Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
Hi, sorry for the very late test - kernel is unusable for me, appears to be the same issue as described here for F12: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581605 It is one of the typical netbooks - did anyone recently test the Intel graphic on some of those devices? It is likely that the whole class of devices will be broken. Further datapoints, while 2.6.32.8-kernel.org works fine for me the Fedora-2.6.32.11 does not so it might be some of the Fedora patches. Same may be true for the 2.6.33 kernels. I am trying to back out the Fedora pacthes now.. will report. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 16:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta with the -24 kernel included, so now if you still want to help testing, please test that. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2010-April/61.html . Kernel 2.6.33.1-19 and -24 do _not_ really work for me. I hadn't had the time to file a proper bug report but since no one screamed here an now, I will have to do so ;-) If -19 didn't work for you, we actually care less, strange as that may seem. Mostly this was about making sure -24 has no regressions compared to -19. Sorry for this quick and dirty bug report. Hopefully I will find some time during the weekend. Otherwise, hope this helps. Please file a regular report, or this won't get followed up. Late, but done. Just for the records if someone has a similar problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582391 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta with the -24 kernel included, so now if you still want to help testing, please test that. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2010-April/61.html . Now that testing of f-13-beta rc#5 has commenced, shouldn't this kernel have appeared as an update through yum? Rodd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 16:45 +1000, Rodd Clarkson wrote: On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta with the -24 kernel included, so now if you still want to help testing, please test that. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2010-April/61.html . Now that testing of f-13-beta rc#5 has commenced, shouldn't this kernel have appeared as an update through yum? It will do shortly. We didn't have time to go through that process before spinning RC5. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On 06/04/10 23:22, Adam Williamson wrote: Works fine on Dell Vostro 200 as factory minus included soft. Kernel.x86_64 System i686 Architecture: x86_64 CPU op-mode(s):32-bit, 64-bit CPU(s):1 Thread(s) per core:1 Core(s) per socket:1 CPU socket(s): 1 NUMA node(s): 1 Vendor ID: GenuineIntel CPU family:6 Model: 22 Stepping: 1 CPU MHz: 1600.000 L1d cache: 32K L1i cache: 32K L2 cache: 512K 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 02) -- Regards, Frank Murphy UTF_8 Encoded, Fedora.x86 64-32 Hybrid -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
Hi, kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 works for me (amd64 system with nvidia chipset). Regards, Hans On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with your results. Thanks! -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
Already running 2.6.33.1-26.fc13.i686 on my HP s3707c (AMD 5400+ Nvidia 9100 onboard) . No problems -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
Running ok here on my HP Pavilion dv9750ed lappy [dmesg attached] dmesg Description: Binary data -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On 04/07/2010 12:21 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote: On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 15:45:39 -0700 John Reiser wrote: Then I did rpm --erase of -24 and rpm --install of -24, and the message was: - /sbin/new-kernel-pkg: line 289: 2334 Segmentation fault (core dumped) Is it reproducible if you run dracut by hand?: dracut -f -v /boot/initramfs-2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64.img \ 2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64 Yes, the Segmentation fault (core dumped) is reproducible. Did abrt catch the segfault? If yes, did you post the report to Bugzilla? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=580141 I had to look for the abrt report; there wasn't any icon displayed in the Gnome desktop menu bar. So I didn't see it yesterday, and this report is from a re-run this morning. -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 14:53 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with your results. Thanks! Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta with the -24 kernel included, so now if you still want to help testing, please test that. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2010-April/61.html . -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 22:30 +0200, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: On Mi, 2010-04-07 at 09:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: [...] Thanks to everyone for their testing, it's greatly appreciated. Based on the positive response here and on forums, we spun a new RC of the beta with the -24 kernel included, so now if you still want to help testing, please test that. See http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2010-April/61.html . Kernel 2.6.33.1-19 and -24 do _not_ really work for me. I hadn't had the time to file a proper bug report but since no one screamed here an now, I will have to do so ;-) If -19 didn't work for you, we actually care less, strange as that may seem. Mostly this was about making sure -24 has no regressions compared to -19. Sorry for this quick and dirty bug report. Hopefully I will find some time during the weekend. Otherwise, hope this helps. Please file a regular report, or this won't get followed up. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with your results. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 Works for me on x86_64: cpu family : 15 model : 47 05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G72 [GeForce 7300 SE] (rev a1) 05:00.0 0300: 10de:01d3 (rev a1) -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 HANGS at boot: VGA console blank except for text cursor in upper left. cpu family : 6 model : 23 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV710 [Radeon HD 4550] 01:00.0 0300: 1002:9540 -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:29 -0700, John Reiser wrote: kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 HANGS at boot: VGA console blank except for text cursor in upper left. cpu family: 6 model : 23 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc RV710 [Radeon HD 4550] 01:00.0 0300: 1002:9540 Does kernel -19 work on the same system? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 15:45 -0700, John Reiser wrote: Does kernel -19 work on the same system? Yes, -19 works on the same system. At first I did yum localupdate --nogpg kernel-*. There was a warning about a POSTTRANS scriptlet failure, but yum did not abort. The boot hangs. Then I did rpm --erase of -24 and rpm --install of -24, and the message was: - /sbin/new-kernel-pkg: line 289: 2334 Segmentation fault (core dumped) $tool mkinitrd failed warning: %posttrans(kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 - and rpm --verify said: - ...T./lib/modules/2.6.33.1-24.fc13.x86_64/modules.builtin.bin - The system is up-to-date w.r.t. yum update. That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this an F13 system? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On 04/06/2010 03:49 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this an F13 system? /etc/fedora-release says Fedora release 13 (Goddard). /etc/yum.repos.d has enabled repos for fedora, fedora-updates, and fedora-updates-testing, using a baseurl= that points to download.fedora.redhat.com [I hate lagging mirrors.] What more of a pedigree should I report? -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: That seems strange, it should use dracut, not mkinitrd at all? Is this an F13 system? dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for both referenced kernel builds. I don't think anything has changed in the scriptlet logic there between the kernel releases so it makes the scriptlet failure that much more of a head scratcher. -jef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 14:53:04 -0700, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. I have been testing most of the f13 builds as they become available in koji and haven't noticed any regressions. There was once case where a couple of updates came in close succession and I updated before trying out one of the kernels. I am not sure if that was -24 or not. I am currently running 2.6.33.2-35 on 4 machines and haven't noticed any regressions. That's not the same, but gives an indication that some of the patches aren't causing problems. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. I have one machine that has an nv28 card in it and an attached monitor. I haven't noticed a problem caused by the nouveau driver, but haven't done much at the console on that machine this week. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On 04/06/2010 04:11 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: dracut package provides /sbin/mkinitrd and you'll see that new-kernel-pkg gets called with --mkinitrd as well as --dracut in the kernel scriptlet for both referenced kernel builds. I don't think anything has changed in the scriptlet logic there between the kernel releases so it makes the scriptlet failure that much more of a head scratcher. # rpm -qf /sbin/new-kernel-pkg grubby-7.0.13-1.fc13.x86_64 # rpm --verify grubby-7.0.13-1.fc13.x86_64 prelink: /sbin/grubby: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../sbin/grubby # ldd /sbin/grubby linux-vdso.so.1 = (0x7fff8c5ff000) libblkid.so.1 = /lib64/libblkid.so.1 (0x0038b4e0) libpopt.so.0 = /lib64/libpopt.so.0 (0x0036a900) libglib-2.0.so.0 = /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x003446e0) libc.so.6 = /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x7f550e125000) libuuid.so.1 = /lib64/libuuid.so.1 (0x0038b520) /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f550e4aa000) # rpm -qf /lib64/libc.so.6 /lib64/libblkid.so.1 /lib64/libpopt.so.0 /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0 /lib64/libuuid.so.1 glibc-2.11.90-17.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64 popt-1.13-7.fc13.x86_64 glib2-2.24.0-1.fc13.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64 # rpm --verify glibc-2.11.90-17.x86_64 libblkid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64 popt-1.13-7.fc13.x86_64 glib2-2.24.0-1.fc13.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-1.fc13.x86_64 prelink: /lib64/libblkid.so.1.1.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libblkid.so.1.1.0 prelink: /lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libpopt.so.0.0.0 prelink: /lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libgio-2.0.so.0.2400.0 prelink: /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.0 prelink: /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0.2400.0 prelink: /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0.2400.0 prelink: /lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2400.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libgthread-2.0.so.0.2400.0 prelink: /usr/bin/gio-querymodules-32: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../usr/bin/gio-querymodules-32 prelink: /lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0: at least one of file's dependencies has changed since prelinking S.?../lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0 # -- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote: Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with your results. Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net Works fine on my X60 with: 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection (rev 02) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On 06-04-2010 18:53, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with your results. Thanks! Works for me on HP Pavilion dv7 1025nr 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9600M GT] (rev a1) 02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 5100 AGN [Shiloh] Network Connection /proc/cpuinfo cpu family : 6 model : 23 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P8400 @ 2.26GH -- Filipe Rosset Fedora Project Brazil filiperos...@fedoraproject.com rosset.fil...@gmail.com Rio Grande do Sul - Brazil First they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win. Mahatma Gandhi -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: urgent testing call: F13 kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13
On 04/06/2010 11:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hi, everyone. We're looking at pulling kernel-2.6.33.1-24.fc13 into Fedora 13 Beta, quite late, because current Beta candidate builds include kernel-2.6.33.1-19.fc13 which is known to include a severe bug that breaks boot on systems with Broadcom wired ethernet adapters supported by the b44 module. However, -24 has other changes from -19, including to the nouveau (NVIDIA graphics) and iwlwifi (Intel wifi) drivers. We really need as many people as possible to test kernel -24, which you can get at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=164598 , and confirm that it works okay on your systems. To install it, use 'rpm -ivh' for the kernel and -devel packages. If you have kernel-headers installed, 'rpm -Uvh' that first. Then reboot to the kernel and check that it boots up okay. Please reply to this thread with your results. Thanks! Hi Adam, no problems until now after installing kernel, kernel-devel, kernel-headers and rebooting. Hardware: 00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IGP2 (rev c1) 00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1 (rev c1) 00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4 (rev c1) 00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3 (rev c1) 00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 2 (rev c1) 00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 5 (rev c1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA Bridge (rev a4) 00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet Controller (rev a1) 00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge (rev a3) 00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev c1) 01:09.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 0a) 01:09.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! Game Port (rev 0a) 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV34 [GeForce FX 5200] (rev a1) CPU: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6 model : 10 model name : AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3000+ stepping: 0 cpu MHz : 2162.562 cache size : 512 KB fdiv_bug: no hlt_bug : no f00f_bug: no coma_bug: no fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 1 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr sse syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow up bogomips: 4325.12 clflush size: 32 cache_alignment : 32 address sizes : 34 bits physical, 32 bits virtual power management: ts Regards Joachim Backes joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de http://www.rhrk.uni-kl.de/~backes smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
