Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
Hi, On Tuesday, 2023-06-27 17:06:56 -, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > Anyone interested can join the `#libreoffice-sig:fedoraproject.org` matrix > room for discussion. Nope, it's #libreoffice:fedoraproject.org Eike -- GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
Greetings folks, the libreoffice-sig is now live. Anyone interested can join the `#libreoffice-sig:fedoraproject.org` matrix room for discussion. If you're a packager and like to help maintain LO and related packages, you can ask to join the https://accounts.fedoraproject.org/group/libreoffice-sig/ FAS group. If you maintain a LO package or any dependency, you're invited to add commit (or admin) access for libreoffice-sig group to your package and change the default bugzilla assignee to libreoffice-sig group. This will make BZ emails be sent to the libreoffice-...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list which you're also encouraged to join (this list is set as private as the only purpose is for BZ related activity; for active discussions please use the matrix room). That should be all, let me know if I have forgot something important. Thanks to all for your work in supporting Libreoffice RPM packaging in Fedora! Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
I've filed the request to set up a libreoffice-sig: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11372 If I forgot something in the request, please correct it. I've also quickly set up a wiki page which can be enhanced in many ways... ;-) Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
Hi Adam, On Wednesday, 2023-06-07 13:57:44 -, Adam Ł. wrote: > What ( and eventually where post this message ) about missing feature in > LibreOffic3 ? > (transulcent/transparent groups and interesecion 2d object/text top of video) > https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share_medium=member_desktop As all requests for enhancements (RFE), in the upstream's bug tracker: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/ with the Importance Severity set to 'enhancement'. Eike -- GPG key 0x6A6CD5B765632D3A - 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918 630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
What ( and eventually where post this message ) about missing feature in LibreOffic3 ? (transulcent/transparent groups and interesecion 2d object/text top of video) https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nandi-bishal_powerpoint-design-study-activity-7072031917180674048-stI8?utm_source=share_medium=member_desktop ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
On 6/7/23 08:00, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: As for admin privileges on the FAS group and ML, I'd like to ask 3-4 people to be set up. @decathorpe, @limb, @sharkcz ? @caolanm and @sbergmann would you like to continue helping in your great work on LO packages outside RH assignment? Yes, you can count me (sbergmann) in on trying to help out as far as my spare time permits. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
Il 06/06/23 21:16, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel > wrote: >> I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of >> which I am more than happy to be a member. > This is not possible, the "main admin" needs to be a person, and > cannot be a group. However, the default assignee for BugZilla bugs > *can* be overridden to be a group, which is basically the next best > thing. > > In my experience (:sad java face:), what's needed to form a SIG that > can maintain packages is: > > - requesting a FAS group *with* dist-git group > - a private mailing list that will receive bugzilla email > - a bugzilla account registered with the email address of this private > mailing list > - a Wiki page (though this is less important than it used to be) > - (maybe I forgot something) > (but fedora-infra people will also tell you what you need if you open a > ticket) > > Most SIGs also have IRC / Matrix channels or tracking projects on > pagure, but these are all optional and can be added later. > > And I'm not sure how much time I can contribute, but I'd also like to > help keep libreoffice RPMs available in Fedora. :) > > Fabio Ok, as soon as I have some free time I'll file the request to fedora-infra and set up the wiki page. Unless someone beats me in time, I would not object that :-p I was thinkink to use the mailing list address only for bugzilla purposes, since it would be private, and ask to set up a Discourse tag/section for project coordination. Thoughts? As for admin privileges on the FAS group and ML, I'd like to ask 3-4 people to be set up. @decathorpe, @limb, @sharkcz ? @caolanm and @sbergmann would you like to continue helping in your great work on LO packages outside RH assignment? Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
I am also interested in keeping the LO packages in Fedora. Hussein On 6/6/23 20:55, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried under tons of posts. Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos? What it is needed to set up a SIG? A wiki page and a mailing list? And also a FAS group, I suppose? BTW I've already seen a couple of hiccups which needs to be solved: the Bugzilla assignee of libreoffice package on src.fp.o is set to @sbergmann but I suppose it should now be changed to @limb? And, also, libreoffice 7.5.3 failed to build on Fedora Rawhide, so we now have LO 3.5.3 on F38 and LO 3.5.2 on Rawhide. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
Then I can be that person. :) -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 at 2:16 PM, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote: > > > I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, > > of which I am more than happy to be a member. > > > This is not possible, the "main admin" needs to be a person, and > cannot be a group. However, the default assignee for BugZilla bugs > can be overridden to be a group, which is basically the next best > thing. > > In my experience (:sad java face:), what's needed to form a SIG that > can maintain packages is: > > - requesting a FAS group with dist-git group > - a private mailing list that will receive bugzilla email > - a bugzilla account registered with the email address of this private > mailing list > - a Wiki page (though this is less important than it used to be) > - (maybe I forgot something) > (but fedora-infra people will also tell you what you need if you open a > ticket) > > Most SIGs also have IRC / Matrix channels or tracking projects on > pagure, but these are all optional and can be added later. > > And I'm not sure how much time I can contribute, but I'd also like to > help keep libreoffice RPMs available in Fedora. :) > > Fabio > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
On Tue, 06 Jun 2023 18:55:36 + Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried > under tons of posts. > > Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that > libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as > RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only > have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and > would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos? I am surely interested in the RPMs, mainly from the ppc64le (and s390x) point of view. They are very unlikely to get flatpaks. Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: > > I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of > which I am more than happy to be a member. This is not possible, the "main admin" needs to be a person, and cannot be a group. However, the default assignee for BugZilla bugs *can* be overridden to be a group, which is basically the next best thing. In my experience (:sad java face:), what's needed to form a SIG that can maintain packages is: - requesting a FAS group *with* dist-git group - a private mailing list that will receive bugzilla email - a bugzilla account registered with the email address of this private mailing list - a Wiki page (though this is less important than it used to be) - (maybe I forgot something) (but fedora-infra people will also tell you what you need if you open a ticket) Most SIGs also have IRC / Matrix channels or tracking projects on pagure, but these are all optional and can be added later. And I'm not sure how much time I can contribute, but I'd also like to help keep libreoffice RPMs available in Fedora. :) Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of which I am more than happy to be a member. -- Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, June 6th, 2023 at 1:55 PM, Mattia Verga wrote: > I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried > under tons of posts. > > Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that > libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as > RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only > have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and > would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos? > > What it is needed to set up a SIG? A wiki page and a mailing list? And > also a FAS group, I suppose? > > BTW I've already seen a couple of hiccups which needs to be solved: the > Bugzilla assignee of libreoffice package on src.fp.o is set to > @sbergmann but I suppose it should now be changed to @limb? And, also, > libreoffice 7.5.3 failed to build on Fedora Rawhide, so we now have LO > 3.5.3 on F38 and LO 3.5.2 on Rawhide. > > Mattia signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig
I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried under tons of posts. Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to only have LO available as a flatpak from an external service like Flathub and would like to join forces to maintain it in RPM repos? What it is needed to set up a SIG? A wiki page and a mailing list? And also a FAS group, I suppose? BTW I've already seen a couple of hiccups which needs to be solved: the Bugzilla assignee of libreoffice package on src.fp.o is set to @sbergmann but I suppose it should now be changed to @limb? And, also, libreoffice 7.5.3 failed to build on Fedora Rawhide, so we now have LO 3.5.3 on F38 and LO 3.5.2 on Rawhide. Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
