Re: compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict

2017-11-29 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 23:51 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> Il 29/11/2017 23:29, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> > Why do you need to have both -devel packages installed at once? 
> 
> libdigidoc needs compat-openssl10-devel
> libdigidocpp needs openssl-devel and libdigidoc-devel
> so IMHO this could trigger

FWIW, I'd be asking myself "why is libdigidoc this way?" and trying to
fix that, rather than "How can I get both -devel packages installed at
once?".
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict

2017-11-29 Thread Germano Massullo 
Il 29/11/2017 23:29, Adam Williamson ha scritto:
> Why do you need to have both -devel packages installed at once? 

libdigidoc needs compat-openssl10-devel
libdigidocpp needs openssl-devel and libdigidoc-devel
so IMHO this could trigger



DEBUG util.py:478:  Error: 
DEBUG util.py:478:   Problem: package libdigidoc-devel-3.10.2-2.fc28.x86_64 
requires compat-openssl10-devel, but none of the providers can be installed
DEBUG util.py:478:- package compat-openssl10-devel-1:1.0.2m-1.fc28.i686 
conflicts with openssl-devel provided by openssl-devel-1:1.1.0g-1.fc28.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:478:- package compat-openssl10-devel-1:1.0.2m-1.fc28.x86_64 
conflicts with openssl-devel provided by openssl-devel-1:1.1.0g-1.fc28.x86_64
DEBUG util.py:478:- cannot install the best candidate for the job
DEBUG util.py:478:- conflicting requests
DEBUG util.py:478:  (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace 
conflicting packages or '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages)
DEBUG util.py:616:  Child return code was: 1
DEBUG util.py:635:  child environment: None
DEBUG util.py:561:  Executing command: /usr/bin/gzip -9 --force 
/var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/root.log with env {'TERM': 'vt100', 'SHELL': 
'/bin/sh', 'HOME': '/builddir', 'HOSTNAME': 'mock', 'PATH': 
'/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin', 'LANG': 'en_US.UTF-8'} and shell True


In log
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682275-libdigidocpp/root.log.gz

*libdigidoc.spec*
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682273-libdigidoc/libdigidoc.spec
*libdigidocpp.spec*
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/germano/eeste-id-card-tools/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00682275-libdigidocpp/libdigidocpp.spec



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: compat-openssl10 and openssl conflict

2017-11-29 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 23:09 +0100, Germano Massullo wrote:
> I am working on unretiring Estonia ID Card utilities[1] and I noticed
> that ‎ compat-openssl10 conflicts with openssl. In my case I am speaking
> about ‎ compat-openssl10-devel and openssl-devel. I noticed that while
> compiling libdigidocpp [2] in my eeste-id-card-tools Copr repository [3].
> Yesterday I also experienced a similar problem with their respective
> debuginfos [4].
> Isn't possible to fix this conflict?

Well, this is normal for compat packages; naturally their devel
packages will conflict because they contain the unversioned .so for the
same library. Only the non-devel library packages are actually expected
to be parallel installable. Why do you need to have both -devel
packages installed at once?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org