 
none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-common-36-20.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package fedy-4.8.0-1.fc28.noarch
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-10-11 Thread Peter Braet
Added --allowerasing
I'll have to wait for the 'beid-release', usually a few weeks after the 
official Fedora-release.

Removing dependent packages:
 gufw noarch 21.04.0-2@rpmsphere-noarch
  3.2 M
Downgrading:
 grubby   x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 fedora   33 k
 pipewire-gstreamer   x86_64 0.3.59-2.fc37updates-testing  60 k
 pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit
  x86_64 0.3.59-2.fc37updates-testing 136 k
 pipewire-libsx86_64 0.3.59-2.fc37updates-testing 1.7 M

Transaction Summary

Install  49 Packages
Upgrade2270 Packages
Remove1 Package
Downgrade 4 Packages

It will work here.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-22 Thread Otto Liljalaakso

oli oli via devel kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 18.36:

Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:04 ago on Thu Sep 22 17:22:15 2022.
Error:
  Problem 1: package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch requires 
python3.10dist(mopidy) >= 3, but none of the providers can be installed
   - mopidy-3.3.0-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
   - problem with installed package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch
  Problem 2: package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requires python(abi) 
= 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed
   - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
   - problem with installed package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64


mopidy-spotify is a RPM Fusion package, which has been retired [1]. 
According to the retirement notice, it does not work any more, so I 
suppose you should just remove it. I am not sure if RPM Fusion has 
something like fedora-obsolete-packages, where it could be added so that 
it would be automatically removed for others having the same problem.


[1]: 
https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/mopidy-spotify.git/commit/?id=a390757c3c03c58191a38161bf043da3ee9a0a06

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-22 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 1:36 PM Marcin Szydelski  wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)
>
> KDE Spin
>
> With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28

(snip)

> Error:
> Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 4: package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 5: package gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-3.fc37.noarch requires 
> gnome-shell >= 3.33, but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 6: problem with installed package gnome-desktop4-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
> Problem 7: package gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-42-3.fc37.noarch 
> requires gnome-shell >= 3.14.0, but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 8: package gnome-shell-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> gnome-settings-daemon(x86-64) >= 3.37.1, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
> Problem 9: problem with installed package gnome-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64
> Problem 10: problem with installed package 
> gnome-session-xsession-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64
> Problem 11: problem with installed package 
> gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64
> Problem 12: problem with installed package 
> xdg-desktop-portal-gnome-42.3-1.fc36.x86_64
> Problem 13: problem with installed package 
> gnome-control-center-42.3-1.fc36.x86_64
> Problem 14: problem with installed package gdm-1:42.0-2.fc36.x86_64

These are all caused by brokenness of the Pantheon desktop.
I've requested the affected packages to be added to fedora-obsolete-packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126443

This has happened for rawhide already, but the change is still pending for F37.
I assume this will be ready it in time for the final release, so this
problem should go away.

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-22 Thread oli oli via devel
Last metadata expiration check: 0:10:04 ago on Thu Sep 22 17:22:15 2022.
Error: 
 Problem 1: package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch requires 
python3.10dist(mopidy) >= 3, but none of the providers can be installed
  - mopidy-3.3.0-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package mopidy-spotify-4.1.1-1.fc36.noarch
 Problem 2: package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64 requires python(abi) 
= 3.10, but none of the providers can be installed
  - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package python3-pyspotify-2.1.3-2.fc36.x86_64
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-22 Thread Marcin Szydelski
Hi

Fedora release 36 (Thirty Six)

KDE Spin

With a history of upgrading since Fedora 28


Last metadata expiration check: 0:03:29 ago on czw, 22 wrz 2022, 13:27:23.
Error:
Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 - problem with installed package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64
Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - mutter-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64


*Problem 3: package nvidia-driver-cuda-3:515.76-1.fc36.x86_64 requires
nvidia-persistenced = 3:515.76, but none of the providers can be installed
 - nvidia-persistenced-3:515.76-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository  - problem with installed package
nvidia-driver-cuda-3:515.76-1.fc36.x86_64 *
Problem 4: package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64
requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can
be installed
 - package wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
libecal-2.0.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - evolution-data-server-3.44.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
 - problem with installed package
wingpanel-indicator-datetime-2.4.0-2.fc36.x86_64
Problem 5: package gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-3.fc37.noarch requires
gnome-shell >= 3.33, but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-clutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-cogl-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-cogl-pango-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires mutter(x86-64) >=
43~rc, but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43.0-1.fc37.x86_64 requires mutter(x86-64) >= 43.0,
but none of the providers can be installed
 - cannot install both mutter-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and
mutter-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64
 - cannot install both mutter-43.0-1.fc37.x86_64 and
mutter-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64
 - problem with installed package
gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-2.fc36.noarch
 - package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64 requires
libmutter-cogl-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - gnome-shell-extension-gamemode-6-2.fc36.noarch does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
 - gnome-shell-42.5-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 - problem with installed package wingpanel-3.0.2-4.fc36.x86_64
Problem 6: problem with installed package gnome-desktop4-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
 - package gnome-desktop4-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 requires
gnome-desktop3(x86-64) = 43~rc-1.fc37, but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package gnome-desktop4-43-1.fc37.x86_64 requires gnome-desktop3(x86-64)
= 43-1.fc37, but none of the providers can be installed
 - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and
gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
 - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43-1.fc37.x86_64 and
gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
 - package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package pantheon-session-settings-35.0-1.fc36.noarch requires gala, but
none of the providers can be installed
 - gnome-desktop4-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 - problem with installed package
pantheon-session-settings-35.0-1.fc36.noarch
Problem 7: package gnome-shell-extension-appindicator-42-3.fc37.noarch
requires gnome-shell >= 3.14.0, but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-clutter-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-cogl-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
 - package gnome-shell-43~rc-3.fc37.x86_64 requires
libmutter-cogl-pango-11.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - package 

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-22 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 05:30:09PM -, James E. LaBarre wrote:
> Also encountered the same error for 0ad
> ---
> 
> Error: 
>  Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
>   - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
> installed
>   - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
> repository
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2084299

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-20 Thread Richard E. van der Luit via devel
...
Downgrading:
 conmon   x86_64 2:2.1.3-1.fc37 
fedora 57 k
 grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 
  fedora 33 k
 hdparmx86_64 9.62-4.fc37   
  fedora 96 k
 openssl-pkcs11x86_64 0.4.12-1.fc37 
 fedora 73 k
 qt5-qtquickcontrols2 x86_64 5.15.5-3.fc37  
fedora1.7 M
 qt6-qtwayland   x86_64 6.3.1-4.fc37
fedora971 k

Transaction Summary
===
Install52 Packages
Upgrade2499 Packages
Remove   8 Packages
Downgrade  6 Packages

Total download size: 4.1 G
Operation aborted.

--

Fine on my system :)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-19 Thread James E. LaBarre
Also encountered the same error for 0ad
---

Error: 
 Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
  - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

no other errors encountered (the task exited at that point)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-19 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 04:29:22 PM +0200, Kalev Lember 
 wrote:
I would guess it happened because the F36 webkitgtk version number 
was ahead of the F37 webkitgtk version, so the versioned obsoletes 
that the F37 webkitgtk packages have didn't match.


Oh, OK then. Good catch!

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-19 Thread Kalev Lember
On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 3:52 PM Michael Catanzaro 
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin
>  wrote:
> > Error: Transaction test error:
> >   file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of
> > webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64
> > conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64
>
> This problem would go away if webkit2gtk3 (F36 package) were replaced
> by webkit2gtk4.0 (corresponding F37 package, which does not provide
> /usr/bin/WebKitWebdriver). I don't know why that is not happening, so
> I'm not sure what to do about this.
>

I would guess it happened because the F36 webkitgtk version number was
ahead of the F37 webkitgtk version, so the versioned obsoletes that the F37
webkitgtk packages have didn't match.

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-19 Thread Michael Catanzaro


I see a similar report here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2127841

which reveals a packaging bug. But that one is slightly different 
because there is an additional conflict with webkit2gtk5.0 as well, 
which is a bug (only one of the F37 packages should provide the file 
/usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver). I will fix that, but if you provided the 
full error message, then it won't help with your problem.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-19 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Sep 19 2022 at 12:08:10 AM +0200, Robert-André Mauchin 
 wrote:

Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of 
webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64

conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64


This problem would go away if webkit2gtk3 (F36 package) were replaced 
by webkit2gtk4.0 (corresponding F37 package, which does not provide 
/usr/bin/WebKitWebdriver). I don't know why that is not happening, so 
I'm not sure what to do about this.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-18 Thread Robert-André Mauchin

On 9/12/22 14:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
try to run:

# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'

dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync


This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal 
potential problems.

You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.


The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual 
upgrade.


In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate 
package.

Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in Fedora 37. Please 
check existing reports against


fedora-obsolete-packages first:

https://red.ht/2kuBDPu

and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F37FailsToInstall) 
reports:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2045109_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12486533

Thank you

Miroslav


Hello,

I've got no issue running this command, but when I try to do the actual update, 
I get

Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/bin/WebKitWebDriver from install of webkit2gtk4.1-2.37.91-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package webkit2gtk3-2.38.0-2.fc36.x86_64


Has anyone encountered the same issue?

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-16 Thread stan via devel
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 13:06:42 +
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  wrote:

> Error: Transaction test error:
>   file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of
> lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64

[snip list of lv2-devel conflicts]


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123422
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Error: Transaction test error:
  file /usr/include/lv2/atom from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/buf-size from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/core from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/data-access from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/dynmanifest from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/event from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/instance-access from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/log from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/midi from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/morph from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/options from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/parameters from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/patch from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/port-groups from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/port-props from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/presets from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/resize-port from install of 
lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 conflicts with file from package 
lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/state from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/time from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/ui from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/units from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/uri-map from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/urid from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
  file /usr/include/lv2/worker from install of lv2-devel-1.18.8-1.fc37.x86_64 
conflicts with file from package lv2-devel-1.18.2-2.fc36.x86_64
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Eric Lavarde
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Fedora 37 - x86_64  6.7 MB/s |  81 MB 00:11
Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_643.1 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64  2.8 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:01
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates570  B/s | 257  B 00:00
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates590  B/s | 257  B 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   3.0 MB/s | 4.7 MB 00:01
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   221 kB/s | 267 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free 1.2 MB/s | 680 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates   665  B/s | 257  B 00:00
Error:
 Problem: package google-noto-sans-phoenician-vf-fonts-20201206-10.fc36.noarch 
requires google-noto-fonts-common = 20201206-10.fc36, but none of the providers 
can be installed
  - google-noto-fonts-common-20201206-10.fc36.noarch does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package 
google-noto-sans-phoenician-vf-fonts-20201206-10.fc36.noarch
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2022-09-15 at 14:08 +0300, Timo Saarinen wrote:
> > On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> > Hi,
> > where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ? 
> > is not is any known  repo that I'm aware 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installed
> it using the following commands.
> 
> dnf config-manager --add-repo
> https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:im:signal/Fedora_36/network:im:signal.repo
> dnf install signal-desktop
> 

thank you , I'm using this sources [1] (which are basically the same)
to build nodejs-electron and element-desktop on corp [2] for my
surprise openSUSE:Factory updated electron from version 17 to version
19 . 


[1] 
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/nodejs-electron
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/element-web
https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/element-desktop


[2] 
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sergiomb/electrons/monitor/
> Timo

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Tommy Nguyen
I'm unable to figure out why, but running the command:

sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=37

on my main system (with RPMFusion and some copr repos enabled)
consistently causes dnf to segfault. The crashing function appears to
be solver_addbestrules. In either case, I'm submitting a bug report
generated by abrt.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Timo Saarinen via devel
> On 15.9.2022 1:11 EEST Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> Hi,
> where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ? 
> is not is any known  repo that I'm aware 

Hi,

signal-desktop package for Fedora is from openSUSE repo. I installed it using 
the following commands.

dnf config-manager --add-repo 
https://download.opensuse.org/repositories/network:im:signal/Fedora_36/network:im:signal.repo
dnf install signal-desktop

Timo
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Kalev Lember
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 9:52 PM Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions.
> Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion
> package.
>
> However, I think that for people on Workstation who
> encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not
> comfortable with a terminal), the loss of seahorse-nautilus is going
> to be a significant problem. Could anyone take a look to see if it can
> be patched to work on F37? I was able to get the compilation going up
> to a point, but the subsequent errors were beyond my knowledge.
>

seahorse-nautilus should be hopefully fixed with
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-5d2dea3270

Can you try if it works and leave karma in the bodhi update? Thanks!

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Dominik Drazyk via devel
Works fine for me.

Removing:
 kernel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
@updates  0  
 kernel-corex86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
@updates 92 M
 kernel-modules x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
@updates 57 M
 kernel-modules-extra   x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
@updates3.4 M
Downgrading:
 grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 
fedora   33 k
 hdparm x86_64 9.62-4.fc37  
fedora   96 k
 kf5-filesystem x86_64 5.96.0-2.fc37
fedora   11 k
 openssl-pkcs11 i686   0.4.12-1.fc37
fedora   76 k
 openssl-pkcs11 x86_64 0.4.12-1.fc37
fedora   73 k
 qt6-qtwayland  x86_64 6.3.1-4.fc37 
fedora  971 k

Transaction Summary
==
Install  62 Packages
Upgrade2856 Packages
Remove4 Packages
Downgrade 6 Packages

Total download size: 3.3 G
Operation aborted.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-15 Thread Thomas Moschny
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync

 Problem 1: problem with installed package mkdocs-1.2.3-2.fc36.noarch
  - mkdocs-1.2.3-2.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - nothing provides (python3.11dist(markdown) < 3.4~~ with
python3.11dist(markdown) >= 3.2.1) needed by
mkdocs-1.3.1-2.fc37.noarch
 Problem 2: package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36.x86_64 requires
openjfx(x86-64) = 3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36, but none of the providers can be
installed
  - openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-10.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 3: problem with installed package
seahorse-nautilus-3.11.92-20.fc36.x86_64
  - package seahorse-nautilus-3.11.92-20.fc36.x86_64 requires
libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
 Problem 4: problem with installed package gtkhash-nautilus-1.4-4.fc35.x86_64
  - package gtkhash-nautilus-1.4-4.fc35.x86_64 requires
libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - package nautilus-python-4.0~alpha-1.fc37.x86_64 requires
nautilus-extensions(x86-64) >= 43~beta, but none of the providers can
be installed
  - package nautilus-python-4.0~alpha-1.fc37.x86_64 requires
libnautilus-extension.so.4()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - cannot install both nautilus-extensions-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and
nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64
  - problem with installed package nautilus-python-1.2.3-10.fc36.x86_64
  - nautilus-python-1.2.3-10.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Tue, 2022-09-13 at 16:46 +, Timo S via devel wrote:
> $ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 -
> -enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
> && echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
> Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:47 ago on Tue 13 Sep 2022
> 19:34:54.
> Error: 
>  Problem 1: problem with installed package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-
> 1.3.x86_64
>   - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires
> libavif.so.13()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>   - libavif-0.9.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
>  Problem 2: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
>   - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
> libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can
> be installed
>   - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
>  Problem 3: problem with installed package signal-desktop-5.58.0-
> 1.7.x86_64
>   - package signal-desktop-5.58.0-1.7.x86_64 requires (nodejs-
> electron(x86-64) >= 19 with nodejs-electron(x86-64) < 20), but none
> of the providers can be installed
>   - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires
> libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires
> libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires
> libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires
> libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - libjxl-0.6.1-9.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
> repository
> (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)


Hi,
where did you get signal-desktop and nodejs-electron ? 
is not is any known  repo that I'm aware 


-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Dennis Gilmore via devel
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null
&& echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Fedora 37 - x86_64

  22 MB/s |
81 MB 00:03
Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64

 3.0 kB/s |
2.5 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64

 4.5 MB/s |
3.8 MB 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates

 237  B/s |
257  B 00:01
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates

 722  B/s |
257  B 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates

 4.1 MB/s |
5.0 MB 00:01
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates

 266 kB/s |
267 kB 00:01
RCM Tools for Fedora 37 (RPMs)

 7.5 kB/s |
4.5 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free

 528 kB/s |
680 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates

 192  B/s |
257  B 00:01
Error:
 Problem: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
  - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires
libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can
be installed
  - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 8:00 AM Miroslav Suchý  wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync
>
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal 
> potential problems.
>
> You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
>
>
> The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual 
> upgrade.
>
>
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate 
> package.
>
> Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in 
> Fedora 37. Please check existing reports against
>
> fedora-obsolete-packages first:
>
> https://red.ht/2kuBDPu
>
> and also there is already bunch of "Fails to install" (F37FailsToInstall) 
> reports:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2045109_id_type=anddependson=tvp_id=12486533
>
> Thank you
>
> Miroslav
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Scott Beamer
OK, third time is the charm.  I finally got the command right.

Everything went just fine.:

sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync


$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Copr repo for PyCharm owned by phracek 54 kB/s |  
44 kB 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 14 MB/s |  
81 MB 00:05
Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64  2.4 kB/s | 
2.5 kB 00:01
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_642.1 MB/s | 
3.8 MB 00:01
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates  333  B/s | 
257  B 00:00
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates  313  B/s | 
257  B 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 1.4 MB/s | 
5.0 MB 00:03
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates 273 kB/s | 
267 kB 00:00
google-chrome  11 kB/s | 
3.6 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver 14 kB/s |  
14 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Steam3.0 kB/s | 
2.2 kB 00:00
Dependencies resolved.

[...]

Transaction Summary
==
Install  55 Packages
Upgrade2348 Packages
Downgrade95 Packages

Total download size: 2.6 G
Operation aborted.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 9/14/22 09:40, Scott Beamer wrote:

I just copied and pasted from the OP...


Ok, but you have to be aware that your email client might reformat the 
text and mess up the lines.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Scott Beamer
I just copied and pasted from the OP...
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread stan via devel
On Wed, 14 Sep 2022 05:06:29 -
"Richard Myers"  wrote:

> This is for F35 -> F37 ...
> 
> I sure
> would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which
> shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or
> 4 Fedora revisions, maybe more):
> 
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf/plugin.py", line 104,
> in _caller getattr(plugin, method)()
>   File
> "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf-plugins/generate_completion_cache.py",
> line 62, in sack cur.execute("delete from available")
> sqlite3.DatabaseError: database disk image is malformed
> 
> I've tried (in the past) many things to try to fix it, but nothing
> worked.  Can't remember everything I tried, because it has been a
> couple of years, but suffice to say, I've tried the low-hanging,
> obvious stuff, and some obscure things...

The database it is trying to access is
/var/cache/dnf/packages.db
If you delete it, it will rebuild it at the next update, and that
should take care of the error, since it shouldn't build a malformed
database from scratch.  If it does, you should open an error agaist
package
python3-dnf-plugins-core
component
generate_completion_cache.py
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Phoenix
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:44 ago on Wed 14 Sep 2022 02:12:53 PM CEST.
Error: 
 Problem: problem with installed package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64
  - package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.10, but 
none of the providers can be installed
  - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)



# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync --skip-broken
Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:12 ago on Wed 14 Sep 2022 02:12:53 PM CEST.
Error: 
 Problem: problem with installed package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64
  - package python3-lhafile-0.3.0-6.1.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 3.10, but 
none of the providers can be installed
  - python3-3.10.6-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-14 Thread Paulo Fidalgo
Copr repo for Signal-Desktop owned by luminoso  

561  B/s | 341  B 00:00
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 
'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop':
  - Status code: 404 for 
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luminoso/Signal-Desktop/fedora-37-x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
 (IP: 2600:9000:248c:e400:4:bbc1:1840:93a1)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 
'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop': Cannot download 
repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates

 26 kB/s |  19 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates

 30 kB/s |  19 kB 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   

 22 kB/s |  16 kB 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   

919 kB/s | 1.4 MB 00:01
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   

 16 kB/s |  13 kB 00:00
Hashicorp Stable - x86_64   

476  B/s | 314  B 00:00
Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'hashicorp':
  - Status code: 404 for 
https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/37/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml 
(IP: 2600:9000:20dc:7800:18:566b:ecc0:93a1)
Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'hashicorp': Cannot download 
repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were tried
Ignoring repositories: copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:luminoso:Signal-Desktop, 
hashicorp
Error: 
 Problem: package elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37.x86_64 requires 
libecal-2.0.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc36.x86_64
  - evolution-data-server-3.44.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Richard Myers
This is for F35 -> F37 ...

Error:
 Problem 1: package compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.20-1.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libvpx.so.6()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - libvpx-1.10.0-2.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package compat-ffmpeg28-2.8.20-1.fc35.x86_64
 Problem 2: package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires 
mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires 
osgi(org.apache.lucene.core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be installed
  - lucene-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch
 Problem 3: package mono-yui-2.0.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libyui.so.12()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - libyui-3.10.0-4.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package mono-yui-2.0.2-6.fc35.x86_64
 Problem 4: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - nautilus-extensions-41.5-1.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64
 Problem 5: package perl-Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4-37.fc35.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed
  - perl-libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package perl-Verilog-CodeGen-0.9.4-37.fc35.noarch
  - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is filtered 
out by modular filtering
 Problem 6: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 
5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed
  - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
--
I sure would love it if anybody knows how to fix the below warning(?), which 
shows up every time I run DNF (it has persisted through at least 3 or 4 Fedora 
revisions, maybe more):

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf/plugin.py", line 104, in _caller
getattr(plugin, method)()
  File 
"/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/dnf-plugins/generate_completion_cache.py", 
line 62, in sack
cur.execute("delete from available")
sqlite3.DatabaseError: database disk image is malformed

I've tried (in the past) many things to try to fix it, but nothing worked.  
Can't remember everything I tried, because it has been a couple of years, but 
suffice to say, I've tried the low-hanging, obvious stuff, and some obscure 
things...

-Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 7:06 PM Thomas Link via devel
 wrote:
>
> Error:
>  Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>  Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
> libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>  Problem 3: package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 
> requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
> installed

This is fallout from the removal of the Pantheon desktop environment,
caused by the libsoup3pocalypse and other big breaking changes in GNOME 43.

You should be able to work around this problem by using "--allowerasing".
But to ensure that's not necessary in the future, I filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126443

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Samuel Sieb

On 9/13/22 12:07, Scott Beamer wrote:

# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found...
No such command:  . Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help
It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command( )'


You have linebreaks in the wrong places.  The \ should have been at the 
end of the line.  The following should be all one line:


dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && 
echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Ian Laurie

On 9/12/22 22:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your 
time and try to run:


I have updated 5 native systems running Fedora 36 (all running Xfce) to 
Fedora 37 as follows:


(1) ASUS G750JS 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4700HQ CPU @ 2.40GHz

Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core Processor Integrated Graphics Controller 
(rev 06)


NVIDIA Corporation GK104M [GeForce GTX 870M] (rev a1)

(2) Dell Precision T5610 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2603 v2 @ 1.80GHz 
(8 cores total)


NVIDIA Corporation GK104 [GeForce GTX 760] (rev a1)

(3) Dell Precision T3600 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1620 0 @ 3.60GHz (8 
cores total)


NVIDIA Corporation GF119 [NVS 310] (rev a1)

(4) Dell Optiplex 3040 1 x Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-6100T CPU @ 3.20GHz

Intel Corporation HD Graphics 530 (rev 06)

(5) Intel NUC i7 NUC11PAH 1 x 11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-1165G7 @ 2.80GHz

Intel Corporation TigerLake-LP GT2 [Iris Xe Graphics] (rev 01)

All working fine. I have one more native system to convert, which is the 
exact same H/W platform as (5) above (but with less memory), which I 
will do after release.


Upgrades were performed around the time of the updates-testing 
activation point (long before the beta was released). I recall some 
non-show-stopping complaints from dnf, but the upgrades happened without 
a blocking incident and all machines are functioning normally now.


Ian

--
Ian Laurie
FAS: nixuser | IRC: nixuser
TZ: Australia/Sydney
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Scott Wallace via devel
Everything looks good for me.  I get notices about packages getting replaced:

evince  x86_64  
43~alpha-4.fc37 
  fedora2.0 M
 replacing  evince-nautilus.x86_64 42.3-1.fc36

and some others but I would expect this. No errors.
 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Alexander Finkel
Error: 
 Problem 1: package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 requires 
flatpak-session-helper(x86-64) = 1.12.7-5.fc36, but none of the providers can 
be installed
  - flatpak-session-helper-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 2: package flatpak-1.12.7-5.fc36.x86_64 requires (flatpak-selinux = 
1.12.7-5.fc36 if selinux-policy-targeted), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package fedora-flathub-remote-1-3.fc37.noarch requires flatpak, but none of 
the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package selinux-policy-targeted-36.14-1.fc36.noarch
  - problem with installed package fedora-flathub-remote-1-2.fc36.noarch
  - selinux-policy-targeted-36.14-1.fc36.noarch does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - flatpak-selinux-1.12.7-5.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - fedora-flathub-remote-1-2.fc36.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - package flatpak-1.13.3-6.fc37.i686 is filtered out by exclude filtering
  - package flatpak-1.13.3-6.fc37.x86_64 is filtered out by exclude filtering
  - package flatpak-1.14.0-1.fc37.i686 is filtered out by exclude filtering
  - package flatpak-1.14.0-1.fc37.x86_64 is filtered out by exclude filtering
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Scott Beamer
> # dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null &&
> echo
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
> bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found...
> No such command:  . Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help
> It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command( )'


OK, I tried it again, with a fresh install of F36.I still got an error message 
with the command, but it looks like it was all set to run the upgrade.:

$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found...
[sudo] password for scott: 

[...]

Transaction Summary
==
Install  55 Packages
Upgrade2349 Packages
Downgrade94 Packages
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Scott Beamer
# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing \ $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
bash: --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular: command not found...
No such command:  . Please use /usr/bin/dnf --help
It could be a DNF plugin command, try: "dnf install 'dnf-command( )'
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Karim Naufal
I get the following problems:

 Problem 1: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires 
system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-workstation-36-18.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch

 Problem 2: package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-36-1.noarch requires 
system-release(36), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package fedora-release-workstation-36-18.noarch requires 
fedora-release-common = 36-18, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-rawhide-36-1.noarch requires 
rpmfusion-nonfree-release = 36-1, but none of the providers can be installed
  - fedora-release-common-36-18.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-rawhide-36-1.noarch
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread przemek klosowski via devel


On 9/12/22 08:59, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your 
time and try to run:


# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'

dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \

--assumeno distro-sync


conflict due to

 elementary-planner-1:3.0.7-1.fc37.x86_64 requires 
libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2126527
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Marcin Zajączkowski
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:

Hi. I've got the following errors:

> Error:
>  Problem 1: package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 requires
openjfx(x86-64) = 3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35, but none of the providers can be
installed
>   - openjfx-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
>   - problem with installed package openjfx-devel-3:11.0.9.2-6.fc35.x86_64
>  Problem 2: package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires
libQt5Core.so.5(Qt_5.15.2_PRIVATE_API)(64bit), but none of the providers
can be installed
>   - package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64 requires
qt5-qtbase(x86-64) = 5.15.2, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - qt5-qtbase-5.15.2-31.fc35.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
>   - problem with installed package qt5-qtenginio-1:1.6.2-36.fc35.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

Should I report them in Bugzilla (for the appropriate packages)?

I use Fedora 35. Nevertheless, the F35→F37 path should be also supported.


Marcin
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread ilkka tengvall
no any problem on this laptop.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Renich Bon Ćirić
I found issues with evolution-rss dependencies. Will report it to them. [root@introdesk ~]# dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 --enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo  --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-syncFedora 37 - x86_64                                                                                                                                                                     12 MB/s |  81 MB     00:06    Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64                                                                                                                                              1.5 kB/s | 2.5 kB     00:01    Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64                                                                                                                                                            1.4 MB/s | 3.8 MB     00:02    Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates                                                                                                                                                          157  B/s | 257  B     00:01    Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates                                                                                                                                                  209  B/s | 257  B     00:01    Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates                                                                                                                                                     2.3 MB/s | 4.6 MB     00:01    Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates                                                                                                                                             173 kB/s | 267 kB     00:01    Hashicorp Stable - x86_64                                                                                                                                                             315  B/s | 314  B     00:00    Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'hashicorp':  - Status code: 404 for https://rpm.releases.hashicorp.com/fedora/37/x86_64/stable/repodata/repomd.xml (IP: 2600:9000:21d4:e00:18:566b:ecc0:93a1)Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'hashicorp': Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All mirrors were triedRPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free                                                                                                                                                       226 kB/s | 680 kB     00:03    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free tainted                                                                                                                                               732  B/s | 1.8 kB     00:02    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates                                                                                                                                             185  B/s | 257  B     00:01    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree                                                                                                                                                    141 kB/s | 248 kB     00:01    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - NVIDIA Driver                                                                                                                                    9.9 kB/s |  14 kB     00:01    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Steam                                                                                                                                            1.5 kB/s | 2.2 kB     00:01    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree tainted                                                                                                                                            2.5 kB/s | 3.8 kB     00:01    RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Updates                                                                                                                                          183  B/s | 257  B     00:01    Ignoring repositories: hashicorpError:  Problem 1: package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed  - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libebook-contacts-1.2.so.3()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed  - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed  - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.63()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed  - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libebackend-1.2.so.10()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed  - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libecal-2.0.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed  - package evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.3()(64bit), but none of the 

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Thomas Link via devel
Error: 
 Problem 1: package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 2: package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libmutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libmutter-clutter-10.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - mutter-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package gala-libs-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 3: package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 
requires libedataserver-1.2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libcamel-1.2.so.63()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - evolution-data-server-3.44.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package 
switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts-6.5.0-1.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 4: package gnome-session-42.0-4.fc37.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~alpha-6.fc37.x86_64 and 
gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and 
gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
  - package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package gnome-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64
  - package switchboard-plug-keyboard-2.7.0-3.fc36.x86_64 requires gala, but 
none of the providers can be installed
  - gnome-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package switchboard-plug-keyboard-2.7.0-3.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 5: package gnome-session-42.0-4.fc37.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.20()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~alpha-6.fc37.x86_64 and 
gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install both gnome-desktop3-43~rc-1.fc37.x86_64 and 
gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64
  - package gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-4.fc37.x86_64 requires 
gnome-session(x86-64) = 42.0-4.fc37, but none of the providers can be installed
  - package gala-6.3.1-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - problem with installed package 
gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64
  - package switchboard-plug-notifications-2.2.0-3.fc36.x86_64 requires 
gala(x86-64), but none of the providers can be installed
  - gnome-session-wayland-session-42.0-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package 
switchboard-plug-notifications-2.2.0-3.fc36.x86_64
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages or 
'--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Timo S via devel
$ sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:47 ago on Tue 13 Sep 2022 19:34:54.
Error: 
 Problem 1: problem with installed package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64
  - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires libavif.so.13()(64bit), 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - libavif-0.9.3-3.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 Problem 2: problem with installed package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64
  - package 0ad-0.0.25b-2.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libboost_filesystem.so.1.76.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - boost-filesystem-1.76.0-12.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
 Problem 3: problem with installed package signal-desktop-5.58.0-1.7.x86_64
  - package signal-desktop-5.58.0-1.7.x86_64 requires (nodejs-electron(x86-64) 
>= 19 with nodejs-electron(x86-64) < 20), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.3.x86_64 requires 
libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires libjxl.so.0.6()(64bit), 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - package nodejs-electron-19.0.16-1.4.x86_64 requires 
libjxl.so.0.6(JXL_0)(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - libjxl-0.6.1-9.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
sudo dnf -  1  ST 3   rawhide module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && 
echo --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync

Copr repo for gnome-info-collect owned by vstan 484  B/s | 1.3 kB 00:02
Fedora 37 - x86_64  2.9 MB/s |  80 MB 00:27
Fedora 37 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64    1.3 kB/s | 2.5 kB 00:01
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64  2.0 MB/s | 3.8 MB 00:01
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Updates    352  B/s | 257 B 00:00
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Updates    329  B/s | 257 B 00:00
Fedora 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   1.8 MB/s | 9.1 MB 00:05
Fedora Modular 37 - x86_64 - Test Updates   132 kB/s | 268 kB 00:02
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free 491 kB/s | 680 kB 00:01
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Free - Updates   409  B/s | 257 B 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree  285 kB/s | 248 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 37 - Nonfree - Updates    356  B/s | 257 B 00:00
Error:
 Problem 1: package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires 
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository

  - problem with installed package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64
 Problem 2: package 
nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package 
nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64

(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Fedora Design Team
Fedora Design Suite maintainer
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Scott Beamer
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:
> 
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules

What do you mean by "default modules"?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Nathanael D. Noblet
On Mon, 2022-09-12 at 14:59 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>  
>  # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
>  # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled
> again
>  sudo dnf module reset '*'
>  
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
>  --enablerepo=updates-testing \
>  $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo --
> enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
>  --assumeno distro-sync
> 
Error: 
 Problem 1: package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.lucene:lucene-core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers
can be installed
  - package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch requires
osgi(org.apache.lucene.core) = 8.8.2, but none of the providers can be
installed
  - lucene-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package lucene-analysis-8.8.2-1.fc35.noarch
 Problem 2: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64
requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers
can be installed
  - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-
3.fc35.x86_64
 Problem 3: package perl-File-Inplace-0.20-31.fc36.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed
  - perl-libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package perl-File-Inplace-0.20-
31.fc36.noarch
  - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
 Problem 4: package mod_perl-2.0.12-5.fc37.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.fc37.x86_64 and perl-
libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-492.fc37.x86_64 and perl-
libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64
  - problem with installed package mod_perl-2.0.12-1.fc36.x86_64
  - package perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.22-11.fc36.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed
  - mod_perl-2.0.12-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package perl-Lingua-EN-Fathom-1.22-
11.fc36.noarch
  - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
  - package perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.module_f37+14796+372df908.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
 Problem 5: package perl-BDB-1.92-18.fc37.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.fc37.x86_64 and perl-
libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-492.fc37.x86_64 and perl-
libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64
  - problem with installed package perl-BDB-1.92-16.fc36.x86_64
  - package perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-1:0.30-18.fc36.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed
  - perl-BDB-1.92-16.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package perl-Lingua-EN-Syllable-1:0.30-
18.fc36.noarch
  - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
  - package perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.module_f37+14796+372df908.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
 Problem 6: package perl-BSD-Resource-1.291.100-20.fc37.x86_64 requires
libperl.so.5.36()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.fc37.x86_64 and perl-
libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64
  - cannot install both perl-libs-4:5.36.0-492.fc37.x86_64 and perl-
libs-4:5.34.1-486.fc36.x86_64
  - problem with installed package perl-BSD-Resource-1.291.100-
18.fc36.x86_64
  - package publican-4.3.2-23.fc36.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.34.0), but none of the providers can be installed
  - perl-BSD-Resource-1.291.100-18.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package publican-4.3.2-23.fc36.noarch
  - package perl-libs-4:5.34.1-487.module_f37+15117+20131e0e.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
  - package perl-libs-4:5.36.0-491.module_f37+14796+372df908.x86_64 is
filtered out by modular filtering
(try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting
packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Scott Beamer
What do you mean by "default modules"?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Ours Ique
Error: 
 Problem: package nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64 
requires libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package 
nautilus-image-converter-0.3.1-0.22.git430afce31.fc35.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Héctor H . Louzao P .
I've just add --alowerasing for protonvpn...

LANG=C sudo dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 
--enablerepo=updates-testing $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) --assumeno distro-sync --allowerasing;


Installing weak dependencies:
 clevis-pin-tpm2x86_64 0.5.2-2.fc37 
  fedora736 k
 fedora-chromium-config-gnome   noarch 2.0-2.fc37   
  fedora9.6 k
 firefox-langpacks  x86_64 104.0.2-1.fc37   
  updates-testing40 M
 libreoffice-gtk4   x86_64 1:7.4.0.3-1.fc37 
  fedora508 k
 perl-IO-Compress-Brotlix86_64 0.004001-6.fc37  
  fedora 27 k
 python3.10 x86_64 3.10.7-1.fc37
  updates-testing27 k
 python3.10-tkinter x86_64 3.10.7-1.fc37
  updates-testing   347 k
 rubygem-irbnoarch 1.4.1-169.fc37   
  updates-testing86 k
 sysprof-agent  x86_64 3.45.1-1.fc37
  fedora130 k
Removing:
 kernel x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
  @updates0  
 kernel-corex86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
  @updates   92 M
 kernel-devel   x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
  @updates   64 M
 kernel-modules x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
  @updates   57 M
 kernel-modules-extra   x86_64 5.19.4-200.fc36  
  @updates  3.4 M
Removing dependent packages:
 kmod-v4l2loopback-5.19.4-200.fc36.x86_64   x86_64 0.12.7-1.fc36
  @@commandline  17 k
 nmstate-plugin-ovsdb   noarch 2.0.0-1.fc36 
  @fedora22 k
 nvautoinstall  noarch 0.4.1-0.fc36 
  @copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:t0xic0der:nvidia-auto-installer-for-fedora

216 k
 python3-bodhi  noarch 5.7.5-1.fc36 
  @fedora32 k
 python3-language-servernoarch 0.36.2-6.fc35
  @fedora   245 k
 python3-pipreqsnoarch 0.4.10-4.fc35
  @fedora97 k
 python3-proton-client  noarch 0.7.1-2  
  @protonvpn-fedora-stable   64 k
 python3-protonvpn-nm-lib   noarch 3.12.0-1.fc36
  @protonvpn-fedora-stable  388 k
 python3-yarg   noarch 0.1.9-16.fc35
  @fedora56 k
 seahorse-nautilus  x86_64 3.11.92-20.fc36  
  @fedora   847 k
Downgrading:
 grubby x86_64 8.40-66.fc37 
  fedora 33 k
 kf5-filesystem x86_64 5.96.0-2.fc37
  fedora 11 k
 openjfxx86_64 3:17.0.0.1-4.fc37
  fedora8.8 M
 openssl-pkcs11 i686   0.4.12-1.fc37
  fedora 76 k
 openssl-pkcs11 x86_64 0.4.12-1.fc37
  fedora 73 k
 protonvpn-cli  noarch 2.2.11-6.fc37
  fedora 90 k
 python3-xarray noarch 2022.3.0-2.fc37  
  fedora2.1 M
 qt6-qtwayland  

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Vitaly Zaitsev via devel

On 13/09/2022 12:15, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:

How should I proceed?


It should be added to fedora-obsolete-packages.

--
Sincerely,
  Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Miro Hrončok

On 13. 09. 22 12:15, Mikel Olasagasti wrote:

Hau idatzi du Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022
ira. 12, al. (15:00)):


Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
try to run:

# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'

dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync


Error:
  Problem: package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
   - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
   - problem with installed package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64

I see package has been retired.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-books

How should I proceed?


Please report this to fedora-obsolete-packages:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=fedora-obsolete-packages=37

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Mikel Olasagasti
Hau idatzi du Miroslav Suchý (msu...@redhat.com) erabiltzaileak (2022
ira. 12, al. (15:00)):
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo dnf module reset '*'
>
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync

Error:
 Problem: package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64 requires
libgnome-desktop-3.so.19()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
  - gnome-desktop3-42.4-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
  - problem with installed package gnome-books-40.0-4.fc36.x86_64

I see package has been retired.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-books

How should I proceed?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Tommy Nguyen
In a F36 toolbox:

Transaction Summary
Install 21 Packages
Upgrade588 Packages
Downgrade1 Package

Total download size: 438 M
Operation aborted.

Wants to downgrade grubby. So no issues.

I cannot run this on my actual system because the mirrors I use (which
I hard-coded for bandwidth) still has F37 in testing/beta folders.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Rajeesh K V
> dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
> --enablerepo=updates-testing \
> $(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
> --assumeno distro-sync

Without modules enabled, works fine here:

dnf --releasever=37 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno distro-sync

Install  49 Packages
Upgrade3911 Packages
Remove7 Packages
Downgrade 5 Packages

Total download size: 3.8 G
Operation aborted.

Downgrading:
grubby
hdparm
keepassxc
openssl-pkcs11
texmaker
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-13 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz

W dniu 12.09.2022 o 14:59, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time 
and try to run:


# Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
# next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
sudo dnf module reset '*'

dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \

--assumeno distro-sync


No issues this time:

Transaction Summary
=
Install  48 Packages
Upgrade4450 Packages
Remove7 Packages
Downgrade   131 Packages

Total download size: 6.3 G
Operation aborted.

Removal is the usual one - kernel, nvidia and some Python.

Downgrade is mostly KDE. Plus grubby, hdparm and some cmake.

I am waiting for "downgrade" number to go further down (it was at 233 
last week) and upgrade this or next week.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-12 Thread Alexander Ploumistos
The only issues I've encountered were related to nautilus extensions.
Bugs are open for all of them and I submitted a PR for an rpmfusion
package.

However, I think that for people on Workstation who
encrypt/decrypt/sign files through nautilus (and who are not
comfortable with a terminal), the loss of seahorse-nautilus is going
to be a significant problem. Could anyone take a look to see if it can
be patched to work on F37? I was able to get the compilation going up
to a point, but the subsequent errors were beyond my knowledge.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-12 Thread Paul Wouters

On Mon, 12 Sep 2022, Miroslav Suchý wrote:


Do you want to make Fedora 37 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
try to run:



In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate 
package.


Seemed fine. I saw two issues related to python azure packages but since
I maintain some that might be self inflected. will double check though
on a stock install.

Paul
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

2022-09-12 Thread Steven A. Falco

On 9/12/22 08:59 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:

dnf --releasever=37 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f37 \
--enablerepo=updates-testing \
$(rpm -q fedora-repos-modular >/dev/null && echo 
--enablerepo=updates-testing-modular) \
--assumeno distro-sync


Error:
 Problem: package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64 requires 
libnautilus-extension.so.1()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
  - nautilus-extensions-42.2-1.fc36.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package nautilus-dropbox-1:2020.03.04-3.fc35.x86_64
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue