Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.13.0
On Tuesday, 31 January 2023 at 16:29, Ben Beasley wrote: > I finished checking for fallout from the gtest 1.13.0 update in Rawhide. > The following packages built with GCC 13 but FTBFS with gtest-0.13.0 and > have NOT been patched yet: [...] > gstreamermm (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165230) Fixed by dropping hard-coded -std=c++11 and -std=c++0x. [...] > mkvtoolnix ([edit: FTBFS with] Ruby 3.2: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161534) Fixed by backporting upstream patch. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.13.0
On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 10:29 -0500, Ben Beasley wrote: > I finished checking for fallout from the gtest 1.13.0 update in Rawhide. > The following packages built with GCC 13 but FTBFS with gtest-0.13.0 and > have NOT been patched yet: > > abseil-cpp (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164154); this > one is a nontrivial regression that has been reported upstream > deepin-calculator (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164921) > deepin-network-utils (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164920) > dtkcore (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164924) > dtkwidget (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164925) > gstreamermm (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165230) > > The following started to FTBFS with GCC 13 and have not yet been > patched, so it’s unclear whether or not they have any issues with > gtest-0.13.0: > > android-tools (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164598) > fcitx5-mozc (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcitx5-mozc/pull-request/1) > folly (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165219) > > Same as above, but something else triggered the FTBFS: > > mkvtoolnix (Ruby 3.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161534) > root (numpy 1.24.1: https://github.com/root-project/root/issues/12148) > sdformat (Ruby 3.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165939) > > The following appear to be OK with gtest-0.13.0, or they have already > been patched for gtest-0.13.0 (in the rawhide branch or in an open PR). > A *large* minority of these did need to be patched for gtest-0.13.0 or > for GCC 13. Thanks a lot for doing all this work, Ben! -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.13.0
I finished checking for fallout from the gtest 1.13.0 update in Rawhide. The following packages built with GCC 13 but FTBFS with gtest-0.13.0 and have NOT been patched yet: abseil-cpp (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164154); this one is a nontrivial regression that has been reported upstream deepin-calculator (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164921) deepin-network-utils (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164920) dtkcore (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164924) dtkwidget (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164925) gstreamermm (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165230) The following started to FTBFS with GCC 13 and have not yet been patched, so it’s unclear whether or not they have any issues with gtest-0.13.0: android-tools (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2164598) fcitx5-mozc (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fcitx5-mozc/pull-request/1) folly (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165219) Same as above, but something else triggered the FTBFS: mkvtoolnix (Ruby 3.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161534) root (numpy 1.24.1: https://github.com/root-project/root/issues/12148) sdformat (Ruby 3.2: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2165939) The following appear to be OK with gtest-0.13.0, or they have already been patched for gtest-0.13.0 (in the rawhide branch or in an open PR). A *large* minority of these did need to be patched for gtest-0.13.0 or for GCC 13. ImageMagick InsightToolkit Macaulay2 PDAL2 apitrace apt arbor assimp barrier bear binaryen bloaty cachelib cantera casc cctz ceph colobot cpp-httplib cpp-jwt davix ddnet deepin-control-center deepin-dock deepin-editor deepin-launcher deepin-qt5integration deepin-session-shell deepin-session-ui deepin-system-monitor deepin-terminal dosbox-staging dtkgui dwgrep easyloggingpp elements fbthrift fizz flann fbthrift gazebo gfal2 gnome-commander gnucash google-benchmark google-cpu_features gplugin guidelines-support-library gumbo-parser highway jd jpegxl jsonnet lib3mf libcamera libecpint libindi libkiwix libkml libphonenumber librime libyuv litehtml luminance-hdr mathic mathicgb mcrouter memtailor mir moveit msgpack nativejit ninja-build nvtop oomd openclonk opentype-sanitizer partio pcl petpvc phd2 proj proxygen prusa-slicer python-html5-parser python-steps rapidjson rapidyaml rlottie rnp sdformat sdsl-lite seqan3 sipp snappy sonivox sqlitecpp srt strawberry synergy uriparser uvw wabt wangle watchman wdt wlcs xtensor xtensor-python zimlib zstd On Jan 24, 2023, at 11:58 AM, Ben Beasley wrote: The recent update of gtest to 1.13.0 in Rawhide bumped the .so version. I reminded the maintainers of the Updates Policy for Rawhide and asked them to please announce and coordinate similar updates in the future[1]. The following packages depend on a specific .so version of gtest/gmock at runtime and already have FTI bugs: ceph, davix, gfal2, libcamera, mir, python-steps, and wlcs. The list of packages that BuildRequire gtest/gmock is huge. I haven’t attempted to determine the full last of packages that could be impacted, or to explicitly (B)CC their maintainers on this message. There is a higher than usual chance that packages that simply BuildRequire gtest/gmock will FTBFS, because gtest 1.13.0 drops support for C++ standard versions older than C++14. In *most* cases where a package’s build system enforces a specific older C++ version like C++11, it should be OK to patch that out and build with the compiler’s default C++ standard, or, more conservatively, enforce C++14 instead of C++11. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161870#c3 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Unannounced .so version bump in gtest 1.13.0
The recent update of gtest to 1.13.0 in Rawhide bumped the .so version. I reminded the maintainers of the Updates Policy for Rawhide and asked them to please announce and coordinate similar updates in the future[1]. The following packages depend on a specific .so version of gtest/gmock at runtime and already have FTI bugs: ceph, davix, gfal2, libcamera, mir, python-steps, and wlcs. The list of packages that BuildRequire gtest/gmock is huge. I haven’t attempted to determine the full last of packages that could be impacted, or to explicitly (B)CC their maintainers on this message. There is a higher than usual chance that packages that simply BuildRequire gtest/gmock will FTBFS, because gtest 1.13.0 drops support for C++ standard versions older than C++14. In *most* cases where a package’s build system enforces a specific older C++ version like C++11, it should be OK to patch that out and build with the compiler’s default C++ standard, or, more conservatively, enforce C++14 instead of C++11. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2161870#c3 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
