Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Miro Hrončok]

On 07. 02. 23 15:12, Miro Hrončok wrote:

On 23. 01. 23 17:44, Tomas Hrcka wrote:

FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.


Is there an estimated date when this will happen?


There is now a ticket with the same question:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11295

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Dan Horák]

On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 17:37:09 +0100
Dan Horák  wrote:

> On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:24:47 +
> Sérgio Basto  wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:  
> > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> > > > Szmek wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I found more 5 with
> > > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > > > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 96474133 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > > > > > > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 96404064 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > > > > > > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 96383273 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > > > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 96368979 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > > > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1f
> > > > > > > f)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, I have canceled all those now. 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I started builds for all of those now.
> > > > 
> > > > All of them have hung again after running since you started them. 
> > > > 
> > > > I think someone is going to need to try and build them in local
> > > > mock and
> > > > see where they are getting stuck. 
> > > > 
> > > > Can you cancel them again? Or would you like me to try and look and
> > > > see
> > > > what they are hung on?
> > > 
> > > I cancelled them now. All five were still hung.
> > > It's up to the maintainers to figure out what is going.
> > > E.g. yaksa was hanging in tests…
> > 
> > Any news about these packages that hang on koji ? we may include opencv
> > package on this list.
> > 
> > Last lines of build opencv on ppc64le are [1] and after we got 55385703
> > (55 millions) of lines with "mashing detected" message,  the log file
> > have 2,30G ! 
> > 
> > Also I see "buffer overflow detected ***: terminated cat: /symlink2-
> > fakechroot: No such file or directory " on fakechroot  
> 
> this looks weird, I am trying a local build

and they confirm the observation from koji, both a small and a big
machine produce tons of the error messages, but the build itself
finishes successfully. I will keep looking further.


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Dan Horák]

On Wed, 08 Feb 2023 15:24:47 +
Sérgio Basto  wrote:

> On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:  
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> > > Szmek wrote:  
> > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:  
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:  
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I found more 5 with
> > > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 96474133 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > > > > > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 96404064 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > > > > > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 96383273 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 96368979 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1f
> > > > > > f)  
> > > > > 
> > > > > Yes, I have canceled all those now.   
> > > > 
> > > > I started builds for all of those now.  
> > > 
> > > All of them have hung again after running since you started them. 
> > > 
> > > I think someone is going to need to try and build them in local
> > > mock and
> > > see where they are getting stuck. 
> > > 
> > > Can you cancel them again? Or would you like me to try and look and
> > > see
> > > what they are hung on?  
> > 
> > I cancelled them now. All five were still hung.
> > It's up to the maintainers to figure out what is going.
> > E.g. yaksa was hanging in tests…  
> 
> Any news about these packages that hang on koji ? we may include opencv
> package on this list.
> 
> Last lines of build opencv on ppc64le are [1] and after we got 55385703
> (55 millions) of lines with "mashing detected" message,  the log file
> have 2,30G ! 
> 
> Also I see "buffer overflow detected ***: terminated cat: /symlink2-
> fakechroot: No such file or directory " on fakechroot

this looks weird, I am trying a local build


Dan
 
> Best regards,
> 
> [1]
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97209133
> 
> /usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:1142: std::vector<_Tp,
> _Alloc>::const_reference std::vector<_Tp,
> _Alloc>::operator[](size_type) const [with _Tp = float; _Alloc =  
> std::allocator; const_reference = const float&; size_type = long
> unsigned int]: Assertion '__n < this->size()' failed.
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> *** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
> 
> > Zbyszek
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue  
> 
> -- 
> Sérgio M. B.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> 

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Sérgio Basto]

On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 12:03 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-
> > Szmek wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > I found more 5 with
> > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> > > > > 
> > > > > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 96474133 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > > > > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 96404064 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > > > > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> > > > > 
> > > > > 96383273 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> > > > > 
> > > > > 96368979 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1f
> > > > > f)
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, I have canceled all those now. 
> > > 
> > > I started builds for all of those now.
> > 
> > All of them have hung again after running since you started them. 
> > 
> > I think someone is going to need to try and build them in local
> > mock and
> > see where they are getting stuck. 
> > 
> > Can you cancel them again? Or would you like me to try and look and
> > see
> > what they are hung on?
> 
> I cancelled them now. All five were still hung.
> It's up to the maintainers to figure out what is going.
> E.g. yaksa was hanging in tests…

Any news about these packages that hang on koji ? we may include opencv
package on this list.

Last lines of build opencv on ppc64le are [1] and after we got 55385703
(55 millions) of lines with "mashing detected" message,  the log file
have 2,30G ! 

Also I see "buffer overflow detected ***: terminated cat: /symlink2-
fakechroot: No such file or directory " on fakechroot

Best regards,

[1]
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=97209133

/usr/include/c++/13/bits/stl_vector.h:1142: std::vector<_Tp,
_Alloc>::const_reference std::vector<_Tp,
_Alloc>::operator[](size_type) const [with _Tp = float; _Alloc =
std::allocator; const_reference = const float&; size_type = long
unsigned int]: Assertion '__n < this->size()' failed.
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** longjmp causes uninitialized stack frame ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated
*** stack smashing detected ***: terminated

> Zbyszek
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Miro Hrončok]

On 23. 01. 23 17:44, Tomas Hrcka wrote:

FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly.


Is there an estimated date when this will happen?

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 04:45:37PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > I found more 5 with
> > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> > > > 
> > > > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> > > > 
> > > > 96474133 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > > > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> > > > 
> > > > 96404064 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > > > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> > > > 
> > > > 96383273 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> > > > 
> > > > 96368979 build (f38-rebuild,
> > > > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1ff)
> > > 
> > > Yes, I have canceled all those now. 
> > 
> > I started builds for all of those now.
> 
> All of them have hung again after running since you started them. 
> 
> I think someone is going to need to try and build them in local mock and
> see where they are getting stuck. 
> 
> Can you cancel them again? Or would you like me to try and look and see
> what they are hung on?

I cancelled them now. All five were still hung.
It's up to the maintainers to figure out what is going.
E.g. yaksa was hanging in tests…

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 09:42:10AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > 
> > > I found more 5 with
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> > > 
> > > 96481236   build (f38-rebuild,
> > > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> > > 
> > > 96474133   build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> > > 
> > > 96404064   build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> > > 
> > > 96383273   build (f38-rebuild,
> > > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> > > 
> > > 96368979   build (f38-rebuild,
> > > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1ff)
> > 
> > Yes, I have canceled all those now. 
> 
> I started builds for all of those now.

All of them have hung again after running since you started them. 

I think someone is going to need to try and build them in local mock and
see where they are getting stuck. 

Can you cancel them again? Or would you like me to try and look and see
what they are hung on?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 22:53, Gary Buhrmaster  wrote:
>
> 
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:29 AM Jeff Law  wrote:
>
> > On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > See
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > > Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
> > > as an implementation detail but no longer do.
> > >
> > > Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
> > > but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
> > > include .
> > I've got a partial list of packages affected by the ongoing header
> > cleanups in libstdc++:
>
> I am in favor of header cleanups, and moving forward
> with new(er) gcc versions, but I wonder that if in the
> future the Fedora gcc change proposal can reference
> the porting changes rather than referring only to the
> main gcc docs as an additional heads up (in this case,
> I skimmed the gcc 13 changes page, but you had to
> follow yet another link for porting issues to see the
> library header changes (and I did not go looking
> there, my bad)).

I think linking to that page would be a good idea. My only reservation
is that a lot of the content of that page gets written *after* we do a
mass rebuild with the new gcc, because that is when we find which
changes cause the biggest porting headaches. When the change proposal
gets written the porting-to page isn't very well populated. But we
could still link to it, even if it's not very useful until closer to
the mass rebuild.

> While it may take me only a minute to recognize
> the issue when I see the compile failure for a
> missing header ("and there they go again..."),
> writing PRs for upstreams and getting those fixes
> into their release cycle may take somewhat longer
> (and I prefer not to carry local patches in packages
> when possible).
>
> Had I seen cstdint I like to think that I would have
> tried a rebuild with gcc 13 earlier to see what
> (if any) upstream(s) needed some encouragement
> for support gcc 13.

Well if it would encourage people to try the new GCC earlier, we
should definitely link to that page in the change proposal :-)
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jeff Law]

On 1/24/23 15:52, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:



Had I seen cstdint I like to think that I would have
tried a rebuild with gcc 13 earlier to see what
(if any) upstream(s) needed some encouragement
for support gcc 13.
I actually did stuff like this in the past -- build all of Fedora with 
the new compiler as early as possible and then proceeded to fix as many 
of these trivial things as I could.


It was mostly done to keep the noise down in the tester so that the vast 
majority of the failures were actually compiler issues the team needed 
to address and to find deeper issues earlier in the cycle.


I've since moved on from Red Hat and don't even worry about any of the 
significant Fedora platforms anymore (I'm in risc-v land).  The mass 
rebuild testing I did was looking for something completely different, 
hence I didn't get through analysis of generic build failures as I was 
focused on a specific issue.


jeff
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:29 AM Jeff Law  wrote:

> On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > See
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
> > as an implementation detail but no longer do.
> >
> > Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
> > but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
> > include .
> I've got a partial list of packages affected by the ongoing header
> cleanups in libstdc++:

I am in favor of header cleanups, and moving forward
with new(er) gcc versions, but I wonder that if in the
future the Fedora gcc change proposal can reference
the porting changes rather than referring only to the
main gcc docs as an additional heads up (in this case,
I skimmed the gcc 13 changes page, but you had to
follow yet another link for porting issues to see the
library header changes (and I did not go looking
there, my bad)).

While it may take me only a minute to recognize
the issue when I see the compile failure for a
missing header ("and there they go again..."),
writing PRs for upstreams and getting those fixes
into their release cycle may take somewhat longer
(and I prefer not to carry local patches in packages
when possible).

Had I seen cstdint I like to think that I would have
tried a rebuild with gcc 13 earlier to see what
(if any) upstream(s) needed some encouragement
for support gcc 13.

Thanks for the consideration.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 02:01:39PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
> 
> > hobbes1069 (9):
> > cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> > flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> > flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> > freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> > gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> > openCOLLADA - error: possibly dangling reference to a temporary. Don't
> > know how to fix this one.
> > opencascade - error: declaration of 'tbb::task&
> > tbb::internal::task_prefix::task()' changes meaning of 'task'
> > openexr - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> > spnavcfg - https://github.com/FreeSpacenav/spnavcfg/issues/30
> >
> 
> I think I've gotten everything situated except openCOLLADA.

See https://gcc.gnu.org/PR107532 and
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/thread.html#610188
It is a new warning, which has some false positives and some further work
is being done on that, but whether openCOLLADA triggers a false positive
or has a real bug is something that somebody needs to analyze.
E.g. -fsanitize=address should diagnose similar use after scope bugs
at runtime.
Of course, packages which use -Werror need to be prepared to deal with new
warnings at any time.

Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Richard Shaw]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 7:20 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:

> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> openCOLLADA - error: possibly dangling reference to a temporary. Don't
> know how to fix this one.
> opencascade - error: declaration of 'tbb::task&
> tbb::internal::task_prefix::task()' changes meaning of 'task'
> openexr - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> spnavcfg - https://github.com/FreeSpacenav/spnavcfg/issues/30
>

I think I've gotten everything situated except openCOLLADA.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Mattia Verga via devel]

Il 24/01/23 08:16, Jakub Jelinek ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
>> I have some packages failed.
>> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>>
>> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>>
>> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
> See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
> as an implementation detail but no longer do.
>
> Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
> but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
> include .
>
>   Jakub

I think rawtherapee is FTB for this as well:

/builddir/build/BUILD/rawtherapee-5.9/rtengine/dcraw.h:187:13: error:
'uint32_t' does not name a type

and

/builddir/build/BUILD/rawtherapee-5.9/rtengine/dcraw.h:24:1: note:
'uint32_t' is defined in header ''; did you forget to '#include
'?

Should I patch dcraw.h to have '#include '?

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Rafael Aquini]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 9:49 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> > FYI:
> >
> > memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:
> >
> > This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
> > ago (01/13)
> >
> > ---8<---
> >
> > EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M
> > b67a9ff69f3540e9bb559e45f9dafdf5 -D
> > /var/lib/mock/f38-build-40444675-4981555/root -a -u mockbuild
> > --capability=cap_ipc_lock
> > --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv._3nfqeom:/etc/resolv.conf
> > --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control
> > --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1
> > --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4
> > --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7
> > --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10
> > --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100
> > --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir
> > --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
> > --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;\\007"
> > --setenv=PS1= \\s-\\v\\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
> > --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --noclean
> > --target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/memkind.spec\n', 1)]
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> >   File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> > line 93, in trace
> > result = func(*args, **kw)
> >
> > --->8---
>
> Very odd failure. :(
>
> It looks like it finished linking and then somehow systemd-nspawn
> crashed, but I don't see in the logs any reason why. :(
>
> I'd say try a scratch build and if that works, just resubmit it?
>
>
Kevin,

A local mock build helped identifying what seems to be the issue -- that
only happens with recent rawhide (as
I mentioned, I had the RPM successfully built last week, see [1]):

---8<---
libtool: link: gcc -shared  -fPIC -DPIC  src/.libs/hbwmalloc.o
src/.libs/heap_manager.o src/.libs/memkind.o src/.libs/memkind_arena.o
src/.libs/memkind_bitmask.o src/.libs/memkind_capacity.o
src/.libs/memkind_dax_kmem.o src/.libs/memkind_default.o
src/.libs/memkind_fixed.o src/.libs/memkind_gbtlb.o src/.libs/memkind_hbw.o
src/.libs/memkind_hugetlb.o src/.libs/memkind_interleave.o
src/.libs/memkind_local.o src/.libs/memkind_log.o
src/.libs/memkind_memtier.o src/.libs/memkind_mem_attributes.o
src/.libs/memkind_pmem.o src/.libs/memkind_regular.o
src/.libs/tbb_wrapper.o   -ldl -lrt -ldaxctl jemalloc/lib/libjemalloc_pic.a
-lm -lpthread -lnuma -Wl,-z,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld -O2 -flto=auto -g
-grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
-fstack-protector-strong -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64
-mtune=generic -mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer -fstack-protector -Wl,-z
-Wl,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z -Wl,now
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -Wl,--build-id=sha1
-specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-package-notes -Wl,-z -Wl,relro -Wl,-z
-Wl,now   -pthread -Wl,-soname -Wl,libmemkind.so.0 -o
.libs/libmemkind.so.0.0.1
gcc: fatal error: environment variable 'RPM_ARCH' not defined
compilation terminated.
make: *** [Makefile:2426: libmemkind.la] Error 1
--->8---

and this seem to be exactly what was reported at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2142119

[1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2110820

-- Rafael

>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:29, Jeff Law  wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> >> I have some packages failed.
> >> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
> >>
> >> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
> >>
> >> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
> >
> > See
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
> > as an implementation detail but no longer do.
> >
> > Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
> > but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
> > include .
> I've got a partial list of packages affected by the ongoing header
> cleanups in libstdc++:
>
> intel-igc
> j4-dmenu-desktop
> julia
> jd
> jigdo
> mtxclient
> openclonk
> texlive-base
> tcpflow
> synergy
> R-svglite
> rstudio
> rssguard
> rpi-imager
> rocm-opencl
> rocksdb
> qucs
> parzip
> root
> openmsx
> openlierox
> openexr
> openexr2
> openms
> mongo-cxx-driver
> kakoune
>
>
> I'm sure there's more, I've probably looked at about 20% of the packaged
> I'd flagged as needing further analysis.  But that might help folks
> chase these things down.

The header cleanups will continue until morale improves!

The point of these changes is to speed up compilation. Removing
unnecessary headers means the compiler has less work to do, so koji
builds use less time and less power. The fixed package also becomes
more portable and more standard conforming. The  header isn't
expensive to compile, but what changed is actually that 
and  are no longer included in so many places, and those were
transitively including . Not including  where it
isn't needed removes thousands of lines of code. Most code seems to
remember to include  to use std::string, but everybody forgets
to include  for std::int32_t etc.

Looks like these have that issue and need to include :

widelands
warzone2100
uhd
usd
tcpflow
synergy
snapper
safeint
rstudio
rocksdb
rocm-opencl
prusa-slicer
plug
pingus
paraview
openms
openmsx

I didn't look at any packages starting with the letters A-N so there
are probably more.

Similarly, supertuxkart is missing  or .

pdns is missing 

openvdb failed but should work OK now as there's been an updated tbb.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
This is most likely my fault, since Lazarus seems to be quite tightly coupled 
to specific FPC versions.
Historically, whenever we updated/rebuilt FPC, we'd also rebuilt Lazarus. This 
time, when I rebuilt
FPC as part of the repackaging change [1], I completely forgot about rebuilding 
Lazarus as well.

Since Lazarus eventually got rebuilt as part of the Mass Rebuild, I expect that
once lazarus-2.2.4-2.fc38 becomes available in the rawhide buildroot,
it should be possible to just re-submit the failed builds and they'll work this 
time.

Sorry about the mess.
A.FI.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F38-FPC-repackaging
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Vascom]

Need help with rebuilding doublecmd.

вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 16:21, Richard Shaw :
>
> hobbes1069 (9):
> cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
> flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
> flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
> freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
> gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> openCOLLADA - error: possibly dangling reference to a temporary. Don't know 
> how to fix this one.
> opencascade - error: declaration of 'tbb::task& 
> tbb::internal::task_prefix::task()' changes meaning of 'task'
> openexr - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
> spnavcfg - https://github.com/FreeSpacenav/spnavcfg/issues/30
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Richard Shaw]

hobbes1069 (9):
cqrlog - Fails for some weird lazbuild issue I don't understand
flnet - Spec conditional oops. Fixed.
flrig - Needed cstdint. Fixed
freecad - Needs cstdint. Working on it.
gmsh - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
openCOLLADA - error: possibly dangling reference to a temporary. Don't know
how to fix this one.
opencascade - error: declaration of 'tbb::task&
tbb::internal::task_prefix::task()' changes meaning of 'task'
openexr - Needed cstdint. Fixed.
spnavcfg - https://github.com/FreeSpacenav/spnavcfg/issues/30

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Tomas Hrcka]

done.

$ koji list-tagged eln libunistring
Build

libunistring-1.0-2.eln120
libunistring-1.0-2.fc37

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:59 AM Tomáš Popela  wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
>> > I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
>>
>> The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
>>
>> We untagged it in december, but looks like no one followed up to get
>> dependent packages rebuilt:
>>
>> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11175
>>
>> I have untagged it (again) for now.
>
>
> I see that the ELN buildroot is broken in the same way, can you Kevin or 
> Stephen untag the libunistring from ELN?
>
> Tom
>
>>
>>
>> kevin
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives: 
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue



-- 
Tomas Hrcka
role: CPE Team - Senior Software Engineer
fas: humaton
freenode: jednorozec
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Tomáš Popela]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> > I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.
>
> The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again).
>
> We untagged it in december, but looks like no one followed up to get
> dependent packages rebuilt:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11175
>
> I have untagged it (again) for now.
>

I see that the ELN buildroot is broken in the same way, can you Kevin or
Stephen untag the libunistring from ELN?

Tom


>
> kevin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 08:13:56AM +, Tom Hughes via devel wrote:
> On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> > > > I have some packages failed.
> > > > One of them libtins. Problem is that:
> > > > 
> > > > error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
> > > > 
> > > > Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
> > > 
> > > See
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
> > > Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
> > > as an implementation detail but no longer do.
> > > 
> > > Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
> > > but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
> > > include .
> > I've got a partial list of packages affected by the ongoing header
> > cleanups in libstdc++:
> 
> mapnik was affected as well but I fixed it last night.

dolfin had the same issue and I fixed it now. Thanks for the hint.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jonathan Wakely]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 07:01, Vascom  wrote:
>
> I have some packages failed.
> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
>
> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
>
> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?
>
> I must patch sources now?
> sed -i 's|stdint.h|cstdint|' include/tins/ip_address.h

std::uint32_t is defined in . If the sources don't include
that header, that is a bug.

This is the same thing we have mass rebuild: C and C++ code must
include the headers for the features it uses.

If you get an error saying something is not declared, make sure the
right header is included.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 06:52:30PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > 
> > I found more 5 with
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> > 
> > 96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
> > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> > 
> > 96474133 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> > 
> > 96404064 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> > 
> > 96383273 build (f38-rebuild,
> > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> > 
> > 96368979 build (f38-rebuild,
> > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1ff)
> 
> Yes, I have canceled all those now. 

I started builds for all of those now.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Tom Hughes via devel]

On 24/01/2023 07:28, Jeff Law wrote:



On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:

I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:

error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';

Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?


See
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
as an implementation detail but no longer do.

Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
include .
I've got a partial list of packages affected by the ongoing header 
cleanups in libstdc++:


mapnik was affected as well but I fixed it last night.

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jeff Law]

On 1/24/23 00:16, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:

I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:

error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';

Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?


See
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
as an implementation detail but no longer do.

Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
include .
I've got a partial list of packages affected by the ongoing header 
cleanups in libstdc++:


intel-igc
j4-dmenu-desktop
julia
jd
jigdo
mtxclient
openclonk
texlive-base
tcpflow
synergy
R-svglite
rstudio
rssguard
rpi-imager
rocm-opencl
rocksdb
qucs
parzip
root
openmsx
openlierox
openexr
openexr2
openms
mongo-cxx-driver
kakoune


I'm sure there's more, I've probably looked at about 20% of the packaged 
I'd flagged as needing further analysis.  But that might help folks 
chase these things down.



Jeff
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:00:47AM +0300, Vascom wrote:
> I have some packages failed.
> One of them libtins. Problem is that:
> 
> error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';
> 
> Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?

See
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-13/porting_to.html#header-dep-changes
Some libstdc++ headers included  in older versions
as an implementation detail but no longer do.

Including stdint.h will introduce ::uint32_t type among others,
but not std::uint32_t, if you use the latter, you need to
include .

Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Vascom]

I have some packages failed.
One of them libtins. Problem is that:

error: 'uint32_t' is not a member of 'std';

Is it normal? Is it GCC 13 change?

I must patch sources now?
sed -i 's|stdint.h|cstdint|' include/tins/ip_address.h

вт, 24 янв. 2023 г. в 05:52, Kevin Fenzi :
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > I found more 5 with
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> >
> > 96481236   build (f38-rebuild,
> > /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> >
> > 96474133   build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> > cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> >
> > 96404064   build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> > SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> >
> > 96383273   build (f38-rebuild,
> > /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> >
> > 96368979   build (f38-rebuild,
> > /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1ff)
>
> Yes, I have canceled all those now.
>
> kevin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:26:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> I found more 5 with
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id
> 
> 96481236   build (f38-rebuild,
> /rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)
> 
> 96474133   build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
> cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)
> 
> 96404064   build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
> SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)
> 
> 96383273   build (f38-rebuild,
> /rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d
> 
> 96368979   build (f38-rebuild,
> /rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1ff)

Yes, I have canceled all those now. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:11:03PM -0500, Rafael Aquini wrote:
> FYI:
> 
> memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:
> 
> This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
> ago (01/13)
> 
> ---8<---
> 
> EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M
> b67a9ff69f3540e9bb559e45f9dafdf5 -D
> /var/lib/mock/f38-build-40444675-4981555/root -a -u mockbuild
> --capability=cap_ipc_lock
> --bind=/tmp/mock-resolv._3nfqeom:/etc/resolv.conf
> --bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control
> --bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1
> --bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4
> --bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7
> --bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10
> --bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100
> --setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir
> --setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
> --setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;\\007"
> --setenv=PS1= \\s-\\v\\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
> --resolv-conf=off bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --noclean
> --target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/memkind.spec\n', 1)]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 93, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
> 
> --->8---

Very odd failure. :( 

It looks like it finished linking and then somehow systemd-nspawn
crashed, but I don't see in the logs any reason why. :( 

I'd say try a scratch build and if that works, just resubmit it?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Rafael Aquini]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 7:43 PM Petr Šabata  wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:23 PM Tomas Hrcka  wrote:
> > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f38-rebuild) and moved over to
> > f38. Failures can be seen at
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-failures.html
>
>
FYI:

memkind failure (aarch64) seems to be koji/mock related:

This package was updated and sucessfully built in rawhide and f37 a week
ago (01/13)

---8<---

EXCEPTION: [Error('Command failed: \n # /usr/bin/systemd-nspawn -q -M
b67a9ff69f3540e9bb559e45f9dafdf5 -D
/var/lib/mock/f38-build-40444675-4981555/root -a -u mockbuild
--capability=cap_ipc_lock
--bind=/tmp/mock-resolv._3nfqeom:/etc/resolv.conf
--bind=/dev/btrfs-control --bind=/dev/mapper/control
--bind=/dev/loop-control --bind=/dev/loop0 --bind=/dev/loop1
--bind=/dev/loop2 --bind=/dev/loop3 --bind=/dev/loop4
--bind=/dev/loop5 --bind=/dev/loop6 --bind=/dev/loop7
--bind=/dev/loop8 --bind=/dev/loop9 --bind=/dev/loop10
--bind=/dev/loop11 --console=pipe --setenv=TERM=vt100
--setenv=SHELL=/bin/bash --setenv=HOME=/builddir
--setenv=HOSTNAME=mock --setenv=PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
--setenv=PROMPT_COMMAND=printf "\\033]0;\\007"
--setenv=PS1= \\s-\\v\\$  --setenv=LANG=C.UTF-8
--resolv-conf=off bash --login -c /usr/bin/rpmbuild -bb --noclean
--target aarch64 --nodeps /builddir/build/SPECS/memkind.spec\n', 1)]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)

--->8---


-- Rafael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Petr Šabata]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 6:23 PM Tomas Hrcka  wrote:
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f38-rebuild) and moved over to
> f38. Failures can be seen at
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-failures.html

pamix fixed in pamix-1.6-7.fc38.

P
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Sérgio Basto]

On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 19:58 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > > Things still needing rebuilding
> > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?
> > > 
> > > ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild
> > > was
> > > attempted:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ocaml-mysql
> > 
> > this situation usually means the build failed in the "create SRPM
> > from
> > dist-git" phase
> 
> Looking at my own packages, e.g. yaksa had a build attempt that seems
> to hang:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2135007


I found more 5 with
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/tasks?owner=releng=active=tree=all=-id

96481236 build (f38-rebuild,
/rpms/yaksa.git:528d57e3c954abfedba6f530f5ac09abaa9170fa)

96474133 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/trace-
cmd.git:d9631ac81ad4f30b7ca5ed8a7d3b57131c545080)

96404064 build (f38-rebuild, /rpms/perl-
SDL.git:347cf3fb5ac90e14b96381722bc335744077e967)

96383273 build (f38-rebuild,
/rpms/octave.git:93e5fb4a813805c66ec7107da26be2d52039106d

96368979 build (f38-rebuild,
/rpms/libtracecmd.git:121d11cfd26c3a0d61671b83f32b0be1ec75f1ff)

> Zbyszek
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:09:24PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > > Things still needing rebuilding
> > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html  
> > > 
> > > What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?
> > > 
> > > ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild was
> > > attempted:
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ocaml-mysql
> > 
> > this situation usually means the build failed in the "create SRPM from
> > dist-git" phase
> 
> Got it, thanks.
> 
> I updated it to the latest version and submitted a build and indeed
> the buildroot can't be built:
> 
>   https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96590546
> 
> The error is some Python / dbus / glib2 / gnutls dependency failure
> which makes no sense because the package is using none of those.

I just saw Kevin's reply elsewhere in the thread.  I will try again a
bit later.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines.  Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > Things still needing rebuilding
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html  
> > 
> > What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?
> > 
> > ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild was
> > attempted:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ocaml-mysql
> 
> this situation usually means the build failed in the "create SRPM from
> dist-git" phase

Got it, thanks.

I updated it to the latest version and submitted a build and indeed
the buildroot can't be built:

  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96590546

The error is some Python / dbus / glib2 / gnutls dependency failure
which makes no sense because the package is using none of those.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 07:50:19PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > > Things still needing rebuilding
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html  
> > 
> > What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?
> > 
> > ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild was
> > attempted:
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ocaml-mysql
> 
> this situation usually means the build failed in the "create SRPM from
> dist-git" phase

Looking at my own packages, e.g. yaksa had a build attempt that seems
to hang: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2135007

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 01:36:10PM -0600, Jonathan Wright via devel wrote:
> I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.

The problem was libunistring-1.1-3.fc38 (again). 

We untagged it in december, but looks like no one followed up to get
dependent packages rebuilt: 

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11175

I have untagged it (again) for now. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

I'm seeing the same errors on rawhide buildroot right now.

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 1:34 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <
s...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> I wanted to resubmit one of my failed builds, but the buildroot seems to
> be broken currently:
>
> > Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.14.0-2.fc38.noarch requires libmodulemd
> >= 2.9.3, but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - package libmodulemd-2.14.0-5.fc38.x86_64 requires
> libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - package libmodulemd-2.14.0-5.fc38.x86_64 requires
> libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - package dnf-4.14.0-2.fc38.noarch requires python3-dnf =
> 4.14.0-2.fc38, but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - package glib2-2.74.1-3.fc38.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.30()(64bit),
> but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - conflicting requests
> >  - nothing provides libunistring.so.2()(64bit) needed by
> gnutls-3.7.8-11.fc38.x86_64
> > Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.3.1-2.fc38.noarch requires
> python3-dbus, but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - package python3-dbus-1.3.2-2.fc38.x86_64 requires
> libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - package dnf-plugins-core-4.3.1-2.fc38.noarch requires
> python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.3.1-2.fc38, but none of the providers can be
> installed
> >  - package glib2-2.74.1-3.fc38.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.30()(64bit),
> but none of the providers can be installed
> >  - conflicting requests
> >  - nothing provides libunistring.so.2()(64bit) needed by
> gnutls-3.7.8-11.fc38.x86_64
>
> A.FI.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Artur Frenszek-Iwicki]

I wanted to resubmit one of my failed builds, but the buildroot seems to be 
broken currently:

> Problem 1: package python3-dnf-4.14.0-2.fc38.noarch requires libmodulemd >= 
> 2.9.3, but none of the providers can be installed
>  - package libmodulemd-2.14.0-5.fc38.x86_64 requires 
> libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>  - package libmodulemd-2.14.0-5.fc38.x86_64 requires 
> libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>  - package dnf-4.14.0-2.fc38.noarch requires python3-dnf = 4.14.0-2.fc38, but 
> none of the providers can be installed
>  - package glib2-2.74.1-3.fc38.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.30()(64bit), but 
> none of the providers can be installed
>  - conflicting requests
>  - nothing provides libunistring.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
> gnutls-3.7.8-11.fc38.x86_64
> Problem 2: package python3-dnf-plugins-core-4.3.1-2.fc38.noarch requires 
> python3-dbus, but none of the providers can be installed
>  - package python3-dbus-1.3.2-2.fc38.x86_64 requires 
> libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>  - package dnf-plugins-core-4.3.1-2.fc38.noarch requires 
> python3-dnf-plugins-core = 4.3.1-2.fc38, but none of the providers can be 
> installed
>  - package glib2-2.74.1-3.fc38.x86_64 requires libgnutls.so.30()(64bit), but 
> none of the providers can be installed
>  - conflicting requests
>  - nothing provides libunistring.so.2()(64bit) needed by 
> gnutls-3.7.8-11.fc38.x86_64

A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Dan Horák]

On Mon, 23 Jan 2023 18:44:00 +
"Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > Things still needing rebuilding
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html  
> 
> What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?
> 
> ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild was
> attempted:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ocaml-mysql

this situation usually means the build failed in the "create SRPM from
dist-git" phase


Dan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 05:44:16PM +0100, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> Things still needing rebuilding
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html

What is the significance of packages that appear on this list?

ocaml-mysql appears there, and it does not look like a rebuild was
attempted:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=ocaml-mysql

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
nbdkit - Flexible, fast NBD server with plugins
https://gitlab.com/nbdkit/nbdkit
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:05AM -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> 
> Can somebody cancel the bigloo build?  It's been running for several
> days and is obviously off in the weeds.  I'll investigate.

Done. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Fedora 38 mass rebuild is finished

[Jerry James]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:24 AM Tomas Hrcka  wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the Fedora Linux 38 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora Linux
> 38 on 1. 18, 2023. We did a mass rebuild for Fedora 38 for:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF38
>
> As per the maintainer's request[4] we have skipped all Haskell
> packages from this rebuild.
>
> The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f38-rebuild) and moved over to
> f38. Failures can be seen at
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-failures.html
> Things still needing rebuilding
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f38-need-rebuild.html
>
> 20996 builds have been tagged into f38, there are currently 840 failed
> builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs
> will be filed shortly. Please be sure to let releng know if you see any
> bugs in the reporting. You can contact releng in #fedora-releng on
> libera.chat, by dropping an email to our list[2], joining
> #releng:fedoraproject.org on Matrix, or filing an issue in pagure[3]
>
> Regards,
> Tomas Hrcka
> Fedora Release Engineering
>
> [1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-38/f-38-key-tasks.html
> [2] 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/rel-eng.lists.fedoraproject.org/
> [3] https://pagure.io/releng/
> [4] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11217

Can somebody cancel the bigloo build?  It's been running for several
days and is obviously off in the weeds.  I'll investigate.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue