Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Thomas Spura
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 +
Rawhide Report wrote:
 Broken deps for x86_64
 --
   FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgText.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgSim.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgParticle.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgGA.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgFX.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgDB.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosg.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libOpenThreads.so.11()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires
 libosgParticle.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosgDB.so.74
   SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosg.so.74
   SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libOpenThreads.so.11
   SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgParticle.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosgDB.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libosg.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires
 libOpenThreads.so.11()(64bit)

Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others don't...

Why that?

Tom
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes

2011-09-04 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:31:21 +0200
Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote:

 Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others
 don't...
 
 Why that?

This is multilib. Basically packages that have a -devel subpackage have
that devel subpackage and it's requirements (if available) shipped in
the 64bit tree. The theory is that this allows people to develop and
run 32bit applications if they need on 64bit machines. The 32bit
packages in the 64bit repo that don't show up in the report, don't have
broken deps. ;) 

You can see the exact logic used in the 'mash' project: 

http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=mash;a=blob;f=mash/multilib.py;h=9ae98f0adef296451e0ceffa7589b985d20725af;hb=980e4863b241bcb4bd18e1a82f6256aa1d28b65a

If you are wanting to fix issues as a maintainer,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks
may provide some ideas. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel