Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-09 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 09/10/17 04:13 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 21:27:40 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a
>>> repository just fine.
>>> I'm sorry I can't help you more.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Robert-André
>> In that case, could you pull request to the main branch as the
>> maintainer is active?
>> Simply fork the branch to do so.
>>
>> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparkleshare
>>
>> Thank again for the efforts.
>>
>> --
>> Luya Tshimbalanga
>> Graphic & Web Designer
>> E: l...@fedoraproject.org
>> W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
>> ___
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Ok, I've sent a PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparkleshare/pull-request/2
>
> I think you can close yours.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André
Done. Thanks for the helps.

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEWyB+BQtYiFz4GUNDXlKBdNiiYJoFAlncRVwACgkQXlKBdNii
YJpKGAf/UqPiS1HxQKKhWlBcGcz0YKE0K8sJH0rjfUSwmh3VBdTVwsTTAuojQZqp
FeQ8XBqauSXDC/RiLbjg5DBcyCDgCG2UzdWeABfeYeGwNObyqhLBRBprM0BKAu/s
I+RKyaDigZ7Wpz7YUh43XTSlmTGJ0NQ8z8gCwGrIYkDqsCcNBBhbokR6URKX3m0P
bUnUcpEyuc5hdgvpWXolL1pknHdyCdIwlz3fbHK5WaSGGMFTiMgldE9TAx8QFFLO
BN8pBIJcQ2NlTGXbONyR4BKhRmkCqMRBSxmBweHz43H9rsOs2uHrimCE60CrPLpI
m2jMbGPR2+nrWqbmYClxZcQU/fuORQ==
=Ci8F
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-09 Thread Robert-André Mauchin 
On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 21:27:40 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a 
> > repository just fine.
> > I'm sorry I can't help you more.
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert-André
> 
> In that case, could you pull request to the main branch as the
> maintainer is active?
> Simply fork the branch to do so.
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparkleshare
> 
> Thank again for the efforts.
> 
> -- 
> Luya Tshimbalanga
> Graphic & Web Designer
> E: l...@fedoraproject.org
> W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Ok, I've sent a PR: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparkleshare/pull-request/2

I think you can close yours.

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 05:02:11 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>> Hello Luya,
>>>
>>> I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC,
>>> SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/
>>>
>>> The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0
>>> compatibility.
>>>
>>> It builds in Mock and Koji but I haven't attempted to run the program
>>> itself.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Robert-André
>> Hello Robert-André,
>>
>> Thank you for porting the change to 1.5. The only issue is the panel
>> setting to add repositories missing and a traceback when starting it:
>>
>> tacktrace:
>>
>>   at  <0x>
>>   at (wrapper managed-to-native) Gtk.Label.gtk_label_new_with_mnemonic
>> (intptr) [0x2] in :0
>>   at Gtk.Label..ctor (string) [0x00062] in
>> :0
>>   at Gtk.Label..ctor () [0x0] in :0
>>   at SparkleShare.SparkleUI..ctor () [0x0003c] in
>> :0
>>   at SparkleShare.Program.Main (string[]) [0x00133] in
>> :0
>>   at (wrapper runtime-invoke) .runtime_invoke_void_object
>> (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) [0x0004e] in
>> :0
>> /proc/self/maps:
>> 41393000-4143c000 rwxp  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 41503000-41513000 rwxp  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 55d5da816000-55d5dad17000 r-xp  08:08 2535114   
>> /usr/bin/mono-sgen
>> 55d5daf17000-55d5daf2e000 r--p 00501000 08:08 2535114   
>> /usr/bin/mono-sgen
>> 55d5daf2e000-55d5daf39000 rw-p 00518000 08:08 2535114   
>> /usr/bin/mono-sgen
>> 55d5daf39000-55d5daf6d000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 55d5db68a000-55d5dbc8f000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffae800-7ffae8021000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffae8021000-7ffaec00 ---p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf000-7ffaf0021000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf0021000-7ffaf400 ---p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf6d96000-7ffaf6d97000 ---p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf6d97000-7ffaf7597000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf7597000-7ffaf7598000 ---p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf7598000-7ffaf7d98000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf7d98000-7ffaf7dac000 r-xp  08:08 2497942   
>> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
>> 7ffaf7dac000-7ffaf7fab000 ---p 00014000 08:08 2497942   
>> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
>> 7ffaf7fab000-7ffaf7fac000 r--p 00013000 08:08 2497942   
>> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
>> 7ffaf7fac000-7ffaf7fad000 rw-p 00014000 08:08 2497942   
>> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
>> 7ffaf7fb-7ffaf7fc3000 r-xp  08:08 2500440   
>> /usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
>> 7ffaf7fc3000-7ffaf81c3000 ---p 00013000 08:08 2500440   
>> /usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
>> 7ffaf81c3000-7ffaf81c4000 r--p 00013000 08:08 2500440   
>> /usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
>> 7ffaf81c4000-7ffaf81c5000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>> 7ffaf81c8000-7ffaf81ed000 r-xp  08:08 2501211   
>> /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
>> 7ffaf81ed000-7ffaf83ec000 ---p 00025000 08:08 2501211   
>> /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
>> 7ffaf83ec000-7ffaf83ed000 r--p 00024000 08:08 2501211   
>> /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
>> 7ffaf83ed000-7ffaf83ee000 rw-p  00:00 0 
>> [mpx]
>>
>>
>> Not sure where to start.
> I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a 
> repository just fine.
> I'm sorry I can't help you more.
>
> Robert-André
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

I referred your files on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparkleshare/pull-request/1

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-08 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 08/10/17 01:51 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a 
> repository just fine.
> I'm sorry I can't help you more.
>
> Robert-André
In that case, could you pull request to the main branch as the
maintainer is active?
Simply fork the branch to do so.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sparkleshare

Thank again for the efforts.

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-08 Thread Robert-André Mauchin 
On dimanche 8 octobre 2017 05:02:11 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> > Hello Luya,
> > 
> > I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC,
> > SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/
> > 
> > The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0
> > compatibility.
> > 
> > It builds in Mock and Koji but I haven't attempted to run the program
> > itself.
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > Robert-André
> 
> Hello Robert-André,
> 
> Thank you for porting the change to 1.5. The only issue is the panel
> setting to add repositories missing and a traceback when starting it:
> 
> tacktrace:
> 
>   at  <0x>
>   at (wrapper managed-to-native) Gtk.Label.gtk_label_new_with_mnemonic
> (intptr) [0x2] in :0
>   at Gtk.Label..ctor (string) [0x00062] in
> :0
>   at Gtk.Label..ctor () [0x0] in :0
>   at SparkleShare.SparkleUI..ctor () [0x0003c] in
> :0
>   at SparkleShare.Program.Main (string[]) [0x00133] in
> :0
>   at (wrapper runtime-invoke) .runtime_invoke_void_object
> (object,intptr,intptr,intptr) [0x0004e] in
> :0
> /proc/self/maps:
> 41393000-4143c000 rwxp  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 41503000-41513000 rwxp  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 55d5da816000-55d5dad17000 r-xp  08:08 2535114   
> /usr/bin/mono-sgen
> 55d5daf17000-55d5daf2e000 r--p 00501000 08:08 2535114   
> /usr/bin/mono-sgen
> 55d5daf2e000-55d5daf39000 rw-p 00518000 08:08 2535114   
> /usr/bin/mono-sgen
> 55d5daf39000-55d5daf6d000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 55d5db68a000-55d5dbc8f000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffae800-7ffae8021000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffae8021000-7ffaec00 ---p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf000-7ffaf0021000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf0021000-7ffaf400 ---p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf6d96000-7ffaf6d97000 ---p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf6d97000-7ffaf7597000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf7597000-7ffaf7598000 ---p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf7598000-7ffaf7d98000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf7d98000-7ffaf7dac000 r-xp  08:08 2497942   
> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
> 7ffaf7dac000-7ffaf7fab000 ---p 00014000 08:08 2497942   
> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
> 7ffaf7fab000-7ffaf7fac000 r--p 00013000 08:08 2497942   
> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
> 7ffaf7fac000-7ffaf7fad000 rw-p 00014000 08:08 2497942   
> /usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
> 7ffaf7fb-7ffaf7fc3000 r-xp  08:08 2500440   
> /usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
> 7ffaf7fc3000-7ffaf81c3000 ---p 00013000 08:08 2500440   
> /usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
> 7ffaf81c3000-7ffaf81c4000 r--p 00013000 08:08 2500440   
> /usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
> 7ffaf81c4000-7ffaf81c5000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 7ffaf81c8000-7ffaf81ed000 r-xp  08:08 2501211   
> /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
> 7ffaf81ed000-7ffaf83ec000 ---p 00025000 08:08 2501211   
> /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
> 7ffaf83ec000-7ffaf83ed000 r--p 00024000 08:08 2501211   
> /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
> 7ffaf83ed000-7ffaf83ee000 rw-p  00:00 0 
> [mpx]
> 
> 
> Not sure where to start.

I've installed it and can’t reproduce your issue: I can start and add a 
repository just fine.
I'm sorry I can't help you more.

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-07 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 07/10/17 08:28 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> Hello Luya,
>
> I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC, 
> SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/
>
> The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0 
> compatibility.
>
> It builds in Mock and Koji but I haven't attempted to run the program itself.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André
Hello Robert-André,

Thank you for porting the change to 1.5. The only issue is the panel
setting to add repositories missing and a traceback when starting it:

tacktrace:

  at  <0x>
  at (wrapper managed-to-native) Gtk.Label.gtk_label_new_with_mnemonic
(intptr) [0x2] in :0
  at Gtk.Label..ctor (string) [0x00062] in
:0
  at Gtk.Label..ctor () [0x0] in :0
  at SparkleShare.SparkleUI..ctor () [0x0003c] in
:0
  at SparkleShare.Program.Main (string[]) [0x00133] in
:0
  at (wrapper runtime-invoke) .runtime_invoke_void_object
(object,intptr,intptr,intptr) [0x0004e] in
:0
/proc/self/maps:
41393000-4143c000 rwxp  00:00 0 
[mpx]
41503000-41513000 rwxp  00:00 0 
[mpx]
55d5da816000-55d5dad17000 r-xp  08:08 2535114   
/usr/bin/mono-sgen
55d5daf17000-55d5daf2e000 r--p 00501000 08:08 2535114   
/usr/bin/mono-sgen
55d5daf2e000-55d5daf39000 rw-p 00518000 08:08 2535114   
/usr/bin/mono-sgen
55d5daf39000-55d5daf6d000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
55d5db68a000-55d5dbc8f000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffae800-7ffae8021000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffae8021000-7ffaec00 ---p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf000-7ffaf0021000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf0021000-7ffaf400 ---p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf6d96000-7ffaf6d97000 ---p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf6d97000-7ffaf7597000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf7597000-7ffaf7598000 ---p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf7598000-7ffaf7d98000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf7d98000-7ffaf7dac000 r-xp  08:08 2497942   
/usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
7ffaf7dac000-7ffaf7fab000 ---p 00014000 08:08 2497942   
/usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
7ffaf7fab000-7ffaf7fac000 r--p 00013000 08:08 2497942   
/usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
7ffaf7fac000-7ffaf7fad000 rw-p 00014000 08:08 2497942   
/usr/lib64/libgpg-error.so.0.22.0
7ffaf7fb-7ffaf7fc3000 r-xp  08:08 2500440   
/usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
7ffaf7fc3000-7ffaf81c3000 ---p 00013000 08:08 2500440   
/usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
7ffaf81c3000-7ffaf81c4000 r--p 00013000 08:08 2500440   
/usr/lib64/liblz4.so.1.8.0
7ffaf81c4000-7ffaf81c5000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]
7ffaf81c8000-7ffaf81ed000 r-xp  08:08 2501211   
/usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
7ffaf81ed000-7ffaf83ec000 ---p 00025000 08:08 2501211   
/usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
7ffaf83ec000-7ffaf83ed000 r--p 00024000 08:08 2501211   
/usr/lib64/liblzma.so.5.2.3
7ffaf83ed000-7ffaf83ee000 rw-p  00:00 0 
[mpx]


Not sure where to start.


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-07 Thread Robert-André Mauchin 
On vendredi 6 octobre 2017 22:24:01 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth
> > 
> > > wrote:
> > Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged
> > breaking changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the
> > most recent 1.x in F27 and below at this time.
> > 
> > The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.
> > 
> > I haven't been following this closely, but my understanding is
> > that if it's not updated, there won't be any Sparkleshare in F27,
> > since one of the current version's dependencies (WebKitGTK+ 2.4)
> > is gone. So the update should go into F27 as well (which has not
> > even reached beta yet, despite the freeze). The updates policy is
> > very important, but it doesn't trump common sense. :)
> > 
> > The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue
> > and keeping it in Fedora.
> > 
> > Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit with
> > our policies I'd suggest.
> 
> I attempt to build Sparkleshare 1.5 on master but the main issue is the
> webkitgitk dependency. Suggestion welcome to fix that:
> 
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/luya/rpms/sparkleshare/blob/master/f/spar
> kleshare.spec

Hello Luya,

I've worked on this issue this afternoon, you can find the resulting SPEC, 
SRPM and patches here: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/sparkleshare/

The main patch backports the changes made in 2.0 for WebkitGTK 2.0 
compatibility.

It builds in Mock and Koji but I haven't attempted to run the program itself.

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-10-06 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 24/09/17 11:47 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro
> > wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth
> > wrote:
>
> Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged
> breaking changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the
> most recent 1.x in F27 and below at this time.
>
> The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.
>
>
> I haven't been following this closely, but my understanding is
> that if it's not updated, there won't be any Sparkleshare in F27,
> since one of the current version's dependencies (WebKitGTK+ 2.4)
> is gone. So the update should go into F27 as well (which has not
> even reached beta yet, despite the freeze). The updates policy is
> very important, but it doesn't trump common sense. :)
>
>
> The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue
> and keeping it in Fedora.
>
> Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit with
> our policies I'd suggest.

I attempt to build Sparkleshare 1.5 on master but the main issue is the
webkitgitk dependency. Suggestion welcome to fix that:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/luya/rpms/sparkleshare/blob/master/f/sparkleshare.spec

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-27 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> s sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency satisfied.
>
> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0; release
> added the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
>
> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few minutes
> though[1]
>
> The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes from 1.X
> ... 
>
> To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and any
> dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already packaged
> though which should help.
>
webkit2-sharp is now packaged for the first step:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=25135

Update for sparkleshare can proceed


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro 
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:47 PM, James Hogarth 
 wrote:
The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue 
and keeping it in Fedora.


Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit 
with our policies I'd suggest.


OK, looks like I misunderstood. Sounds good then.

Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread James Hogarth 
On 24 September 2017 at 16:29, Michael Catanzaro 
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth 
> wrote:
>
>> Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking changes
>> in 2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in F27 and below
>> at this time.
>>
>> The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.
>>
>
> I haven't been following this closely, but my understanding is that if
> it's not updated, there won't be any Sparkleshare in F27, since one of the
> current version's dependencies (WebKitGTK+ 2.4) is gone. So the update
> should go into F27 as well (which has not even reached beta yet, despite
> the freeze). The updates policy is very important, but it doesn't trump
> common sense. :)
>
>
The Sparkeshare 1.5 release removes that dependency fixing the issue and
keeping it in Fedora.

Having that in F27 and 2.0 in F28 would be most keeping in spirit with our
policies I'd suggest.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 24/09/17 11:17 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> On dimanche 24 septembre 2017 20:03:45 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
>> On 24/09/17 07:31 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> T
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it
>>>
>>> here:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/sparkleshare/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Robert-André
>>> ___
>>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
>> Thanks Robert-André for the quick build. Looking at the spec file for
>> webkit2-sharp, I brought some improvement:
>>
>> https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec
>>
>> The appstream line for Sparkleshare is outdated per guideline below:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData
>>
>>
>> Would you mind to submit webkit2-sharp for review? If not, I will do it.
>>
> Already submitted as a RR here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
> id=1494981 
>
> I will add your changes ASAP.
>
Excellent. I took the RR and will wait for the update.
I am aware of rpmlint behavior as clarified by the guildeline:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#rpmlint_and_mono_packages

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin 
On dimanche 24 septembre 2017 20:03:45 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 24/09/17 07:31 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > T
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it
> > 
> > here:
> >
> >
> >
> > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/sparkleshare/
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert-André
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> 
> Thanks Robert-André for the quick build. Looking at the spec file for
> webkit2-sharp, I brought some improvement:
> 
> https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec
> 
> The appstream line for Sparkleshare is outdated per guideline below:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData
> 
> 
> Would you mind to submit webkit2-sharp for review? If not, I will do it.
> 

Already submitted as a RR here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?
id=1494981 

I will add your changes ASAP.


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 24/09/17 07:31 AM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>
> T
> Hello,
>
> I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it 
> here:
>
> https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/sparkleshare/
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert-André
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Thanks Robert-André for the quick build. Looking at the spec file for
webkit2-sharp, I brought some improvement:

https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec

The appstream line for Sparkleshare is outdated per guideline below:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AppData


Would you mind to submit webkit2-sharp for review? If not, I will do it.

-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Michael Catanzaro 
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 2:09 AM, James Hogarth 
 wrote:
Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking 
changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in 
F27 and below at this time.


The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.


I haven't been following this closely, but my understanding is that if 
it's not updated, there won't be any Sparkleshare in F27, since one of 
the current version's dependencies (WebKitGTK+ 2.4) is gone. So the 
update should go into F27 as well (which has not even reached beta yet, 
despite the freeze). The updates policy is very important, but it 
doesn't trump common sense. :)


Michael
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-24 Thread Robert-André Mauchin 
On samedi 23 septembre 2017 23:56:12 CEST Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> On 22/09/17 12:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 22 Sep 2017 4:46 am, "Luya Tshimbalanga"  > 
> > > wrote:
> > On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> >> On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga
> >> 
> >> > wrote:
> >> Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just
> >> reach 2.0[1][2]
> >> The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with
> >> current broken dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
> >> 
> >>  Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires
> >> mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can
> >> be installed
> >>   - conflicting requests
> >>   - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by
> >> webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64
> >> 
> >>  but no response so far[3][4].
> >> As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make
> >> the change because I cannot access it?
> >> Thanks in advance,
> >> 
> >> Luya
> >> 
> >> References
> >> --
> >> [1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
> >> 
> >> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
> >> 
> >> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
> >> 
> >> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
> >> 
> >> 
> >> A quick look of course shows this to be an issue with the
> >> retiring of webkitgtk as that's no longer in the repos for
> >> webkit-sharp to build against, which then means sparkleshare
> >> doesn't have its dependency satisfied.
> >> 
> >> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0 release
> >> added the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
> >> 
> >> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few
> >> minutes though[1]
> >> 
> >> The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes
> >> from 1.X ... 
> >> 
> >> To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and
> >> any dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already
> >> packaged though which should help.
> >> 
> >> They say that as of 2.0 they have a flatpak release - have you
> >> tried that so at least you'll have access to the application in F27?
> > 
> > Wearing Design Suite lab maintainer's hat, I would love to include
> > a flatpak version of 2.0 as default for F27 if there is a proper
> > mechanism to do so.
> > 
> > Just a quick look, I made a spec file for guideline[1]
> > 
> > References
> > ---
> > [1]
> > https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > 
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > 
> > 
> > Ah I thought you meant the application for you to use. Last I heard
> > how to formally include a flatpak app in Fedora is still up for debate. 
> > 
> > The Workstation working group may have some ideas there. 
> > 
> > Not making any promises but if no-one else has got to it by the end of
> > next week I'll try and get something together. 
> > 
> > I'm not familiar with the app though so it'll take a little getting up
> > to speed. 
> > 
> > Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking
> > changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in
> > F27 and below at this time. 
> > 
> > The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.
> 
> Fair enough.
> Sparkleshare is basically a client based file synchronization similar to
> Dropbox or iFolder.
> 1.5 is the last release for the 1.x according to Sparkleshare website
> which should lesser the breakage.
> 
> Thanks for the lookup as the update was long overdue.

Hello,

I've packaged webkit2-sharp and Sparkleshare 2.0 on COPR. You can grab it 
here:

https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/eclipseo/sparkleshare/

Best regards,

Robert-André
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-23 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 22/09/17 12:09 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Sep 2017 4:46 am, "Luya Tshimbalanga"  > wrote:
>
> On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga
>> > wrote:
>>
>> Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just
>> reach 2.0[1][2]
>> The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with
>> current broken dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
>>
>>  Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires
>> mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can
>> be installed
>>   - conflicting requests
>>   - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by
>> webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64
>>
>>  but no response so far[3][4].
>> As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make
>> the change because I cannot access it?
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Luya
>>
>> References
>> --
>> [1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
>> 
>> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
>> 
>> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
>> 
>> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> A quick look of course shows this to be an issue with the
>> retiring of webkitgtk as that's no longer in the repos for
>> webkit-sharp to build against, which then means sparkleshare
>> doesn't have its dependency satisfied.
>>
>> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0 release
>> added the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
>>
>> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few
>> minutes though[1]
>>
>> The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes
>> from 1.X ... 
>>
>> To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and
>> any dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already
>> packaged though which should help.
>>
>> They say that as of 2.0 they have a flatpak release - have you
>> tried that so at least you'll have access to the application in F27?
>>
> Wearing Design Suite lab maintainer's hat, I would love to include
> a flatpak version of 2.0 as default for F27 if there is a proper
> mechanism to do so.
>
> Just a quick look, I made a spec file for guideline[1]
>
> References
> ---
> [1]
> https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec
> 
>
>
> -- 
> Luya Tshimbalanga
> Graphic & Web Designer
> E: l...@fedoraproject.org 
> W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 
>
>
> Ah I thought you meant the application for you to use. Last I heard
> how to formally include a flatpak app in Fedora is still up for debate. 
>
> The Workstation working group may have some ideas there. 
>
> Not making any promises but if no-one else has got to it by the end of
> next week I'll try and get something together. 
>
> I'm not familiar with the app though so it'll take a little getting up
> to speed. 
>
> Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking
> changes in 2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in
> F27 and below at this time. 
>
> The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.
>
>
Fair enough.
Sparkleshare is basically a client based file synchronization similar to
Dropbox or iFolder.
1.5 is the last release for the 1.x according to Sparkleshare website
which should lesser the breakage.

Thanks for the lookup as the update was long overdue.


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-22 Thread James Hogarth 
On 22 Sep 2017 4:46 am, "Luya Tshimbalanga"  wrote:

On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:



On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga 
wrote:

> Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach
> 2.0[1][2]
> The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current broken
> dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
>
>  Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires
> mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64
>
>  but no response so far[3][4].
> As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make the change
> because I cannot access it?
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Luya
>
> References
> --
> [1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
>
>
>
A quick look of course shows this to be an issue with the retiring of
webkitgtk as that's no longer in the repos for webkit-sharp to build
against, which then means sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency
satisfied.

According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0 release added the
gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.

The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few minutes
though[1]

The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes from 1.X ...

To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and any
dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already packaged though
which should help.

They say that as of 2.0 they have a flatpak release - have you tried that
so at least you'll have access to the application in F27?

Wearing Design Suite lab maintainer's hat, I would love to include a
flatpak version of 2.0 as default for F27 if there is a proper mechanism to
do so.

Just a quick look, I made a spec file for guideline[1]

References
---
[1] https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


Ah I thought you meant the application for you to use. Last I heard how to
formally include a flatpak app in Fedora is still up for debate.

The Workstation working group may have some ideas there.

Not making any promises but if no-one else has got to it by the end of next
week I'll try and get something together.

I'm not familiar with the app though so it'll take a little getting up to
speed.

Based on the fedora update policy and the acknowledged breaking changes in
2.0 we should only really update to the most recent 1.x in F27 and below at
this time.

The latest version should be a self contained change in F28.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-21 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
On 21/09/17 08:02 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>
> On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga
> > wrote:
>
> Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach
> 2.0[1][2]
> The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current
> broken dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
>
>  Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires
> mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can be
> installed
>   - conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by
> webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64
>
>  but no response so far[3][4].
> As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make the
> change because I cannot access it?
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Luya
>
> References
> --
> [1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
> 
> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
> 
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
> 
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
> 
>
>
>
> A quick look of course shows this to be an issue with the retiring of
> webkitgtk as that's no longer in the repos for webkit-sharp to build
> against, which then means sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency
> satisfied.
>
> According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0 release added
> the gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.
>
> The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few minutes
> though[1]
>
> The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes from 1.X
> ... 
>
> To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and any
> dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already packaged
> though which should help.
>
> They say that as of 2.0 they have a flatpak release - have you tried
> that so at least you'll have access to the application in F27?
>
Wearing Design Suite lab maintainer's hat, I would love to include a
flatpak version of 2.0 as default for F27 if there is a proper mechanism
to do so.

Just a quick look, I made a spec file for guideline[1]

References
---
[1] https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/webkit2-sharp.spec


-- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-21 Thread James Hogarth 
On 21 September 2017 at 07:17, Luya Tshimbalanga 
wrote:

> Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach
> 2.0[1][2]
> The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current broken
> dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:
>
>  Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires
> mono(webkit-sharp) = 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can be installed
>   - conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64
>
>  but no response so far[3][4].
> As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make the change
> because I cannot access it?
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Luya
>
> References
> --
> [1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
> [2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
> [4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
>
>
>
A quick look of course shows this to be an issue with the retiring of
webkitgtk as that's no longer in the repos for webkit-sharp to build
against, which then means sparkleshare doesn't have its dependency
satisfied.

According to the sparkleshare release notes[0] the 1.3.0 release added the
gtk3 bindings... so any of those ought to help.

The build dependencies are more complex than I can do in a few minutes
though[1]

The 2.0 release the release notes states has breaking changes from 1.X ...

To get this updated someone needs to package webkit2-sharp (and any
dependencies that needs to build) ... gtk-sharp3 is already packaged though
which should help.

They say that as of 2.0 they have a flatpak release - have you tried that
so at least you'll have access to the application in F27?




[0] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/blob/master/release-notes.txt
[1]
https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/blob/master/SparkleShare/Linux/README.md
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

State of Sparkeshare in Fedora

2017-09-21 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga 
Sparkleshare package is currently behind upstream which just reach 2.0[1][2]
The maintainer was contacted for updating the package with current broken 
dependency below on Fedora 27 and above:

 Problem: package sparkleshare-1.2.0-8.fc26.x86_64 requires mono(webkit-sharp) 
= 1.1.15.0, but none of the providers can be installed
  - conflicting requests
  - nothing provides webkitgtk needed by webkit-sharp-0.3-19.fc26.x86_64

 but no response so far[3][4].
As the application is used by Design Team, could someone make the change 
because I cannot access it?
Thanks in advance,

Luya

References
--
[1] https://github.com/hbons/SparkleShare/releases/tag/2.0.0
[2] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/sparkleshare
[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151172
[4] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375789
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org