Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

2017-03-22 Thread stan 
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:59:07 -0600
Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> For f25 and before there's 2 keys per release: a primary key and a
> secondary key. For f26 and later there are still two keys, but only
> s390 is signed by the secondary one now.
> 
> i686 and x86_64 have always been signed by the same key.

Thanks.  Learn something new every day.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

2017-03-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi 
On 03/22/2017 06:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:22:23PM -0700, stan wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
>> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:

...snip...

>> Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?
> 
> Oh right, well spotted.
> 
> Yes, I wanted to compile a program with `gcc -m32' (it's some Wii tool
> which is derived from Windows software so it makes 32 bit assumptions
> all over the place).
> 
> So this is a DNF bug, I suppose?

No, I think it's the fedora-release bug mentioned above.

If you had a older fedora-repos-25 installed, it had a wrong/old/never
used version of the Fedora 26 key.

For f25 and before there's 2 keys per release: a primary key and a
secondary key. For f26 and later there are still two keys, but only s390
is signed by the secondary one now.

i686 and x86_64 have always been signed by the same key.

kevin






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

2017-03-22 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:22:23PM -0700, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
> 
> > Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
> > but what does it mean?
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > 00:01
> > warning: 
> > /var/cache/dnf/fedora-6dbd63560daef6bf/packages/glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm:
> > Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 64dab85d: NOKEY Importing GPG
> > key 0xBFB2D6E3: Userid : "Fedora 26 Primary (26)
> > " Fingerprint: 2D0F 6533 6953
> > 8D2E 6157 F220 AC4F F563 BFB2 D6E3
> > From   : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64 Is this ok
> > [y/N]: y Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help,
> > wrong key(s)? Error: 
> > 
> > 
> > Public key for glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm is not
> > installedFailing package is: glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686 GPG Keys
> > are configured as:
> > file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64
> 
> It seems that the key for i686 is different than the key for x86_64.
> And for some reason, your system is installing a mix of i686 and x86_64
> packages.  Is it trying to work around a dependency issue, or do you
> really want both architectures installed?
> 
> Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?

Oh right, well spotted.

Yes, I wanted to compile a program with `gcc -m32' (it's some Wii tool
which is derived from Windows software so it makes 32 bit assumptions
all over the place).

So this is a DNF bug, I suppose?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

2017-03-21 Thread Corey W Sheldon 
the fix was committed with this pull-request [0] due to the present
freeze things may be a bit delayed:


[0] https://pagure.io/fedora-repos/pull-request/28

Corey W Sheldon:
> This is a known issue the gpg key that is shipped in the
> fedora-repos-25-3.noarch has an temporary key that was killed, work is
> in progress to fix this, see
> https://keys.fedoraproject.org/pks/lookup?op=get=0x812A6B4B64DAB85D
> curl the static key for this one and rpm --import it and try again.
> 
> stan:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
>> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
>>
>>> Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
>>> but what does it mean?
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> 00:01
>>> warning: 
>>> /var/cache/dnf/fedora-6dbd63560daef6bf/packages/glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm:
>>> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 64dab85d: NOKEY Importing GPG
>>> key 0xBFB2D6E3: Userid : "Fedora 26 Primary (26)
>>> " Fingerprint: 2D0F 6533 6953
>>> 8D2E 6157 F220 AC4F F563 BFB2 D6E3
>>> From   : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64 Is this ok
>>> [y/N]: y Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help,
>>> wrong key(s)? Error: 
>>>
>>>
>>> Public key for glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm is not
>>> installedFailing package is: glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686 GPG Keys
>>> are configured as:
>>> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64
>>
>> It seems that the key for i686 is different than the key for x86_64.
>> And for some reason, your system is installing a mix of i686 and x86_64
>> packages.  Is it trying to work around a dependency issue, or do you
>> really want both architectures installed?
>>
>> Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

-- 
Corey W Sheldon
ph: +1 (310).909.7672
0x90DD92F222C15DC2||0x32C80DA97E25CEFE||0x5C9AB5EC2C5CA3DA
https://keybase.io/linuxmodder
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
Fedora AmbaNA (linuxmodder)
Ameridea LLC Founder, President

Find me elsewhere:
https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9

"One must never underestimate the power of boredom...from which
creativity and laziness are borne, which can spark great works of chaos
and genius."  --Anonymous

"Any man willing to retreat freedom for security is deserving of
neither." (Pp) -- Benjamin Franklin.


This document, including attachments, is intended for the person or
company named and contains confidential and/or legally privileged
information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information
may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

2017-03-21 Thread Corey W Sheldon 
This is a known issue the gpg key that is shipped in the
fedora-repos-25-3.noarch has an temporary key that was killed, work is
in progress to fix this, see
https://keys.fedoraproject.org/pks/lookup?op=get=0x812A6B4B64DAB85D
curl the static key for this one and rpm --import it and try again.

stan:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:
> 
>> Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
>> but what does it mean?
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> 00:01
>> warning: 
>> /var/cache/dnf/fedora-6dbd63560daef6bf/packages/glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm:
>> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 64dab85d: NOKEY Importing GPG
>> key 0xBFB2D6E3: Userid : "Fedora 26 Primary (26)
>> " Fingerprint: 2D0F 6533 6953
>> 8D2E 6157 F220 AC4F F563 BFB2 D6E3
>> From   : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64 Is this ok
>> [y/N]: y Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help,
>> wrong key(s)? Error: 
>>
>>
>> Public key for glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm is not
>> installedFailing package is: glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686 GPG Keys
>> are configured as:
>> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64
> 
> It seems that the key for i686 is different than the key for x86_64.
> And for some reason, your system is installing a mix of i686 and x86_64
> packages.  Is it trying to work around a dependency issue, or do you
> really want both architectures installed?
> 
> Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 

-- 
Corey W Sheldon
ph: +1 (310).909.7672
0x90DD92F222C15DC2||0x32C80DA97E25CEFE||0x5C9AB5EC2C5CA3DA
https://keybase.io/linuxmodder
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
Fedora AmbaNA (linuxmodder)
Ameridea LLC Founder, President

Find me elsewhere:
https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9

"One must never underestimate the power of boredom...from which
creativity and laziness are borne, which can spark great works of chaos
and genius."  --Anonymous

"Any man willing to retreat freedom for security is deserving of
neither." (Pp) -- Benjamin Franklin.


This document, including attachments, is intended for the person or
company named and contains confidential and/or legally privileged
information. Unauthorized disclosure, copying or use of this information
may be unlawful and is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please destroy this message and notify the sender.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

2017-03-21 Thread stan 
On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
"Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:

> Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
> but what does it mean?

[snip]

> 00:01
> warning: 
> /var/cache/dnf/fedora-6dbd63560daef6bf/packages/glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm:
> Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 64dab85d: NOKEY Importing GPG
> key 0xBFB2D6E3: Userid : "Fedora 26 Primary (26)
> " Fingerprint: 2D0F 6533 6953
> 8D2E 6157 F220 AC4F F563 BFB2 D6E3
> From   : /etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64 Is this ok
> [y/N]: y Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help,
> wrong key(s)? Error: 
> 
> 
> Public key for glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686.rpm is not
> installedFailing package is: glibc-devel-2.25-4.fc26.i686 GPG Keys
> are configured as:
> file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-26-x86_64

It seems that the key for i686 is different than the key for x86_64.
And for some reason, your system is installing a mix of i686 and x86_64
packages.  Is it trying to work around a dependency issue, or do you
really want both architectures installed?

Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org