Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 19:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
   RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
  
  RWMJ I will take ocaml* and unison*.
  
  I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership.
 
 Done, thanks.

what do you plan to do with unison, and its incompatibility quirkiness?
(I just ask because at present I have to use a private build because
Mandriva moved on to a newer stable release, so I have to run that on my
Fedora systems to remain interoperable).
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Unison (was: Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request)

2010-11-19 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:14:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
 On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 19:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
  On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
   
   RWMJ I will take ocaml* and unison*.
   
   I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership.
  
  Done, thanks.
 
 what do you plan to do with unison, and its incompatibility quirkiness?
 (I just ask because at present I have to use a private build because
 Mandriva moved on to a newer stable release, so I have to run that on my
 Fedora systems to remain interoperable).

Yes, it's a big mess.  I don't think maintaining separate *packages*
for each version / protocol level is in any way scalable.  Can we fold
all the versions into a single package, if necessary carrying and
building several source tarballs?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Unison (was: Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request)

2010-11-19 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-11-20 at 07:19 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
 On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:14:22PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
  On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 19:00 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
   On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
 RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:

RWMJ I will take ocaml* and unison*.

I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership.
   
   Done, thanks.
  
  what do you plan to do with unison, and its incompatibility quirkiness?
  (I just ask because at present I have to use a private build because
  Mandriva moved on to a newer stable release, so I have to run that on my
  Fedora systems to remain interoperable).
 
 Yes, it's a big mess.  I don't think maintaining separate *packages*
 for each version / protocol level is in any way scalable.  Can we fold
 all the versions into a single package, if necessary carrying and
 building several source tarballs?

off the top of my head I think we *could*, but it's not necessarily a
lot cleaner; they'd all have to have different executable names, for one
thing. but yeah, I don't think there's any reason we can't do this, just
carry multiple tarballs and expand and build them one at a time in the
spec.

I think the previous maintainer planned to just maintain two or possibly
max three versions at a time, and obsolete older ones...but that still
requires a new package review for each new incompatible version.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-18 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2010-11-16, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote:
  Michel Alexandre Salim salimma at fedoraproject.org wrote:
  We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot 
  continue his Fedora work anymore.
 
 Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org writes:
  Gérard already said he was amenable to other people taking over his
  packages:
  
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-July/138375.html
 
 So does that mean that his packages can now be orphaned?

 which are these one ...

 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/gemi

I can take: pl, yap.

-- Petr

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-18 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
 PP == Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com writes:

PP I can take: pl, yap.

They should be orphaned in pkgdb; you'll need to log in and take
ownership.

 - J
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-18 Thread Björn Persson
Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
 They should be orphaned in pkgdb; you'll need to log in and take
 ownership.

I took GtkAda. I've been the de facto maintainer for some time anyway.

Björn Persson


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote:
  Michel Alexandre Salim salimma at fedoraproject.org wrote:
  We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot 
  continue his Fedora work anymore.
 
 Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org writes:
  Gérard already said he was amenable to other people taking over his
  packages:
  
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-July/138375.html
 
 So does that mean that his packages can now be orphaned?

which are these one ...

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/gemi

I will take ocaml* and unison*.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-16 Thread Peter Lemenkov
2010/11/16 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com:

 Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org writes:
  Gérard already said he was amenable to other people taking over his
  packages:
 
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-July/138375.html

 So does that mean that his packages can now be orphaned?

 which are these one ...

 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/gemi

 I will take ocaml* and unison*.

I took his erlang-related (erlang.erlang-esdl, wings) stuff already.
As for compat-erlang, I believe that we should remove it from Rawhide
entirely.

-- 
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-16 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
 RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:

RWMJ I will take ocaml* and unison*.

I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership.

 - J
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-16 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:09PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
  RWMJ == Richard W M Jones rjo...@redhat.com writes:
 
 RWMJ I will take ocaml* and unison*.
 
 I have orphaned them; feel free to take ownership.

Done, thanks.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-16 Thread François Cami
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +, Joel wrote:
  Michel Alexandre Salim salimma at fedoraproject.org wrote:
  We might need a mass-orphaning if Gérard cannot
  continue his Fedora work anymore.

 Paul Howarth paul at city-fan.org writes:
  Gérard already said he was amenable to other people taking over his
  packages:
 
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-July/138375.html

 So does that mean that his packages can now be orphaned?

 which are these one ...

 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/gemi

If supercyper and fab are OK with that, I'd like to take scons.

François
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Milmeister Mass-Orphaning Request

2010-11-16 Thread Jerry James
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
 which are these one ...

 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/gemi

 I will take ocaml* and unison*.

 Rich.

I'm already comaintainer on clisp and ecl.  I can take those if nobody
else has a burning desire to do so.
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel