Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition
On 9/2/23 5:32 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 02. 09. 23 v 13:07 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
"python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check"
The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX
expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that would
indicate the license was converted to SPDX.
Typical example is
MIT
this is valid string in old system. And also in the SPDX format. But
the old MIT represented whole family. It can be actually anything from
$ license-fedora2spdx'MIT'
Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options:
['mpich2', 'libtiff', 'Xfig', 'UnixCrypt', 'SMLNJ', 'SGI-B-2.0',
'NTP', 'MIT', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-enna',
'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-F
estival', 'MIT-CMU', 'ICU', 'HPND', 'HPND-sell-variant', 'HP-1986',
'Boehm-GC', 'BSL-1.0', 'Adobe-Glyph']
{{pick MIT choice}}
It can be converted to MIT, but also to ICU or HPND... and without any
indication in the changelog there is no way to know if you check it or
not.
This is probably a good explanation to add to our Updating Existing
Packages documentation page. I've added an issue as a reminder. Need to
probably do a documentation update soon...
Jilayne
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition
Dne 02. 09. 23 v 13:07 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a):
"python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check"
The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX
expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that would
indicate the license was converted to SPDX.
Typical example is
MIT
this is valid string in old system. And also in the SPDX format. But the old MIT represented whole family. It can be
actually anything from
$ license-fedora2spdx'MIT'
Warning: more options on how to interpret MIT. Possible options: ['mpich2', 'libtiff', 'Xfig', 'UnixCrypt', 'SMLNJ',
'SGI-B-2.0', 'NTP', 'MIT', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-F
estival', 'MIT-CMU', 'ICU', 'HPND', 'HPND-sell-variant', 'HP-1986', 'Boehm-GC',
'BSL-1.0', 'Adobe-Glyph']
{{pick MIT choice}}
It can be converted to MIT, but also to ICU or HPND... and without any indication in the changelog there is no way to
know if you check it or not.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition
On Sat, Sep 02, 2023 at 02:39:14AM -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > What does this message mean: > > "python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please > check" The License string is valid as both the old-style Fedora license and a SPDX expression, and the tooling did not match anything in the changelog that would indicate the license was converted to SPDX. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Passenger pigeon edition
Hi, What does this message mean: "python-lit warning: valid as old and new and no changelong entry, please check" -Tom On 9/1/23 01:33, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Two weeks ago we had: * 23030 spec files in Fedora * 29469license tags in all spec files * 16716 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 6149tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` * Progress: 43.28% ██ 100% ELN subset: 895 out of 2492 packages are not converted yet Today we have: * 23128 spec files in Fedora * 29572license tags in all spec files * 16519 tags have not been converted to SPDX yet * 6059tags can be trivially converted using `license-fedora2spdx` * Progress: 44.14% ██ 100% ELN subset: 825 out of 2479 packages are not converted yet Graph with the burndown chart: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QVMEzXWML-6_Mrlln02axFAaRKCQ8zE807rpCjus-8s/edit?usp=sharing The list of packages needed to be converted is here: https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt List by package maintainers is here https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final-maintainers.txt List of packages from ELN subset that needs to be converted: https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/eln-not-migrated.txt New version of fedora-license-data has been released. With 9 new licenses. 33 licenses have been submitted to SPDX.org and are waiting to be review (and then added to fedora-license-data). Legal docs and especially https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/allowed-licenses/ was updated too. New projection when we will be finished is 2025-01-22 (we are slowing down. Again. :( ). Pure linear approximation. If your package does not have neither git-log entry nor spec-changelog entry mentioning SPDX and you know your license tag matches SPDX formula, you can put your package on ignore list https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/ignore-packages.txt Either pull-request or direct email to me is fine. Tip of the day: You can use Chrome or Firefox plugin to find what is the license and how much it differ from nearest SPDX match. https://github.com/spdx/spdx-license-diff#installation Why Passenger pigeon edition? Passenger pigeon is extinct species. On today's date at 1914, last known one died at Cincinnati Zoo. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passenger_pigeon Do you hesitate how to proceed with the migration? Please follow https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/ Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
