Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On 21/02/2024 15:43, Miro Hrončok wrote: Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. Package (co)maintainers pesign-test-app javierm, nfrayer, pjones, rharwood I've created a bugfix PR for this package that fixes the immediate build problem (due to changed paths in gnu-efi): https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pesign-test-app/pull-request/1 Could someone in provenpackagers please review and merge? Thanks, Michael -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On 21. 02. 24 17:46, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org aliases are currently broken https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768 (Side note: This should now be fixed) Thanks. I forwarded the email. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 04:43:26PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > NOTE: This was not sent to individual maintainers, as @fedoraproject.org > aliases are currently broken > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11768 (Side note: This should now be fixed) kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 4:25 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > That seems to be a mistake in the schedule. The policy says: I opened https://pagure.io/fedora-pgm/schedule/issue/87 for this. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On 08. 08. 22 4:37, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote: On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (next week). The F37 schedule says the retirement occurs on the same day as branching: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-all-tasks.html That seems to be a mistake in the schedule. The policy says: """ 8. Cca a week before the Fedora N mass branching, packages that weren’t successfully rebuilt at least in Fedora N-2 will be retired assuming there have been at least 5 warnings on the devel mailing list. """ https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs and also, the title of this email says "in 1 week", which is the same week as branching. Yes, I've started to send the reminders a bit later, the "cca" gives some room for error. This time, I plan to do it more or less today. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:56 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (next > week). > The F37 schedule says the retirement occurs on the same day as branching: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-37/f-37-all-tasks.html and also, the title of this email says "in 1 week", which is the same week as branching. > Policy: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ > > The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 35. > > This report is based on dist tags. > > Packages collected via: > https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb > > If you see a package that was built, please let me know. > If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me > know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. > > If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. > > Package (co)maintainers > == > tinygo go-sig, qulogic It is not entirely correct that tinygo has "not successfully built at least since Fedora 35." It has been rebuilt in stable branches multiple times since then, and there are currently no FTBFS bugs open for them. It *was* FTBFS in Rawhide though, and I have now fixed it. -- Elliott ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
Hi, On 01.08.22 14:55, Miro Hrončok wrote: php-aws-sdk3 lcts php-pimple lcts both fixed. Best, Christopher ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 8:56 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > xs petersen Thanks, I finally retired this one already. Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in 1 week
Dne 01. 08. 22 v 14:55 Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
rubygem-coffee-rails jaruga, ruby-packagers-sig, vondruch
Dependency on coffee-rails is removed from Ruby on Rails since:
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/4838c1716a0340137d858fab49bf460e23be5a4b
https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/cab17ffe4ed5c37acdba046d0da0b0e137262f17
That is with Ruby on Rails 6.0. I think we can let this package go.
Nothing depends on it.
rubygem-minitest-reporters pvalena
I don't think minitest-reporters are currently in use, because it has no
additional value (basically just different test output formatting) for
Fedora packages and it is easy to remove the dependency. If anybody
needs an example how to do so, here is a list of spec files for
inspiration.:
~~~
$ grep -R minitest-reporters
rubygem-minitest-reporters.spec:%global gem_name minitest-reporters
rubygem-minitest-reporters.spec:URL:
https://github.com/CapnKernul/minitest-reporters
rubygem-minitest-reporters.spec:%exclude
%{gem_instdir}/minitest-reporters.gemspec
rubygem-nokogiri.spec:# Remove minitest-reporters. It does not provide
any additional value while
rubygem-nokogiri.spec:- Remove rubygem(minitest-reporters) dependency.
rubygem-public_suffix.spec:# We don't have minitest-reporters in Fedora
yet, but they are not needed
rubygem-shoulda.spec:# Remove minitest-reporters dependency.
rubygem-shoulda.spec:- Remove minitest-reporters dependency.
rubygem-shoulda-matchers.spec:- Remove unnecessary BR:
rubygem(minitest-reporters).
rubygem-tomlrb.spec:Patch0: 00-disable-minitest-reporters.patch
rubygem-tomlrb.spec:- Simplify packaging and remove minitest-reporters
dependency.
rubygem-zeitwerk.spec:# Remove minitest-reporters. It does not provide
any additional value while
rubygem-zeitwerk.spec:- Drop `BR: rubygem(minitest-reporters)`.
~~~
IOW it is fine to let it go IMO.
Vít
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 5:58 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > ghc-pretty-show (maintained by: mathstuf) > ghc-pretty-show-1.9.5-3.fc32.x86_64 requires js-jquery1 = > 1.12.4-7.fc30 > I fixed this in ghc-pretty-show-1.10-2.fc33 two weeks ago btw. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
On 28. 07. 20 11:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 33 in a week. Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 31. This report is based on dist tags. Packages collected via: https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb Package (co)maintainers Latest build === OpenCoarrays jussilehtolaFedora 30 js-jquery-jqplot xavierb Fedora 30 js-jquery1 nodejs-sig, patches, vondruch Fedora 30 js-jquery2 vondruchFedora 30 js-sizzle nodejs-sig, patches, vondruch Fedora 30 nodejs-path-type nodejs-sig, orphan Fedora 30 nodejs-temp-write orphan Fedora 30 nodejs-unique-stream jsmith, nodejs-sig Fedora 30 orpie bowlofeggs, orphan Fedora 30 rubygem-ruby-hmac humaton, mmorsi Fedora 30 This has been done. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
On 28. 07. 20 11:56, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 33 in a week. Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 31. This report is based on dist tags. Packages collected via: https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb Package (co)maintainers Latest build === OpenCoarrays jussilehtolaFedora 30 js-jquery-jqplot xavierb Fedora 30 js-jquery1 nodejs-sig, patches, vondruch Fedora 30 js-jquery2 vondruchFedora 30 js-sizzle nodejs-sig, patches, vondruch Fedora 30 nodejs-path-type nodejs-sig, orphan Fedora 30 nodejs-temp-write orphan Fedora 30 nodejs-unique-stream jsmith, nodejs-sig Fedora 30 orpie bowlofeggs, orphan Fedora 30 rubygem-ruby-hmac humaton, mmorsi Fedora 30 This has been done. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in a week
On 28. 01. 20 1:45, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (2020-02-03). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ The packages in rawhide were not successfully built at least since Fedora 30. This report is based on dist tags. Packages collected via: https://github.com/hroncok/fedora-report-ftbfs-retirements/blob/master/ftbfs-retirements.ipynb If you see a package that was built, please let me know. If you see a package that should be exempted from the process, please let me know and we can work together to get a FESCo approval for that. If you see a package that can be rebuilt, please do so. Package (co)maintainers Latest build elasticsearch hubbitus, jvanek, lbazan, Fedora 24 zbyszek expresso jamielinux, nodejs-sig, Fedora 28 patches libocrdma ocrdma Fedora 27 nuvola-app-google-calendar martinkg Fedora 29 nuvola-app-groove martinkg Fedora 28 nuvola-app-logitech-media- martinkg Fedora 29 server nuvola-app-plex martinkg Fedora 29 nuvola-app-soundcloud martinkg Fedora 29 nuvola-app-yandex-music martinkg Fedora 29 shim-unsigned-aarch64 pjones (exception request) Fedora 28 shim-unsigned-x64 pjones (exception request) Fedora 28 It has been done. shim-unsigned-aarch64 and shim-unsigned-x64 have exception: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2331 libocrdma and nuvola-app-groove were already retired, but only partially: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9217 I've just retired: elasticsearch expresso nuvola-app-google-calendar nuvola-app-logitech-media-server nuvola-app-plex nuvola-app-soundcloud nuvola-app-yandex-music -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
