Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade
On Sun., Feb. 9, 2020, 11:15 a.m. Jerry James,  wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
>  wrote:
> > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> > review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive
> > *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention
> > of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there.
> > Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention
> > anything about timelines.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
>
> I don't know why that page is so hard to find.  I have to hunt around
> for awhile every time I want it.  Perhaps there should be a link to it
> from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process ?
>

Ah, thank you. Yes it would definitely be best to link it from somewhere
else.

Should it also be moved to policy documents at
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/
(Is it a FESCo policy?)

-- 
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread François Cami
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jerry James  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
>  wrote:
> > Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> > I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> > review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive
> > *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention
> > of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there.
> > Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention
> > anything about timelines.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews
>
> I don't know why that page is so hard to find.  I have to hunt around
> for awhile every time I want it.  Perhaps there should be a link to it
> from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process ?

Yes please, around "You should fix any blockers that the reviewer identifies.".
Can you add the link?

François

> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Jerry James
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 4:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
 wrote:
> Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive
> *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention
> of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there.
> Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention
> anything about timelines.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews

I don't know why that page is so hard to find.  I have to hunt around
for awhile every time I want it.  Perhaps there should be a link to it
from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process ?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Policy for non-responsive reviewers

2020-02-09 Thread Neal Gompa
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 6:21 AM Elliott Sales de Andrade
 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've been waiting almost 2 months for my reviewer to respond on my
> package request. I pinged and set needinfo some time ago, but still
> nothing. My package is FTBFS and FTI in F31, and I've been stuck
> because of this.
>
> Looking at policies, I see one for non-responsive maintainerw [1], but
> I don't think this really applies. There's a page about the package
> review process [2] which mentions several items about non-responsive
> *submitters*, but nothing about reviewers. There's also some mention
> of legal blockers, but not how to ping for clarification there.
> Neither the Join page [3] nor the review guidelines [4] mention
> anything about timelines.
>
> Now I know there's no _technical_ reason why I can't un-assign a bug,
> but I'd rather discuss policy here.
> * Who should be pinged, needinfo'd, or otherwise contacted, and after how 
> long?
> * If there's a legal question, who should be pinged and when?
> * At what point does a packager give up and ask for another reviewer
> (by setting back to NEW)?
>
> [1] 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/
> [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
> [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers
> [4] 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/
>

What is the review you're waiting on?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org