Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-15 Thread Mamoru TASAKA

Miroslav Lichvar wrote on 2022/09/15 16:14:

On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:09:16PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:

I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take
too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for
unrelated reasons.


All the packages on your list except the 4 you listed in the paragraph
above should be built now, please check if anything is missing:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=58420&order=-build_id&latest=1


Thanks! It looks good to me.

I see that Mamoru rebuilt the three packages that failed for me
locally and also vlfrx-tools which I missed somehow. The only missing
package now seems to be chromium, which failed to build after last
update and it takes almost whole day to build, so I think we'll leave
that to its maintainer.


xmms2 was rebuilt with new flac without changes.

ardour6, audacity actually needed modification - due to that lv2 was
updated from 1.18.4 to 1.18.8 and with this update build method was
changed from waf to meson then some "compat" headers are removed.
I've added patches to detect new lv2 header paths (i.e. not related to
flac changes)



I submitted an update for the side tag:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-918429c97a



Regards,
Mamoru
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-15 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:09:16PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take
> > too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for
> > unrelated reasons.
> > 
> All the packages on your list except the 4 you listed in the paragraph
> above should be built now, please check if anything is missing:
> 
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=58420&order=-build_id&latest=1

Thanks! It looks good to me.

I see that Mamoru rebuilt the three packages that failed for me
locally and also vlfrx-tools which I missed somehow. The only missing
package now seems to be chromium, which failed to build after last
update and it takes almost whole day to build, so I think we'll leave
that to its maintainer.

I submitted an update for the side tag:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-918429c97a

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-14 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi Miroslav,

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 04:36:47PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> flac-1.4.0 changes the libFLAC and libFLAC++ sonames. There are also
> some incompatible changes in the API, but I didn't see any packages
> failing to built due to these changes.
> 
> The following packages need to be rebuilt:
>


> I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take
> too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for
> unrelated reasons.
> 
All the packages on your list except the 4 you listed in the paragraph
above should be built now, please check if anything is missing:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/builds?inherited=0&tagID=58420&order=-build_id&latest=1

Best,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-13 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 09:12:49AM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:24:34PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> > On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 11:29 AM CDT, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
> > > > now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
> > > > need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.
> > > > 
> > >
> > > Sure, what do you need done? Just push an update from that sidetag, or
> > > actually do some rebuilds as well?
> > 
> > It sounds like they need all of those packages to be rebuilt:
> 
> Yes, I'm looking for a proven packager to rebuild the packages and
> submit an update for those that built successfully. Otherwise, we
> would need to ask the individual maintainers and that would likely
> take a long time to finish this.
> 
Ack. I asked before checking, which I should have done. I can start
going down the list - thanks for keeping it alphabetical. Need something
for my machine to do while I'm watching conference talks anyway.

Best,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-13 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 12:24:34PM -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 11:29 AM CDT, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > > 
> > > Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
> > > now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
> > > need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.
> > > 
> >
> > Sure, what do you need done? Just push an update from that sidetag, or
> > actually do some rebuilds as well?
> 
> It sounds like they need all of those packages to be rebuilt:

Yes, I'm looking for a proven packager to rebuild the packages and
submit an update for those that built successfully. Otherwise, we
would need to ask the individual maintainers and that would likely
take a long time to finish this.

Thanks,

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-12 Thread Maxwell G via devel
On Mon Sep 12, 2022 at 11:29 AM CDT, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> > 
> > Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
> > now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
> > need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.
> > 
>
> Sure, what do you need done? Just push an update from that sidetag, or
> actually do some rebuilds as well?

It sounds like they need all of those packages to be rebuilt:

```
$ koji list-tagged f38-build-side-58420
Build Tag   Built by
    
flac-1.4.0-1.fc38 f38-build-side-58420  mlichvar
```

--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-12 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
Hi Miroslav,


On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 04:36:47PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> flac-1.4.0 changes the libFLAC and libFLAC++ sonames. There are also
> some incompatible changes in the API, but I didn't see any packages
> failing to built due to these changes.
> 
...
> 
> Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
> now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
> need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.
> 

Sure, what do you need done? Just push an update from that sidetag, or
actually do some rebuilds as well?

Best,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


libFLAC soname bump

2022-09-12 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
flac-1.4.0 changes the libFLAC and libFLAC++ sonames. There are also
some incompatible changes in the API, but I didn't see any packages
failing to built due to these changes.

The following packages need to be rebuilt:

libsndfile
audiofile
SDL_sound
SFML
allegro5
ardour6
audacious-plugins
audacity
audiocd-kio
bigloo
butt
chromium
easytag
flac123
getdata
gstreamer1-plugins-good
gtkpod
k3b
kf5-audiocd-kio
kid3
kwave
libextractor
libfishsound
libopenmpt
mame
mednafen
mkvtoolnix
mp3fs
ocp
opus-tools
qmmp
retroarch
scummvm
scummvm-tools
sox
squeezelite
timidity++
traverso
vavoom
vorbis-tools
xmms2

I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take
too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for
unrelated reasons.

Would a proven packager be willing to take care of it? The new flac is
now built in --target=f38-build-side-58420. libsndfile and audiofile
need to be rebuilt next as some of the other packages depend on them.

Thanks,

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue