unhide / Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

[Michael Schwendt]

Just forwarding, because I've had a look:
The final one for today. ;)

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote:

 unhide -- Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from rootkits

Sounds interesting, didn't knew that one.


Project site tells rkhunter uses it:
  $ repoquery --whatrequires unhide
  $
Hmmm?
What's known here?


Unhide 20100201
http://www.security-projects.com/?Unhide

says: ** This project has been moved to http://www.unhide-forensics.info ***
Please update your bookmark


Current Stable Version:
--  2012-12-29

Apparently much newer.

Similarly to chkrootkit (but not limited to that one), a tool like this
can break in funny ways without anything discovering it. For example, if
it starts parsing something incorrectly, it can happen that it doesn't
find anything. This can be hard to debug without a test-case.

-- 
Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.8.0-0.rc4.git5.1.fc19.x86_64
loadavg: 1.08 0.36 0.16
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: unhide / Re: releasing ownership (maintainers/co-maintainers required)

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:59:22 +0100
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just forwarding, because I've had a look:
 The final one for today. ;)
 
 On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 03:37:43 +0200, Rakesh Pandit wrote:
 
  unhide -- Tool to find hidden processes and TCP/UDP ports from
  rootkits
 
 Sounds interesting, didn't knew that one.
 
 
 Project site tells rkhunter uses it:
   $ repoquery --whatrequires unhide
   $
 Hmmm?
 What's known here?

It _can_ use it, but it didn't really provide much and so I removed it
as a dep. It's detected at runtime if you have it installed. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel