Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
5.16 is the correct version, see https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html 5.16 will probably be released late January next year. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
I tried kernel-debug that didn't fix it, I will try debuginfo-install kernel now. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
Reon Beon via devel writes: > I see mine crashing reasonably often in Problem Reporting. Any > packages I should install? > > "The backtrace does not contain enough meaningful function frames to > be reported. It is annoying but it does not necessarily indicate a > problem with your computer. ABRT will not allow you to create a report > in a bug tracking system but you can contact kernel maintainers via > e-mail." These days, many debugging tools can automatically fetch debuginfo from fedora servers (https://debuginfod.fedoraproject.org/). Do you know which abrt processing tool was complaining to you - like based on which dead program's backtrace? If that can't work for this tool just now, you can probably do this: # debuginfo-install kernel - FChE ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
I guess it is kernel-debug, I am going to try that. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
I see mine crashing reasonably often in Problem Reporting. Any packages I should install? "The backtrace does not contain enough meaningful function frames to be reported. It is annoying but it does not necessarily indicate a problem with your computer. ABRT will not allow you to create a report in a bug tracking system but you can contact kernel maintainers via e-mail." ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
I see it is not git, never mind. Thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 7:29 PM Reon Beon via devel wrote: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/ no? Upstream kernel git is gearing up to release 5.16-rc4, so it'd be premature to bump to a version that doesn't exist yet. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Shouldn't Fedora 36/rawhide kernel be 5.17 not 5.16 rc3 git?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kernel/ no? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
