Re: fedora-review and/or pkgdb problem?
On 23/02/13 15:44, Tom Hughes wrote: On 23/02/13 15:26, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-02-23 16:09, Tom Hughes wrote: I'm not quite sure if this is a bug in fedora-review, python-fedora, or whether pkgdb is returning broken responses or something? Tom Hm... Which f-r version are you running (release, devel?) and on what (F18, rawhide...) Just using 0.3.1-3 from the F18 repos, and I've had that version installed since 12th Jan and it was working just a couple of days ago which is why I'm kind of suspecting that something is up with pkgdb given that it seems to be barfing processing the response. It seems to be working again now... Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedora-review and/or pkgdb problem?
On 2013-02-23 16:09, Tom Hughes wrote: Attempts to run fedora-review seem to be failing today (it was working a couple of days ago) when it tries to query pkgdb to see if there is already a package with the same name: 02-23 14:44 requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool DEBUG POST https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/nodejs-ms HTTP/1.1 200 1800 02-23 14:44 root DEBUGException down the road... Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py, line 183, in run self._do_run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py, line 176, in _do_run self.__do_report() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py, line 75, in __do_report self.__run_checks(self.bug.spec_file, self.bug.srpm_file) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py, line 89, in __run_checks writedown=not Settings.no_report) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/checks.py, line 310, in run_checks run_check(name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/checks.py, line 292, in run_check check.run() File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/generic.py, line 2025, in run p.get_package_info(name) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/pkgdb.py, line 139, in get_package_info req_params=data) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/baseclient.py, line 344, in send_request auth_params=auth_params, retries=retries) File /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/fedora/client/proxyclient.py, line 394, in send_request if 'exc' in data: TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable I'm not quite sure if this is a bug in fedora-review, python-fedora, or whether pkgdb is returning broken responses or something? Tom Hm... Which f-r version are you running (release, devel?) and on what (F18, rawhide...) --alec -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedora-review and/or pkgdb problem?
On 2013-02-23 16:09, Tom Hughes wrote: Attempts to run fedora-review seem to be failing today (it was working a couple of days ago) when it tries to query pkgdb to see if there is already a package with the same name: I'm not quite sure if this is a bug in fedora-review, python-fedora, or whether pkgdb is returning broken responses or something? Tom And the practical walk-around: look into ~/.cache/fedora-review.log and you will find the name of the test that fails. Use -x flag to exclude it, and you should get a template Of course, a bug filed at https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ is appreciated :) --alec -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedora-review and/or pkgdb problem?
On 23/02/13 15:26, Alec Leamas wrote: On 2013-02-23 16:09, Tom Hughes wrote: I'm not quite sure if this is a bug in fedora-review, python-fedora, or whether pkgdb is returning broken responses or something? Tom Hm... Which f-r version are you running (release, devel?) and on what (F18, rawhide...) Just using 0.3.1-3 from the F18 repos, and I've had that version installed since 12th Jan and it was working just a couple of days ago which is why I'm kind of suspecting that something is up with pkgdb given that it seems to be barfing processing the response. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
