Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 04:35:25PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 8.1.2016 v 14:45 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> > On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> >>> Hiya!
> >>>
> >>> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
> >>>
> >>> Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
> >>> differ from the spec?
> >>>
> >>> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914
> >>
> >> Got my answer from puiterwijk over IRC:
> >>
> >> Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so one
> >> just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after the
> >> next push.
> >
> > So the whole business of faffing around extracting the description to
> > paste into the new package form is a bit pointless then, because it
> > will just get overwritten when the initial spec is pushed?
> >
> > Does that apply to the upstream URL as well?
> 
> Description and URL are optional. And the refresh is done just once in
> while (like once per week? but it might change already, who knows :).

It is a weekly check running against the meta-data of rawhide, so you need to
build it, not just push :)


Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Dave Olsthoorn
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:41 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so
> one
> just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after
> the
> next push.

That seems weird to me because I forgot to add a description in pkgdb
when I created ola. But that was almost a month ago but the overview[1]
still says "(no description in pkgdb)" while the subpackages do have their 
descriptions from the spec file.

[1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ola

-- 
Dave Olsthoorn 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
Hiya!

Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?

Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
differ from the spec?

Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914
-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Ankur Sinha
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Hiya!
> 
> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
> 
> Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
> differ from the spec?
> 
> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914

Got my answer from puiterwijk over IRC:

Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so one
just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after the
next push.
-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD"

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Tom Hughes

On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote:

On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:

Hiya!

Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?

Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
differ from the spec?

Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914


Got my answer from puiterwijk over IRC:

Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so one
just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after the
next push.


So the whole business of faffing around extracting the description to 
paste into the new package form is a bit pointless then, because it will 
just get overwritten when the initial spec is pushed?


Does that apply to the upstream URL as well?

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 14:58:55 +0100, Dave Olsthoorn wrote:

> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:41 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so
> > one
> > just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after
> > the
> > next push.  
> 
> That seems weird to me because I forgot to add a description in pkgdb
> when I created ola. But that was almost a month ago but the overview[1]
> still says "(no description in pkgdb)" while the subpackages do have their 
> descriptions from the spec file.
> 
> [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/ola

That's not pkgdb. This is: 
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ola/

 | rpms/ola (upstream)
 |
 | a framework for controlling entertainment lighting equipment
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Dave Olsthoorn
On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 16:45 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> That's not pkgdb.
No, but it still reports "(no description in pkgdb)"

>  This is: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/ola/
> 
>  | rpms/ola (upstream)
>  |
>  | a framework for controlling entertainment lighting equipment
This is not the description but the summary, so the description is
still empty

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Updating summary and description of a package on pkgdb and the spec

2016-01-08 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 8.1.2016 v 14:45 Tom Hughes napsal(a):
> On 08/01/16 13:41, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-01-08 at 13:36 +, Ankur Sinha wrote:
>>> Hiya!
>>>
>>> Can the summary and description of a package be changed on pkgdb?
>>>
>>> Also, if it can't, is it OK if the summary and description on pkgdb
>>> differ from the spec?
>>>
>>> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296914
>>
>> Got my answer from puiterwijk over IRC:
>>
>> Pkgdb picks up the summary and description from the spec itself, so one
>> just needs to update the spec and it should reflect in pgkdb after the
>> next push.
>
> So the whole business of faffing around extracting the description to
> paste into the new package form is a bit pointless then, because it
> will just get overwritten when the initial spec is pushed?
>
> Does that apply to the upstream URL as well?

Description and URL are optional. And the refresh is done just once in
while (like once per week? but it might change already, who knows :).

Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org