Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-18 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Good catch, thanks. Fix is building.



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at 8:38 AM, Ben Beasley 
 wrote:


> Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.
> 

> I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that
> they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I
> could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded,
> but I chose not to.
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequeler/c/cd442978b013b374bd1a9127a9e42d8f2f5a1e34?branch=rawhide
> 

> However, the package still doesn’t build:
> 

> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
> libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
> 

> In fact:
> 

> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local -i libgda5-devel
> […]
> 

> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
> libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
> 

> It seems like the problem is here:
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgda5/blob/rawhide/f/libgda5.spec#_73
> 

> Requires: %{upstream}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> 

> where “upstream” is “libgda”.
> 

> On 8/18/22 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> 

> > Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)
> > 

> > --
> > Gwyn Ciesla
> > she/her/hers
> > 
> > in your fear, seek only peace
> > in your fear, seek only love
> > -d. bowie
> > 

> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > 

> > --- Original Message ---
> > On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini 
> > decatho...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 

> > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > > 

> > > > I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga 
> > > > to 6.0.0.
> > > > 

> > > > The following packages are impacted.
> > > > 

> > > > If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
> > > > libgda5-devel.
> > > > 

> > > > anjuta
> > > > elementary-music
> > > > gtranslator
> > > > libgdamm
> > > > sequeler
> > > > Hi Gwyn,
> > > 

> > > I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
> > > looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
> > > The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
> > > wrong contents.
> > > 

> > > And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
> > > elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
> > > superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
> > > the two follow-up commits ...
> > > 

> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide
> > > 

> > > Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted 
> > > rebuilds :)
> > > 

> > > Fabio
> > > ___
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: 
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> > > 

> > > ___
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: 
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to 

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Beasley

Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.

I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that 
they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I 
could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded, 
but I chose not to.


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequeler/c/cd442978b013b374bd1a9127a9e42d8f2f5a1e34?branch=rawhide

However, the package still doesn’t build:

     Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
      - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by 
libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64


In fact:

    $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local -i libgda5-devel
    […]

 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
      - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by 
libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64


It seems like the problem is here:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgda5/blob/rawhide/f/libgda5.spec#_73

    Requires:   %{upstream}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}

where “upstream” is “libgda”.

On 8/18/22 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:

Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)



--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini 
 wrote:



On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:


I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to 6.0.0.

The following packages are impacted.

If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
libgda5-devel.

anjuta
elementary-music
gtranslator
libgdamm
sequeler

Hi Gwyn,

I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
wrong contents.

And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
the two follow-up commits ...

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide

Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds :)

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-18 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini 
 wrote:


> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> 

> > I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to 
> > 6.0.0.
> > 

> > The following packages are impacted.
> > 

> > If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
> > libgda5-devel.
> > 

> > anjuta
> > elementary-music
> > gtranslator
> > libgdamm
> > sequeler
> 

> 

> Hi Gwyn,
> 

> I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
> looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
> The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
> wrong contents.
> 

> And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
> elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
> superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
> the two follow-up commits ...
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide
> 

> Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds 
> :)
> 

> Fabio
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-17 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
 wrote:
>
> I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to 
> 6.0.0.
>
> The following packages are impacted.
>
> If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
> libgda5-devel.
>
> anjuta
> elementary-music
> gtranslator
> libgdamm
> sequeler

Hi Gwyn,

I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
wrong contents.

And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
the two follow-up commits ...

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide

Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds :)

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue