Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
Dne 10. 04. 21 v 19:33 Fabio Valentini napsal(a): I have created the missing bodhi updates where the packagers obviously just forgot to file one, or missed the announcement of the updates-testing activation point (i.e. builds for f35 and f34 (and sometimes f33 or even f32) exist, but no bodhi update for f34 was created). We should advertise bodhi activation point more aggressively. I filed https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/4207 Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 11:12 AM Kalev Lember wrote:
>
> On 4/10/21 8:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:33:42PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> >> - Would it be OK if I fix a few packages where there are missing
> >> *builds* for f34 as well?
> >> (Of course, only where it is obvious that the packager just forgot to
> >> merge the same changes that already happened on rawhide and f33
> >> branches.)
> >
> > +1
>
> Go for it, I say! And thanks for doing all of this.
>
>
> >> - Would it be OK if I file freeze exceptions for the bodhi updates
> >> that fix upgrade path, or is it fine if they are just 0day-updates?
> >> (Freeze-excepting packages that land on any images would probably be a
> >> good idea, but I don't know how to check that for individual
> >> packages.)
> >
> > 0day-updates should be enough.
>
> Agreed.
Great, less work for me. ;)
All cases where the missing build was an obvious oversight should be
fixed now, and the remaining issues should just be versioning mishaps
(e.g. bumped Release only on stable branch but not on F34 / Rawhide,
instead of appending .1 after %{?dist}).
Other than that, that leaves only a handful of package downgrades that
are caused by FTBFS issues on F34+.
I'll keep an eye on this, and re-run my checks after the current batch
of bodhi updates is pushed to the testing repos, but I think all "real
issues" should be fixed now (details below).
Fabio
---
- charliecloud-0:0.22-2.fc33 > charliecloud-0:0.21-2.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-0d811a26c1
- gecode-0:6.2.0-6.fc33 > gecode-0:6.2.0-5.fc34
Bumped release and rebuilt on f35 and f34 to account for koji snafu at
f34 branch point:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c7bafa26a5
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ea8f4e12af
- klog-0:1.4.7-2.fc33 > klog-0:1.4.4-3.fc34
All dist-git branches had up-to-date commits, but update was only
built for F33 and F32.
So ... built, and update submitted F34:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5677441800
- libreswan-0:4.3-1.fc33 > libreswan-0:4.2-1.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-51852f56bd
- mingw32-libusbx-0:1.0.24-1.fc33 > mingw32-libusbx-0:1.0.22-7.fc34
- mingw32-libusbx-static-0:1.0.24-1.fc33 >
mingw32-libusbx-static-0:1.0.22-7.fc34
- mingw64-libusbx-0:1.0.24-1.fc33 > mingw64-libusbx-0:1.0.22-7.fc34
- mingw64-libusbx-static-0:1.0.24-1.fc33 >
mingw64-libusbx-static-0:1.0.22-7.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-cd89a72b72
- nagios-plugins-nrpe-0:4.0.3-6.fc33 > nagios-plugins-nrpe-0:4.0.3-3.fc34
- nrpe-0:4.0.3-6.fc33 > nrpe-0:4.0.3-3.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-32c0a7f123
- nsd-0:4.3.5-1.fc33 > nsd-0:4.3.2-3.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-33fcb048ee
- python3-pyunicorn-0:0.6.1-2.fc33 > python3-pyunicorn-0:0.6.1-1.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-fcfaba6d79
- ydotool-0:0.2.0-5.fc33 > ydotool-0:0.2.0-4.fc34
Merged, built, and update submitted:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-857257f9aa
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On 4/10/21 8:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:33:42PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: - Would it be OK if I fix a few packages where there are missing *builds* for f34 as well? (Of course, only where it is obvious that the packager just forgot to merge the same changes that already happened on rawhide and f33 branches.) +1 Go for it, I say! And thanks for doing all of this. - Would it be OK if I file freeze exceptions for the bodhi updates that fix upgrade path, or is it fine if they are just 0day-updates? (Freeze-excepting packages that land on any images would probably be a good idea, but I don't know how to check that for individual packages.) 0day-updates should be enough. Agreed. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 07:33:42PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:42 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > --- > > A quick update: > > I have created the missing bodhi updates where the packagers obviously > just forgot to file one, or missed the announcement of the > updates-testing activation point (i.e. builds for f35 and f34 (and > sometimes f33 or even f32) exist, but no bodhi update for f34 was > created). > > As far as I can see, this leaves 21 packages with issues, those being > various combinations of: > > - a missing commit in f34 dist-git branch, > - a missing koji build for f34, > - mistagged packages, possibly related to a build that happened right > during mass branching (looking at you, gecode). > > Question regarding further actions: > > - Would it be OK if I fix a few packages where there are missing > *builds* for f34 as well? > (Of course, only where it is obvious that the packager just forgot to > merge the same changes that already happened on rawhide and f33 > branches.) +1 > - Would it be OK if I file freeze exceptions for the bodhi updates > that fix upgrade path, or is it fine if they are just 0day-updates? > (Freeze-excepting packages that land on any images would probably be a > good idea, but I don't know how to check that for individual > packages.) 0day-updates should be enough. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:42 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > --- A quick update: I have created the missing bodhi updates where the packagers obviously just forgot to file one, or missed the announcement of the updates-testing activation point (i.e. builds for f35 and f34 (and sometimes f33 or even f32) exist, but no bodhi update for f34 was created). As far as I can see, this leaves 21 packages with issues, those being various combinations of: - a missing commit in f34 dist-git branch, - a missing koji build for f34, - mistagged packages, possibly related to a build that happened right during mass branching (looking at you, gecode). Question regarding further actions: - Would it be OK if I fix a few packages where there are missing *builds* for f34 as well? (Of course, only where it is obvious that the packager just forgot to merge the same changes that already happened on rawhide and f33 branches.) - Would it be OK if I file freeze exceptions for the bodhi updates that fix upgrade path, or is it fine if they are just 0day-updates? (Freeze-excepting packages that land on any images would probably be a good idea, but I don't know how to check that for individual packages.) Fabio --- > - YafaRay-0:3.5.1-8.fc33 > YafaRay-0:3.5.1-7.fc34 > - YafaRay-blender-0:3.5.1-8.fc33 > YafaRay-blender-0:3.5.1-7.fc34 > - YafaRay-devel-0:3.5.1-8.fc33 > YafaRay-devel-0:3.5.1-7.fc34 > - YafaRay-lib-0:3.5.1-8.fc33 > YafaRay-lib-0:3.5.1-7.fc34 > > YafaRay seems to have been updated on f33 but not on f34, or the > release bump was done to the "main" integer instead of appending .1 > after dist if it was a stable-release-branch-only change. I have unpushed the update that broke the upgrade path for YafaRay. It had collected -2 negative karma already, and it bumped a SONAME in F33 / stable. > - conky-0:1.12.1-1.fc33 > conky-0:1.11.6-2.fc34 > > Was successfully built for f34, but no bodhi update was submitted. Created a bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-90f942916f > - container-selinux-2:2.160.0-1.fc33 > > container-selinux-2:2.158.0-1.gite78ac4f.fc34 > > Bad rhcontainerbot (built for f34, but no update created). Created a bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ac9daea36e > - cppad-devel-0:2021.3-3.fc33 > cppad-devel-0:2021.3-2.fc34 > - cppad-doc-0:2021.3-3.fc33 > cppad-doc-0:2021.3-2.fc34 > > Update was built for f34, but no bodhi update was created. Created a bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5f179fa2c6 > - python-scrapy-doc-0:2.4.1-1.fc33 > python-scrapy-doc-0:1.5.1-10.fc34 > - python3-scrapy-0:2.4.1-1.fc33 > python3-scrapy-0:1.5.1-10.fc34 > > The 2.4.1 update had been built for f34, but no bodhi updates has been > submitted. Created a bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ee5190cbb0 > - yoshimi-0:2.0-1.fc33 > yoshimi-0:1.7.4-2.fc34 > > yoshimi 2.0 was built for f34, but no bodhi update was created. Created a bodhi update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4b3d6a519d ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:42:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - icedtea-web-0:2.0.0-pre.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 > > > icedtea-web-0:2.0.0-pre.0.3.alpha16.patched1.fc34.3 > > > > Versioning snafu - alpha 13 should not sort higher than alpha 16, I guess. > > > In case it's not obvious, it's the change from "pre.2" to "pre.0.3" that is > the oops. Strictly speaking, we don't require versions to not go down (i.e. 'distro-sync --releasever=34' is recommended over 'upgrade --releasever=34'). So while ugly, this is not a problem. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 09:07:53PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:42:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > - virt-dib-1:1.44.1-1.fc33 > virt-dib-0:1.45.3-3.fc34 > > > > This subpackage seems to have been accidentally dropped from F34+ when > > it was dropped for RHEL 9? > > What happened here was part of libguestfs (Epoch 1) was split into a > separate upstream repo and Fedora package called guestfs-tools (Epoch 0). > > I don't really want to use Epoch 1 for the whole of the new package. > I wonder if it will work to just put Epoch 1 into the virt-dib > subpackage? Let's see ... So yes is the answer. I'll push the appropriate update soon. Rich. > We're not shipping virt-dib in RHEL 9. > > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any > software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. > http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:42:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > - virt-dib-1:1.44.1-1.fc33 > virt-dib-0:1.45.3-3.fc34 > > This subpackage seems to have been accidentally dropped from F34+ when > it was dropped for RHEL 9? What happened here was part of libguestfs (Epoch 1) was split into a separate upstream repo and Fedora package called guestfs-tools (Epoch 0). I don't really want to use Epoch 1 for the whole of the new package. I wonder if it will work to just put Epoch 1 into the virt-dib subpackage? Let's see ... We're not shipping virt-dib in RHEL 9. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On 4/6/21 10:58 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:43 PM Colin Walters wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >>> Hi everybody, >>> >>> It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many >>> downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like >>> F34FTBFS, already excluded from the list). >>> >>> However, the list also includes some pretty important "critpath" >>> packages (ostree (!), rpm-ostree, libuv, ...), which should probably >>> be fixed before F34 is released. Shipping with old ostree packages >>> OOTB seems like a bad idea, especially for the Editions that are built >>> on top of it. >> >> Hi, thanks for raising this. The two updates are >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-33f693d20d >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-971f672259 > > Thanks! It would probably be a good idea to request freeze exceptions > for them sooner rather than later, so testing of the candidate images > will be done with the new versions. > The following two bugs have been proposed as FE: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946727 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1946731 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 1:01 PM Kalev Lember wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> - libuv-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 >> - libuv-devel-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-devel-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 >> - libuv-static-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-static-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 >> >> libuv 1.41.0 was built for f34, but the bodhi update is stuck (build >> is mistagged in koji?): >> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9ab6c1ee93 > > > I unpushed the libuv update and queued it to stable again. Hopefully this is > enough to fix this. Apparently that was enough. Thanks! Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 4:43 PM Colin Walters wrote: > > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many > > downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like > > F34FTBFS, already excluded from the list). > > > > However, the list also includes some pretty important "critpath" > > packages (ostree (!), rpm-ostree, libuv, ...), which should probably > > be fixed before F34 is released. Shipping with old ostree packages > > OOTB seems like a bad idea, especially for the Editions that are built > > on top of it. > > Hi, thanks for raising this. The two updates are > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-33f693d20d > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-971f672259 Thanks! It would probably be a good idea to request freeze exceptions for them sooner rather than later, so testing of the candidate images will be done with the new versions. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
Hi, On Tue, Apr 6, 2021, at 6:42 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, > > It's that time of the year again, and this time there's not that many > downgrades to complain about (packages with "obvious" causes, like > F34FTBFS, already excluded from the list). > > However, the list also includes some pretty important "critpath" > packages (ostree (!), rpm-ostree, libuv, ...), which should probably > be fixed before F34 is released. Shipping with old ostree packages > OOTB seems like a bad idea, especially for the Editions that are built > on top of it. Hi, thanks for raising this. The two updates are https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-33f693d20d https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-971f672259 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:42:33PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > - icedtea-web-0:2.0.0-pre.2.alpha13.patched1.fc33 > > icedtea-web-0:2.0.0-pre.0.3.alpha16.patched1.fc34.3 > > Versioning snafu - alpha 13 should not sort higher than alpha 16, I guess. In case it's not obvious, it's the change from "pre.2" to "pre.0.3" that is the oops. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 12:43 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > - libuv-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 > - libuv-devel-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-devel-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 > - libuv-static-1:1.41.0-1.fc33 > libuv-static-1:1.40.0-2.fc34 > > libuv 1.41.0 was built for f34, but the bodhi update is stuck (build > is mistagged in koji?): > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-9ab6c1ee93 I unpushed the libuv update and queued it to stable again. Hopefully this is enough to fix this. -- Kalev ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package downgrades from Fedora 33 -> Fedora 34 (including ostree + rpm-ostree)
On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 12:42:33 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > Hi everybody, Hello! Thanks very much for catching this. > - python-PyLEMS-doc-0:0.5.2-1.fc33 > python-PyLEMS-doc-0:0.5.1-2.fc34 > - python3-PyLEMS-0:0.5.2-1.fc33 > python3-PyLEMS-0:0.5.1-2.fc34 > > Updated to 0.5.2 for f32, f33, and rawhide, but not for f34. Building and pushing an update to F34 now. -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Time zone: Europe/London signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
