apel - emacs-apel (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for apel? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: apel - emacs-apel (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal)
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for apel? $ repoquery --whatprovides apel apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch emacs-apel-0:10.8-1.fc14.noarch apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch What do the other packages require a specific VR of apel? Is that necessary or just too strict? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: apel - emacs-apel (was: Re: [ACTION REQUIRED v2] Orphan removal)
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: BN Orphan: apel BN ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN emacs-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN flim requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-emacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 BN migemo-xemacs requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 apel has just been renamed to emacs-apel because of the naming guidelines. the above packages has to be rebuilt against emacs-apel instead of apel. When renaming a package you would normally add a good Obsoletes/Provides pair for the old name and drop that only after an appropriate period of time (e.g. 2-3 dist releases). Has that been done for apel? $ repoquery --whatprovides apel apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch emacs-apel-0:10.8-1.fc14.noarch apel-0:10.7-4.fc12.noarch What do the other packages require a specific VR of apel? Is that necessary or just too strict? I believe it's just an artifact of the script that checks for requires; if something else provides apel, we can drop the original apel package. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
