Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Sérgio Basto]

On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 22:23 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 13:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> > for
> > sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
> > proper
> > reason:
> > 
> > Orphaned packages:
> > 
> > ladspa-swh-plugins orphan 59 weeks ago
> 
> Hi. Somehow I missed this email from November, perhaps because I was
> not a co-maintainer.
> ladspa-swh-plugins got retired 3 weeks ago. Now we cannot install
> jamin in F30, as it requires ladspa-swh-plugins.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709735
> Is it too late to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins now? I can take it
> over.
> Does it need a re-review? It's an old package, and should build
> without any changes.

Now we have 8 weeks [1] but ladspa-swh-plugins [2] was retired 5 months
ago, so we need a re-review [3], if you unretire it please let me 
know,flowblade also may use it . 

Thanks. 


[1] 
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2089

[2]
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ladspa-swh-plugins

[3]
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8120 


[3]

> Thanks,
> Orcan
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Orcan Ogetbil]

On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 13:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
>
> Orphaned packages:
>
> ladspa-swh-plugins orphan 59 weeks ago

Hi. Somehow I missed this email from November, perhaps because I was
not a co-maintainer.
ladspa-swh-plugins got retired 3 weeks ago. Now we cannot install
jamin in F30, as it requires ladspa-swh-plugins.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709735
Is it too late to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins now? I can take it over.
Does it need a re-review? It's an old package, and should build
without any changes.

Thanks,
Orcan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 02. 02. 19 12:29, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:

Sigh, I just saw this...

I have been super-busy and missed the mails unfortunately.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:16 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote:


The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life


I don't fully understand the process - if an "orphaned" package has a 
comaintainer, are we sure it is really orphaned?


Yes. If it's orphaned, the comaintainer should claim it if they want it.



Orphaned packages:

ghc-fgl orphan, petersen 59 weeks ago


I recently unretired this package last year. :-(

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585448
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7549


Yet it was orphaned. If this was done by some infra error, please report that.


ghc-hgettext orphan, pwithnall 46 weeks ago
ghc-pcap orphan, pwithnall 46 weeks ago
ghc-setlocale orphan, pwithnall 46 weeks ago


These are all BRs of bustle.

I wouldn't have considered the above packages orphaned and did not wish them to 
be retired.


Yet they were orphaned.

Also note in F30 Rawhide and current f29-updates, Haskell executable packages 
are now statically linked to Haskell libraries (for better portability).
(This also means less deps breakage but also makes deps harder to detect 
directly like this.)


Does the orphan script take BuildRequires into account? Presumably


Yes.


Sorry to moan but to me 6 weeks is really a short time.
If things are not broken, do we really need to make more work for ourselves and 
break them?


If things are not maintained, we should get rid of them. If you don't like the 
policy, feel free to start a discussion about how it can be better.
In this case those packages have been orphaned for months, so not sure if "6 
weeks is really a short time" applies here at all.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

Sigh, I just saw this...

I have been super-busy and missed the mails unfortunately.

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 9:16 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>

I don't fully understand the process - if an "orphaned" package has a
comaintainer, are we sure it is really orphaned?


> Orphaned packages:
>


> ghc-fgl orphan, petersen 59 weeks ago
>

I recently unretired this package last year. :-(

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585448
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7549

ghc-hgettext orphan, pwithnall 46 weeks ago
> ghc-pcap orphan, pwithnall 46 weeks ago
> ghc-setlocale orphan, pwithnall 46 weeks ago
>

These are all BRs of bustle.

I wouldn't have considered the above packages orphaned and did not wish
them to be retired.

Also note in F30 Rawhide and current f29-updates, Haskell executable
packages are now statically linked to Haskell libraries (for better
portability).
(This also means less deps breakage but also makes deps harder to detect
directly like this.)

Does the orphan script take BuildRequires into account? Presumably


Sorry to moan but to me 6 weeks is really a short time.
If things are not broken, do we really need to make more work for ourselves
and break them?

Thanks, Jens
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Raphael Groner]

> Sorry but I have no idea about pykka. Frankly I don't even know what it is.

Upstream obvioulsy uses pykka to connect to spotify with mopidy (currently not 
packaged). That's a valuable reason for me to look deeper into those packages.
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7986
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Miro Hrončok]

Dne 11. 12. 18 v 11:29 Raphael Groner napsal(a):

2. PkgDB was recently deprecated. For now, you will need to submit a ticket to 
the Release Engineering team, stating which package you want to claim.


Miro, that isn't worth the effort to maintain pykka. Is there any active 
upstream?


Sorry but I have no idea about pykka. Frankly I don't even know what it is.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Raphael Groner]

> 2. PkgDB was recently deprecated. For now, you will need to submit a ticket 
> to the Release Engineering team, stating which package you want to claim.

Miro, that isn't worth the effort to maintain pykka. Is there any active 
upstream?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Miro Hrončok]

Dne 10. 12. 18 v 23:16 Raphael Groner napsal(a):

Hi Miro,

I looked in pagure for some of those packages in your list and found hints like 
"Created by orphan a year ago " e.g. Quake2. There's quake2, too but not 
orphaned and actively maintained. Maybe some of those orphans exist because of improper 
apply of our rename process.


I've retired Quake2 now, as this was clearly supposed to happen but 
forgotten.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Miro Hrončok]

Dne 11. 12. 18 v 0:14 Raphael Groner napsal(a):

Hi,

I would like take pykka. Is there a new package review required to unorphan 
this package?


No, for unorphaning, it is not, see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Raphael Groner]

Hi,

I would like take pykka. Is there a new package review required to unorphan 
this package?

Regards, Raphael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Raphael Groner]

Hi Miro,

I looked in pagure for some of those packages in your list and found hints like 
"Created by orphan a year ago " e.g. Quake2. There's quake2, too but not 
orphaned and actively maintained. Maybe some of those orphans exist because of 
improper apply of our rename process.

Regards, Raphael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 01. 12. 18 v 23:17 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
> On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 14:15, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
>> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
>> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
>>
>> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
>> affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the
>> affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken
>> dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected
>> package gets retired.
>>
>> Unretire packages at https://pagure.io/releng/issues
>>
>> Full breakdown of dependent packages is at:
>>
>> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt
>> that have been orphaned for 6+ weeks in 3 weeks from now, will be sending
>> e-mails like this each week.
>>
>> Orphaned packages:
> [...]
>> rathann: js-jquery1
> This is a dependency of lazygal, which bundles an old 1.11.0 version
> and which I unbundle during build. I reported this upstream:
> https://bitbucket.org/niol/lazygal/issues/27/bundled-jquery-1110-is-old-and-vulnerable


Although I am not happy about it, I requested unorphaning the package:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7955

But of course, replacing jQuery 1.x by some thing more up2date is advised.


Vít



>
> Regards,
> Dominik
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Alfredo Moralejo Alonso]

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:25 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> Dne 03. 12. 18 v 10:17 Alfredo Moralejo Alonso napsal(a):
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM Miro Hrončok  > > wrote:
> >
> > Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a):
> >  >
> >  > On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >  >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> >  >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you
> > know for
> >  >> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
> > proper
> >  >> reason:
> >  >>
> >
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> >  > [...]
> >  >> Affected (co)maintainers:
> >  > [...]
> >  >> tdecacqu: python-os-client-config
> >  >>
> >  >
> >  > Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as
> > (co-)maintainer
> >  > of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
> >  > package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it
> is
> >  > no longer used by most of the openstack projects.
> >
> > However other packages depend on it:
> >
> > $ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
> > python2-os-client-config
> > python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
> > python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
> > $ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
> > python3-os-client-config
> > nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
> > python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
> > python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
> > python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
> > python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
> > python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
> > python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
> > python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
> > python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
> > python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch
> >
> > Also, it was taken already:
> >
> > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947
> >
> >
> > Yes, i've taken, in fact i was maintainer for this already but i didn't
> > receive any notification about issues with this package. Anyway, i've
> > created a rebuild without python3 subpackage which i guess was the
> problem.
>
> The problem here was that the package was orphaned. That is now solved,
> thanks.
>
> For the Python 2 problem, I guess thanks, but please make sure to solve
> this as well or you'll get broken dependencies:
>
> $ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
> python2-osc-lib
> python-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.src
> python-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.src
> python2-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.noarch
> python2-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.noarch
> python2-muranoclient-0:1.0.1-2.fc30.noarch
>
>
ok, i know some of them are also fixed but others may still need fix.


> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Miro Hrončok]

Dne 03. 12. 18 v 10:17 Alfredo Moralejo Alonso napsal(a):



On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM Miro Hrončok > wrote:


Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a):
 >
 > On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote:
 >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
 >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you
know for
 >> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a
proper
 >> reason:
 >>
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
 > [...]
 >> Affected (co)maintainers:
 > [...]
 >> tdecacqu: python-os-client-config
 >>
 >
 > Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as
(co-)maintainer
 > of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
 > package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
 > no longer used by most of the openstack projects.

However other packages depend on it:

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python2-os-client-config
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
python3-os-client-config
nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch

Also, it was taken already:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947


Yes, i've taken, in fact i was maintainer for this already but i didn't 
receive any notification about issues with this package. Anyway, i've 
created a rebuild without python3 subpackage which i guess was the problem.


The problem here was that the package was orphaned. That is now solved, 
thanks.


For the Python 2 problem, I guess thanks, but please make sure to solve 
this as well or you'll get broken dependencies:


$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires 
python2-osc-lib

python-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.src
python-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.src
python2-designateclient-0:2.9.0-1.fc30.noarch
python2-heatclient-0:1.14.0-1.fc30.noarch
python2-muranoclient-0:1.0.1-2.fc30.noarch

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Alfredo Moralejo Alonso]

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 10:03 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a):
> >
> > On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> >> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
> >> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
> >> reason:
> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> > [...]
> >> Affected (co)maintainers:
> > [...]
> >> tdecacqu: python-os-client-config
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as (co-)maintainer
> > of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
> > package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
> > no longer used by most of the openstack projects.
>
> However other packages depend on it:
>
> $ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
> python2-os-client-config
> python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
> python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
> $ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires
> python3-os-client-config
> nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
> python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
> python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
> python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
> python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
> python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
> python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
> python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
> python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
> python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch
>
> Also, it was taken already:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947
>
>
Yes, i've taken, in fact i was maintainer for this already but i didn't
receive any notification about issues with this package. Anyway, i've
created a rebuild without python3 subpackage which i guess was the problem.


> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Miro Hrončok]

Dne 03. 12. 18 v 3:51 Tristan Cacqueray napsal(a):


On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote:

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for
sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper
reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

[...]

Affected (co)maintainers:

[...]

tdecacqu: python-os-client-config



Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as (co-)maintainer
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
no longer used by most of the openstack projects.


However other packages depend on it:

$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires 
python2-os-client-config

python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.src
python2-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-3.fc29.noarch
$ dnf repoquery --repo=rawhide  --repo=rawhide-source --whatrequires 
python3-os-client-config

nodepool-driver-openstack-0:3.0.0-3.fc29.noarch
python-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.src
python-openstackclient-0:3.14.1-6.fc30.src
python-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.src
python-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.src
python3-magnumclient-0:2.9.1-2.fc30.noarch
python3-neutronclient-0:6.7.0-2.fc30.noarch
python3-octaviaclient-0:1.3.0-7.fc30.noarch
python3-osc-lib-0:1.9.0-4.fc30.noarch
python3-shade-0:1.27.1-3.fc30.noarch

Also, it was taken already:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7947

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

python-os-client-config (was Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Tristan Cacqueray]

On November 30, 2018 1:15 pm, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for 
> sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper 
> reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
[...]
> Affected (co)maintainers:
[...]
> tdecacqu: python-os-client-config
>

Thanks Miro for the notice. Not sure how I ended up as (co-)maintainer
of python-os-client-config, but it seems like we could remove the
package. It has been merged into the openstacksdk project and it is
no longer used by most of the openstack projects:

http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=os-client-config=nope=requirements.txt=

Regards,
-Tristan


pgpZR9ywj5oge.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Frank Crawford]

On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 10:12 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 6:59 AM Frank Crawford  
> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 11:38 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> 
> 
> Anyone know why this was orphaned?  There doesn't seem to be any
> 
> message about it.
> 
> 
> s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago
> 
> Is there any need for s3cmd with awscli available and supported?

That is a good question, which I haven't really looked at in detail, I
just know that I use it a bit in various scripts, etc, and it is still
supported upstream with recent changes.

Since the swap from s3cmd to awscli isn't a straight drop-in
replacement, I suspect there are probably a few similar to me who won't
change over for a while, if ever.

Regards
Frank
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

On Friday, 30 November 2018 at 14:15, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
> 
> Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the
> affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the
> affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken
> dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected
> package gets retired.
> 
> Unretire packages at https://pagure.io/releng/issues
> 
> Full breakdown of dependent packages is at:
> 
> https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt
> that have been orphaned for 6+ weeks in 3 weeks from now, will be sending
> e-mails like this each week.
> 
> Orphaned packages:
[...]
> rathann: js-jquery1

This is a dependency of lazygal, which bundles an old 1.11.0 version
and which I unbundle during build. I reported this upstream:
https://bitbucket.org/niol/lazygal/issues/27/bundled-jquery-1110-is-old-and-vulnerable

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://getfedora.org  |  RPMFusion   http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 6:59 AM Frank Crawford  wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 11:38 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
>
> Anyone know why this was orphaned?  There doesn't seem to be any
>
> message about it.
>
>
> s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago

Is there any need for s3cmd with awscli available and supported?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Frank Crawford]

On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 11:38 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> 
> Anyone know why this was orphaned?  There doesn't seem to be any
> message about it.
> 
> s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago
> 
> If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.
> 
> orphan != retired. You don't need a reason to orphan something other than
> just not having enough time.

Yep, and if that is the case, I'm happy to take it on, I just don't
want to take on something that has an underlying issue I have missed.

And I mainly asked as it was just orphaned, and I may have missed a
message about it.

> Zbyszek

Frank


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 10:14:14PM +1100, Frank Crawford wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> 
> Anyone know why this was orphaned?  There doesn't seem to be any
> message about it.
> 
> > s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago
> 
> If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.

orphan != retired. You don't need a reason to orphan something other than
just not having enough time.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Frank Crawford]

On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 14:15 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:

Anyone know why this was orphaned?  There doesn't seem to be any
message about it.

> s3cmd orphan 0 weeks ago

If no one has any idea I'm willing to take it on.

Regards
Frank


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 02:15:20PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> f2py orphan 68 weeks ago

This is has been dead.package'd 11 years ago
(https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/f2py/c/136219df3f49bff7e07017cbc3786f9f92b7461a?branch=master).
Maybe something went wrong in the dist-git conversion 8 years ago?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Kevin Fenzi]

On 11/30/18 5:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>>
>> This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September:
>>
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/
>>
>> lzma is dead upstream.
>>
>> afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
>>
>> It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
>> lzma.  But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
>> instead of the dependency (see patch).
>>
>> However since neither of those happened we're stuck.  What is the
>> resolution for this?
> 
> I suppose at least part of the problem is ...
> 
>  (expanded from ): host
> mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of
> `redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM 
> command) 
> Rich.

Can you provide the entire set of headers here? It's hard to tell whats
going on without the whole picture.

Feel free to just send that to me directly...

kevin




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

[Artur Iwicki]

I'd be willing to adopt sonar, but given that:
1) the package is several years out-of-date
2) upstream name of the project changed
3) I'm a tad busy at the moment and don't have much free time

...I think it'll be a better course of action on my side to let the package be 
retired, and then package it anew when I have the time.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 01:27:34PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> 
> This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September:
> 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/
> 
> lzma is dead upstream.
> 
> afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.
> 
> It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
> lzma.  But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
> instead of the dependency (see patch).
> 
> However since neither of those happened we're stuck.  What is the
> resolution for this?

I suppose at least part of the problem is ...

 (expanded from ): host
mx1.seznam.cz[77.75.78.42] said: 550 5.7.1 Sender Policy Framework of
`redhat.com' domain denied your IP address. (in reply to MAIL FROM command) 
Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

afflib (again) (was: Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks))

[Richard W.M. Jones]

This is essentially a repeat of what I wrote back in September:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BN3VZEBKNWO4K77F3YJD2KMIKIBTYZY7/

lzma is dead upstream.

afflib bundles lzma as well as depending on it.

It seems as if it was intended to remove the bundled copy and use
lzma.  But now we'd probably want to keep the bundle and use it
instead of the dependency (see patch).

However since neither of those happened we're stuck.  What is the
resolution for this?

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
diff --git a/afflib.spec b/afflib.spec
index 4077ba6..c29d184 100644
--- a/afflib.spec
+++ b/afflib.spec
@@ -16,8 +16,6 @@ BuildRequires:  curl-devel
 BuildRequires:  expat-devel
 # GPLv2 FOSS incompatible with BSD with advertising
 ##BuildRequires:  fuse-devel
-# Afflib uses lzma-SDK 443
-BuildRequires:  lzma-devel
 BuildRequires:  ncurses-devel
 BuildRequires:  libtermcap-devel
 BuildRequires:  openssl-devel
@@ -27,6 +25,8 @@ BuildRequires:  python2-devel
 #BuildRequires:  libedit-devel - good replacement for readline - not supported 
for now
 BuildRequires:  zlib-devel
 
+Provides: bundled(lzma) = 4.43
+
 
 %description
 AFF® is an open and extensible file format designed to store disk images and
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org