Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:11 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> > I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> > just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
> >
> > $ git push
> > Source file '60-%{fontpkgname1}.conf' was neither listed in the
> > 'sources' file nor tracked in git. Push operation was cancelled
> > Hint: this check (.git/hooks/pre-push script) can be bypassed by
> > adding the argument '--no-verify' argument to the push command.
> > error: failed to push some refs to
> > 'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts'
> >
> > The error is bogus. Something failed to expand the %{fontpkgname1}
> > macro. I wonder if the mass rebuilder actually made a commit, but the
> > push failed.
>
> Interesting. One of my fonts packages was also skipped during
> the Mass Rebuild, though in my case, pushing a manual rebuild
> later worked fine.
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/daniel-wikholm-segment16-fonts
Sometimes if a builder has issues during the "make srpm" phase it
fails in a weird way and isn't picked up I found during my days in
rel-eng.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
> I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
>
> $ git push
> Source file '60-%{fontpkgname1}.conf' was neither listed in the
> 'sources' file nor tracked in git. Push operation was cancelled
> Hint: this check (.git/hooks/pre-push script) can be bypassed by
> adding the argument '--no-verify' argument to the push command.
> error: failed to push some refs to
> 'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts'
>
> The error is bogus. Something failed to expand the %{fontpkgname1}
> macro. I wonder if the mass rebuilder actually made a commit, but the
> push failed.
Interesting. One of my fonts packages was also skipped during
the Mass Rebuild, though in my case, pushing a manual rebuild
later worked fine.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/daniel-wikholm-segment16-fonts
A.FI.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:15 PM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> Is it up to the packagers to rebuild these? I have a package on this
> list, but there is no commit in dist-git concerning the F39 Mass
> Rebuild.
I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
$ git push
Source file '60-%{fontpkgname1}.conf' was neither listed in the
'sources' file nor tracked in git. Push operation was cancelled
Hint: this check (.git/hooks/pre-push script) can be bypassed by
adding the argument '--no-verify' argument to the push command.
error: failed to push some refs to
'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fontawesome-fonts'
The error is bogus. Something failed to expand the %{fontpkgname1}
macro. I wonder if the mass rebuilder actually made a commit, but the
push failed.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Sat, Jul 29, 2023 at 8:26 AM Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> […]
> >
> > Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a
> > commit/build.
>
> A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never
> happened:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374
> The task does not exist in koji.
>
> Could this be related?
It might, or might not.
During past mass rebuilds, some failures (like intermittent network
issues, or failure to parse spec files) caused no build to be
launched, but also no failure to be recorded.
If there's a package that's prone to cause issues, it might fail there
*and* in anitya scratch builds.
Looking at the spec file for liborigin, I see something that's
definitely suspicious:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/liborigin/blob/rawhide/f/liborigin.spec#_12
i.e. the Source
"https://downloads.sourceforge.net/%%{name}/%%{name}-%%{version}.tar.gz;
Looks like this line was previously commented out, then uncommented,
but the double-%% for escaping macros were not removed.
This might trip up parsing of the spec file, which is likely the cause
of what made release monitoring fail here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374#c1
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > […] > > Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a > commit/build. A new version was released yesterday, but Anitya's scratch build never happened: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227374 The task does not exist in koji. Could this be related? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 06:51:36PM +0800, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > I submitted > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043 Change: Migrate NetworkManager ifcfg > > profiles to keyfile > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3044 Change: IBus 1.5.29 > > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3045 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc > > 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) > > to push things through fesco. But I did not very well, e.g. I didn't > > update the categories in the wiki. > > > Just noting that in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:ChangeAnnounced > the following proposed System Wide Changes are also still waiting to go to > Fesco: > >- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Color_Bash_Prompt Oops. I looked at "Last updated: 2023-07-26", but the change was announced on the 5th too. I'll make a fesco ticket. >- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Indic_Noto_fonts Same here. >- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MigrateIfcfgToKeyfile That's being handled in https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 5:56 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > I submitted > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043 Change: Migrate NetworkManager ifcfg > profiles to keyfile > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3044 Change: IBus 1.5.29 > https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3045 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc > 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) > to push things through fesco. But I did not very well, e.g. I didn't > update the categories in the wiki. Just noting that in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:ChangeAnnounced the following proposed System Wide Changes are also still waiting to go to Fesco: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Color_Bash_Prompt - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Indic_Noto_fonts - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MigrateIfcfgToKeyfile as well as 3 Self-Contained Changes. Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:24:20PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > As far as I can tell, the toolchain proposal was announced on the devel / > > devel-announce lists on July 7 but never submitted to FESCo for a vote. > > Looks like the process broke down somewhere along the way. > > I think it was actually a couple of days before that, but no matter. > In either case it was announced more than a week after it was > submitted (which happened to be the date of the deadline). So the > problem is two-fold: > > 1. It sat in "ChangeReadyForWrangler" for a week during a rather > time-critical part of the cycle > 2. It never made it to FESCo > > I could be salty about this, but I'll refrain. The point is that > altering the schedule wouldn't make a difference here because the > schedule isn't the problem. It's that there's not someone whose actual > job is wrangling Change proposals. amoloney has done a great job > picking up many of my former duties while also doing her full time > job, but as that sentence implies, there are capacity issues. Of > course, earlier submission is better when possible but I don't know if > it was possible in this case and it's not clear it would have helped > this specific issue. I submitted https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3043 Change: Migrate NetworkManager ifcfg profiles to keyfile https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3044 Change: IBus 1.5.29 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3045 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) to push things through fesco. But I did not very well, e.g. I didn't update the categories in the wiki. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 01:46:19AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > > > On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote: > > > > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed > > > > builds > > > > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be > > > > filed shortly. > > > > > > Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass > > > rebuild > > > and haven't been fixed yet, receive another FTBFS/FTI bug? Or will those > > > be > > > filtered out? > > > > If they already have a FTBFS bug (attached to the tracker) they will not > > get a new bug. If they do not, they will. :) > > Well, the first batch of bugs for the Python3.12 mass rebuild were mostly > FTI bugs, even though some of them turned out to be in fact FTBFS. > > Since FTI and FTBFS use separate tracker bugs, I/we now have two different > bugs pointing at the same issue: > > FTI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220504 > FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226331 Yeah, the ftbfs script doesn't know about the fti bugs. We could extend it, but they are different (but very related) things. > I also noticed that the FTBFS bugs filed after the f39 mass rebuild have log > files attached. While not harmful, wouldn't it be better to just link to the > failed build in Koji, that has all the logs for all the archs stored anyway? > Especially since large log files are truncated. After a while, the logs will get garbage collected and no longer will be available in koji. Of course at this point you can do a scratch (or real) build to get current logs, but the bugs have some logs so you can see what the failure was at the time it happened. ;) We don't attach full logs because some packages have logs that are... crazy large. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On 25-07-2023 18:23, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote: On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote: 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly. Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass rebuild and haven't been fixed yet, receive another FTBFS/FTI bug? Or will those be filtered out? If they already have a FTBFS bug (attached to the tracker) they will not get a new bug. If they do not, they will. :) Well, the first batch of bugs for the Python3.12 mass rebuild were mostly FTI bugs, even though some of them turned out to be in fact FTBFS. Since FTI and FTBFS use separate tracker bugs, I/we now have two different bugs pointing at the same issue: FTI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220504 FTBFS: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2226331 I also noticed that the FTBFS bugs filed after the f39 mass rebuild have log files attached. While not harmful, wouldn't it be better to just link to the failed build in Koji, that has all the logs for all the archs stored anyway? Especially since large log files are truncated. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 3:58 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > As far as I can tell, the toolchain proposal was announced on the devel / > devel-announce lists on July 7 but never submitted to FESCo for a vote. Looks > like the process broke down somewhere along the way. I think it was actually a couple of days before that, but no matter. In either case it was announced more than a week after it was submitted (which happened to be the date of the deadline). So the problem is two-fold: 1. It sat in "ChangeReadyForWrangler" for a week during a rather time-critical part of the cycle 2. It never made it to FESCo I could be salty about this, but I'll refrain. The point is that altering the schedule wouldn't make a difference here because the schedule isn't the problem. It's that there's not someone whose actual job is wrangling Change proposals. amoloney has done a great job picking up many of my former duties while also doing her full time job, but as that sentence implies, there are capacity issues. Of course, earlier submission is better when possible but I don't know if it was possible in this case and it's not clear it would have helped this specific issue. -- Ben Cotton (he/him) TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bcotton ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023, 21:36 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kevin Fenzi: > > > ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass > > rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)? > > > > Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed > > issues? > > I don't think it matters. I raised it mainly for accuracy. > > We should adjust the system wide change proposal deadline for Fedora 40, > though, so that Fesco has plenty of time to review proposals. > As far as I can tell, the toolchain proposal was announced on the devel / devel-announce lists on July 7 but never submitted to FESCo for a vote. Looks like the process broke down somewhere along the way. Fabio > Thanks, > Florian > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
* Kevin Fenzi: > ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass > rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)? > > Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed > issues? I don't think it matters. I raised it mainly for accuracy. We should adjust the system wide change proposal deadline for Fedora 40, though, so that Fesco has plenty of time to review proposals. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:47:12PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Samyak Jain: > > > > > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) > > > > This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not > > included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version, glibc was > > GCC 13.2 isn't out yet either, will be hopefully on Thursday, the mass > rebuild was done using ~ 1 month old GCC 13 branch snapshot, so compared to > what will be in 13.2 lacks that roughly a month of bugfixes. I'll build new > GCC 13.2 into F39 at the end of the week. :( ok. How big a problem is this? Do we need to schedule another mass rebuild (and push back the schedule most likely)? Or we can/should just rebuild things that failed due to already fixed issues? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 02:23:00AM +0200, Sandro wrote: > On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote: > > 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed > > builds > > that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be > > filed shortly. > > Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass rebuild > and haven't been fixed yet, receive another FTBFS/FTI bug? Or will those be > filtered out? If they already have a FTBFS bug (attached to the tracker) they will not get a new bug. If they do not, they will. :) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 12:40:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Samyak Jain: > > > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) > > This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not > included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version, glibc was GCC 13.2 isn't out yet either, will be hopefully on Thursday, the mass rebuild was done using ~ 1 month old GCC 13 branch snapshot, so compared to what will be in 13.2 lacks that roughly a month of bugfixes. I'll build new GCC 13.2 into F39 at the end of the week. Jakub ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
* Samyak Jain: > - GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 13.2, binutils 2.40, glibc 2.38, gdb 13.2) This change has not yet been voted on by Fesco, so it's largely not included in the rebuild: gcc was still using a 13.1 version, glibc was at a 2.38 pre-release (not much we can do about that given the schedule), and more importantly, the planned changes in the build settings were not included. I believe someone spoke to the proposal owner who encouraged to go forward with the mass rebuild, but this doesn't mean the planned change were included. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On 24-07-2023 20:30, Samyak Jain wrote: 21426 builds have been tagged into f39, there are currently 1017 failed builds that need to be addressed by the package maintainers. FTBFS bugs will be filed shortly. Will all the Python packages that failed during the Python3.12 mass rebuild and haven't been fixed yet, receive another FTBFS/FTI bug? Or will those be filtered out? -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:45 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Please do bump and rebuild it. It's done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103849749 > Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a > commit/build. Indeed. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 10:13:44PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote: > > > > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to > > f39. > > So it's over? Yes. "was done". > > Things still needing rebuilding > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html > > Is it up to the packagers to rebuild these? I have a package on this > list, but there is no commit in dist-git concerning the F39 Mass > Rebuild. Please do bump and rebuild it. Although it would be nice to figure out why it didn't get a commit/build. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild
Hello, On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 9:31 PM Samyak Jain wrote: > > The mass rebuild was done in a side tag (f39-rebuild) and moved over to > f39. So it's over? > Things still needing rebuilding > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html Is it up to the packagers to rebuild these? I have a package on this list, but there is no commit in dist-git concerning the F39 Mass Rebuild. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 09:35:26 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > > The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38): > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild > > > > I had the usual question---should I be making new builds for updates and > > fixes into the mass rebuild side tag, or is rawhide OK? > > Rawhide as normal is fine. > > When the tag is merged it will look and see if there is a newer build in > rawhide already. If so, it won't take the mass rebuild one in. Cool! Thanks very much. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started
On Sat, Jul 22, 2023 at 11:04:19AM +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 13:31:57 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Oh, that thing again. > > Let me update the template so sed works correctly. > > > > The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38): > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild > > I had the usual question---should I be making new builds for updates and > fixes into the mass rebuild side tag, or is rawhide OK? Rawhide as normal is fine. When the tag is merged it will look and see if there is a newer build in rawhide already. If so, it won't take the mass rebuild one in. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 13:31:57 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > Oh, that thing again. > Let me update the template so sed works correctly. > The wiki page also looks out of date (still refers f38): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild I had the usual question---should I be making new builds for updates and fixes into the mass rebuild side tag, or is rawhide OK? -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started
Oh, that thing again. Let me update the template so sed works correctly. On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:28 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on > > 2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the > > changes listed in: > > > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild > > > > This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (39-rebuild) and merged > > when completed. > > > > Failures can be seen > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/39-failures.html > > > > Things still needing rebuilding > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/39-need-rebuild.html > > Those should be > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-failures.html > and > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html > > Fabio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Tomas Hrcka fas: humaton libera.CHAT: jednorozec ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 Mass Rebuild started
On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 1:04 PM Tomas Hrcka wrote: > > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora Linux 39 schedule [1] we have started a mass rebuild on > 2023-07-19 for Fedora 39. We are running this mass rebuild for the > changes listed in: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issues?status=Open=mass+rebuild > > This mass rebuild will be done in a side tag (39-rebuild) and merged > when completed. > > Failures can be seen > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/39-failures.html > > Things still needing rebuilding > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/39-need-rebuild.html Those should be https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-failures.html and https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f39-need-rebuild.html Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
