Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
Ah, it all makes sense now.. Mail chatting lagging a little bit, so my previous questions not actual anymore then. :) Thanks for clearing that up. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
Also, if upstream against about packaging, why they added packaging status badge then on their project page? Availability in distros: https://gitlab.com/BuildStream/buildstream They against only Fedora? I don't understand at all then. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 10:34 pm, Artem Tim wrote: Michael, this is super weird. I pushed to repos bst-external already. I see it's two months old. Thanks for creating it. :) Upstream had asked bochecha not to package bst-external because it's not stable. But since every project that uses buildstream depends on bst-external, that was a bad idea ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
> Also note the buildstream package is mostly useless without bst-external, > which is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora because upstream requested it > not be packaged Michael, this is super weird. I pushed to repos bst-external already. And i never seen before that upstream against it. Quite the opposite, upstream emailed me about this issue and buildstream update in Fedora. The original bug report itself is reported by Javier btw https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821245 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:20 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:03 PM Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > I believe Mathieu is temporarily unavailable. If you don't hear back > > soon, it makes sense to proceed with nonresponsive maintainer procedure > > if you want to take over the buildstream package, or ask a > > provenpackager to help. > > > > (Also note the buildstream package is mostly useless without > > bst-external, which is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora because > > upstream requested it not be packaged) > > > > Wait, what?! Why would we respect such a request and package something > that's "mostly useless" then? Curiously, this actually exists: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bst-external ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 6:03 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Hi, > > I believe Mathieu is temporarily unavailable. If you don't hear back > soon, it makes sense to proceed with nonresponsive maintainer procedure > if you want to take over the buildstream package, or ask a > provenpackager to help. > > (Also note the buildstream package is mostly useless without > bst-external, which is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora because > upstream requested it not be packaged) > Wait, what?! Why would we respect such a request and package something that's "mostly useless" then? -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for bochecha
Hi, I believe Mathieu is temporarily unavailable. If you don't hear back soon, it makes sense to proceed with nonresponsive maintainer procedure if you want to take over the buildstream package, or ask a provenpackager to help. (Also note the buildstream package is mostly useless without bst-external, which is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora because upstream requested it not be packaged) Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
